21 Slide Ecology and Social ChemicalsCHEMICALS AND ECOLOGY: MULTITROPHIC PREDATORPREY INTERACTIONS MEDIATED BY CHEMISTRYFerrer R.P. 1 , Zimmer R. 1 1 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of California, Los Angeles, CADuring development, sensory systems undergo changes in cellreceptor machinery. Such modifications may alter the way an animalperceives its olfactory environment. Here we investigate a cannibalisticinteraction between two discrete life history stages of the Californianewt (Taricha torosa). The defense compound tetrodotoxin (TTX), inadult newt skin is recognized by conspecific larvae as an avoidancesignal. Yet, antipredator behavior is suppressed when TTX is mixedwith odors from alternative adult prey. In laboratory assays, newt larvaewere exposed to TTX alone, or in binary mixtures with test compoundsisolated from invertebrate prey tissues. The larval escape response toTTX (0.1 µM) was significantly reduced when Arg (0.1 to 0.01 µM)was added. Free-ranging adult newts were exposed to components ofprey tissue extracts in the field. Arg was the most attractive compoundtested, evoking plume-tracking behavior at concentrations as low as 10nM. A comparable array of Arg analogs and TTX/Arg analog mixtureswas tested on adults and larvae, respectively. Adult responses wereeliminated by even slight alterations to Arg, such as the addition of asingle carbon to the side chain or esterification of the α-carboxyl group.In contrast, larval responses to TTX were inhibited by Arg as well as byanalogs with the guanidinium group. Thus, adults were more narrowlytuned than larvae to Arg analogs. These results show that Arg hasopposing effects (inhibitory/stimulatory) on larval/adult newts, andapparently acts on different suites of olfactory receptors for individualsof the two, distinct, life history stages.22 Slide Ecology and Social ChemicalsENANTIOMERIC PHEROMONE BLENDS IN MAMMALS:ASIAN ELEPHANTS AND BARK BEETLES SHARE CHIRALCHEMISTRYGreenwood D. 1 , Rasmussen L. 2 1 School of Biological Sciences,University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; 2 Environmental &Biomolecular Systems (EBS), Oregon Health & Science University,Portland, ORFrontalin (1,5-dimethyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane) a bicyclicketal of terpene origin can exist in two chiral or mirror image forms.Our recent finding that both enantiomeric forms of frontalin are presentin the temporal gland secretions of male Asian elephants during musth(Greenwood et al., Nature 438:1097-8, 2005) mirrors that seen in anumber of bark beetle species. Moreover changes in the ratio of the twoforms has implications for chemical signalling in both diverse phyleticgroups as important behavioral consequences are dependent on this. Ourresults suggest that stereochemical control of the enantiomeric ratioimplemented during biosynthesis involving a putative dihydroxylationstep provides modulation of the pheromonal message. This modulationis likely translated into a differential message at the level of pheromonereception based on the inherent chiral selectivity of receptor proteins.Supported by ISAT.23 Slide Ecology and Social ChemicalsBEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE THAT GOLDFISH DISCERNMOSAICS OF PHEROMONAL ODORANTS THAT INCLUDEBOTH SEX HORMONE DERIVATIVES AND BILE ACIDSSorensen P.W. 1 , Fine F. 2 , Murphy C. 2 , Bjerselius R. 2 , Kihslinger R. 31 University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN; 2 Fisheries, Wildlife, andConservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN;3 Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California,Davis, Davis, CAAlthough behavioral studies have established that many species ofteleost fish employ species-specific pheromonal odors to mediatereproduction, all cues identified to date are common hormonal productsincapable of imparting species-specific information. A possibleexplanation for this phenomenon is that fish discern mixtures or`mosaics´ of odorants which include compounds such as bile acids(taxon-specific steroids released via the fish gut). Here, we tested thispossibility for the goldfish. Examining bile acid release, we found thatwhile most fish release similar suites of bile acids, their ratios differ.Thus, goldfish release mostly cyprinol sulfate (a bile acid specific tominnows), trout release mostly taurocholic acid, and gouramis releasemostly cholic acid (see Thwaits et al., this conference). Examining theolfactory sensitivity and specificity of the goldfish olfactory system toseveral dozen bile acids using EOG recording, we next found thatcyprinol sulfate is especially potent with a detection threshold of 10-11M. Cross-adaptation studies found sensitivity to be highly specific.Finally, we found that behavioral responses of male goldfish to 15 ketoprostaglandinF2a (a pheromonal cue released by female goldfish) wasstrongly suppressed by the addition of bile acids only released by otherspecies. In conclusion, odor mixtures seem important to naturalpheromone function in fish. (NSF 9723798).24 