109 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalCEREBRAL ACTIVATION IN PD DURING OLFACTORYSTIMULATION—AN FMRI STUDYWelge-Lüssen A. 1 , Westermann B. 1 , Wattendorf E. 1 , Uta S. 1 , Peter F. 1 ,Wolfensberger M. 2 , Hummel T. 3 , Bilecen D. 1 1 University HospitalBasel, Basel, Switzerland; 2 Otorhinolaryngology, University HospitalBasel, Basel, Switzerland; 3 University of Dresden, Dresden, Saxony,GermanyObjectives: Olfactory dysfunction is common in patients withParkinson´s disease (PD). The cerebral systems however being involvedin the olfactory disorder in PD are still largely unknown. Methods: In12 PD patients and 16 age-matched healthy controls olfactory functionwas evaluated using psychophysical testing (Sniffin´Sticks test battery)and functional (f)MRI. In both experiments, olfactory stimuli(phenylethylalcohol, PEA) were separately applied to the left and rightnostril using a computer-controlled dynamic olfactometer (OM2S;Burghart, Germany). Statistical analysis of functional images wasperformed using SPM2. Results: In contrast to controls, in PD patients,activation was almost exclusively observed during left-sidedstimulation. In PD left-lateralized activation was observed in theamygdala, the hippocampal formation, and in region of the inferiorparietal lobe. Direct contrasts between both groups revealed reducedactivity in the inferior parietal lobe in PD patients. Conclusions:Olfactory stimulation produced distinct patterns of activation in PDwith a prevalence for left-sided activation. Olfactory stimuli in PDpatients seem not to be sufficient to gain bilateral access to olfactoryprocessing even in the amygdala, a primary olfactory relay. A reducedinterhemispheric exchange could explain the lateralized activity inregions of the inferior parietal lobe in PD patients. SNF 3100-068282110 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalIMPAIRMENTS IN SOURCE MEMORY FOR OLFACTORYSTIMULI IN PRECLINICAL GENE CARRIERS OFHUNTINGTON´S DISEASEPirogovsky E. 1 , Rice J. 1 , Mekrut A. 1 , Vallejo F. 1 , Brushfield A.M. 1 ,Gilbert P.E. 1 , Murphy C. 1 1 Psychology, San Diego State University, SanDiego, CASource and item memory for olfactory and visual stimuli wereexamined in 10 pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease (HD) genecarriers and 10 controls. During the study phase, a male and a femaleexperimenter (sources) presented odors and objects to the participant inan alternating sequence. To assess item memory, the participant chosebetween a stimulus from the study phase and a novel stimulus. Toassess source memory, the participant identified whether the male orfemale experimenter had previously presented the stimulus. The presentstudy also assessed odor detection in gene carriers and controls. Nosignificant differences were detected between gene carriers and controlsin source memory for visual stimuli. However, source memory forolfactory stimuli was impaired in gene carriers compared to controls.Gene carriers and controls did not differ in item memory for olfactoryor visual stimuli. In odor detection, gene carriers were significantlyimpaired compared to controls. The effect size for the olfactory sourcememory result was notably higher than the effect size for the odorthreshold finding. This suggests an important cognitive component inaddition to the olfactory sensory impairment in gene carriers. Overall,these results suggest that source memory for olfactory stimuli may beparticularly sensitive to neuropathological changes in preclinical stagesof HD. Supported by NIH grant #AG04085 to CM. We thank the UCSDHD Clinical Research Group for their contribution.111 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalOLFACTORY IDENTIFICATION AS A FUNCTION OF APOE-STATUS IN NON-DEMENTED ADULTS: EVIDENCE FROM APOPULATION-BASED SAMPLEOlofsson J.K. 1 , Nordin S. 1 , Larsson M. 2 , Cruts M. 3 , Adolfsson R. 4 ,Sleegers K. 3 , Van Broeckhoven C. 3 , Nilsson L. 2 1 Psychology, UmeåUniversity, Umeå, Sweden; 2 Psychology, Stockholm University,Stockholm, Sweden; 3 Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp,Antwerp, Belgium; 4 Clinical sciences and Psychiatry, Umeå University,Umeå, SwedenThe ε-4 allele of the ApoE gene is a well-established risk factor forAlzheimer´s disease (AD). Having one or two ε-4 alleles is associatedwith impairment in cued odor identification, a test that therefore mightindicate AD at a preclinical stage. The present study investigates theApoE gene´s influence on odor identification ability in a largepopulation-based sample (N = 1572) of individuals screened fordementia at 5 years post-test. The sample was divided into a middleaged (45-60) and an elderly (65-80) group. Results show that ApoE ε-4is associated with poor odor identification ability which is morepronounced in elderly males. We also show that homozygotic ε-4carriers (two ε-4 alleles) display poorer odor identification ability thanheterozygotic ε-4 carriers (one ε-4 allele) at older age, but not at middleage. The present findings provide evidence that elderly individuals withhigh and low genetic risk of developing AD can be differentiated on thebasis of olfactory identification ability. Sponsored by the Bank ofSweden Tercentenary Foundation, The Swedish Council for Planningand Coordination of Research, the Swedish Research Council, and theSwedish Council for Working Life and Social Research to L.