349 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneEXPANSION OF THE HONEY BEE ODORANT RECEPTORFAMILY SUPPORTS THE 1 NEURON/1 OR/1 GLOMERULUSMODEL OF INSECT OLFACTIONRobertson H.M. 1 , Wanner K. 1 1 Entomology, University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign, Champaign, ILWe have built 170 odorant receptor (Or) gene models in the drafthoney bee genome sequence, of which about 10 are pseudogenes. Theseinclude a massive subfamily expansion of 157 receptors, including 60 ina perfect tandem array. This number of roughly 160 functional Or genesmatches well the number of glomeruli in the bee antennal lobe atroughly 160-165. This match supports the 1 neuron/1 Or/1 glomerulusmodel of insect olfaction. In stark contrast, bees encode just 10gustatory receptors (Grs), which represent most of the major Grlineages in insects, but with no subfamily expansions. Thus bees haveexpanded their Or repertoire significantly relative to flies (60-80 Ors),perhaps to meet their needs for floral odor recognition in addition totheir use of several pheromones in social communication and chemicalsfor kin recognition. The lack of Gr family expansion relative to the flies(68-76 Grs) might reflect their mutualistic relationship with plants, thusnot needing to detect toxic plant chemicals, as well as their nursing oflarval bees which do not need to forage. Bees might also employ Ors asgustatory receptors when antennating each other and other objects.350 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneDIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION OF LEPIDOPTERANOLFACTORY RECEPTORSAnderson A.R. 1 , Jordan M. 2 , Newcomb R. 2 , Trowell S. 1 1 Entomology,CSIRO, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; 2 GeneTechnologies, HortResearch, Auckland, New ZealandThe ability of organisms to detect and discriminate between manyodours is pivotal to their survival and primarily due to the olfactorysystem. In vertebrates, C.elegans and Drosophila, odorant receptors(OR´s) provide the molecular basis for odor coding and belong to thelarge super family of G-Protein Coupled <strong>Receptors</strong>. In insects, OR´s areextremely diverse across orders and species with the exception of theOr83b homologues. The Or83b receptor exhibits a high level ofsequence conservation across four orders and appears to be required forlocalizing other OR proteins to the dendrites of olfactory neurons. Thegenomes of Drosophila, Anopheles gambiae and Bombyx mori, the silkmoth, are now available for sequence mining. We are mining thegenome of Bombyx for homologues of the known ORs of Drosophilaand Heliothis virescens and also for homologues of novel ORs isolatedexperimentally from other lepidopteran species (Jordan and Newcomb,unpublished). We are particulary interested in the extent to whichspecific OR sequences are conserved within an order or other taxon andthe functional significance of such sequence conservation. We are usingdegenerate RT-PCR to probe for conservation of OR sequences in sixlepidopteran species, besides Bombyx, representing another fivelepidopteran families. RNA in-situ hybridisation and functional studieswill help us to elucidate the functions of the ORs we have identified.351 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneFEMALE SPECIFIC ODORANT RECEPTORS EXPRESSED INTHE ADULT ANTENNAE OF THE SILKMOTH, BOMBYXMORIWanner K.W. 1 , Anderson A.R. 2 , Trowell S. 3 , Theilmann D. 4 , RobertsonH.M. 1 , Newcomb R. 5 1 Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL; 2 School of Biological Sciences, MonashUniversity, Victoria, Victoria, Australia; 3 Entomology, CSIRO, Acton,Australian Capital Territory, Australia; 4 PARC, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada; 5 GeneTechnologies, HortResearch, Auckland, New ZealandOlfaction plays an important role in the life history of insects,including key pest behaviors such as host selection and oviposition byfemale moths. We identified 54 novel scaffolds encoding complete orpartial odorant receptors (Or) from the recently sequenced silkmoth(Bombyx mori, Bm) genome. This brings the total number of knownBmOrs to 60, a number that corresponds well to the approximate 61glomeruli in the silkmoth antennal lobe, supporting the one odorantreceptor- one sensory neuron- one glomerulus model of insect olfaction.Each Or was screened for female biased expression patterns in adultmoth antennae using quantitative PCR. Several Ors were moderatelyfemale biased, 3-10 times more abundant in female as compared to maleantennae. Three were of particular interest since their relativeabundance in female antennae was much greater, 40 to 800 times that ofmale antennae. The complete cDNA sequences of the three