397 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorINJECTION OF CHOLECYSTOKININ INTO THE WAISTAREA OF THE PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS INCREASESTASTE REACTIVITY RESPONSES TO INTRA-ORALINFUSION OF QUININE IN RATSKing M.S. 1 , Delmond J. 1 , Maddox L.C. 2 1 Biology, Stetson University,DeLand, FL; 2 Daytona Beach Community College, Daytona Beach, FLNeurons in the waist area of the parabrachial nucleus (W) processtaste input and project to medullary regions that generate taste reactivityresponses. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a gut-brain peptide that has beenimplicated in satiation. Since CCK and its receptors are located in W,we hypothesized that this peptide influences the processing of tasteinformation thereby altering the oromotor responses to taste input. Totest this hypothesis, 10 mM CCK (400 nl) was injected into the ponsthrough implanted guide cannula (Plastics One) in 12 male Wistar ratsimmediately before intra-oral infusion of 0.01 M NaCl, 0.01 M sucroseand 0.003 M quinine HCl. The injection of CCK into W increased thenumber of gapes and tongue protrusions performed following intra-oralinfusion of quinine as compared to when vehicle was injected on thefollowing day (n = 5, p < 0.05). Although there was a trend for feweringestive behaviors following intra-oral infusion of NaCl when CCKwas present, this effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.098).Taste reactivity responses to sucrose were not altered by CCKinjections. Indicating that these effects of CCK were due to actionwithin or near W, injections just dorsal, medial and rostral to W did notalter oromotor responses to the intra-oral infusion of any tastant used.These preliminary results suggest that CCK may act within the waistarea of the parabrachial nucleus to alter oromotor behaviors to tasteinput. [Supported by NSF RUI 0090641 and NIH R01 DC07854-01].398 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorALTERED PARABRACHIAL TASTE PROCESSING IN OBESEOLETF RATSLundy R. 1 , Hajnal A. 2 1 Anatomical Sciences & Neurobiology,University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; 2 Neural & Behavioral Sciences,Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PAOtsuka-Long-Evans-Tokushima-Fatty rats (OLETF) lack functionalCCK-1 receptors, are hyperphagic, and gradually develop obesity anddiabetes during their life span. Recently we have reported a greaterpreference for sucrose in prediabetic OLETF compared to age-matched,lean controls (LETO). This study investigated sucrose taste processingin the pontine parabrachial nucleus using a semi-chronic preparationthat allowed data collection over several recording sessions (e.g. 12, 13,15, 16, 19, and 20 wks of age). Forty-four taste neurons were tested and,using cluster analysis, categorized based on response profile to 0.1 MNaCl, 0.01 M citric acid, 0.003 M QHCl, and six sucrose concentrations(0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 1.5 M). These neurons were furtherdivided into Block 1 (wks 12&13) and Block 2 (wks 15–20)representing different stages of glucose tolerance. For NaCl-best cells,the Block 2 response rates to 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 1.5 M sucrose were 21%to 47% smaller relative to Block 1 sessions in OLETF, but not LETOrats. Sucrose-best cells (S-best), on the other hand, were 15% to 69%more responsive to these concentrations of sucrose during Block 2sessions relative to Block 1 sessions both for OLETF and LETO rats.The net effect was to alter the across-neuron pattern evoked by sucrose.That is, advancing age in OLETF rats, but not LETO rats, increased thepercentage of sucrose information carried by S-best cells. This effectmay contribute to the increased behavioral sensitivity to palatable mealsin this strain. Supported by NIH grants DK065709 and DC006698.399 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorTHE PROPERTIES OF INHIBITORY TASTE NEURONS INTHE PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS OF RATSLei Q. 1 , Yan J. 1 , Yang X. 1 , Shi J. 1 , Chen K. 1 1 Physiology &Pathophysiology, Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical Center, Xi'an,Shaanxi, ChinaIn rodents, the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) is the second relay of thetaste system, that receives projection from the gustatory portion in thenucleus solitary. Our earlier study found that there was some tasteneurons with inhibitory response to taste stimuli in addition to themajority of taste neurons with excitatory response in PBN. The aim ofthe present study was to characterize the spontaneous and evokedactivities of the inhibitory gustatory neurons of PBN . The single PBNneurons were recorded extracellularly and identified by the responses ofthe neurons to taste stimuli including 0.3 M NaCL, 0.01 M HCL, 0.003M QHCL and 0.5 M Sucrose in the anesthetized rat. A total of 19inhibitory neurons were studied. The spontaneous firing rates of theseneurons were in the range of 0.5-30 Hz and were depressed remarkablyand quickly, from 3.89 ± 1.85 Hz to 0.46 ± 0.09Hz, by application oftaste stimuli. The inhibition lasted about 5-80s. Most of them respondedto more than one of the