445 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearch<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong>AL EFFECTS OF LINGUAL NERVETRANSECTION ON TASTE BUD VOLUMES IN RATGomez A.M. 1 , Sollars S.I. 1 1 Psychology, University of Nebraska atOmaha, Omaha, NEThe present study examined the role of the lingual nerve in themaintenance of taste buds located in fungiform papillae at variousdevelopmental ages. Rats underwent unilateral lingual nerve transectionon postnatal days 10, 25, or 65. Care was taken to avoid injury to thechorda tympani nerve. Following 2, 8, 16, or 50 days survival time,analysis of taste bud volume was conducted. Results identified adevelopmental effect of this procedure; transection of the lingual nerveon P10 resulted in a complete absence of taste buds following 8 and 16days survival time. Transection on P25 resulted in a significantreduction in taste bud volume relative to control sides of the tonguefollowing 8 days survival time (p < 0.05), but no apparent reduction inthe number of taste buds on the control versus intact tongue sides.Transection on P65 did not significantly alter taste bud volumes or thenumber of taste buds identified, regardless of survival time.Furthermore, morphological analyses identified the presence offiliform-like structures as early as 2 days posttransection in all groups(i.e., P10, P25, P65), and the persistance of these structures following50 days survival time in P10 and P25 transected rats. These findingsfurther demonstrate earlier results from our laboratory showing theimportance of sensory innervation during early gustatory developmentin rats and for the first time identify the lingual nerve as an integralcomponent in the early maintenance of taste buds in fungiform papillae.446 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchWITHDRAWN447 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchWNT/-CATENIN SIGNALING MODULATES <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong>OF TASTE PRIMORDIAThirumangalathu S. 1 , Stoick-Cooper C.L. 2 , Moon R.T. 3 , Barlow L.A. 11 Cell & Developmental Biology, University of Colorado HealthSciences Center, Aurora, CO; 2 Neurobiology & Behavior GradProgram, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;3 HHMI/Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WAWnt genes are key regulators of embryonic development. Thesesecreted factors bind Frizzled receptors to activate the ß-cateninpathway. To determine if Wnt signaling is involved in the developmentof taste papillae, we examined Wnt reporter gene activity in tongues ofembryonic TOPGAL mice (DasGupta & Fuchs, 1999). Wnt signalingis first evident in anterior lingual epithelium on embryonic day (E)12.0,then focuses to papillary placodes as these taste primordia form (E12.5).Wnt activity persists in taste papillae, and at lower levels in lingualepithelium, as morphogenesis ensues. We have identified Wnt6 andWnt10a via RT-PCR of lingual mRNA as likely activators of TOPGALin embryonic tongues. Frizzled receptors 2-5, 7 and 8, secretedantagonists Dkk 1-3, and coreceptor LRP5/6 are also expressed indeveloping tongue coincident with Wnt6 and 10a. In sum, our datasuggest that Wnts function in taste papilla formation, morphogenesisand/or differentiation. To test this hypothesis, embryonic tonguecultures were exposed at E11.5 to lithium (Li + ), which activates Wntsignaling by stabilizing cytoplasmic ß-catenin. Explants treated with Li +had significantly more papillae than controls, implying that early Wntsignaling promotes taste primordia development. We are now exploringthe expression patterns of Wnt6 and 10a with respect to embryonicpapillae, and testing the specificity of Wnt action in vitro. Supported byNIDCD DC03947 to LAB448 Poster Poster #7 - Developmental, Neurogenesis, andConsumer ResearchCELL SIGNALING IN EGF REGULATION OF FUNGIFORMPAPILLA PATTERNINGLiu H.X. 1 , Henson B.S. 1 , Zhou Y.Q. 1 , D'Silva N.J. 1 , Mistretta C.M. 11 School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIWe demonstrated previously that exogenous epidermal growth factor(EGF) regulates patterning of fungiform papillae by reducing papillanumber and increasing cell proliferation between papillae in embryonicrat tongue cultures. Using specific inhibitors, we also found thatsignaling through protein kinases, PI3K/Akt, MEK/ERK and p38MAPK, mediates these responses to EGF. In the present study weinvestigate whether EGF-mediated effects on tongue papillae areinduced via the EGF receptor (EGFR) and further explore intracellularsignaling events. Compound 56, a specific inhibitor of EGFR, inducedan increase in papilla number, completely