11.07.2015 Views

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

316 <strong>Understanding</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Finance</strong>In all modern forms <strong>of</strong> Shirkah as well, the partners have equal rights, as mentionedabove. In a partnership concern, the partners, by a mutual agreement, distribute among themtheir responsibilities, duties and jobs. In limited companies and cooperative societies, theshareholders delegate their powers to some <strong>of</strong> them to be called directors, or some suchname. The partners may appoint a managing partner by mutual consent. Some <strong>of</strong> the partnersmay decide not to work for the Musharakah and work as sleeping partners.12.3.4 Treatment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it and LossPr<strong>of</strong>it and loss sharing is a crucial aspect in partnership. As the amount <strong>of</strong> the share towardsthe capital subscribed by each partner can be unequal (except in the case <strong>of</strong> Mufawadah,briefly discussed in Section 12.2.2), the share in pr<strong>of</strong>its and losses can also be unequal.It is, however, necessary that the share <strong>of</strong> all the partners should be decided without anyambiguity. The generally accepted view, which is based on the views <strong>of</strong> Imam Ahmadand Imam Abu Hanifa, is that the ratio <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it must be agreed uponat the time <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> the agreement, otherwise the contract will not be valid inSharī´ah.There is a slight difference <strong>of</strong> opinion among jurists about a ratio <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it distributiondifferent from the ratio <strong>of</strong> investment <strong>of</strong> two (or more) partners when both <strong>of</strong> them areobliged to work on the basis <strong>of</strong> a Musharakah contract. As a general rule, the shares <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itand <strong>of</strong> loss should be commensurate with the share in capital subscribed by each partner.According to Imam Malik, Imam Shafi‘e and Imam Zufar, each partner shall get the pr<strong>of</strong>itexactly in the proportion <strong>of</strong> his investment. On the other hand, according to Imam Ahmadand the majority <strong>of</strong> Hanafi jurists, the ratio <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it may differ from the ratio <strong>of</strong> investment,provided it is agreed with free consent <strong>of</strong> the parties. 27 The viewpoint <strong>of</strong> Imam Abu Hanifais a combination <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> these views. He says that, normally, the pr<strong>of</strong>it distribution ratiomay differ from the investment ratio. But if a partner has made an express condition thathe will not work for the Musharakah and will only be a sleeping partner, then his share <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>it cannot be more than the ratio <strong>of</strong> his investment. 28 But it can be less than the ratio <strong>of</strong>a partner’s capital according to all jurists. Therefore, it is permissible that a partner with a40 % investment may get 50 % <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>it, provided he has not declared that he will be asleeping partner. 29 Hanbali jurists allow even a sleeping partner more than the ratio <strong>of</strong> hisshare in a Musharakah investment. 30The difference <strong>of</strong> opinion is not generally taken care <strong>of</strong> and the general ruling is givenas per the views <strong>of</strong> Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad, according to whom the pr<strong>of</strong>itratio can differ from the investment ratio on the basis <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> work to be doneby the partners, because along with capital, labour and work are also factors for accrual <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>it. Thus, any partner can make a condition that he will get more than the ratio <strong>of</strong> hisinvestment as compensation for the work he will be doing for the Shirkah. According to all27 Ibn-Qudama, 1367 AH, 5, p. 31; Al-Kasani, 1993, 6, p.63.28 Al-Kasani, 1993, 6, pp. 62, 63.29 For details see Usmani, 2000b, pp. 213–215. The principle that “pr<strong>of</strong>it is based on agreement <strong>of</strong> the parties, but loss is alwayssubject to the ratio <strong>of</strong> investment” has been derived from the Fiqh <strong>of</strong> Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad. (Ibn-Qudama, 1367 AH,5, p.140; Al-Kasani, 1993, 6, pp. 162, 163). As regards loss, there is complete consensus <strong>of</strong> the jurists on this part <strong>of</strong> the principle(Ibn-Qudama, 1367 AH, 5, p. 147).30 Ibn-Qudama, 1367 AH, 5, pp. 140; Usmani, 2000b, pp. 210–218.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!