Guam Hazard Mitigation Plan - Western States Seismic Policy Council

STANDARD STATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALKFEMA REGION IXState: Guam Date of Plan: March 2011Requirement §201.4(c)(4)(i): [The section on the Coordination of Local Mitigation Planning must include a] description of the State process to support,through funding and technical assistance, the development of local mitigation plans.ElementA. Does the new or updated plan provide a description of the Stateprocess to support, through funding and technical assistance, thedevelopment of local mitigation plans?B. Does the updated plan describe the funding and technicalassistance the State has provided in the past three years toassist local jurisdictions in completing approvable mitigationplans?Location in thePlan (section orannex and page #)N/AN/AReviewer’s CommentsNSCORESSUMMARY SCORELocal Plan IntegrationRequirement §201.4(c)(4)(ii): [The section on the Coordination of Local Mitigation Planning must include a] description of the State process and timeframeby which the local plans will be reviewed, coordinated, and linked to the State Mitigation Plan.Requirement §201.4(d): Plan must be reviewed and revised to reflect changes in development, progress in statewide mitigation efforts, and changes inpriorities…Location in theSCOREPlan (section orN SElementannex and page #) Reviewer’s CommentsA. Does the new or updated plan provide a description of theprocess and timeframe the State established to review localplans?B. Does the new or updated plan provide a description of theprocess and timeframe the State established to coordinate andlink local plans to the State Mitigation Plan?N/AN/ASUMMARY SCOREPrioritizing Local AssistanceRequirement §201.4(c)(4)(iii): [The section on the Coordination of Local Mitigation Planning must include] criteria for prioritizing communities and localjurisdictions that would receive planning and project grants under available funding programs, which should include consideration for communities with thehighest risks, repetitive loss properties, and most intense development pressures.Further, that for non-planning grants, a principal criterion for prioritizing grants shall be the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a costbenefit review of proposed projects and their associated costs.January 2008 11