Slide Ecology and Social ChemicalsPHEROMONAL RECOGNITION MEMORY INDUCED BYTRPC2-INDEPENDENT VOMERONASAL SENSINGKelliher K.R. 1 , Spehr M. 1 , Li X. 1 , Zufall F. 1 , Leinders-Zufall T. 11 Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland at Baltimore,Baltimore, MDOne of the best known examples of olfactory imprinting in adultvertebrates is the selective pregnancy block (or Bruce effect) in themouse, which depends on the formation and maintenance of apheromonal recognition memory by the vomeronasal system. Peptideligands of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules are thefirst identified vomeronasal stimuli that can mediate the Bruce effect,but the molecular mechanisms underlying this effect remain to beexplored. The cation channel gene TRPC2 plays a critical role in thesignal transduction mechanism of vomeronasal sensory neurons (VSNs)and TRPC2 -/- mice constitute an important genetic model forinvestigating the role of the vomeronasal organ (VNO) in mammalianpheromonal sensing. By using mice with a homozygous deficiency inTRPC2, we tested whether TRPC2 is essential for a pheromonalrecognition memory. Surprisingly, the loss of the TRPC2 channel genedoes not significantly influence the establishment of this memory,whereas, surgical lesions of the VNO do. Furthermore, field potentialand single cell patch-clamp recordings show that TRPC2 is dispensablefor the transduction of MHC peptide ligands by sensory neurons in thebasal zone of the VNO. This indicates that a previously unrecognizedTRPC2-independent signal transduction mechanism in the VNOunderlies the formation of this pheromonal recognition memory.Supported by grants from NIH/NIDCD (to K.R.K, F.Z., and T.L.-Z.)and the Emmy Noether Program of the DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft (to M.S.).6
25 <strong>Symposium</strong> Impact of Odorant Metabolism on ScentPerceptionODORANT/PHEROMONE METABOLISM IN INSECTSVogt R. 1 1 Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia,SCSignal termination plays a critical role in all chemically mediatedbiological processes, and this is no less so in odor detection. Theprocess of insect pheromone degradation has been studied for someyears, at least as far back as Kasang (1971) in Bombyx mori andFerkovich et al., (1973) in Trichoplusia ni. Since then, a few pheromoneand odor degrading enzymes (ODEs) have been identified andcharacterized in detail and the general principal of odor degradation hasbecome well established. One reason to expand efforts studying ODEsis their potential in insect control. If it is true that pheromones and odorsin general are perceived as precise mixtures, then the targeted inhibitionof the ODE for a specific component should alter the blend ratio withina sensillum resulting in misperception of the odor. Of the three proteinclasses with which odors interact (ORs, OBPs and ODEs), ODEs maybe the least specific and thus the more generally targetable protein forbehavioral inhibition. ODEs characterized include extracellular solubleenzymes localized in the compartmentalized fluid that surrounds theolfactory neurons, enzymes associating with the neuron or support cellmembranes, cytosolic enzymes which may serve the dual purpose ofinactivating xenobiotics, and body surface enzymes insuring thatadsorbed odors do not desorb and become false signals. Enzymes maybe sex specific suggesting roles targeting pheromones; others may besex indifferent suggesting broader roles. Individual species may havemultiple but parallel metabolic pathways. The complexity and diversityof odor degrading processes suggests strong evolutionary selectiontowards noise reduction (rapid removal of accumulated odor signal).Support has been gratefully received from NIH, NSF and USDA.26 <strong>Symposium</strong> Impact of Odorant Metabolism on ScentPerceptionMAMMALIAN NASAL P450 ENZYMES AND ODORANTMETABOLISMDing X. 1 1 Wadsworth Center, NYSDOH, Albany, NYThe role of mammalian nasal biotransformation enzymes, such as thefamily of cytochrome P450 (P450) monooxygenases, in olfactorychemoreception has been a subject of much speculation. Nasalmetabolism may influence the levels of odorants in the olfactoryreceptor environment, activate non-odorants to odorants, convertodorants to non-odorants, or change an odorant to a ligand for adiffering odorant receptor. Earlier studies have concentrated on theidentification and pharmacological characterization of the numerousP450s, as well as other biotransformation enzymes, expressed in theolfactory mucosa. These studies, fueled by findings of tissue-specific,abundant, and relatively early developmental expression of select P450genes, demonstrated the in vitro activity of the olfactory mucosa totransform inhaled chemicals to metabolites that potentially differ fromthe parent compounds in olfactory potency and odor quality. However,in vivo evidence for a chemosensory function of the nasal P450s hasbeen difficult to obtain. Recently, my laboratory has been developingknockout mouse models that can be used to demonstrate the roles