QA methodsA variety of QA methods are observed in the mega universities. The popular methods ofQA include providing a wide range of opportunities for training workshops, conductingevaluation research, introducing internal review processes, <strong>and</strong> inviting external audits<strong>and</strong> assessments. In some cases, detailed guidelines or directions for assessing qualityin selected key areas of <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> at the course <strong>and</strong> programme level are alsoprovided.Offering internal training <strong>and</strong> professional development opportunities: The mostprevalent method of QA is to provide training <strong>and</strong> professional developmentopportunities to faculty <strong>and</strong> staff, including part-time tutors. The clearest examples areshown in several cases. OUUK specifies initial induction <strong>and</strong> training, <strong>and</strong> continuousstaff development opportunities for its salaried staff, academic staff <strong>and</strong> associatelecturers in the “Guide to Quality <strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards”. Formal training sessions, workshops,resources, moderated online courses <strong>and</strong> seminars are offered. SHTVU has offered aseries of training courses to its young instructors, academic staff, <strong>and</strong> part-time lecturerscovering topics in course development <strong>and</strong> learner support. Each institution at UT setsout personnel development programmes to equip its staff with competencies for effectivetask performance. IGNOU also provides orientation programmes for course writers,tutors, <strong>and</strong> counselors. Similarly, KNOU <strong>and</strong> AIOU organise a series of workshops oncourse development for teachers.Involvment in international training workshops <strong>and</strong> conferences: Some mega universitiesgo beyond internal training activities. For example, UT (Indonesia) has sent a selectednumber of its staff to a three month training workshop in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s in co-operationwith the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s’ International Development Agency (NUFFIC) <strong>and</strong> Southeast<strong>Asia</strong>n Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) <strong>and</strong> other various internationalconferences, workshops <strong>and</strong> training sessions on QA. International organisations suchas UNESCO <strong>and</strong> COL have provided online training manuals <strong>and</strong> face-to-face trainingopportunities to <strong>distance</strong> educators.Evaluating <strong>and</strong> monitoring staff performance: Evaluation <strong>and</strong> monitoring of staffperformance is another method to ensure the quality of <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong>. AIOUmonitors routine duties of its staff <strong>and</strong> also prepares a formal Annual ConfidentialReport that includes evaluation of staff performance by each section head in charge.CCRTVU uses feedback from teachers <strong>and</strong> students to assess the quality of courses <strong>and</strong>teaching activities. KNOU evaluates tutor performance based on students’ evaluationof their services <strong>and</strong> tutorials. OUUK implements a period of probation to all staffjoining the university. During the period, the head of each unit is required to carefully<strong>and</strong> continually monitor the work of probationers. The “Manual of Personnel Policies<strong>and</strong> Procedures” specify job evaluation policy <strong>and</strong> procedure of salaried staff <strong>and</strong> the“Associate Lecturer H<strong>and</strong>book” clarifies appraisal system for associate lecturers. UT’sevaluation system is rather extensive. It requests each unit to undertake self-assessment<strong>and</strong> self-monitoring. A university-wide quality audit team, then, visits all units <strong>and</strong>regional centres to assess their performance. The top management of the university isalso involved in this evaluation process <strong>and</strong> examines the quality assurance report <strong>and</strong>provides feedback to all units.Specifying steps in the course development process: The internal quality assurancesystem during the development of courses/programmes <strong>and</strong> materials is well integratedinto the whole operations of most <strong>distance</strong> teaching universities. AIOU adopts a courseteam approach <strong>and</strong> a system for QA during the course design <strong>and</strong> development. CCRTVU84
plans <strong>and</strong> produces its conventional DE courses, online courses, <strong>and</strong> materials following ast<strong>and</strong>ardised QA process to ensure the quality. Similarly, IGNOU introduces step-by-stepcourse development processes <strong>and</strong> engages experts from all over the nation for the design<strong>and</strong> development of its courses <strong>and</strong> programmes, ensuring the quality of its teaching <strong>and</strong><strong>learning</strong> materials. OUUK provides the Course Management Guide <strong>and</strong> adopts the courseteam approach in approving <strong>and</strong> developing courses. At UT, the course developmentprocess begins from an idea of programme development followed by a market surveyor needs analysis. UT has specified a process of development <strong>and</strong> review of its courses.KNOU develops its textbooks employing a course team approach. Each course teamconsists of KNOU faculty, external content experts, <strong>distance</strong> <strong>education</strong> specialists, <strong>and</strong>textbook designers. Students’ evaluation is sought as well. Anadolu assures the qualityof its courses through the Instructional Design Committee. The Committee decides on ateam of experts for the development of each course <strong>and</strong> facilitates communication amongcontent experts, lecturers <strong>and</strong> students.Reviewing learner assessment: The quality assurance procedure during assessment<strong>and</strong> examinations development is well laid out in a few <strong>distance</strong> teaching universities.OUUK operates an Examination <strong>and</strong> Assessment Board for every course. This boardis responsible for the production of the examination paper, marking guidelines, theawarding of course results <strong>and</strong> other related matters. OU’s assessment frameworkcomplies with the national Quality Assurance Agency’s Code of Practice for Assessmentof Students. At IGNOU, a marking scheme is prepared <strong>and</strong> made available to