-G.N.112 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalLONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF SMELLIDENTIFICATION DEFICITS IN PATIENTS WITH MILDCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTTabert M. 1 , Albers M. 2 , Liu X. 3 , Devanand D. 4 1 New York StatePsychiatric Institute and Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York,NY; 2 Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY; 3 Biostatistics,Columbia University, New York, NY; 4 Columbia University and the NewYork State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NYPatients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Mild CognitiveImpairment (MCI) consistently exhibit smell identification deficitsrelative to healthy control subjects in cross sectional studies. Fewlongitudinal studies have directly examined the evolution of thesedeficits over time in AD or MCI patients relative to elderly controls. Ina prospective study of putative predictors of conversion to AD in MCIpatients, we administered the University of Pennsylvania SmellIdentification test (UPSIT) to 150 MCI patients (40 converters to AD onfollow-up evaluation and 110 non-converters) and 63 group-matchedhealthy controls at baseline (BL), 2-year follow-up, and 4-year followupevaluations. Two- and 4-year test-retest reliability of UPSIT scoresfor the entire sample of controls and patients was high (BL to 2 year, r =0.86; 2-year to 4-year, r = 0.87; and BL to 4-year, r = 0.74). All groupsdemonstrated significant (p < 0.05) declines in mean UPSIT scoresacross successive test intervals. Using ANOVA, a two-way group bytest interval interaction revealed that patients who converted to ADshowed significantly greater decline across test intervals than didhealthy controls or non-converting patients (p < 0.001), even afteradjusting for group differences in age (p = 0.001). These findingsdemonstrate that the UPSIT is sensitive to the evolution of smellidentification deficits over time as a function of normal aging and earlyAlzheimer's disease. Supported by NIA: AG1776128
113 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalSPECIFIC EFFECTS OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON TASTEIDENTIFICATIONWang M. 1 , Marks L.E. 1 , Gent J. 2 , Frank M.E. 3 1 John B. PierceLaboratory, New Haven, CT; 2 Epidemiology & Public Health, YaleUniversity, New Haven, CT; 3 Oral Health & Diagnostic Sciences,University of Connecticut, Farmington, CTChlorhexidine, a bitter bis-biguanide, depresses the salty and bittertastes (Frank et al., 2000). We tested 13 human subjects to see howpretreatment with two different concentrations of chlorhexidinegluconate, 1 mM and 3 mM, affects the ability to identify an ensembleof 10 taste stimuli, each presented 10 times. Stimuli were equalperceived-intensitysolutions of NaCl, quinine.HCl, sucrose, citric acid,mixtures of all possible pairs except sucrose + citric acid, and water.Two information theoretic measures, transmitted information in theentire 10x10 taste confusion matrix (T 10 ) and transmitted informationfor each pair of stimuli (T 2 ), served to quantify overall performance andpairwise stimulus discriminability, respectively. Both concentrations ofchlorhexidine depressed discriminability relative to pretreatment withwater in 12 of the 45 pairs compared (p ≤ 0.0001). 3 mM chlorhexidinehad a greater effect than did 1 mM chlorhexidine (p = 0.03). Asexpected, pretreatment with chlorhexidine affected performance withNaCl and quinine (Gent et al., 2002). In each case in whichchlorhexidine depressed pairwise discriminability, one or both of thestimuli contained NaCl and/or quinine. Moreover, chlorhexidinedepressed discriminations of NaCl, quinine, and NaCl + quinine fromwater, but not discriminations of sucrose or citric acid from water. Thus,concentration did not have a differential effect: 3 mM chlorhexidineinterfered with taste identification more than did 1 mM chlorhexidinebut the effect remained specific to NaCl and quinine. [Supported byNIH grant DC04849]114 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalOLFACTORY FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH POST-INFECTIOUS AND POST-TRAUMATIC SMELL DISORDERSBEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT WITH VITAMIN A: ADOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZEDCLINICAL TRIALLill K. 1 , Reden J. 1 , Müller A. 1 , Zahnert T. 1 , Hummel T. 1 1 Department ofOtorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Germany,Dresden, GermanyIntroduction: The presented data is based on a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial for investigation oneffectiveness of vitamin A in