269 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyIN VIVO TWO-PHOTON IMAGING OF MITRAL CELL ODORRESPONSIVENESSNagayama S. 1 , Zeng S. 1 , Fletcher M.L. 1 , Xiong W. 1 , Chen W.R. 11 Department of Neurobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CTRecent advances in molecular biology and functional imaging haveestablished that odor information is represented as spatial patterns ofactivated glomeruli on the olfactory bulb surface. How these glomerularcoding patterns are subsequently transformed into the mitral-cellensemble output has emerged as a next critical question forunderstanding odor discrimination and recognition. To date, no directcomparison has been made between odor-evoked glomerular activityand its corresponding mitral cell output. In an effort to address thisissue, we have carried out in vivo imaging of odor responses both fromolfactory glomeruli and individual mitral cells. The odorants tested inthis study were a homologous series of aliphatic aldehydes. Thealdehyde-evoked glomerular activity pattern was imaged with the OMPsynapto-pHluorinmice originally developed in Peter Mombaerts´laboratory. Mitral cells in these GFP mice were labeled with a calciumsensitiveindicator. By taking advantage of deep-tissue imaging of twophotonmicroscopy, we were able to trace the glomerular projection ofindividual mitral cells, and then characterized odor responses of theseneurons with known glomerular identity. This approach revealedoptically the excitatory molecular receptive range of individual mitralcells in the dorsal olfactory bulb. The odorant receptive range of amitral cell was found to be similar to that of the correspondingglomerulus. These results suggest a tight functional coupling between aglomerulus and its associated mitral cells. We are currently exploringthe conditions under which a mitral cell could have a different odorresponseprofile from its glomerulus. Supported by an NIH grant(DC003918).270 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyNEUROANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONALCHARACTERIZATION OF MOR-EG GENE-TARGETED MICE: AXON CONVERGENCE AND ODORANT RESPONSESKatada S. 1 , Oka Y. 1 , Omura M. 1 , Yoshihara Y. 2 , Touhara K. 11 Department of Integrated Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba,Japan; 2 RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, JapanWe recently identified the odorant-binding site of a mouse eugenolreceptor, mOR-EG, providing the structural basis for olfactory receptors(ORs) that recognize broad but selective ligand spectrum [1]. Wecreated three transgenic mouse lines in which olfactory sensory neuronsexpressing mOR-EG co-expressed gap-EGFP. The zonal distribution ofthe fluorescent neurons was conserved in all these transgenic lines,whereas aberrant axonal projections to the olfactory bulb were detectedin two lines. A gene-targeting approach was also applied to visualizethe glomerular convergence of endogenous mOR-EG neurons by X-galstaining, and we compared axon convergence of mOR-EG neurons ingene-targeted mice with that in transgenic lines. To examine odorantresponses in these genetically modified mice, we utilized c-Fos as aneuronal activity marker. Eugenol induced c-Fos expression inperiglomerular cells and granule cells around the endogenous mOR-EGglomeruli as well as minor mOR-EG glomeruli observed in thetransgenic mice. The eugenol-response pattern in the olfactory bulbdetermined by c-Fos induction correlated well with that obtained by acalcium imaging method. [1] Katada et al. (2005) J. Neurosci. 25,1806-1815. Supported by PROBRAIN, Japan.271 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyRESPONSE SPECIFICITY OF OLFACTORY FOREBRAINUNITS IN THE CHANNEL CATFISH TO AMINO ACIDSNikonov A.A. 1 , Caprio J. 1 1 Biological Sciences, Louisiana StateUniversity, Baton Rouge, LAWe previously described the odotopic maps of both the olfactory bulb(OB) (J. Neurophysiol. 86:1869-1876, 2001) and forebrain (FB) (PNAS102:18688-18693, 2005) in the channel catfish to amino acids (AA),nucleotides and bile salts. We now report on the specificity of FB unitsto AA and how it compares to that determined for OB units (J.Neurophysiol. 