tastants. On the basis of their largest inhibitoryresponses to the four basic stimuli. these inhibitory taste neurons wereclassified as follows: NaCL-best (56.3%); HCL-best (12.5%); QHCLbest(12.5%) Sucrose-best (18.7%).These findings suggest that there areinhibitory taste neurons in PBN that may play role in modulation ofgustatory information. Supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China(No. 30270454 and 30300111)Correspondingauthor: Janqun Yan.400 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorEFFERENT PROJECTION FROM THE BED NUCLEUS OFTHE STRIA TERMINALIS SUPPRESSES ACTIVITY OFTASTE-RESPONSIVE NEURONS IN THE HAMSTERPARABRACHIAL NUCLEILi C. 1 , Cho Y.K. 2 1 Anatomy, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale,IL; 2 Physiology & Neuroscience, Kangnung National UniversityCollege of Dentistry, Kangnung, Kangwon-do, South KoreaAlthough the reciprocal projections between the bed nucleus of thestria terminalis (BNST) and the gustatory parabrachial nuclei (PbN)have been demonstrated neuroanatomically, there is no direct evidenceshowing that the projections from the PbN to the BNST carry tasteinformation or that descending inputs from the BNST to the PbNmodulate the activity of PbN gustatory neurons. In the present study, werecorded from 105 taste-responsive neurons in the PbN and examinedtheir responsiveness to electrical stimulation of the BNST bilaterally.Twelve neurons (11.4%) were antidromically invaded from the BNST,mostly from the ipsilateral side (11 cells), indicating that a subset oftaste neurons in the PbN project their axons to the BNST. The BNSTstimulation induced orthodromic responses on most of the PbN neurons:103 out of 105 (98.0%), including all projection units that weremodulated by BNST stimulation. This descending modulation on thePbN gustatory neurons was exclusively inhibitory. We also confirmedthat activation of this efferent inhibitory projection from the BNSTreduces taste responses of PbN neurons in all units tested. The BNST isknown to be involved in sodium appetite and taste aversion learning.The BNST is also participates in the neural circuits that involve stressassociatedfeeding behavior. Therefore, this neural substrate may beimportant in taste aversion learning and sodium appetite as well as thestress-elicited alteration in ingestive behavior. Supported byNIDCD006623100
401 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorENSEMBLE RESPONSES OF GUSTATORY CORTICALNEURONS ACCURATELY PREDICT TASTANT IDENTITYJones L.M. 1 , Fontanini A. 1 , Katz D.B. 1 1 Brandeis University, Waltham,MAGustatory neurons respond to tastants with patterns of spikes that arehighly variable—both throughout the time course of a single responseand across repeated deliveries of the same stimulus. Yet currentanalyses of coding in the gustatory system rely heavily on time and trialaveraging. Here we investigate cortical processing of taste stimuli usingHidden Markov Modeling (HMM), an analysis method that does notaverage over time or trial, but instead classifies responses in individualtrials as progressions through different neural states. We recorded extracellularactivity from small ensembles of well isolated neurons (6-12simultaneously) in the gustatory cortex of awake rats while the 4 basictastes were delivered via intra-oral cannulae. We found that theensembles reliably transition through a taste-specific series of states(defined by the firing rates of each neuron). This allowed us to predicttastant identity from single trial responses and compare thesepredictions to those computed using a method based on averaged firingrates. HMM predictions were consistently more accurate than theaverage-based method (10 of 12 sessions). Examination of HMMsolutions revealed the source of their high-quality performance: theexact timing of the progression through a taste-specific set of statesvaried from trial to trial, such that some of the information available insingle trials using HMM was lost in the across-trial averages. Thisindicates that the gustatory cortex may utilize specifically timedchanges in firing patterns of neural ensembles to process tasteinformation. Supported by 1 R01 DC006666 to DBK.403 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorANTICIPATORY CORTICAL ACTIVITY IN A TASTEDISCRIMINATION TASKGutierrez R.M. 1 , Nicolelis M.A. 1 , Simon S.A. 2 1 Neurobiology, DukeUniversity, Durham, NC; 2 Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham,NCPreviously we have shown that when freely licking rats know whattastant will be delivered, their anticipatory cortical activity candistinguish among them Gutierrez et.al. J Neurophysiol 95:119–133(2006). Here we explore whether such discrimination would be presentwhen the animal does not know which tastant will be delivered. Thiswas accomplished by recording the activity of neuronal ensembles inthe OFC, insula and nucleus accumbens while rats performed a tastediscrimination task. For this task, rats were trained to lick an empty tube(10 times) in order to randomly receive NaCl (positive cue) thatsignaled the availability of a reward (sucrose) or MSG (negative cue)that signaled the delivery of quinine. Importantly, taste cues (NaCl,MSG) and