post-infectious and post-traumatic smelldisorders. The effect is probably based on the stimulation ofregeneration and repair of the peripheral olfactory system. Material andmethods: A total of 60 patients (age: 20-70 years, mean age: 52 years)participated 26 of whom received placebo (7 male, 19 female) andanother 26 verum (6 male, 20 female). A standardized history wasobtained in each patient. Olfactory function was measured by means ofthe “Sniffin´Sticks“ test kit, a validated technique to investigate odortresholds, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Vitamin A wasprescribed at a dose of 10.000 I.U./d for 3 months. Follow-up testingwas performed on average 5 months after the first investigation.Results: Forty-four percent of all patients reported subjective recoveryof their sense of smell; 27% of the participants exhibited significantimprovement in measured olfactory function. However, there was nosignificant difference between the outcome of patients receiving verumor placebo. Conclusion: The application of vitamin A at a dose of10.000 I.U./d for 3 months does not appear to be useful in the therapy ofolfactory loss.115 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalSEROTONIN AND NORADRENALINE DIFFERENTIALLYMODULATE TASTE SENSITIVITY IN HUMANSHeath T.P. 1 , Melichar J.K. 2 , Donaldson L.F. 1 1 Department ofPhysiology, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, United Kingdom;2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, UnitedKingdomTo determine the effect of altering serotonin and noradrenaline levelson taste sensitivity in humans a series of quinine, sucrose and sodiumchloride and hydrochloric acid solutions were presented to the tip of thetongue in 20 healthy human subjects. The subjects indicated whether ornot they could recognise the taste stimuli at each concentration. Eachvolunteer was then given a single acute dose of either paroxetine(serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor), reboxetine (noradrenalinereuptake inhibitor) or placebo (lactose), in a double blind cross-overdesign. Taste recognition tests were performed again 2 hours after drugadministration. Psychophysical taste function curves were constructedfor the group for each taste modality before and after drug intervention.Paroxetine significantly increased quinine [threshold 30.4 µM (24 µMto 38 µM 95% CI) before, 14.4 µM (11 µM to 19 µM 95% CI) after; p< 0.0001] and sucrose [threshold 23.4 mM (21 mM to 27 mM 95% CI)before, 16.6 mM (14 mM to 19 mM 95% CI) after; p < 0.001] tastesensitivity. Reboxetine significantly increased quinine taste sensitivity[threshold 30.8 µM (24 µM to 39 µM 95% CI) before, 19.4 µM (15 µMto 26 µM 95% CI) after; p < 0.02] but had no effect on sucrose acuity.NaCl and HCl taste responses were not affected by either drug. Placebohad no significant effects on any taste modality. Our findings support adifferential, modality specific neuromodulatory role for serotonin andnoradrenaline in human taste perception. Experiments complied withUK legislation and funded by the Dept of Physiology and AWP NHSTrust.116 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalOLFACTORY DEFICITS IN ALCOHOLISM: ASSOCIATIONWITH IMPAIRED EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONRupp C.I. 1 , Fleischhacker W. 1 , Drexler A. 1 , Hausmann A. 1 , HinterhuberH. 1 , Kurz M. 1 1 Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck MedicalUniversity, Innsbruck, AustriaOlfactory dysfunctions are common in patients with chronicalcoholism. Brain regions implicated in the neuropathology ofalcoholism overlap with those involved in olfaction. The goal of thepresent study was to investigate whether deficits in olfactory functionsare related to cognitive deficits in neuropsychological tasks, which aresuggested to represent sensitive measures of frontal and medialtemporallobe functioning. We assessed olfactory functions (Sniffin'Sticks), executive function and memory in patients with a diagnosis ofalcohol dependence and healthy control subjects, comparable in age,gender and smoking. Patients performed more poorly than controls intheir ability to detect an odor in low concentrations, to discriminatebetween qualitatively different odors, and to identify odors. Comparedto controls, patients were also impaired in both neuropsychologicaldomains (executive function and memory). In patients, olfactorydiscrimination ability was positively correlated with executive functionperformance. Regression analyses indicated that group was the onlysignificant predictor of olfactory detection threshold and identification,and both, group and executive function were found to be the significantpredictors of olfactory discrimination. Results support the assumptionthat olfactory deficits in alcohol-dependent patients may not beexplained with cognitive deficits. Our findings suggest that deficits inolfactory discrimination ability may be associated with frontal lobedysfunction in chronic alcoholism.29
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26