• Fixing trading margin in inter-state trading of electricity, if considered necessary.CERC also has advisory functions on:• Formulation of national electricity policy and tariff policy;• Promotion of competition, efficiency and economy in the activities of the electricityindustry;• Promotion of investment in electricity industry; and• Any other matter referred to CERC by the Government of India.D. Needs assessment1. National Energy StrategyThe National Energy Strategy is based on the IEP announced in 2008. The broadvision behind IEP is to meet the demand for energy services of all sectors at competitiveprices to deliver a sustained growth rate of 8 per cent through 2031-32, and to meet thelifeline energy needs of all citizens.This calls for an approach to realizing a cost-effective energy system through thefollowing elements:• Energy markets should be competitive, wherever possible, though competitionalone has been shown to have its limitations in a number of areas of the energysector and independent regulation becomes even more critical in such instances;• Pricing and resource allocations that are determined by market forces under aneffective and credible regulatory oversight;• Transparent and targeted subsidies;• Improved efficiencies across the energy chain;• Policies that reflect externalities of energy consumption;• Policies that rely on incentives/disincentives to regulate market and consumerbehaviour;• Policies that are implementable; and• Management reforms that create accountability and incentives for efficiency.With regard to climate change concerns, the thrust has been on energy efficiencyimprovement in all sectors, on mass transport and on accelerated development ofnuclear and hydro electricity. The most important among the strategy recommendationsincluded technology mission for clean coal technologies and focus on R&D on variousclimate-friendly technologies. The IEP framework has been developed over a 25-yeartime horizon (2006-07 to 2031-32). This is spread over to five FYP periods and stronglyrecommends the low-carbon route: the thrust during the 12 th FYP period and subsequentyears is on the low-carbon route.Thermal power generation options under low-carbon strategiesMr. Kirit Parikh, Chairman, Expert Committee on Integrated Energy Policy during 2005-06, subsequently chaired the Expert Group on Low Carbon Strategies for Inclusive62
Growth, which submitted its interim report in April 2011. The report – which examinedpower, transport, industry, building and forestry sectors – considered supply options inand emissions from the power sector. On thermal power generation through the lowcarbonroute, the report made several important observations and suggestions.On the supply side, coal is presently the least-cost option and will continue to be themain power generation source by 2020 as well. To ensure energy security, the presentcoal-based capacity needs to be expanded to 230 GW by 2020. This will require anannual coal supply of at least 1,000 million tonnes, two-and-a-half times the presentsupply. Domestic mining will have to increase considerably and/or imports will have tomeet a sizable fraction of coal demand.As of May 2010, all the coal-based plants were of sub-critical technology. The totalgeneration from coal and lignite power plants was 461 billion kWh (at bus-bar) during2008-09, leading to 508 million tonnes of CO 2emissions. Thus, the specific CO 2emissionof all existing coal and lignite power plants is 1.1 kg per net kWh for this period. Someof the old and less efficient coal power plants emit as high as 2 kg of CO 2per kWh.However, the new 500 MW sub-critical power plants have net heat rates of 2,450 kCal/kWh leading to specific emission of 0.93 kg per net kWh.There are several technology options to improve combustion efficiency and lower CO 2emissions. Supercritical plants operate at higher temperatures leading to a net heatrate of 2,235 kCal/kWh and specific emissions of 0.83 kg per net kWh. The technologyis available globally and the cost is almost the same as sub-critical plants. Accordingto recent guidelines and projections, supercritical power plants would account for 60per cent of thermal capacity to be built in the 12 th FYP and 100 per cent in the 13 th FYP.Supercritical units could thus contribute up to 50 GW by 2020.Ultra-supercritical power plants operate at still higher temperatures leading to a netheat rate of 1,986 kCal/kWh and specific CO 2emissions of 0.74 kg per kWh. However,the technology is still not ready for large-scale adoption. The high temperatures imposestringent materials challenges. It is unlikely that such plants would be installed before2020. IGCC is another promising technology that can attain higher efficiencies andlower CO 2emissions. It can also produce synthetic chemical fuels such as diesel andhydrogen. However, initial