11.07.2015 Views

Overview in PDF format - Tallinna Tehnikaülikool

Overview in PDF format - Tallinna Tehnikaülikool

Overview in PDF format - Tallinna Tehnikaülikool

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3. Prediction of mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g accuracyDynamical phenomena of vibrations are caused by external factors on the stra<strong>in</strong>edsystem of the lathe. In the turn<strong>in</strong>g operations, tool vibrations <strong>in</strong>fluence both productquality and productivity and may also have a negative <strong>in</strong>fluence on the work<strong>in</strong>genvironment. The relative dynamic motion between cutt<strong>in</strong>g tool and workpiece willaffect mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g results, the surface f<strong>in</strong>ish <strong>in</strong> particular (Hakansson 1999). Dur<strong>in</strong>gthe mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of a material, all disturbances f<strong>in</strong>ally lead to relative displacementsof the cutter and the blank. It allows us to l<strong>in</strong>k the parameters of surface roughnessto the relative vibrodisplacements of the cutter and the blank (Sharma, 2004). In thecalculation of dynamics characteristics, the real elastic system of the lathe wasreplaced by a system with f<strong>in</strong>ite degrees of freedom. In the case of <strong>in</strong>sufficientaccuracy of the underly<strong>in</strong>g data, complicated calculation schemes can lead tosignificant errors <strong>in</strong> the calculation (Bayard, 2003). Therefore we used simplifiedschemes, composed on the basis of experimental <strong>in</strong>vestigations.The <strong>in</strong>ternal friction is due to imperfect elasticity of vibrat<strong>in</strong>g bodies – the ma<strong>in</strong>factor of damp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the lathes. Internal friction can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by non-elasticdamp<strong>in</strong>g factor of frequency of cyclical stra<strong>in</strong>s. In many cases structural damp<strong>in</strong>gdepends on the type of mach<strong>in</strong>e tool construction. It was assumed, therefore, thatnon-elastic damp<strong>in</strong>g coefficient <strong>in</strong>cludes also the losses caused by structuraldamp<strong>in</strong>g. Experimental measurements were performed on the lathes of type 1K62at different cutt<strong>in</strong>g speeds, feeds and depths of cut. After every cutt<strong>in</strong>g, surfaceroughness was measured with a profilograph Surtronic 3+.In order to simplify the dynamic model, the factors of a m<strong>in</strong>or effect on theresults were elim<strong>in</strong>ated. In this study only dynamic models with one and twodegrees of freedom were <strong>in</strong>vestigated (Fig. 2.8).a)y=ybs<strong>in</strong>ptyOlϕyAxb) y=y b s<strong>in</strong>ptz=zbs<strong>in</strong>ptOzylAxFigure 2.8 Dynamic models with one (a) and two (b) degrees of freedomIn mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of a detail on the lathe, the cutt<strong>in</strong>g force F (Fig. 2.9) is not constant.It is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by several factors, as the change <strong>in</strong> the thickness of the cut-offchips, the change <strong>in</strong> the mechanical properties of the blank material and tool wear.The <strong>in</strong>put of the lathe system is the cutt<strong>in</strong>g force F as the function of time and theoutput is the displacement of the cutter or the blank.23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!