333 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneA POSSIBLE GENETIC BASIS FOR GENERAL HYPEROSMIAHasin Y. 1 , Menashe I. 1 , Feldmesser E. 1 , Lancet D. 1 1 MolecularGenetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelSpecific anosmia has been amply described as the far end of agenetically determined bell-shaped distribution of individualsensitivities towards a given odorant. We suggest that innate generalanosmia similarly represents an extreme of a general olfactory thresholddistribution, which also includes general hyposmia, normosmia andhyperosmia. Our preliminary experiments have demonstratedsignificant concordance among human detection thresholds to sixodorants (Menashe et al, this volume), thus supporting the existence ofa common general olfactory sensitivity factor. We are exploring thegenetic basis of the entire general olfactory sensitivity curve, whichmay stem from genetic polymorphisms in olfactory signaling pathwaycomponents, such as Golf and adenylyl cyclase III. Our study isparticularly focused on general hyperosmia, since it has a lowerprobability of arising from non-genetic factors. Currently, wholegenome scans with Affymetrix 100k single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) arrays are performed on hyperosmic subjects in comparison tohyposmic and normosomic controls. This will help to identify genomicregions which differ significantly in their SNP patterns between thegroups. In addition, we attempt to discover similar regions in the murinegenome. This can be done utilizing automated olfactometry, and therecently described in silico mapping method, based on a dense SNPmap in 48 inbred mouse strains (Pletcher et al., PLOS Biol 2(12): e393).Species comparisons, fine mapping and sequencing should allow theidentification of specific genes, which underlie human olfactoryvariability.334 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneA NEW STRUCTURAL SUB-CLASS OF OLFACTORYRECEPTORSLai P.C. 1 , Bahl G. 2 , Clot-Faybesse O. 3 , Matarazzo V. 3 , Crasto C.J. 41 Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT;2 University of San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA;3 Laboratoire de Neuroglycobiologie, L'Université de Provence,Marseille, Marseille, France; 4 Neurobiology, Yale University, NewHaven, CTRecognition of the mechanism of olfaction depends uponunderstanding the sequence-structure-function relationships of olfactoryreceptors. We used bioinformatics methods to identify a new structuralsub-class of olfactory receptors and GPCRs. We used availablestatistical methods to predict trans-membrane helical domains inolfactory receptor hOR17-210, a receptor that has been shown to bevariably functional and pseudogenic in humans. TM domainidentification was undertaken as a prelude to modeling this olfactoryreceptor in order to understand its interaction with ligands that havebeen experimentally shown to bind to this receptor. Our analysesrevealed that the N-terminus of this protein is intracellular and the C-terminus is extra-cellular. This reversed polarity in the termini does notdisrupt the positions of typical OR-motifs that initiate the signaltransduction process at the membrane. Our observations are contrary toconventional structural knowledge about ORs and GPCRs. Preliminarysequence analysis studies have shown that such a structure is observedin a limited number of olfactory receptors distributed across differentmammalian species. We present the results of the survey of all knownolfactory receptors and more than 15,000 proteins identified as GPCRs.We also present a methodology for modeling such olfactory receptors.When combined with experimental data, we believe that thisinformation will further our understanding of olfaction.335 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneCHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL HUMAN TESTICULARODORANT RECEPTORTriller A. 1 , Schwane K. 1 , Riffell J.A. 2 , Panten J. 3 , Zimmer R.K. 4 , SpehrM. 5 , Hatt H. 1 1 Cell Physiology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany;2 Neurobiology, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; 3 RD Syntheses NewMolecules FRA, Symrise GmbH, Holzminden, Germany; 4 Ecology andEvolution, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; 5 Anatomy andNeurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore,MDIn addition to their conventional role in nasal chemodetection,members of the odorant receptor (OR) family have been attributed apotential function as molecular mediators of mammalian spermbehavior. Recently, we identified and characterized a human testicularOR, OR1D2 (alternate name: hOR17-4) that triggers chemotactic andchemokinetic responses in navigating sperm. Whether other putativesperm ORs control similar