11.07.2015 Views

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

Understanding Islamic Finance - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Loan and Debt in <strong>Islamic</strong> Commercial Law 163the holy Prophet ordered to pay a better camel in repayment <strong>of</strong> a debt as a camel <strong>of</strong> the agethat was borrowed was not available at the time <strong>of</strong> repayment.However, gracious repayment <strong>of</strong> debt is a matter <strong>of</strong> individual discretion and cannot beadopted as a system, because this would mean that a loan would necessarily yield a pr<strong>of</strong>it.All references in the Fiqh literature that we find in favour <strong>of</strong> gracious payment <strong>of</strong> debtindicate that addition should not be a precondition, explicit or implicit. But if it is adoptedby banks or the government as a system, it would envisage addition, both explicit (in theform <strong>of</strong> a customary rate) and implicit (an investor would expect that he would get somereturn that may be in the form <strong>of</strong> the GNP’s nominal rate <strong>of</strong> growth, for example).Current account deposits in <strong>Islamic</strong> banks are considered loans and the bank is bound toreturn their full amount on call. Banks’ income from the business is pooled and allocatedto various categories <strong>of</strong> deposits/liabilities on the basis <strong>of</strong> weightages, assigned in advance.Current accounts will carry no weightage. As resolved by the <strong>Islamic</strong> Fiqh Council <strong>of</strong> theOIC, the liability to return the loan (current deposit) will not be affected by the bank’ssolvency or otherwise, meaning that the bank will pay the amount <strong>of</strong> the deposit irrespective<strong>of</strong> its pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss. The predominant Sharī´ah ruling, therefore, is that such accounts arenot eligible for a share in pr<strong>of</strong>its, as they are not subject to risk and there shall be no returnpayable on them. The relationship between the depositor and the bank in the case <strong>of</strong> suchdeposits is that <strong>of</strong> a creditor and debtor. Banks may indicate in the account opening formthat they will invest the funds deposited under current accounts at their own discretion inany <strong>of</strong> the Sharī´ah-compliant modes. Further, they will be at liberty to take service chargesfrom the current account holders.A departure from the general view in this regard is that some Sharī´ah boards have ruledthat current accounts may be eligible for gifts but not for pr<strong>of</strong>its. The Sharī´ah supervisoryboard <strong>of</strong> the Faysal <strong>Islamic</strong> Bank <strong>of</strong> Sudan, for example, sees it as permissible to give prizesfor deposits that bear no risk and, therefore, cannot get dividends. Such gifts may be givenwithout prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> the account holders, so long as the prizes are varied and madeon a nonregular basis, in order to help mobilize the funds and to achieve a just rewarddistribution between account holders and shareholders. Most Sharī´ah boards, however, donot favour such arrangements.Another consideration is that a part <strong>of</strong> banks’ income comprises non-fund income earnedfrom currency transfers or other “customer services”. As deposits in the current accounts arean important source <strong>of</strong> financial strength for banks, they can pass on a part <strong>of</strong> that incometo such depositors as a gift, provided no such prior inducement is given to such depositorsand it does not take the form <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> return or earnings on deposits.7.12 REMITTING A PART OF A LOAN AND PREPAYMENTREBATEOn the subject <strong>of</strong> remitting a part <strong>of</strong> the debt against early payment and other concessionsto debtors, we come across three traditions <strong>of</strong> the holy Prophet (pbuh). Two contradictory(in meaning) traditions have been reported by Imam Baihaqi. Briefly these traditions are:1. When the holy Prophet (pbuh) expelled Bani al Nadhir from Madina, he was told thatdebts were owed to some <strong>of</strong> them that had not become due; the Prophet said, “Dha‘awoowa Ta‘ajjloo” (remit a part <strong>of</strong> the receivable and take that earlier).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!