11.07.2015 Views

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

466 <strong>Understanding</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Finance</strong>the wake <strong>of</strong> emerging issues in the fast-moving world <strong>of</strong> finance, some aspects will remainto be decided in the light <strong>of</strong> the Sharī´ah principles, and the same may be resolved as andwhen confronted, but the major Sharī´ah-related issues that the <strong>Islamic</strong> finance movementfaced in the early years <strong>of</strong> its foundation have been resolved or cleared by dint <strong>of</strong> amplework by the jurists.The <strong>Islamic</strong> Fiqh Council <strong>of</strong> the OIC, the AAOIFI and the Sharī´ah scholars in generalhave discussed at length almost all major areas and provided a number <strong>of</strong> alternatives tomost <strong>of</strong> the conventional products, except derivatives based on interest or short-sellingand speculative transactions in the Forex markets. Now the practitioners have to proceedon the basis <strong>of</strong> the achieved consensus. Product innovation from the Sharī´ah perspectivedoes not mean that alternatives must be provided for each and every instrument or productused by conventional institutions. This is not possible; a discipline based on ethics and justhypotheses cannot afford to follow any unethical system step by step. <strong>Islamic</strong> finance willhave to observe certain restraints so that it does not become exploitative and unjust, as isthe case with its counterpart, interest-based system.There are some unresolved issues as well, but these are not purely <strong>of</strong> Sharī´ah interpretation;the practical difficulties and the ground realities have given rise to these issues.Therefore, such problems and issues can be resolved once and for all by a body <strong>of</strong> Sharī´ahscholars like the OIC <strong>Islamic</strong> Fiqh Council or that <strong>of</strong> the AAOIFI. And if this is not possible,the Sharī´ah boards/Sharī´ah advisors <strong>of</strong> the respective banks may decide cases on merit byresorting to Ijtihad, subject to the widely accepted principles <strong>of</strong> the Sharī´ah.Examples <strong>of</strong> such unresolved issues are the award <strong>of</strong> liquidated damages to the banks incases <strong>of</strong> default on their receivables. In principle, the penalty paid by the defaulting clientgoes to the charity fund; if the default persists for longer periods, it will be harmful to thesystem, besides being unjust to the bank and the depositors. An accepted solution in thisregard is that banks may claim their loss through a court or any independent arbitration;but on what firm basis the courts would be deciding is another related issue. Conventionalopportunity cost per se should not be the basis for such award. Some Sharī´ah boards allowthe banks to charge defaulters a rate based on the income that they have earned from thesimilar portfolio in the related period. But the deciding factor should be the financial positionand the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the client and the expenses and time involved in litigation, on the basis<strong>of</strong> which the court may allow some or the whole <strong>of</strong> the penalty to go to the bank.Another practice-related issue could be that <strong>of</strong> the liability <strong>of</strong> the banks’ shareholderstowards investment account holders <strong>of</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> banks. This is a complicated issue becauseit also involves conflict <strong>of</strong> interests; its solution lies in a firm regulatory framework withspecial emphasis on safeguarding the interests <strong>of</strong> the depositors. Losses to banks couldbe due to overexposure, lack <strong>of</strong> diversification, imprudent banking practices and/or actualbusiness losses. The Sharī´ah boards <strong>of</strong> the banks may decide the cases on merit, keepingin mind all such factors.As regards the big issues <strong>of</strong> Sharī´ah interpretation, it is encouraging to observe that,lately, the practitioners in the Far East have started using genuine alternatives to interest(like Ijarah) for issuance <strong>of</strong> Sukuk, and it could be anticipated that in future, they will alsochange the basis <strong>of</strong> products based on the sale <strong>of</strong> debt and buy-back. Going forward, thefocus <strong>of</strong> policymakers and product developers should be on development <strong>of</strong> the products,instruments and the <strong>Islamic</strong> finance industry by using the flexibilities already available andnot wasting time and money on such areas that could lead only to the loss <strong>of</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong>the emerging discipline <strong>of</strong> finance. They should stick to the standards issued by the AAOIFI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!