THE ORGANISATION OF RESEARCHIN DISTANCE EDUCATIONResearch into <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> has generally been the responsibility of individualsworking in the <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> field, or the subject of individual Ph.D. theses. This isone reason why there is a large quantity of research, often of low quality, although thereare several individuals working relatively independently who consistently produce highquality research.High quality research that has had a measurable impact on the practice of <strong>distance</strong><strong>education</strong> has come generally from small research groups within <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>universities or departments, such as the British Open University, the American Centrefor Distance Education at Penn State University, the Open University of Hong Kong(RIDAL), Fernuniversität in Germany, the Open University of the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong>the MAPLE research group in the Distance Education unit at the University of BritishColumbia. In most cases these small research groups are internally supported, but seekexternal funding for specific projects.National research funding agencies <strong>and</strong> the European Commission have often fundedresearch into the underlying technologies of <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>, especially information<strong>and</strong> communications technologies, but have been less keen to fund research into <strong>distance</strong><strong>education</strong> itself. In particular, it is more difficult to get external research funding forthe “softer” areas such as policy research, cost-benefit analysis, instructional design orlearner support than for technology applications.One well funded national programme was the TeleLearning Network of Centres ofExcellence (TL-NCE), a Canadian national consortium of researchers formed to advanceknowledge, technology <strong>and</strong> practice in networked collaborative <strong>learning</strong>. TL-NCEreceived CDN $13 million (just under US $10 million) from 1996 from the CanadianFederal government. Again, its focus was mainly on software development <strong>and</strong> its outputwas disappointing, considering the level of funding.Similarly, the European Commission has provided extensive funding for projects on theuse of information <strong>and</strong> communication technologies in <strong>education</strong>, again with little impacton overall practice. Besides an over-emphasis on technology, the European Commissionprojects are too big <strong>and</strong> unwieldy to produce high quality research. For instance,European Commission projects often require participants from a balance of economicallyadvanced <strong>and</strong> less advanced countries, partnerships with industry <strong>and</strong> an even spreadof money across member nations. This may be good politics in that it supports theintegration of Europe, but it usually results in poor research.Small, well-focused, professionally staffed research teams, working systematicallyover a five-year time period <strong>and</strong> extensively networked through collaboration withother research teams through the Internet, publications <strong>and</strong> conferences, are the mostproductive <strong>and</strong> sustainable models for research in this area. Without institutional <strong>and</strong>government support, though, such teams will be difficult to sustain.CONCLUSIONDistance <strong>education</strong> presents major challenges for managers <strong>and</strong> teachers. The growingimportance of <strong>lifelong</strong> <strong>learning</strong> needs new approaches <strong>and</strong> new financial models forpublic sector <strong>higher</strong> <strong>education</strong> institutions. Above all, <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> requires majorchanges to the way teaching <strong>and</strong> <strong>learning</strong> are organised.144
Research can be a useful tool for change. It can support innovation, help developeffective business models <strong>and</strong> improve current practice. For this to happen, though,research into <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> needs to be integrated within the decision-making ofany institution considering the use of <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>. In particular, there needs to bea greater focus on policy research, research that can help decision-makers implement <strong>and</strong>support <strong>lifelong</strong> <strong>learning</strong>.Lastly, in recent years there has been a major shift in policy with respect to<strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>, a move away from increasing access as its core rationale, to thecommercialisation of <strong>education</strong>. In many countries, though, access to <strong>higher</strong> <strong>education</strong>remains a major challenge. Even in economically advanced countries, access to <strong>lifelong</strong><strong>learning</strong> is becoming more <strong>and</strong> more important. Policy-makers should be aware that<strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> can bring increased access, support innovation in teaching <strong>and</strong> be usedto organise <strong>higher</strong> <strong>education</strong> more effectively. Distance <strong>education</strong> research can play astrong supportive role in such change.POLICY CONSIDERATIONSA number of policy recommendations can be drawn from this review of research into<strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>:• There is a large body of research-based knowledge that provides clear guidelines forthe successful practice of <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>; institutional decision-makers ignorethis knowledge base at their peril.• Research has shown that student success can be markedly increased by specialised<strong>distance</strong> course design <strong>and</strong> good quality personal support through <strong>distance</strong> tutors.