317 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneINFUSIONS OF LIDOCAINE IN THE ACCESORYOLFACTORY BULB (AOB) REDUCE SEXUAL INCENTIVEMOTIVATION IN MALE RATSHurtazo H.A. 1 , Agmo A. 2 , Paredes R.G. 1 1 Instituto de Neurobiología,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico;2 Department of Psychology, University of Tromso, Tromso, NorwayOlfaction is important for the correct display of sexual behavior. Theaim of the present study was to determine if a temporary inactivation ofthe accesory olfactory bulb (AOB) inhibits sexual incentive motivationand copulatory behavior in male rats. Sexual incentive motivation wasevaluated in an arena where incentive animals (a sexually receptivefemale and a stud male) were located at diagonally opposing cornersand confined behind a wire mesh. The parameters registered were: timein and frequency of visits to an area adjacent to the incentives. Subjectswere also tested for sexual behavior with receptive females. Subjectswere tested twice before being bilaterally implanted with a guidecannulae aimed above the AOB. One week after surgery, the animalswere tested again three times in both tests. First without anymanipulation then with saline or lidocaine (1 µl of lidocaine at 10%)infused into the AOB in random order. Cannula placements wereverified using standard histological procedures. Injections of lidocaineprolonged mount and intromission latencies and reduce the time spentnear the receptive female. These results suggest that reduced preferencefor a receptive female after AOB inactivation can be explained as aconsequence of reduced incentive value of the female. Howeverdetailed studies are necessary to dissociate between reduce sexualmotivation and lack of olfactory integration. Sponsored by CONACYT28039N, DGAPA IN228199318 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneVNO/AOB FUNCTION IN THE ABSENCE OF MOB INPUTFROM OLFACTORY EPITHELIUMSlotnick B. 1 , Restrepo D. 2 , Lin W. 2 , Sanguino A. 1 , Schellinck H. 3 ,Archbold G. 3 , Marquino G. 1 1 Psychology, University of South Florida,Tampa, FL; 2 Cellular Biology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO;3 Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaIn separate experiments with male mice we determined that: 1.Transport of HRP*WGA from OE to MOB is completely blocked for 5or more days after syringing nasal epithelium with 50 µl of 5% ZnSO 4 .This treatment had no apparent effect on anterograde transport fromVNO to AOB. 2. Treatment had little or no effect on EVOG response toliquid application of mouse urine or 2-heptanone to the VNO. 3.Application of mouse urine to the naris of awake mice induced strongFos protein expression in glomeruli as well as mitral and granule celllayers in the AOB. 4. Despite this evidence for a functional VNO/AOBsystem in the absence of OE input to the MOB, treated mice givenextensive pre-training in an olfactometer to detect the vapor of ethylacetate, methyl benzoate, mouse urine and 2-heptanone were anosmic tothese odors. 5. Nevertheless, some mice given extensive fightingexperience continued to engage in vigorous aggressive behavior aftertreatment. This is in contrast to the total absence of aggression inolfactory bulbectomized mice. Thus, in the absence of MOB activation,VNO sampling may occur in the presence of appropriate speciesspecificsocial signals but does not occur to (or does not supportdetection of) olfactometric presentations of vapors from knownpheromonal and non-pheromonal stimuli. Supported in part by NIHgrants DC04671 (BS), DC006828 (WL) and DC0056 and DC006070(DR).319 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneVOLATILE, SEX-SPECIFIC URINARY ODORS DETECTED BYTHE MAIN OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM AUGMENT FOSEXPRESSION IN THE ACCESSORY OLFACTORY BULB OFFEMALE MICEMartel K.L. 1 , Botros J. 1 , Baum M.J. 1 1 Department of Biology, BostonUniversity, Boston, MAVolatile male urinary odorants elicit distinct patterns of glomerularactivation in the main olfactory bulb (MOB) of female mice (Schaeferet al., 2001, J. Neurosci., 21:2481-2487) whereas non-volatile bodyodorants most reliably activate the mouse accessory olfactory bulb(AOB) (Luo et al., 2003, Science, 299:1196-1201). We asked whethervolatile urinary odors from male vs female mice differentially activateMOB glomeruli as well as AOB mitral and/or granule cells of femalesubjects. Using increased Fos immunoreactivity (IR) injuxtaglomerular cells as an index of activation, we found that volatileurinary odors from male vs female mice activated distinct clusters ofglomeruli in the ventral portion of the female´s MOB. Surprisingly,exposure to volatile urinary odors from male, but not from female,conspecifics also augmented the number of Fos-IR mitral and granulecells in the female´s AOB compared with exposure only to clean air.Bilateral lesions of the main olfactory