estimates show very high auxiliary power consumption whenusing Indian coal with high ash content and hence, the overall efficiency is comparableto sub-critical units at almost double the cost. While research in IGCC should bepursued, commercial deployment of the technology is unlikely before 2020.CCS is being considered in several countries with substantial coal-based powergeneration. However, there are several technical, economic and regulatory challengesin its role as a commercially viable low-carbon option. The government should watchthe development of this technology in the United States and the European Union,where a number of commercial plants are under implementation/consideration. It couldalso undertake a few studies to examine the issues of potential and feasibility, bothtechnical and economic.Gas-based power is an attractive power generation option, as the capital cost is lowand the CO 2emissions are only 0.4 kg per kWh. However, the cost of gas is usuallymuch more than the cost of coal to generate one unit of electricity. Besides, given thelimited gas reserves and also its use in fertilizer production and other sectors, there is63
- Page 1 and 2:
ADVANCES IN FOSSIL FUELTECHNOLOGIES
- Page 3 and 4:
ADVANCES IN FOSSIL FUELTECHNOLOGIES
- Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTSABBREVIATIONSiiiPART ONEREP
- Page 7 and 8:
ABBREVIATIONSAC : Alternating curre
- Page 9:
OECD : Organization for Economic Co
- Page 12 and 13:
IORGANIZATION OF THE WORKSHOPA. Bac
- Page 14 and 15:
D. Election of officersThe followin
- Page 16 and 17:
IIICONSIDERATION OF ISSUESA. Backgr
- Page 18 and 19:
emissions. Underground coal gasific
- Page 20 and 21:
800 MWe, a steam pressure of 300 kg
- Page 22 and 23: • Materials development & manufac
- Page 24 and 25: Figure 1-5: Strategy for commercial
- Page 26 and 27: tonnes, the state-owned enterprise
- Page 28 and 29: • Ensuring not just easy FDI entr
- Page 30 and 31: MW ultra-supercritical units; and s
- Page 32 and 33: the captive generation capacity) on
- Page 34 and 35: and other financial institutions -
- Page 36 and 37: and higher efficiency power generat
- Page 38 and 39: energy technologies, which can enab
- Page 40 and 41: • Such massive financial inputs c
- Page 43 and 44: BASELINE REPORT ON FOSSIL FUEL TECH
- Page 45 and 46: B. General R&D climate in the count
- Page 47 and 48: a convenient way to envisage energy
- Page 49 and 50: to mature and become more cost-comp
- Page 51 and 52: emissions, at least relative to sin
- Page 53 and 54: The Ministry of Power (MoP), which
- Page 55 and 56: 3. Bio-energyBio-energy, widely ava
- Page 57 and 58: in such a canal will rotate at a lo
- Page 59 and 60: in tackling climate change. A one p
- Page 61 and 62: Advantages of supercritical plants
- Page 63 and 64: existing power plants but also to b
- Page 65 and 66: BASELINE REPORT ON FOREIGN DIRECT I
- Page 67 and 68: CEA at 598 mt. This is mainly due t
- Page 69 and 70: For India to maintain its momentum
- Page 71: Table 2-5: Electricity generation t
- Page 75 and 76: 3. Future challengesThe future chal
- Page 77 and 78: development worked out. Public-priv
- Page 79 and 80: Linking FDI to technology transferI
- Page 81 and 82: The total requirement of fund durin
- Page 83 and 84: Funding from multilateral agenciesM
- Page 85 and 86: cooperation will be essential in so
- Page 87: Planning Commission, Government of
- Page 90 and 91: ANNEX I:LIST OF PARTICIPANTSMr. A.K
- Page 92 and 93: Mr. S.C. Shrivastava, Joint Chief (
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX II:PROGRAMME6 June 2012, Wedn
- Page 96 and 97: ANNEX III:AN OVERVIEW OF ADVANCED F
- Page 98 and 99: • Technology solutions are also v
- Page 100 and 101: Table 3-5: Improvement in cycle eff
- Page 102 and 103: • No liquid effluent formation;
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 3-5: Advancement of gas turb
- Page 106 and 107: Figure 3-8: Goal 2 - New clean tech
- Page 108 and 109: Compared with conventional power pl
- Page 110 and 111: Figure 3-14: Thermax coal gasificat
- Page 112 and 113: ANNEX VII:GE ENERGY AND ADVANCED FO
- Page 114 and 115: ANNEX VIII:SWOT ANALYSIS OF FOSSIL
- Page 116 and 117: By 2035, cumulative CO 2emissions f
- Page 118 and 119: • Falling prices of renewable ene
- Page 120 and 121: Figure 3-20: New advanced coal powe
- Page 122 and 123:
ANNEX X:ENERGY CONSERVATION: ERDA
- Page 124 and 125:
Table 3-11: Energy cost and intensi
- Page 126 and 127:
300Figure 3-23: Trends in coal use
- Page 128 and 129:
C. Gaps in coal use efficiencyFigur
- Page 130 and 131:
ANNEX XII:FINANCING OF THE POWER SE
- Page 132 and 133:
With the entry of many private sect
- Page 134 and 135:
for future requirements should be t
- Page 136 and 137:
Short supply of coal has started af
- Page 138:
Figure 3-35: Life-cycle of technolo