behavioral responses and whether thepopular `one cell–one receptor´ concept also applies to OR expressionin male gametes is currently unknown. Here, we report functionaldescription of a novel human testicular OR. Comparing the activationprofiles of both receptors in a recombinant expression system revealeddistinct non-overlapping receptive fields. Our findings thus provide atool to investigate individual OR-activated signaling mechanisms inmature sperm and determine their specific behavioral effects. Using acombination of calcium imaging and video motion analysis, on-goingstudies show that individual human sperm cells might express severalfunctional ORs which differentially trigger distinct signaling cascadesand behavioral responses. These results provide new insight into thephysiological principles that underlie OR-mediated sperm behaviors.Support: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)336 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneHIGHTHROUGHPUT SCREENING SYSTEM FOROLFACTORY RECEPTORSSallmann F.R. 1 , Wilkin F. 1 , Philippeau M. 1 , Van Osselaer C. 1 , VeithenA. 1 1 ChemCom s.a., Brussels, BelgiumIn human, more than 380 olfactory receptor (OR) genes might berequired to account for the perception of several thousands of odorantmolecules. Exhaustive identification of ligands for each of these ORwould not only allow the understanding of odour recognition anddiscrimination but their use will also represent an essential industrialtool. It will help to discover and design new molecules, and optimize,refine or replace existing molecules by more potent, more appropriateand better protected ones. The design of specific antagonists might alsoallow to mask undesirable smells and achieve a better product profile.Screening programs and the construction of the human olfactory mapcan hardly be considered without a robust and reliable assaytechnology. Chemcom has set up screening procedures making use of aproprietary cell line allowing functional expression of ORs andcontaining an adapted reporter system. The assay was designed to runon a robotized platform, allowing the screening of large chemicallibraries on multiple OR´s. An automated single cell calcium imagingsystem has also been developed. This assay can be used to validateligand-receptor couples but also to screen numerous OR´s againstindividual ligands. Results obtained with both approaches are presented.This work was supported by the Brussels Region.84
337 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE MOUSE ODORANTRECEPTOR MOR42 SUBFAMILYAbaffy T. 1 , Matsunami H. 2 , Luetje C. 1 1 Pharmacology, University ofMiami, Miami, FL; 2 MGM, Duke University, Durham, NCPhylogenetic analysis groups mammalian odorant receptors (ORs)into two broad classes and numerous subfamilies, which may reflectfunctional organization. To investigate the receptive ranges of membersof OR subfamilies, we are using Xenopus oocytes as a heterologousexpression system. A variety of Class I and Class II mouse ORs(MORs) can be expressed in Xenopus oocytes and co-expression withGαolf and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator allowsmeasurement of odorant responses using electrophysiological methods.All receptor constructs included the N-terminal 20 amino acid residuesof human rhodopsin and for 7 out of the 9 MORs tested, this wassufficient for functional expression. Co-expression of accessory proteins(RTP1, RTP2 and REEP1) allowed functional expression of theremaining 2 MORs. We screened the members of the MOR42subfamily against a panel of 31 aliphatic odorants varying in chemicalgroup and carbon chain length. MOR42-1 responded to dicarboxylicacids (C9-C12). MOR42-2 responded to monocarboxylic acids (C7-C10). MOR42-3 responded to dicarboxylic acids (C8-C10) andmonocarboxylic acids (C10-C12). Thus, the receptive range of eachreceptor was unique. However, overlap between the individualreceptive ranges shows that the members of this subfamily arecontributing to one contiguous subfamily receptive range, supportingthe idea that OR subfamilies constitute functional units. Support:MH66038 and DA08102 (CWL), DC05782 (HM)338 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneEXPLORING THE MOLECULAR RECEPTIVE RANGES OFMAMMALIAN ODORANT RECEPTORSRepicky S.E. 1 , Matsunami H. 2 , Luetje C.W. 1 1 Molecular and CellularPharmacology, University of Miami, Miami, FL; 2 MGM, DukeUniversity, Durham, NCEach odorant receptor (OR) is thought to recognize a particular arrayof odorant molecules, termed the molecular receptive range (MRR) ofthe receptor. Several mouse ORs (MORs) have been shown respond tolinear aliphatic compounds. MOR 23-1, 31-4, 32-11, 40-1 and 40-4each respond to octanoic and nonanoic acid. In addition to thesecommon ligands, additional compounds