femalespecific Ors are currently being cloned and attempts to characterizetheir ligand binding specificity are underway. This work represents animportant step towards elucidating female specific olfactory pathwaysthat are involved in key female specific behaviors in lepidopteranmoths.352 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneSHIFTS IN THE USE OF TWO ALDEHYDES AND THEEVOLUTION OF OLFACTORY COMMUNICATION INHELIOTHINE MOTHSHillier K.N. 1 , Hamilton J. 2 , Horovitz J. 2 , Vickers N. 1 , Gould F.L. 21 Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 2 Entomology, NorthCarolina State University, Raleigh, NCIn heliothine moths, a cosmopolitan group with extant species on 6continents, divergence in olfactory communication is often manifestedby shifts in the use of two secondary, but essential compounds in thepheromone blend: (Z)-9-tetradecenal (Z9-14:Ald) and (Z)-9-hexadecenal (Z9-16:Ald). In several species, Z9-14:Ald has becomeantagonistic to male behavior and in two Helicoverpa species the blendshave shifted to the extreme inasmuch as Z9-16:Ald has become theprimary pheromone component. We seek to understand the geneticcomplexity underlying the shift in male preference for either of thesetwo odorants in the Heliothis virescens/Heliothis subflexa system wheremales have diverged to utilize Z9-14:Ald or Z9-16:Ald respectively.Through behavioral and olfactory studies of hybrid and backcross malesof interbred H. virescens and H. subflexa, we have shown that thepreference for either Z9-14:Ald or Z9-16:Ald is associated with achange in the specificity of peripheral olfactory receptor neurons. QTLanalysis from behaviorally phenotyped backcross males indicated thatmost variation in this character was explained by a single chromosome.Subsequent mapping revealed that the candidate pheromone receptorgene, HR14 (Krieger et al., 2004) also mapped to this samechromosome. In the current studies we report on the behavioral andolfactory phenotypes and genotypes of males generated by recurrentbackcrossing to H. virescens. In these males a single H. subflexachromosome was isolated in an H. virescens background. The resultsindicate that a major gene may play a fundamental role in maleolfactory preference and pheromone blend evolution in heliothine mothspecies. Supported by NSF, IOB-0416861 to NJV.88
353 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromonePHEROMONE RECEPTOR MEDIATES BEHAVIOR INDROSOPHILASmith D. 1 , Ha T. 1 1 Pharmacology, University of Texas SouthwesternMedical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TXInsect pheromones elicit stereotypic behaviors critical to survival andreproduction. The only identified volatile pheromone in Drosophila is11-cis vaccenyl acetate (VA), a male-specific lipid that mediatesaggregation behavior. VA is detected by a few dozen olfactory neuronslocated on the antenna in a subset of trichoid sensilla (T1 sensilla) inboth male and female flies. We previously showed that sensitivity toVA requires LUSH, a non-neuronal secreted protein present in thesensillum lymph bathing the trichoid olfactory neuron dendrites. Herewe identify a neuronal receptor that mediates VA sensitivity expressedexclusively by the T1, VA-sensitive neurons. We report two mutantslacking T1 sensilla and demonstrate that expression of the VA receptoris reduced or eliminated in these mutants. Importantly, we show misexpressionof this receptor in olfactory neurons that are normallyinsensitive to VA confers pheromone sensitivity in a LUSH-dependentmanner. These data provide new insight into the molecular componentsand neuronal basis of volatile pheromone perception in Drosophila.355 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneEVOLUTION OF THE SNMP GENE FAMILY IN THEDIPTERA DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, D.PSEUDOOBSCURA, AND ANOPHELES GAMBIAENichols Z. 1 , Vogt R. 1 1 Biological Sciences, University of SouthCarolina, Columbia, SCSNMPs are membrane bound proteins that associate with olfactoryneurons in lepidoptera and are thought to play some central role in odordetection. SNMPs belong to a larger gene family characterized byhuman CD36. In this study, we have iteratively blasted the genomes ofDrosophila melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and Anopheles gambiaeto identify SNMP/CD36 homologs, finding 12-18 candidates in eachspecies. As the distance between these species differs by an order ofmagnitude (25-50 million years divergence for the two Drosophilaspecies, 220-250 million years divergence from Drosophila to A.gambiae), we have two comparative time scales with which to examinethe evolution of the SNMP family. A neighbor joining tree constructedfrom aligned amino acid sequences suggests that