389 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorSOLITARY NUCLEUS–RETICULAR FORMATIONPROJECTIONS IN A NEONATAL SLICE PREPARATIONNasse J. 1 , Travers J.B. 1 1 Oral Biology, Ohio State University,Columbus, OHData obtained from in vivo studies suggest that projections from therostral nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) to the subjacent reticularformation (RF) constitute a pathway through which taste stimuliinfluence oromotor responses of ingestion and rejection. To furtherinvestigate the underlying neural mechanisms, we conductedanatomical, behavioral and physiological studies to determine if thissubstrate could be studied in vitro. Injections of fluorescentmicrospheres into the hypoglossal nucleus of neonatal rats retrogradelylabeled pre-oromotor neurons in the intermediate zone of the RF (IRt)in a distribution identical to adult rats. Neurons in the RF becameopaque to iDIC microscopy after P14 however, thus limiting the abilityto record from identified neurons in a slice. Although RF neurons inyounger animals were visible under iDIC, it was unclear whether theseyounger animals also produce "adult-like" oromotor behavior. Onestudy suggested that neonatal rats gaped in response to QHCl(Ganchrow, 1986), however another study was more equivocal(Johanson & Shapiro, 1986). Thus, we re-evaluated the capacity of ratsfrom age P2 - P14 to gape in response to QHCl (0.01M). Although notall rats gaped, the likelihood of gaping as well as the magnitude of thegape response increased in a graded manner over time. Lastly, wedetermined from extracellular and patch clamp recordings, that neuronsin the IRt could be excited and suppressed by electrical stimulation ofthe rNST. Because electrical stimulation can elicit both licks and gapesin vivo, this may provide an approach to studying taste-oromotorpathways in a slice preparation. Supported by DC00417390 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorTHE ORGANIZATION OF THE GUSTATORY NEURALNETWORK IN THE HAMSTER BRAINSTEMCho Y.K. 1 , Li C. 2 1 Kangnung National University, Kangnung,Kangwondo, South Korea; 2 Anatomy, Southern Illinois University,Carbondale, ILTaste information elicited from the anterior tongue is first carried tothe nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) and then to the parabrachialnuclei (PbN), from which taste information is further transferred toforebrain gustatory nuclei. In the present study we examined thegustatory neural connectivity among gustatory nuclei in the brainstem.Three recording/stimulating electrode assemblies were used first torecord taste neurons and then electrically stimulate the nuclei in order:left PbN, right PbN and left NST. A fourth electrode, a micro glasscapillary was used to record taste cells in the right NST. A total of 45taste cells were isolated in the PbN and the responsiveness of each cellto electrical stimulation of the contralateral PbN was examined: 5neurons (11%) were antidromically invaded and 9 neurons (20%)responded orthodromically. In the NST, 123 taste cells were isolatedand responses of each NST cell to the stimulation of bilateral PbN weretested. Eighty-one percent of NST taste cells were ipsilateral PbNprojectioncells. The same proportion of NST taste neurons receiveddescending input from the ipsilateral PbN. In contrast, 3 cells sent axonsto the contralateral PbN and 47 NST neurons received descendinginfluence from the contralateral PbN. The influence of the NST tasteneurons to the contralateral NST stimulation was examined from 100NST taste neurons: 58 neurons were activated orthodromically and 11antidromically. These data demonstrate the intricate interconnectionamong the four gustatory nuclei in the brainstem. Supported byNIDCD006623391 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorVAGAL GUSTATORY REFLEX SYSTEMS IN GOLDFISHIkenaga T. 1 , Ogura T. 1 , Finger T.E. 1 1 Cell and Developmental Biology,University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, COIn goldfish, the primary sensory nucleus for vagally mediated taste ispart of a complex laminated lobe. The sensory layers of this lobe areequivalent to the n. solitarius while the motor layers containmotoneurons equivalent to the n. ambiguus. The sensory layers arecoupled to the motor layers via a simple reflex arc homologous to thesolitario-ambigual reflex system of mammals. To detail the morphologyof neurons that form this reflex system in goldfish, the retrograde tracer,biocytin, was injected into the motor zone of in vitro slices. Diverseneurons were retrogradely labeled in the sensory zone, from the surface(layer II-III) to the deepest portion (XI). Most labeled neurons had amonopolar or bipolar soma with radially-directed dendrites branching inlayer IV, VI and IX—the layers of termination of primary vagalgustatory inputs. These projection neurons were organizedtopographically along the dorso-ventral axis, projecting only to theimmediately subjacent motoneurons. In functional imagingexperiments, motor neurons were retrogradely labeled by injections ofcalcium green dextran (Ca ++ indicator) into the vagus nerve. Increasesin Ca ++ followed electrical stimulation in the sensory zone of in vitroslices. These Ca ++ responses