Guam Hazard Mitigation Plan - Western States Seismic Policy Council

STANDARD STATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALKFEMA REGION IXState: Guam Date of Plan: March 2011of the potential losses to the identified vulnerable structures?B. Are the potential losses based on estimates provided in local riskassessments as well as the State risk assessment?C. Does the updated plan reflect the effects of changes indevelopment on loss estimates?Appendix FN/A, Section5.5.3, AppendixFSection 5.5.3(specifically intext located afterTables 5-20 and5-21)They are no “local risk assessments” due to the fact that thereare no incorporated local jurisdictions in Guam. However, the2011 Guam HMP includes a risk assessment for Guam’s villages(see Appendix F and discussion in Section 5.5.3, located afterTables 5-20 and 5-21)SUMMARY SCOREEstimating Potential Losses of State FacilitiesElementA. Does the new or updated plan present an estimate of thepotential dollar losses to State owned or operated buildings,infrastructure, and critical facilities in the identified hazard areas?Location in thePlan (section orannex and page #)Section 5.3(Tables 5-20 and5-21)Reviewer’s CommentsNSCORESSUMMARY SCOREMITIGATION STRATEGY: §201.4(c)(3) [To be effective the plan must include a] Mitigation Strategy that provides the State’s blueprint for reducing the lossesidentified in the risk assessment.Hazard Mitigation GoalsRequirement §201.4(c)(3)(i): [The State mitigation strategy shall include a] description of State goals to guide the selection of activities to mitigate andreduce potential losses.Requirement §201.4(d): Plan must be reviewed and revised to reflect changes in development, progress in statewide mitigation efforts, and changes inpriorities…ElementA. Does the new or updated plan provide a description of Statemitigation goals that guide the selection of mitigation activities?B. Does the updated plan demonstrate that the goals wereassessed and either remain valid or have been revised?Location in thePlan (section orannex and page #)Section 6.4Section 6.4Reviewer’s CommentsNSCORESSUMMARY SCOREJanuary 2008 8