blocking the EGF effect inembryonic day 14 tongue cultures. Using immunolocalization andimmunoblot endpoint assays, EGF-mediated phosphorylation of Akt,ERK, and p38 MAPK in tongue cultures was observed. In the absenceof EGF, inhibition of PI3K/Akt, MEK/ERK, and p38 MAPK withLY294002, U0126 or SB203580 respectively, showed no significantchange in papilla number. However, MEK/ERK inhibition, inconjunction with inhibition of PI3K/Akt or p38 MAPK or both,increased papilla number, blocking any EGF-mediated action,consistent with a synergistic effect. In contrast, concurrent inhibition ofPI3K/Akt and p38 MAPK had no effect. These results demonstrate thatthe EGF effect on fungiform papillae is mediated by EGFR, viaPI3K/Akt, MEK/ERK, and p38 MAPK signaling and suggest asynergistic role of MEK/ERK pathway with PI3K/Akt or p38 MAPK inEGF-mediated papilla patterning. Supported by NIH Grants NIDCDDC00456 (CMM), NIDCR DE00452 (NJD).112
449 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchCANONICAL WNT SIGNALING DURING TASTE PAPILLAEFORMATIONIwatsuki K. 1 , Liu H. 2 , Mistretta C. 2 , Margolskee R.F. 1 1 Neuroscience,Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 2 School of Dentistry,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MITaste tissue development in mice is marked by the emergence of thetongue swelling around E11.5, followed by formation of the tongueplacode (E12.5), and taste papillae within the epithelium of the tongue(E13.5). The taste buds emerge at later stages, around the time of birth.As is the case with development of other epithelial tissues, formationand patterning of taste tissues are thought to be induced throughepithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Sonic hedgehog, bonemorphogenetic proteins and epidermal growth factor receptor areassociated with initiation and patterning of taste papillae. Othersignaling pathways, such as those involving the Wnts, essential in thedevelopment of many epithelial tissues, have not been examined for arole in taste tissue development. We have determined that specific Wntsignaling elements are expressed in developing taste tissue and thatcanonical Wnt signaling is associated with taste papilla formation.Topgal mice carry a beta-galactosidase (LacZ) reporter gene regulatedby the Tcf/Lef1-ß-catenin complex such that they can be used tomonitor canonical Wnt signaling pathways (DasGupta and Fuchs,1999). Using Topgal mice we observed that canonical Wnt signalingwas robustly activated during early stages of taste papilla formation, butless so during later stages, and was also active during taste buddevelopment. Work is in progress to identify the specific Wntsunderlying canonical signaling at various stages of taste papillae/buddevelopment. Supported by NIH DC003055 and DC003155 (RFM),DC00456 (CMM) and a JSPS fellowship (KI).450 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchBMP-4 AND NOGGIN ALTER NEURON SURVIVAL ANDDIFFERENTIATION IN EMBRYONIC GENICULATE ANDTRIGEMINAL GANGLIA IN VITROMay O.L. 1 , Mistretta C.M. 1 1 School of Dentistry, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor, MIBy rat embryonic day 16 (E16), geniculate and trigeminal ganglioncells innervate fungiform papillae and surrounding tongue epithelium,respectively, and thus are exposed to target-derived signaling factors,upon which they become dependent for survival and differentiation.Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4), known to be involved inpatterning and regionalization of the nervous system, and its antagonist,noggin are expressed in tongue by E13 and dramatically influence tastepapilla development. To determine if these proteins not only regulateperipheral taste organs, but also influence development of neurons thatinnervate these targets, E16 geniculate and trigeminal ganglia wereexplanted and cultured with exogenous BMP-4, noggin, or brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) for 3-6 days. Ganglia wereassessed for neuron survival and neurite outgrowth. Compared togeniculate ganglia exposed to BDNF, with exogenous BMP-4 or nogginthere was a substantial decrease in neuron number and reduced neuriteextension. Neuron reduction was especially pronounced with noggin.Furthermore, BMP-4 in particular induced neuron aggregation andneurite fasciculation. Although not as profound, neuron survival andneurite extension also were decreased in trigeminal ganglia exposed toeither BMP-4 or noggin. For both ganglia, addition of BDNF, BMP-4,and noggin together increased neuron survival relative to BDNF alone.We propose that these proteins, present in embryonic papillae, havevarying and balanced effects