were enhanced by application of theGABA A receptor antagonist, bicuculin, suggesting tonic inhibition ofthe reflex pathways by GABAergic systems. Finally, reflex activationof the motoneurons was blocked by application of the glutamateantagonist DNQX suggesting that this gustatory reflex system utilizesglutamate acting on AMPA/kainate receptors as the principalneurotransmitter. Supported by NIH Grant DC 00147 (T.E.F.)392 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorTASTANT-INDUCED C-FOS EXPRESSION IN THE NST OFMICE THAT DON´T TASTEBarrows J.K. 1 , Finger T.E. 1 1 Cell and Developmental Biology,University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, COATP is an essential neurotransmitter coupling taste buds to gustatorynerves. Genetic deletion of the ionotropic purinergic receptor subunitsP2X2 and P2X3 eliminates neural responses to all taste stimuli.However, these P2X2/P2X3 KO mice still avoid citric acid andcaffeine, as well as high concentrations of quinine hydrochloride(QHCL) (Finger et al 2005). We hypothesize that the P2X2/P2X3 KOmice detect some noxious substances via laryngeal and/orpharyngeal/esophogeal solitary chemoreceptor cells. We examinedcFos-like immunoreactivity (c-FLI) in the nucleus of the solitary tract(NST) of P2X2/P2X3 KO mice after stimulation with 1 mM QHCL,150 mM monosodium glutamate (MSG), or water. Water-induced c-FLIdid not differ between P2X2/P2X3 KO mice and wild-type controls.MSG-induced c-FLI was moderately reduced throughout the NST inP2X2/P2X3 KO mice compared to wild-type controls. QHCL-inducedc-FLI was elevated compared to water-induced c-FLI, within the caudalNST of P2X2/P2X3 KO mice, where afferents from the larynx andpharynx terminate. These preliminary results suggest that chemosensoryinput reaches the caudal NST in P2X2/P2X3 KO mice, probably arisingfrom the laryngeal or pharyngeal/esophageal nerves. This input may besufficient to allow the P2X2/P2X3 KO mice to avoid certain tastants.Future directions include intra-oral cannulation to control the volumewashed across the tongue and superior laryngeal nerve transactions inboth P2X2/P2X3 KO mice and controls. Funded by NIH GrantsDC006070, DC00244, P30 DC04657 and RO1 DC007495.98
393 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorTASTE-INDUCED C-FOS EXPRESSION IN THE ROSTRALPORTION OF THE SOLITARY TRACT NUCLEUS OFNEONATAL RATSRubio L. 1 , Frias C. 1 , Regalado M. 1 , Torrero C. 1 , Salas M. 11 Developmental Neurobiology & Neurophysiology, UniversidadNacional Autonoma de Mexico, Queretaro, MexicoTaste-induction of Fos expression in the rostral portion of the solitarytract (NTSr) was previously examined in adults showing that Fosimmunoreactive(FI) cells were prominent in the NTSr, for quininemonohydrochloride (QHCl) in the medial zone of the nucleus while thesucrose (S) elicited FI concentrated in the lateral area, little is knowabout taste stimuli-induced activation of brainstem neurons in neonatalrats. The aim of this study was to compared the distribution of FIfollowing intraoral stimulation with, QHCl, S and NaCl in rats of 5, 15and 25 days of age. Subjects were isolated from the mother 3 h beforethe stimulation and later on the pups were stimulated with some of thefollowing solutions: H 2 0, QHCl 0.03, 0.003 M, S 0.1 M and NaCl 0.1M and 90 min after subjects were anesthetized the brain was removedand processed for Fos immunostaining. Data showed that FI wasincreased in this nucleus in QHCl stimulation at all age compared withS, NaCl and non-stimulated (ANOVA, p < 0.05). No differences werefound in the FI between H 2 0 and NaCl. In the NTSr, FI cells weredistributed mainly in the medial region after QHCl and in the lateralregion after S at all ages. The number of FI cells in the NTSr afterQHCl stimuli peaked on P15 and then decreased on day P25. Data showthat taste-specific responses distribution, are already present at birth andmay change during NTSr maturation. The number of FI in the NTSrbetween neonates and adults might partly depend to the reorganizationof the neuronal circuitry occurring early in life as a result of dietaryexperiences. Supported by: DGAPA/UNAM, IN 210903 andCONACYT 503001915.394 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorDIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF CROSS-REGENERATION OFTHE LINGUAL GUSTATORY NERVES ON QUININE-STIMULATED GAPING AND FOS-LIKEIMMUNOREACTIVITY IN THE NUCLEUS OF THESOLITARY TRACTKing C.T. 1 , Garcea M. 2 , Stolzeberg D.S. 1 , Spector A.C. 2 1 Psychology,Stetson Univ, DeLand, FL; 2 Psychology & Center for Smell and Taste,Univ of Florida, Gainesville, FLAn intact glossopharyngeal nerve (GL) is essential for normalunconditioned quinine-stimulated gaping behavior and fos-likeimmunoreactivity (FLI) in the gustatory nucleus of the solitary tract(gNST), especially in the medial-dorsal subfield (MD). Transection ofthe GL, but not the chorda tympani nerve (CT), attenuates gapingbehavior and MD-FLI in response to quinine, which is restored uponGL nerve regeneration In this study, the GL and CT were crossregenerated.Some rats had the central CT-stump sutured to theperipheral GL-stump (CT→PosteriorT); other rats received theconverse surgery (GL→AnteriorT). Histological