outcomes (sucrose, quinine) were delivered in identical, butindependent compartments and rats initiated licking in a similar way inboth compartments. The anticipatory activity in the “cue” compartmentwas similar, meaning that when rats do not know what tastant will bedelivered, there is not any anticipatory activity related to the identity ofthe tastant. However, in the "outcome" compartment, we founddifferences in the anticipatory activity of the expectation of sucrose orquinine. Of the three cortical areas explored, we found a greaterpercentage of neurons in the nucleus accumbens that increased firingrate in the "outcome" compared to "cue" compartment. In summary adistributed number of cells in the brain anticipate behavioral outcomesonly when the rat knows what reward is coming. Supported by NIHDC-01065 and Philip Morris USA Inc. and Philip Morris International402 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorGUSTATORY CORTEX ENCODES MULTIPLE FEATURESDURING AN INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION TASKMacDonald C.J. 1 , Nicolelis M.A. 2 , Simon S.A. 2 1 Psychological andBrain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC; 2 Neurobiology, DukeUniversity, Durham, NCPrevious work on taste intensity processing in gustatory cortex (GC)of awake animals relied on integrated neural activity without taking intoaccount the behavior of the animal. To this end, we used chronic multielectroderecordings in the behaving rat to characterize GC activityduring a NaCl intensity-discrimination task. In this task, the rat lickedon a “sample” lick spout positioned in the center of the chamber walland could receive 20 µL of 30 or 120 mM NaCl (perceptual anchors)during a trial after each of two successive licks. These anchors wererewarded with water after correctly licking on one of two “choice” lickspouts positioned to the left or right of the sample spout, whichcategorizes the concentration as “High” (120 mM) or “Low” (30 mM).Intermediate NaCl concentrations were also delivered during theexperiment but were not rewarded. The probability of categorizingNaCl as “High” increased with NaCl concentration. We identified twosub-populations of neurons whose firing rate monotonically increasedor decreased within one lick in response to concentration. We alsoidentified several additional neuron “types” including licking and watersensitive neurons in addition to neurons that changed activity at definedpoints during the behavioral sequence that makes up a single trial. Insummary, these data show that the GC contains many different neuronaltypes that mediate different aspects of taste-guided behavior. This studywas supported by grants DC-01065 and Philip Morris USA and PhilipMorris International.404 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorGENDER DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVATION WITHIN THE OFCIN RESPONSE TO TASTE STIMULI WITH POSITIVE ORNEGATIVE VALANCE ARE RELATED TO HUNGER ANDSATIETYHaase L.B. 1 , Cerf-Ducastel B. 1 , Kemmotsu N. 1 , Green E. 1 , Jacobson A. 1 ,Miller M. 1 , Murphy C. 1 1 Psychology, San Diego State University, SanDiego, CAPrevious research supports the hypothesis that valance specific brainactivation related to positive and negative taste stimuli involves theorbital frontal cortex (OFC). The physiological states of hunger orsatiety influence behavior relating to the reward value of taste stimuli.This study employed fMRI to investigate cortical activation in responseto taste stimuli that are high and low in reward value when the subjectwas hungry or sated. A region of interest (ROI) analysis was conductedto test the hypothesis that gender differences in activation within theOFC to positive (sucrose) and negative (caffeine) stimuli are affected byhunger and satiety. Subjects rated the pleasantness of stimuli using thegLMS, (Bartoshuk et al., 2004) while stimuli were presented to themouth as 0.3ml boluses in distilled water. Imaging was conducted on a3T GE scanner. Image analysis was conducted using AFNI (Cox, 1996).Fit coefficients were subjected to ANOVA to compare the degree ofactivation in ROIs. Activation within the OFC in response to sucrose inthe hunger condition is greater for females than males. In contrast,activation in response to caffeine is greater in the sated condition forfemales than for males. These findings suggest that gender differencesin activation within the OFC in response to valence specific stimuli arerelated to hunger and satiety. Supported by NIH grants RO1AG04085to C.M and RO3DC05134 to B.C.D. We thank Dr. Giedrius Buracasand Dr. Lisa Eyler for their fMRI expertise.101
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37:
sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39:
149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41:
157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43:
165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45:
173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47:
181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49:
189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137: Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138: Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26