epithelium induced by ZnSO 4irrigation of the nares eliminated the ability of volatile male urinaryodors to stimulate Fos expression in the AOB and the MOB, suggestingthat the ability of volatile male odors to activate the female´s AOBnormally depends on their detection by the main olfactory epithelium asopposed to the vomeronasal organ. Our results suggest that centrifugalinputs from the main olfactory system to the AOB may selectivelyconvey information about opposite-sex conspecifics that facilitates materecognition and successful reproduction. Supported by NIH grantHD044897320 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneRESPONSE OF OPOSSUM ACCESSORY OLFACTORY BULBNEURONS TO URINEZhang J. 1 , Huang G. 2 , Halpern M. 2 1 Anatomy and Cell Biology, SUNY,Brooklyn, NY; 2 Anatomy and Cell Biology, SUNY Downstate MedicalCenter, Brooklyn, NYIn many mammalian species, urine contains pheromones thatstimulate investigatory behaviors. Previous work in this laboratorydemonstrated that, whereas female opossums do not respond to maleopossum urine, male opossums vigorously investigate urine of diestrousfemales. In this study, we examined the response of accessory olfactorybulb (AOB) mitral cells to urine delivered to the vomeronasal organ(VNO) of male and female opossums using extracellular single unitrecordings. Mitral cells of male opossums responded to diestrous femaleurine with two distinct patterns: excitation followed by inhibition orinhibition. Either pattern could be mimicked by application of GTPgSand blocked by GDP-b-S, indicating that the response of neurons in thispathway is through a G-protein-coupled receptor mechanism. Maleurine was ineffective as a stimulus for mitral cells in the AOB of maleor female opossums. These results indicate that urine of diestrousfemales contains a pheromone (or pheromones) that directly stimulatesvomeronasal neurons through a G-protein-coupled receptor mechanismand that the response to the urine is sexually dimorphic.80
321 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneNORADRENERGIC MODULATION OF SYNAPTICTRANSMISSION FROM MITRAL TO GRANULE CELLS INTHE ACCESSORY OLFACTORY BULBKaba H. 1 , Huang G. 1 , Zhou Y. 1 , Taniguchi M. 1 1 Department ofIntegrative Physiology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, JapanWe have shown that the mitral to granule cell synapse in theaccessory olfactory bulb (AOB) is critical site for olfactory learning inmice, in which a female forms a memory to the pheromonal signal ofthe male that mates with her. The formation of this memory depends onmating-induced release of noradrenaline (NA) in the AOB. In supportof this, we have also shown in slice preparations that NA gates longtermpotentiation at the mitral to granule cell synapse via the activationof alpha-2 adrenoceptors. Therefore, we investigated the action of NAon synaptic transmission from mitral to granule cells with the use ofwhole-cell patch-clamp recordings. There are five main observations:(1) NA depressed stimulus-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents(eEPSCs) recorded from granule cells without affecting the decay of thesynaptic currents; (2) NA depressed the high-threshold calcium currentsin mital cells and the effect of NA was mimicked by the alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine; (3) in mitral cells treated with pertusistoxin the effect of clonidine on calcium currents was abolished; (4)clonidine failed to affect outward potassium currents in mitral cells; (5)clonidine reduced the frequency of miniature EPSCs recorded fromgranule cells without affecting the amplitude of the events. Takentogether, our results indicate that alpha2-adrenoreceptor activationdepresses glutamate release from mitral cells by a G-protein-mediatedinhibition of calcium channels and a direct modulation of vesicleexocytosis. Supported by grants from JSPS.322 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneMEDIAL AMYGDALA RESPONSES TO CHEMOSENSORYSTIMULI FROM SAME AND DIFFERENT SPECIES.Samuelsen C. 1 , Blake C. 1 , Case G. 1 , Meredith M. 1 1 Biological Science,Florida State University, Tallahassee, FLIn the medial amygdala of both hamsters and mice, immediate earlygene (IEG= Fos/ FRAs) expression shows a response to pheromonecontaining chemosensory signals originating from both the animal´sown species (conspecific) and other species (heterospecific). In malehamsters, conspecific stimuli, regardless of gender, activate bothanterior and posterior medial amygdala (MeA, MeP). Withheterospecific stimuli, MeA is activated but (dorsal) MeP (MePd)appears to be suppressed. Stimuli conspecific for hamsters includedfemale hamster vaginal fluid and male or female flank-gland secretion.In male mice, initial results suggested the same pattern of response butlater data suggest that responses in MePd to urine stimuli from othermale mice may be less than the response