analysis of taste budsconfirmed nerve regeneration. Numbers of gapes elicited by 3mMquinine in CT→PosteriorT (n = 5) and sham-operated (SHAM-Q, n = 5)rats were similar and significantly higher than those observed in waterstimulatedcontrols (SHAM-W, n = 6), while the number of quininestimulatedgapes in GL→AnteriorT rats (n = 6) was comparable to thatobserved in SHAM-W rats. Likewise, quinine-stimulated MD-FLI inCT→PosteriorT and SHAM-Q rats was comparable and significantlyhigher than MD-FLI in both SHAM-W and quinine-stimulated GL→AnteriorT rats at the most rostral level of the gNST. These findingssuggest that unconditioned quinine-induced gaping and MD-FLI in therostral gNST are more dependent on the taste receptor field stimulatedthan on the nerve that transmits the signal. Support: NIDCD R01-DC01628395 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorLICKING AND GAPING ELICITED BY NSTMICROSTIMULATIONKinzeler N.R. 1 , Travers S.P. 2 1 Psychobiology & BehavioralNeuroscience, Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH; 2 Oral Biology, OhioState Univ, Columbus, OHBitter compounds evoke a distinct distribution of Fos-likeimmunoreactive cells (FLI) concentrated in dorsomedial rNST. IXthnerve section, but not decerebration disrupts this pattern, paralleling theconsequences of these manipulations on oral rejection behavior(gaping), thus suggesting that the region of Fos expression defines anafferent trigger zone for bitter-elicited protective reflexes. We testedthis using rNST microstimulation. Microelectrodes and intraoralcannulae were implanted under electrophysiological guidance. Ratswere tested with taste (0.3 M sucrose & 3 mM quinine) and electricalstimulation (0.2 ms biphasic pulses, 100 Hz) at varying intensities (5-40µA) and durations (0.1–24.3 s), and then 30 mM quinine was infused toelicit FLI. NST microstimulation was effective for eliciting licking andgaping, and the amount of oral behavior was a positive function ofcurrent intensity and duration. Licking was elicited in most (7/8)animals with placements in rNST, but gaping was observed in half(4/8). 2/4 rats had a lower threshold for licking than gaping but thereverse was never true. Correlations between the number of gapes anddistance from the densest FLI failed to reveal a systematic relationship(r = -.25, P > 0.1). Interestingly, however, only one subject had aplacement centered in the FLI, and this was the single instance wheregaping was the dominant behavior. These results suggest that thesubstrate for gaping involves neurons with a more limited anatomicalextent and perhaps a higher threshold than for licking, but defining thecritical topography requires further investigation. Supported byDC00417 and T32-DE014320.396 Poster Central Taste and <strong>Chemosensory</strong> BehaviorMELANIN CONCENTRATING HORMONE INCREASESBRIEF-ACCESS LICKING FOR SUCROSE AND WATER BUTNOT QUININE HYDROCHOLORIDEBaird J.P. 1 , Rios C. 1 , Walsh C.E. 2 , Pecora A.L. 1 1 Psychology &Neuroscience, Amherst College, Amherst, MA; 2 Psychology, SmithCollege, Northampton, MAPreviously we showed that 3V melanin concentrating hormone(MCH) injections (5 µg) increased sucrose intake by increasing lick rateearly in the meal and the mean lick-burst size, suggesting enhancedgustatory evaluation. Therefore, we evaluated brief-access (20 s) lickingfor water, sucrose and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl) solutions afterMCH/vehicle treatment. Under vehicle, licking for sucrose increasedmonotonically with concentration (0.015 M to 1 M). Licking for weakconcentrations of QHCl (0.001 mM-0.03 mM) was comparable to thatfor water, but declined exponentially across the three strongestconcentrations (0.1 mM-1 mM). MCH uniformly increased licking forall concentrations of sucrose, and water (p < 0.001). When sucroseresponses were standardized to water, the effect was completely lost,indicating that although MCH increased avidity for the tastants, it notdid modify the concentration response function. These results areconsistent with the effects of food deprivation on licking for sucroseand water in brief access tests. MCH also increased responding forwater and weak concentrations of QHCl, but it had no effect on lickingfor the three strongest concentrations of QHCl. Therefore, MCH didnot produce non-specific increases in oromotor activity, and it did notchange the perceived intensity of the tastants. We conclude that MCHenhances the gain of responses to normally-accepted stimuli at a phaseof processing that occurs after the initial gustatory apprasial and afterthe decision to accept or reject the taste stimulus. [Supported byAmherst College, Howard Hughes Medical Institute & DC-05326]99
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37:
sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39:
149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41:
157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43:
165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45:
173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47:
181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137: Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138: Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26