on ganglion survival and differentiation.Supported by NIDCD NIH grants DC00456 (CMM) and T32DC00011(OLM).451 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchBDNF AND NT3 ATTRACT TRIGEMINAL NEURITESEgwiekhor A. 1 , Vatterott P. 1 , Rochlin M.W. 1 1 Biology, LoyolaUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILTrigeminal and geniculate axons are both attracted to gustatorypapillae, but are restricted to non-overlapping areas within theepithelium. We recently found that BDNF is an attractant for geniculateneurites. We therefore investigated which neurotrophins stimulatetrigeminal neurite growth by bath application and tested their ability toattract these neurites using slow release beads in collagen gels. Explantswere dissected from E15 and E18 rat embryos corresponding to in vivointralingual pathfinding and target penetration stages, respectively. Bathapplied NGF was the most potent and efficacious at eliciting outgrowthat E15 and E18. NT3 was more effective than BDNF at E15, but thisreversed at E18. NT3 stimulated finer fascicles than BDNF or NGF.Beads soaked in BDNF, NT3, and BDNF + NT3 did not promoteappreciable neurite growth from E15 ganglia, but BDNF- and NT3-soaked beads did attract E18 trigeminal neurites, as reflected byconvergence of proximal neurites toward the bead vs radial divergenceof distal neurites from the opposite side of the explant. BDNF + NT3beads elicited the most robust attraction. In preliminary experiments,NGF soaked beads biased outgrowth less than either BDNF or NT3 atE18. Taken together, our observations support the following model:NGF exerts the predominant trophic influence throughout pathfindingand targeting. BDNF and NT3 attract trigeminal axons to the papillaeepithelium, and NT3 promotes defasciculation within the epithelium.Supported by NIH R03 DC04965-01A1.452 Poster Developmental, Neurogenesis, and ConsumerResearchBDNF ATTRACTS GENICULATE NEURITES, NT4 DOESN'TRochlin M.W. 1 , Vatterott P. 1 , Egwiekhor A. 1 1 Biology, LoyolaUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILIn vivo studies raise the possibility that BDNF attracts geniculateaxons to gustatory papillae: Geniculate axons in mutant mice lackingBDNF or misexpressing BDNF exhibit aberrant intralingual trajectoriesand mistargeting, and BDNF mRNA is concentrated in the papillaeepithelium. However, it has not been determined if the guidanceinfluence of BDNF is direct, i.e., if BDNF is sufficient to attractgeniculate axons. To test this, in vitro studies are necessary. We coculturedcontrol or BDNF-soaked beads and geniculate gangliadissected from rat embryos at intralingual pathfinding stages (E14-16)and targeting stages (E17-18) in collagen gels. Several observationsargue that BDNF is not only trophic but tropic: Geniculate neuritesgrow exclusively (E15) or predominantly (E18) toward the beads, andneurites turn toward, stop at or encircle the beads. Furthermore, 25ng/ml BDNF in the bath did not block attraction to the BDNF soakedbead, suggesting a wide range over which BDNF gradients can besensed. Control beads soaked in media have no effect. Curiously, beadssoaked in NT4, which also signals through trkB, do not attractgeniculate neurites under these conditions. These data and those from invivo studies suggest a role for BDNF as an attractant for lingualgeniculate axons in vivo. We also recently demonstrated that tongueexplants promote and attract geniculate neurites, but the attractant isunlikely to be either BDNF or NT4 (Vilbig et al., J. Neurocytol.33:591). Future studies will assess the precise role and stages at whichBDNF acts as an attractant in vivo, and identify the explant-derivedattractant. Supported by NIH R03 DC04965-01A1.113
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37:
sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39:
149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41:
157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43:
165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45:
173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47:
181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49:
189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51:
197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53:
205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55:
213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57:
221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59:
229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61:
237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137: Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138: Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26