11.07.2015 Views

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 <strong>Understanding</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Finance</strong>All types <strong>of</strong> work except those leading to indecency or socio-economic loss to otherindividuals and society are permissible. A basic principle <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Islamic</strong> legal system is thatan activity or a commodity that is not prohibited through the Sharī´ah texts is permissible.Thus, man has to observe the prohibitions only. <strong>Islamic</strong> economics would mean undertakingall activities individually or collectively that are not prohibited and that could add to thewelfare and happiness <strong>of</strong> human beings.The most important prohibitions in the field <strong>of</strong> economics are the prohibition <strong>of</strong> interest,hazard and gambling due to their extremely harmful impacts on society. Such limitationsare necessary for the fulfilment <strong>of</strong> the overall objectives <strong>of</strong> the Sharī´ah for making societyhappy and satisfied, both materially and spiritually.2.5.5 Liberalism versus State InterventionThe individual self-interest <strong>of</strong> conventional economics leads to maximization <strong>of</strong> wealth andwant satisfaction, independent <strong>of</strong> its impact on the rest <strong>of</strong> society. The concept <strong>of</strong> “positiveness”has been expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> unrestrained individual freedom, making economics“entirely neutral between ends”. Further, it is believed that market forces will themselvescreate “order” and “harmony”, and lead to “efficiency” and “equity”. The government shouldhence abstain from intervening.The concept <strong>of</strong> Pareto efficiency in conventional economics is based on the assumptionthat the market will automatically take care <strong>of</strong> “equity” and that the market equilibrium willbe a Pareto optimum, leading to realization <strong>of</strong> normative goals at least in the long run. Itleads to the common belief <strong>of</strong> modern economics that any intervention in the framework <strong>of</strong>Pareto optimality would lead to less efficient results. This framework is, however, based onsome assumptions like harmony between individual preferences and social interest, equaldistribution <strong>of</strong> income and wealth, a true reflection <strong>of</strong> the urgency <strong>of</strong> wants by prices andperfect competition. Since no real world market is likely to satisfy these assumptions, thereis a considerable distortion in the expression <strong>of</strong> priorities in the markets. Hence, the Paretoefficiency or Pareto optimality concept that generates conflict in society does not fit properlyin the philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> economics. It reflects a built-in bias against the realization <strong>of</strong>normative goals if reliance is placed primarily on prices for allocation and distribution <strong>of</strong>resources. 17Society is for the individuals who are responsible for their actions and accountable to theone creator for their conduct. The individual has a right to participate in economic activitiesfor his sustenance and the tasks relating to social well-being, subject to the limitations andinjunctions <strong>of</strong> the Qur’ān and the Sunnah. The crucial involvement <strong>of</strong> individuals for thecollective benefit <strong>of</strong> society has been aptly described by the holy Prophet (pbuh) in a parable,as reported by Imam Bukhari in his “Sahih” and as given below:“Those who accept and abide by the limits ordained by Allah and those who transgress may belikened to two groups sharing a boat; one group occupying the upper deck and the other the hold.Whenever those in the hold required water they had to go up to draw it. So they thought amongthemselves; why not have a hole in the bottom and thus save inconvenience to those in the top?Now if those on the top do not dissuade and prevent them, all are lost. If they do, all are saved.”17 Chapra, 2000a, pp. 67, 68.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!