• Distance <strong>education</strong> is not a good substitute for conventional <strong>higher</strong> <strong>education</strong> forstudents straight from high school, but <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> is a powerful mechanismfor supporting <strong>lifelong</strong> <strong>learning</strong>.• Online <strong>learning</strong> is seen as a means to better prepare learners for knowledge-basedeconomies; in contrast, mass media <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> may be more cost-effectivefor agricultural- or industrial-based economies.• Research has indicated that very careful course design <strong>and</strong> online moderation areneeded for student success; however, course design in <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> is drivenmore by theory than research. More research on course design <strong>and</strong> online tutoring isneeded, particularly in terms of developing critical <strong>and</strong> original thinking.• Programmes that are delivered internationally require local cultural adaptation; joint<strong>and</strong> equal partnerships between institutions in different countries are one way toensure cultural relevance.• There is an undue emphasis on funding research into <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>technologies; more funding needs to be devoted to the “softer” areas of research in<strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>, such as policy research, cost-benefit analysis, instructional design<strong>and</strong> learner support.• Research can inform decision-making but needs small, internally-supportedprofessional teams working in collaboration with other similar teams to produce <strong>and</strong>disseminate meaningful results.145
- Page 1 and 2:
PERSPECTIVES ONDISTANCE EDUCATIONLi
- Page 3 and 4:
The Commonwealth of Learning (COL)
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn addition to the
- Page 7 and 8:
These are some of the issues that a
- Page 9 and 10:
What are the trends and issues in l
- Page 11 and 12:
of policy implications relating to
- Page 13 and 14:
evince important differences that c
- Page 15 and 16:
inequitable regulations governing t
- Page 17 and 18:
associations and groups of countrie
- Page 19 and 20:
THE CONTRIBUTORChristopher McIntosh
- Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTIONIn his 1996 report to U
- Page 23 and 24:
Lastly, our analysis of the situati
- Page 25 and 26:
diploma or similar certificates of
- Page 27 and 28:
force of the undertaking. Here agai
- Page 29 and 30:
RELEVANT INTERNET SITESUNESCO Task
- Page 31 and 32:
Notes1. This phrasing has been used
- Page 33 and 34:
goals (Daniel, 1996). Lifelong lear
- Page 35 and 36:
eported that group activity had red
- Page 37 and 38:
NEW AREAS FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION:WO
- Page 39 and 40:
targets systematically for the use
- Page 41 and 42:
Rausch, A.S. (2003). A case study o
- Page 43 and 44:
correspondence teaching systems tha
- Page 45 and 46:
significant differences between syn
- Page 47 and 48:
In distance flexible- and blended-e
- Page 49 and 50:
STATE-FUNDED DUAL-MODE SYSTEMS ATUN
- Page 51 and 52:
Table 4.2: Fundable elements in dis
- Page 53 and 54:
sciences in 21 countries of the reg
- Page 55 and 56:
How a system is funded depends in p
- Page 57 and 58:
Litto, Fredric M. (2004). Digital l
- Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 5LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE A
- Page 61 and 62:
education, which was initiated by C
- Page 63 and 64:
So the virtual classroom acted as a
- Page 65 and 66:
In June 2002, when the course came
- Page 67 and 68:
RELEVANT INTERNET SITESFORCIIR proj
- Page 69 and 70:
11. The approximate rate for 1€ w
- Page 71 and 72:
The term modern distance education
- Page 73 and 74:
the National Networked Consortium f
- Page 75 and 76:
important resource for undeveloped
- Page 77 and 78:
standards have been proposed for th
- Page 79 and 80:
The development of e-learning withi
- Page 81 and 82:
RELEVANT INTERNET SITESCCRTVU Onlin
- Page 83 and 84:
MoE (2004b) The Notice on Running N
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 7QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEYOF
- Page 87 and 88:
(Paris, France, 28-29 June 2004) in
- Page 89 and 90:
Examples of elaborated QA policies:
- Page 91 and 92:
plans and produces its conventional
- Page 93 and 94:
SHTVU (China)• Teaching• Teachi
- Page 95 and 96:
offers its programmes to Turkish ci
- Page 97 and 98: mega universities apply a set of st
- Page 99 and 100: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESThe Commonwe
- Page 101 and 102: 2. QA initiatives or publications b
- Page 103 and 104: assurance of ODL. This DST will be
- Page 105 and 106: Educational Planning has been respo
- Page 107 and 108: A system of weighting of the key qu
- Page 109 and 110: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESHigher Educa
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 9THE FINNISH VIRTUAL UNIVER
- Page 113 and 114: foreign providers. In Finland, the
- Page 115 and 116: to make the best use of new educati
- Page 117 and 118: The foremost task for the Service U
- Page 119 and 120: part of quality management. The aim
- Page 121 and 122: online courses; an educational tech
- Page 123 and 124: polytechnics, research institutions
- Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 10PROMOTING CROSS-BORDERREC
- Page 127 and 128: The Bologna Declaration was followe
- Page 129 and 130: indicators currently being used for
- Page 131 and 132: the qualification resulting from th
- Page 133 and 134: Table 9.1: Outline of the portfolio
- Page 135 and 136: • Make sure that incoming student
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 11CHARTING THE EVOLUTIONOF
- Page 139 and 140: Another common characteristic was t
- Page 141 and 142: the current capacity of the educati
- Page 143 and 144: conditions for success. Conditions
- Page 145 and 146: Cultural and ethical issues in inte
- Page 147: the cost and maintenance of learnin
- Page 151 and 152: REFERENCESBates, A. (1995). Technol
- Page 153 and 154: Twigg, C. (2001). Quality Assurance
- Page 155 and 156: y, for example, entering into partn
- Page 157 and 158: and even greater steps, and the dec