to urine stimuli from femalemice. Others have found a more dramatic difference, with male stimuliproducing no significant response in medial amygdala of other malemice, and have interpreted these results in terms of a reproductiveresponse to female stimuli and a defensive response to male stimuli, andto heterospecific stimuli. The division of the mouse medial amygdalainto putative reproductive and defensive regions may not account for allresponses to pheromone containing chemosignals in mice, or in otherspecies. Ongoing experiments examine amygdala responses in male andfemale mice and hamsters to additional conspecific and heterospecificstimuli likely to evoke defensive responses, to address these questions.In male hamsters and mice, the largely GABAergic intercalated nucleus(ICN) of the amygdala was activated when MeP was suppressed byheterospecific stimuli, suggesting inhibition of MeP by ICN. Supportedby NIDCD grant DC05813.323 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneVOLATILE MHC ODORTYPESPreti G. 1 , Kwak J. 1 , Curran M. 1 , Wahl J. 2 , Willse A. 2 , Yamazaki K. 1 ,Beauchamp G. 1 1 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA;2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WAMajor histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes influence urinaryodors (odortypes) of mice. That volatile odorants are involved issupported by the observation that odortype identity can be detectedfrom a distance. Furthermore, chemical analyses of urines have revealednumerous volatile odorants that differ in relative abundance betweenmice that differ only in MHC genotypes. In addition, urines from MHCdifferentmice evoke distinct odor-induced activity maps in the mainolfactory bulbs. Recent studies reported that non-volatile MHC class Ipeptides may directly act as MHC-associated signals. These studiesraise the question of whether the behavioral evidence for volatile MHCsignals needs further verification. To accomplish this, we designed aprocedure to collect peptide-free urinary volatiles and we tested thesevolatiles for their ability to mediate chemosensory discrimination ofmice differing only in their MHC genotype. The headspace volatilesfrom urines of C57BL/6 congenic mice (haplotypes H-2b and H-2k)were collected by solid phase microextraction. These volatiles werethen desorbed into a gas chromatograph and the entire chromatographiceluate was collected into a buffer solution. Our results show that micetrained to discriminate between unadulterated urinary signals of thecongenic mice generalize the discrimination, without reward or training,to the buffer solution containing the peptide-free urinary volatiles. Thusvolatile signals, perhaps along with non-volatile ones, mediatebehavioral discriminations of mice of different MHC genotypes. Thiswork is sponsored by DARPA under ARO Contract No. DAAD19-03-1-0109. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendationsare those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the UnitedStates Government.324 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneFETAL ODORTYPES: CONTRIBUTIONS OF MHC ANDBACKGROUND GENETIC VARIATION.Yamazaki K. 1 , Curran M. 1 , Beauchamp G.K. 1 1 Monell Chemical SensesCenter, Philadelphia, PAIt has long been known that individual animals of many species aredistinguished by unique odors. We and others have repeatedlydemonstrated that these genetically determined individual odors, whichwe have called odortypes, are influenced by genes of the majorhistocompatibility complex (MHC). Other genetic loci (collectivelytermed “background” here) are also involved in provisioning individualmice with unique odors. Among these background loci are ones on theX and Y chromosomes and loci coding for major urinary proteins(MUPs). We have recently found that MHC-determined odortypesproduced by fetuses are expressed in the urinary odors of the pregnantfemale and these fetal odortypes remain in the mother´s circulation daysor longer after the pups are born and have been removed from themother. This phenomenon may be related to microchimerism, thefinding that fetal cells remain functional in the mother long after theinfant has been born. In the current studies we asked whether, inaddition to MHC genetic variation, background genes also contribute tothe fetal odortypes. Additionally, we investigated the interactionbetween MHC and background variation on a recently parturientfemale´s odortype. Using our standard Y-maze training paradigm wefound that (1) background genetic differences influence fetal odortypesremaining in the mother and (2) in some cases background genotypeand MHC interact to obscure the independent contributions of each.Individual volatile body odors are thus influenced in complex ways bygenetic variation at several genetic loci. Supported by NSF grant#0112528.81
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26