activate one or more of thesereceptors suggesting that each MRR is unique. However, the extent towhich the MRRs of these receptors differ is unclear. We have expressedeach OR in Xenopus oocytes, along with Gαolf and the cystic fibrosistransmembrane regulator (CFTR), allowing measurement of ORfunction using two-electrode voltage clamp. MOR23-1 required anaccessory protein (RTP1) for functional expression, while the otherreceptors did not. We screened each MOR against a panel of 39 odorantcompounds that varied in chemical group and carbon chain length. EachMOR displayed a distinct MRR. For example, MOR40-4 had a narrowMRR, responding well only to 9-, 10- and 11-carbon monocarboxylicacids and the 11-carbon aldehyde. In contrast, MOR23-1 had a broadMRR, responding well to alcohols, aldehydes, monocarboxylic acids,and bromocarboxylic acids with carbon lengths ranging from 6 to 9.Thus, while the MRRs for these receptors show some overlap, the MRRfor each receptor is unique. Support: MH66038 (CWL) DA08102(CWL) and DC05782 (HM).339 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneDECIPHERING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF HUMANOLFACTORY THRESHOLD VARIATIONSMenashe I. 1 , Hasin Y. 1 , Doron L. 1 1 Molecular Genetics, WeizmannInstitute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelHumans are highly variable in their olfactory thresholds. Specificanosmia/hyposmia and specific hyperosmia, the two extremes of thisphenotypic spectrum are documented for dozens of odorants andsuggested to have a genetic basis. Olfactory receptor (OR) segregatingpseudogenes, having both functional and non-functional forms in thehuman population, are excellent candidates to underlie these phenotypes(Menashe et al., Nat. Genet. 2003). To examine this hypothesis, weassessed the olfactory thresholds for 6 diverse odorants (androstenone,isoamyl acetate, isovaleric acid, l-carvone, pentadecalactone and cineol)in 377 individuals, and genotyped the segregating single nucleotidepolymorphism in 30 ORs in this cohort. A strong association was seenbetween three OR genes on chromosome 14 and sensitivity to isovalericacid, suggesting a locus related to specific anosmia. We also examinedthe average individual sensitivity across all odorants. These were foundto span a wide range of >4 orders of magnitude, with differentindividuals having disparate values of average threshold. Such result,which stems from a concordance between odorant thresholds in eachindividual, implies a “general olfactory factor” that governs olfactorythresholds, in parallel to the odorant-specific determinants. Thus, wehave demonstrated that the extensive threshold variation among humanstowards particular odorants is a complex trait, contributed to both byolfactory-receptor-specific variations as well as by potential interindividualdifferences in downstream components in the olfactorysignaling pathway.340 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneIDENTIFICATION OF AMINO ACIDS INVOLVED IN GPROTEIN ACTIVATION BY A MOUSE EUGENOLRECEPTOR, MOR-EGKato A. 1 , Katada S. 1 , Touhara K. 1 1 Department of IntegratedBiosciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, JapanThousands of odorants are recognized and discriminated by olfactoryreceptors (ORs) that belong to seven-transmembrane (TM) G proteincoupledreceptors (GPCRs). Once activated, GPCRs undergoconformational changes that trigger an intracellular signal transductioncascade by activating heterotrimeric G proteins. The aim of this studyis to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying G protein activationby an OR. We have previously shown that a eugenol receptor, mOR-EG, is functionally expressed in HEK293 cells such that odorantresponsiveness is determined by intracellular Ca 2+ increase via cotransfectedGα15 or by an increase in cAMP level via endogenous Gαs.We introduced site-directed mutations within highly-conserved residuesin the third intracellular loop and the C-terminal tail of mOR-EG. Eachmutant was characterized by assays of Ca 2+ and cAMP levels inHEK293 cells. Some mutations resulted in dramatic decreases incAMP production, whereas no effect was observed on Ca 2+ responses.The results suggest that these amino acid residues appear to be involvedin coupling to Gαs but not to Gα15. Next, we introduced mutationswithin the cytosolic half of TM6 to investigate a role of TM6 inreceptor dynamics upon odorant activation. One of mutations exhibiteda dramatic increase in cAMP responsiveness, suggesting that TM6 isinvolved in regulation of G protein-coupling efficiency. The presentstudy is the first to provide insight into the interaction of an OR with Gproteins at the molecular level. [supported by PROBRAIN, Japan]85
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26