92:123-134, 2004). All recordings were performed invivo within the AA zone of the FB, and only excitatory responses arereported. As in the OB, FB units of both high (Group I) and lower(Group II) specificities were obtained. Both Group I FB and Group IOB units were excited by only one of three major types of AA: (1)neutral L-amino acids with short side-chains (e.g. Ala or Ser), (2)neutral amino acids with long side-chains (e.g. Met) and (3) basicamino acids (e.g. Arg); responses to acidic AA (e.g. Glu) were scarce atboth OB and FB levels. FB units were excited by a lower (~1 log unit)concentration than were OB units, but dose-response functions weresimilar. The more broadly-tuned Type II FB units showed a broaderspecificity than the Type II OB units. In addition, complex units wereidentified in the FB, but not the OB, that were excited by differentclasses of AA and by nucleotides (feeding stimuli). Supported by NSFIBN-0314970 and NIH DC-03792.272 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologySELECTIVITY OF BILE SALT RESPONSIVE NEURONS INTHE OLFACTORY BULB OF THE CHANNEL CATFISHRolen S. 1 , Caprio J. 1 1 Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University,Baton Rouge, LAAn odotopic map of biologically relevant odorants (bile salts, aminoacids and nucleotides) exists in the olfactory bulb (OB) of channelcatfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Nikonov and Caprio, J. Neurophysiol.86:1869-1876, 2001). We previously reported that OB neurons of thisregion were (1) selectively excited by bile salts that were nonconjugatedat carbon 24, (2) selectively excited by bile salts thattaurine-conjugated at C24, or (3) generalists that were excited by (1),(2), and glycine-conjugated (C24) bile salts. Previous behavioral studiessuggest that bile salts are socially relevant odorants in fishes. Thepresent report indicates that OB neurons are selective for particularcombinations of molecular features located at three additional carbonpositions (C3, C7, C12) along the perhydrocyclopentanophenanthrenering. OB neurons previously categorized as (1) and (2) show additionalselectivity for hydroxylation (or lack thereof) at C7 and C12 andhydroxylation at C3; other category (2) units require sulfonation at C3.Further, the data suggest that the majority of category (3) neuronsrespond excitedly to hydroxylation at C7 in combination withhydroxylation at C3 (irrespective of the molecular feature of C24).Olfactory thresholds of OB neurons to conjugated bile salts were lower(0.01-1 µM) than those to non-conjugated bile salts (1-10 µM).Supported by NSF IBN-0314970 and NIH DC-03792.68
273 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyPATTERN RECOGNITION FOR OPTICAL MICROBEADARRAYS WITH A NEUROMORPHIC MODEL OF THEOLFACTORY BULBRaman B. 1 , Kotseroglou T. 2 , Lebl M. 2 , Clark L. 2 , Gutierrez-Osuna R. 11 Computer Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX;2 Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CAWe present a biologically-inspired approach for sensor-basedmachine olfaction that combines a prototype chemical detection systembased on microbead array technology with a computational model ofsignal processing in the olfactory bulb. The sensor array containshundreds of microbeads coated with solvatochromic dyes adsorbed in,or covalently attached on, the matrix of various microspheres. Whenexposed to odors, each bead sensor responds with intensity changes,spectral shifts and time-dependent variations associated with thefluorescent sensors. The microbead array responses are subsequentlyprocessed using a computational model that captures two key functionsin the early olfactory pathway: chemotopic convergence of receptorneurons onto glomeruli, and center on-off surround lateral interactionsmediated by granule cells. The first circuit, based on Kohonen selforganizingmaps, is used to perform dimensionality reduction,transforming the high-dimensional microbead array response into anorganized spatial pattern (i.e., an odor image). The second circuit,based on Grossberg´s additive model, is used to enhance the contrast ofthese spatial patterns, improving the separability of odors. The model isvalidated on an experimental dataset containing the response of a largearray of microbead sensors to five different analytes. Our resultsindicate that the model is able to improve the separability between odorpatterns compared to that available at the receptor or glomerular levels.274 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyMICROELECTRODE ARRAY ANALYSIS OF ODORANT-EVOKED SPATIAL ACTIVITY PATTERNS IN PIRIFORMCORTEXRennaker R. 1 , Ruyle A. 1 , Chen C.F. 2 , Wilson D.A. 2 1 Aerospace andMechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK;2 Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OKMost sensory cortices incorporate a spatial dimension in the encodingof stimulus identity, resulting for example, in retinotopic, somatotopicand tonotopic patterns of cortical evoked activity. While a form ofodotopic patterning exists in the olfactory bulb, the evidence for spatialencoding of odorant identity in the piriform cortex is less clear (cf. Zouet al., 2005 and Illig & Haberly, 2003). Here, we used simultaneous unitrecordings across large regions of anterior piriform cortex (aPCX) tofurther examine cortical spatial odorant coding. Simultaneousrecordings of single- and multi-unit activity across large regions ofaPCX were performed using fixed microelectrode arrays of 6-8electrodes nominally spaced at 250-500µ apart, and/or extraction ofmultiple single-units recorded from a single microelectrode in urethaneanesthetizedrats. Spontaneous activity, phase locking to respiration,and odorant-evoked activity were analyzed. Odorants included avariety of monomolecular esters, and more complex lemon andpeppermint. Analyses of both small (units near a single electrode) andlarge scale (1-2 mm) spatial patterns were performed. Initial resultssuggest" (1) An individual odorant can activate widely spaced neuronsthroughout the aPCX, and conversely nearby neurons may not respondto the same odorants. (2) Highly volatile (more intense) odorantsactivate larger regions of aPCX, perhaps through caudal expansion.Additional analyses of both spatial and temporal patterning on smalland large scales will be presented. Funded by a grant from NIDCD.275 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyOLFACTORY EXPERIENCE DE-CORRELATES ENCODINGOF MIXTURES FROM COMPONENTS IN RAT PIRIFORMCORTEXKadohisa M. 1 , Wilson D.A. 1 1 Zoology, University of Oklahoma,Norman, OKOlfactory system encoding of odors has been hypothesized to besimilar to visual object encoding. Perceptual odor objects arehypothesized to be synthesized by central circuits through experience.We tested whether experience with an odor mixture would enhance thedistinctiveness of cortical coding of the mixture compared to itscomponents. Rats were trained in a Go, No-Go odor discrimination taskwhere the S+ was a mixture of acetic acid, limonene and eugenol. S-odorants were the individual components or clean air. After reachingbehavioral performance criterion, rats were urethane-anesthetized andsingle-unit recordings made from anterior piriform cortex. Odor naïverats served as controls. Responses to the mixture and components, aswell as the novel odor isoamyl acetate were analyzed. The proportion ofodor responsive cells, odor response magnitude, and correlationanalyses of population odor responses were determined. The resultssuggest that odor experience reduces average aPCX odor-evokedresponse magnitude to all odorants tested, similar to results reported forthe olfactory bulb (Buonviso & Chaput, 2000). Importantly, odorexperience produced a significant de-correlation between corticalresponses to the mixture and its individual components. Responsecorrelations within pairs of the components were either unchanged orenhanced. These results suggest that cortical encoding of the mixturebecomes more distinct from its components through experience,perhaps contributing to reported experiential effects on mixtureperception and impaired ability to identify components within mixtures.Supported by NIDCD.276 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL, BEHAVIORAL ANDCOMPUTATIONAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FUNCTIONALROLE OF SYNAPTIC ADAPTATION IN OLFACTORYCORTEXLinster C. 1 , Kadohisa M. 2 , Wilson D.A. 2 1 Cornell University, Ithaca,NY; 2 Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OKSegmentation of target odorants from background odorants is afundamental computational requirement for the olfactory system.Recent data from our lab (DAW) have shown that odor specificadaptation in piriform neurons, mediated at least partially by synapticadaptation between the olfactory bulb outputs and piriform cortexpyramidal cells, may provide an ideal mechanism for odor-backgroundsegmentation. This rapid synaptic adaptation acts as a high-pass filter toenhance cortical responsivity to changing stimuli, while reducingresponsivity to static, potentially background stimuli. Interestingly, theadaptation observed at the level of pyramidal cell is very odor specific,while that observed at the synaptic level is specific only to certain odorfeatures.Using previously developed computational models of theolfactory system (CL), we here show how synaptic plasticity andassociative memory function within piriform cortex interacts withsynaptic adaptation at the olfactory bulb input to create odor specificadaptation, and in turn contribute to background segmentation. In thecomputational model, we also test how known physiological effects ofacetylcholine in piriform cortex contribute to the cholinergicmodulation of this odor specific adaptation. Supported by NSF grant#0338981 to CL and DAW69
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26