ofnasal P450 enzymes in odorant metabolism and odor detection. Thesemice have either a germ-line deletion of one or more P450 genes thatare abundantly expressed in the nose, such as the olfactory mucosaspecificCyp2g1, or a very low expression of the cytochrome P450reductase (CPR), which is required for the function of all microsomalP450 enzymes. The unique features of these mouse models, andpotential confounding factors for application to odorant metabolism andchemosensory studies, will be discussed (Supported in part by NIHgrants DC05487 and ES07462).27 <strong>Symposium</strong> Impact of Odorant Metabolism on ScentPerceptionODORANT METABOLISM IN THE HUMAN NOSESchilling B. 1 1 Givaudan Schweiz AG - Fragrance Research,Duebendorf, Zurich, SwitzerlandThe initial events taking place in odor recognition have been studiedextensively in recent years primarily at the olfactory receptor andolfactory bulb level. Much less attention has been paid to peri-receptorevents that may influence the responsiveness of receptors to olfactorystimuli. Occurrence of enzymatic reactions in nasal tissue has beendescribed for rodents in connection with xenobiotic metabolism andtoxicity. A human P450 enzyme (CYP2A13) that is predominantlyexpressed in nasal tissue has been characterized, and additionalbiotransformation enzyme genes that are expressed in human olfactoryepithelium have been described (Su et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2005).Several studies were conducted to address the question whether or notsuch metabolism is changing the odorant quality and if such perireceptorevents are increasing the chemical variability of potentialreceptor ligands in the nose. In-vitro enzymatic studies were used toidentify substrates and inhibitors of nasal P450 enzymes which exhibitbroad substrate specificity. In-vivo studies were designed to monitormetabolite formation in real time by detecting metabolites in exhaled airusing mass spectrometry (APCI-MS). Ultimately, sensory tests usingsubstrates and inhibitors of P450 enzymes showed that enzymaticmetabolism can influence the quality of a provided odorant. The latterstudies also showed that there seems to be variability in the extent ofmetabolism among individuals. The results indicate that in-nosebiotransformation of odorants can modify the quality and quantity ofcompounds reaching the olfactory mucosa, and those events may haveto be taken into consideration when interpreting SAR, SOR and OBimagingresults.28 <strong>Symposium</strong> Impact of Odorant Metabolism on ScentPerceptionFLAVOR METABOLISM IN THE ORAL CAVITYBuettner A. 1 1 German Research Center for Food Chemistry, Garching,GermanyProlonged retronasal aroma perception, called aftertaste or better"aftersmell," is relevant for food consumption, but also for medical orcosmetic purposes, such as usage of mouthwashes or toothpastes. Also,undesired aftersmell impressions as from cigarettes or onions are part ofthis phenomenon. Various factors influence the dwell time of odorantswithin the oral cavity. This study highlights the influence of odorantadsorption to oral mucosa, and that of odorant degradation by saliva. Itwas shown that odorants can be effectively metabolized, depending onthe odorant concentrations and the food composition. The turn-overrates were highly dependent on the chemical structures of the odorants,with significant differences in metabolization for diverse substanceclasses, e.g. esters, thiols, aldehydes, etc. These results were correlatedwith sensory experiments, as well as with quantitations by means ofSOOM (Spit-Off Odorant Measurement)- and BOSS (Buccal OdorScreening System) techniques [1,2]. Both methodologies monitor tracekey odorant adsorption to oral mucosa and subsequent release under invivo conditions. Using this analytical concept, salivary odorantmetabolization together with adsorption to mucosal tissue were found toplay a decisive role in aftersmell. This work was financed by theDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft , the Deutsche Forschungsanstaltfuer Lebensmittelchemie and the Hochschulwissenschaftsprogramm II.I thank Prof. P. Schieberle for his support. 1) Buettner, A., Schieberle,P. (2000) In: Flavor release (Roberts, D.D.; Taylor, A.J.; eds), ACSSymp. Ser. 763, 87-98. 2) Buettner, A., Welle, F. (2004). Flavour Fragr.J. 19, 505-514.7
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57:
221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59:
229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61:
237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63:
245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65:
253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67:
261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69:
269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71:
277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73:
285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75:
293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77:
301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26