11.07.2015 Views

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Trading in <strong>Islamic</strong> Commercial Law 1391. The basic principle in the Qur’ān and the Sunnah <strong>of</strong> the Prophet (pbuh) is that a personshould be free to buy and sell and dispose <strong>of</strong> his possessions and money, within theframework <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Islamic</strong> Sharī´ah.2. There is no restriction on the percentage <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it a trader may make in his transactions.It is generally left to the merchants themselves, the business environment and the nature<strong>of</strong> the merchant and <strong>of</strong> the goods. Regard should be given, however, to the ethicsrecommended by the Sharī´ah, such as moderation, contention, leniency and indulgence.3. Sharī´ah texts have spelt out the necessity to keep transactions away from illicit acts likefraud, cheating, deceit, forgery, concealment <strong>of</strong> actual benefits and monopoly, which aredetrimental to society and individuals.4. Governments should not be involved in fixing prices except when obvious pitfalls arenoticed within the market and the price, due to artificial factors. In this case, governmentsshould intervene by applying adequate means to get rid <strong>of</strong> these factors, the causes <strong>of</strong>defects, excessive price increases and fraud.The Sharī´ah does not allow excessive pr<strong>of</strong>iteering (Ghaban-e-Fahish), which means thata person sells a commodity stating explicitly or giving the impression that he is chargingthe market price, when actually he is charging an exorbitant price, taking benefit from theignorance <strong>of</strong> the purchaser. 36 If the purchaser comes to know afterwards that he has beencharged excessively, he has the option to rescind the contract and take back his money.Although jurists in general do not recommend any specific pr<strong>of</strong>it rates in trading, we findinferences in books that the maximum pr<strong>of</strong>it rate to be charged in trade should be 5 % inrespect <strong>of</strong> wares, 10 % in case <strong>of</strong> animals and 20 % in real estate. 376.5.3 Cash and Credit PricesIn medieval <strong>Islamic</strong> trade, not only was buying and selling on credit accepted and apparentlywidespread, but also the credit performed many important functions in trade transitions. Wefind a lot <strong>of</strong> detail in Fiqh books on various aspects <strong>of</strong> trade transactions on credit.Most jurists believe that the seller can indicate two prices, i.e. one for cash and anotherfor a credit transaction, but one <strong>of</strong> the two prices must be settled in the same meeting. They,however, qualify this with the condition that the difference should be a normal practice <strong>of</strong>the market, the aim should be the business <strong>of</strong> trade and the seller should not resort to thepractice <strong>of</strong> Ghaban-e-Fahish. The following tradition is important in this regard: “The personwho makes two bargains in one sale, the lower <strong>of</strong> the two is lawful for him or he would becharging Riba”. 38 Jurists like Semāk, Aozāii and others have interpreted this as a situationwhere a person declares in the sale contract that in the case <strong>of</strong> credit, the sale price will beso much, and in the case <strong>of</strong> cash, so much. 39Besides the situation described above, another situation is where the seller declares onlyone price, the credit price, higher than the price prevalent in the market, and the buyer agreesto buy at that price. Jurists differ regarding the legality <strong>of</strong> charging this excess on account <strong>of</strong>the period allowed for the payment <strong>of</strong> the price. The jurists who disapprove argue that theseller himself may not differentiate between the cash and credit price, but if the purchaser36 For detail on Ghaban-e-Fahish, see Al Jaziri, 1973, 2, pp. 570–573.37 Al-Atasi, 1403 AH, Majallah, Article 165.38 Abu Daud, 1752, 3, p. 274.39 Thanwi, n.d., 14, p. 273.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!