each of the SNMPhomologs found in D. melanogaster has a likely ortholog in D.pseudoobscura with the exception of D. melanogaster CG12789. SinceCG12789 does have a likely ortholog in the A. gambiae SNMPhomologs, we suggest that the related gene was lost in D.pseudoobscura after the divergence of the two Drosophila species.Fewer of the A. gambiae sequences align as orthologs with candidatesfrom the two Drosophila species, unsurprising considering the relativetime since divergence. To further characterize these relationships, a mapwas constructed of intron locations within the aligned amino acidsequences, and a Dollo parsimony tree made by assigning intronlocations a binary value for characters. Both trees have similar structure,providing additional assurance that the phylogeny is reasonable andsuggesting that parsimony trees constructed based in intron locationsare valid.354 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneCHARACTERIZATION OF A DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERCHEMOSENSORY SPECIFIC SNMPFernandez K. 1 , Vogt R. 1 1 Biological Sciences, University of SouthCarolina, Columbia, SCSNMP (Sensory Neuron Membrane Protein; Rogers et al., 1997,2001a,b)) is an antennal specific two transmembrane domain proteinabundantly present in the receptive membrane of olfactory neurons inmoths. SNMP is expressed late in adult development and in adult life,well after morphogenic events have occurred. These temporal andspatial expression patterns suggest SNMP is functionally involved inodor detection, either in odor recognition or clearance. Drosophilamelanogaster contains 13 SNMP homologues; one of these sharessignificant similarity with the moth SNMPs. We have constructed atransgenic fly containing the promoter for this gene; this promoterdrives expression of cd8::GFP, labeling cells ostensibly that express theDrosophila SNMP homologue. Studies of the temporal and spatialpatterns of this protein suggests CG7000 expresses in subsets ofchemosensory (olfactory and gustatory) and mechanosensory neuronsof adults, and chemosensory neurons of larvae. We have also conductedin situ hybridization experiments confirming the validity of thecd8::GFP expression pattern. We have generated double stranded RNAstrains for this gene to knockdown normal expression of CG7000.Behavioral studies will allow us to see whether CG7000 is a suitablecandidate for studying SNMP function as it relates to insect olfaction aswell as studying the roles of diverse SNMP/CD36 homologues in asingle species. Rogers et al. (1997), Journal of Biological Chemistry272, 14792-14804. Rogers et al. (2001a), Cell and Tissue Research 303,433-446. Rogers et al. (2001b), Journal of Neurobiology 49, 47-61.356 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneDROSOPHILA SUGAR RECEPTORSDahanukar A. 1 , Carlson J. 1 1 MCDB, Yale University, New Haven, CTThe sense of taste provides valuable information about the nutritionalquality of food. Like mammals, the fruit fly Drosophila can taste bothattractive and aversive compounds, which are detected via taste neuronson the legs as well as the mouthparts. Gustatory receptor (Gr) genes,which are expressed in these neurons, are members of a large, divergentgene family. Only one of these Gr proteins has been assigned a ligand—previously we have shown that Gr5a is a receptor for the disaccharidesugar trehalose. Gr5a-positive neurons do respond to various othersugars revealing that additional taste receptors are also expressed inthem. Such co-expression of receptors raises intriguing possibilitiesabout the mechanisms of sugar detection and discrimination. To explorethese questions, we sought to identify taste receptors for other sugars.We reasoned that seven Gr genes that are closely related to Gr5a mightencode receptors for other sugars. Consistent with this idea, we find thatat least two of these receptors are expressed in Gr5a neurons. Usingvarious genetic tools we have generated deletion mutations that result inthe loss of multiple receptor genes of the Gr5a sub-family. Analysis ofmutant flies shows that they have electrophysiological or behavioraldefects in their responses to several sugars, including maltose andsucrose, as compared to control flies. Transgenic experiments areunderway to determine the response profiles of individual receptors.Interestingly, we find that some of these deletions have a dramaticeffect on lifespan as well as starvation resistance of mutant flies.Currently, we are investigating further the link between sugar reception,feeding behavior and longevity.89
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37:
sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137: Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26