allexaminers to avoid inter-examiner variability. AIOU reviews the process of studentevaluation <strong>and</strong> makes suggestions for improvement. AIOU gathers evidence of courseeffectiveness from students <strong>and</strong> has developed a built-in mechanism of continuous courseimprovement. The Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Centre of AIOU carries out regular courseevaluation studies.Inviting external reviewers <strong>and</strong> experts: Involvement of external reviewers or/<strong>and</strong> expertsduring course development <strong>and</strong> material production is also a popular method of assuringthe quality in most of the mega universities surveyed. KNOU, AIOU, IGNOU, UT, <strong>and</strong>STOU invite external experts in their QA processes. AIOU invites external experts duringits formative or summative studies or feedback surveys. CCRTVU involves externalexperts, professors from national universities, <strong>and</strong> persons in charge of e-colleges toreview its quality of programmes, courses, tutoring, <strong>and</strong> other services. OUUK seeksthe three main external inputs to QA processes: the External Assessor for course indevelopment, the External Examiner for examination at course level, <strong>and</strong> the ExternalAdvisor appointed at award level.QA areas <strong>and</strong> criteriaThe mega universities surveyed have developed QA criteria for key areas of <strong>distance</strong><strong>education</strong>.Key QA areasOUUK <strong>and</strong> UT provide detailed criteria for each of their QA key areas. Most of the megauniversities tend to have more detailed criteria especially for QA areas such as Programme/Course Design <strong>and</strong> Development, Learner Supports, <strong>and</strong> Assessment. These areas aremore directly related to student <strong>learning</strong>. AIOU, IGNOU, SHTVU, <strong>and</strong> KNOU put a greatemphasis on QA in the areas of course/materials production <strong>and</strong> student support services.Table 7.2 below summarises the key QA areas of the mega universities surveyed.85
- Page 1 and 2:
PERSPECTIVES ONDISTANCE EDUCATIONLi
- Page 3 and 4:
The Commonwealth of Learning (COL)
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn addition to the
- Page 7 and 8:
These are some of the issues that a
- Page 9 and 10:
What are the trends and issues in l
- Page 11 and 12:
of policy implications relating to
- Page 13 and 14:
evince important differences that c
- Page 15 and 16:
inequitable regulations governing t
- Page 17 and 18:
associations and groups of countrie
- Page 19 and 20:
THE CONTRIBUTORChristopher McIntosh
- Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTIONIn his 1996 report to U
- Page 23 and 24:
Lastly, our analysis of the situati
- Page 25 and 26:
diploma or similar certificates of
- Page 27 and 28:
force of the undertaking. Here agai
- Page 29 and 30:
RELEVANT INTERNET SITESUNESCO Task
- Page 31 and 32:
Notes1. This phrasing has been used
- Page 33 and 34:
goals (Daniel, 1996). Lifelong lear
- Page 35 and 36:
eported that group activity had red
- Page 37 and 38:
NEW AREAS FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION:WO
- Page 39 and 40: targets systematically for the use
- Page 41 and 42: Rausch, A.S. (2003). A case study o
- Page 43 and 44: correspondence teaching systems tha
- Page 45 and 46: significant differences between syn
- Page 47 and 48: In distance flexible- and blended-e
- Page 49 and 50: STATE-FUNDED DUAL-MODE SYSTEMS ATUN
- Page 51 and 52: Table 4.2: Fundable elements in dis
- Page 53 and 54: sciences in 21 countries of the reg
- Page 55 and 56: How a system is funded depends in p
- Page 57 and 58: Litto, Fredric M. (2004). Digital l
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 5LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE A
- Page 61 and 62: education, which was initiated by C
- Page 63 and 64: So the virtual classroom acted as a
- Page 65 and 66: In June 2002, when the course came
- Page 67 and 68: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESFORCIIR proj
- Page 69 and 70: 11. The approximate rate for 1€ w
- Page 71 and 72: The term modern distance education
- Page 73 and 74: the National Networked Consortium f
- Page 75 and 76: important resource for undeveloped
- Page 77 and 78: standards have been proposed for th
- Page 79 and 80: The development of e-learning withi
- Page 81 and 82: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESCCRTVU Onlin
- Page 83 and 84: MoE (2004b) The Notice on Running N
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 7QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEYOF
- Page 87 and 88: (Paris, France, 28-29 June 2004) in
- Page 89: Examples of elaborated QA policies:
- Page 93 and 94: SHTVU (China)• Teaching• Teachi
- Page 95 and 96: offers its programmes to Turkish ci
- Page 97 and 98: mega universities apply a set of st
- Page 99 and 100: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESThe Commonwe
- Page 101 and 102: 2. QA initiatives or publications b
- Page 103 and 104: assurance of ODL. This DST will be
- Page 105 and 106: Educational Planning has been respo
- Page 107 and 108: A system of weighting of the key qu
- Page 109 and 110: RELEVANT INTERNET SITESHigher Educa
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 9THE FINNISH VIRTUAL UNIVER
- Page 113 and 114: foreign providers. In Finland, the
- Page 115 and 116: to make the best use of new educati
- Page 117 and 118: The foremost task for the Service U
- Page 119 and 120: part of quality management. The aim
- Page 121 and 122: online courses; an educational tech
- Page 123 and 124: polytechnics, research institutions
- Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 10PROMOTING CROSS-BORDERREC
- Page 127 and 128: The Bologna Declaration was followe
- Page 129 and 130: indicators currently being used for
- Page 131 and 132: the qualification resulting from th
- Page 133 and 134: Table 9.1: Outline of the portfolio
- Page 135 and 136: • Make sure that incoming student
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 11CHARTING THE EVOLUTIONOF
- Page 139 and 140: Another common characteristic was t
- Page 141 and 142:
the current capacity of the educati
- Page 143 and 144:
conditions for success. Conditions
- Page 145 and 146:
Cultural and ethical issues in inte
- Page 147 and 148:
the cost and maintenance of learnin
- Page 149 and 150:
Research can be a useful tool for c
- Page 151 and 152:
REFERENCESBates, A. (1995). Technol
- Page 153 and 154:
Twigg, C. (2001). Quality Assurance
- Page 155 and 156:
y, for example, entering into partn
- Page 157 and 158:
and even greater steps, and the dec