325 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneBACKGROUND STRAIN DEPENDENCE OF MHC-RELATEDODORANTSKwak J. 1 , Willse A. 2 , Preti G. 1 , Curran M. 1 , Wahl J.H. 2 , Yang P. 1 ,Yamazaki K. 1 , Beauchamp G. 1 1 Monell Chemical Senses Center,Philadelphia, PA; 2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,WAGenes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) influence theurinary odors of mice. Mice can discriminate between urinary odors ofmice differing only at the MHC. Notably, mice trained to discriminatebetween MHC types for a particular mouse strain can generalize thediscrimination to other strains, suggesting that some odorants have anMHC association that is independent of background strain. Tocharacterize the effects of MHC and background genotypes on specificodorants, we analyzed the urines of congenic B6 and Balb strains thatare MHC homozygous with haplotypes H-2b or H-2k by SPME-GC/MS. A number of compounds have an MHC association that isindependent of background strain; some of these compounds mightcontribute to the generalized discrimination. However, a surprisinglylarge number of compounds (109 out of 277) have an MHC associationthat is moderated by the background genotype (i.e., there is a MHC ×background interaction). The strong background effects suggest acomplex, yet unknown, mechanism of MHC-related odor expression.This work is sponsored by DARPA under ARO Contract No. DAAD19-03-1-0109. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, andrecommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarilyendorsed by the United States Government.326 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneDETECTION OF THE SAME SOCIAL CUES BY THE MAINAND ACCESSORY OLFACTORY SYSTEMS: DIRECTCOMPARISON OF THEIR FUNCTIONSSpehr M. 1 , Kelliher K.R. 1 , Li X. 1 , Boehm T. 2 , Leinders-Zufall T. 1 , ZufallF. 1 1 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of MarylandSchool of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 2 MPI Immunobiology, Freiburg,GermanyRecent work from several laboratories has shown that the traditionalview that common odors are perceived by the main olfactory systemand pheromones by the vomeronasal system needs to be revised. Wehave found that the mouse main and accessory olfactory systems detect,in part, overlapping sets of molecular cues that regulate social behaviors(e.g. urinary pheromones, MHC peptide ligands). This finding enablesus to directly compare the functional properties of both systems. Severalsurprising results are emerging. (1) Both systems can detect and processsocial chemosignals of volatile and nonvolatile nature. (2) Both systemsare highly sensitive with detection thresholds in the subnanomolarrange. (3) Coding strategies and tuning properties of individual sensoryneurons in MOE and VNO differ significantly, suggesting that differentreceptors are employed in both systems for the detection of the sameligands. (4) System-specific signal transduction pathways are used forthe detection of these cues, indicating that diverse olfactory mechanismshave evolved to assess the structural diversity of social chemosignals.(5) In behavioral tests using mice with genetic and surgical lesions,stimulation of each system by the same social cues can lead to distinctbehavioral outcomes. Therefore, the same chemosignals might mediatedifferent sexual and social behaviors through differential activation ofeach system. Support: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) andNIH/NIDCD.327 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneA ROLE FOR MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY MOLECULESIN THE MAIN OLFACTORY BULBSalcedo E. 1 , Restrepo D. 1 1 Cellular and Developmental Biology,University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, COThe mechanisms involved in establishing and maintaining theexquisite organization of synaptic connections found at the glomerularlayer of the main olfactory bulb (MOB) remain to be resolved. Recentfindings have linked major histocompatibility class I (MHCI) moleculesand the MHCI signaling pathway to neuronal restructuring andrefinement (Corriveau et al., 1998). In this study, we have identified aputative role for MHCI molecules in the MOB. We demonstratehistochemically that MHCI molecules are expressed in the MOB incontrol animals. Additionally, we show that mice deficient in theexpression of MHCI molecules display defects in the targeting ofolfactory sensory neurons to the MOB. Tap1 gene targeted mice lack acritical component for the expression of MHCI molecules on cellsurfaces. In these mice, we find an increased number of P2 labeledglomeruli per bulb as compared to the control littermates. Additionally,the location of these glomeruli is shifted along the rostral-caudal axis ofthe bulb as compared to the control mice. Although severely deficient inthe expression of MHCI molecules, Tap1 mice do express MHCImolecules. Therefore, we are currently characterizing mice which alsolack another component involved in presenting MHCI molecules on cellsurfaces: beta-2 microglobulin.328 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneGENE PROFILING OF AGING IN THE MURINE OLFACTORYSYSTEM: IMMUNE SIGNATURESGetchell M.L. 1 , Vaishnav R.A. 2 , Liu H. 3 , Stromberg A.J. 3 , GetchellT.V. 2 1 Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington,KY; 2 Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; 3 Statistics,University of Kentucky, Lexington, KYGene expression levels in the olfactory epithelium (OE) and bulb(OB) of young and old mice were evaluated to identify characteristicsignatures of aging in expression profiles. Total RNA was isolated fromOEs and OBs of 3 young (1.5 months) and 3 old (20 months) C57BL/6male mice. cDNA from each tissue of each mouse was hybridized on anAffymetrix MG U74Av2 GeneChip (12 chips total). After datascrubbing and ANOVA, known genes with significant differences inexpression levels (p < 0.05) between old vs. young mice were furthercharacterized by EASE analysis to identify functional categories basedon the Gene Ontology database. For genes up-regulated in the OE,13/33 categories with significant EASE scores (< 0.05) indicatedimmune system involvement; for down-regulated genes, 0/44 immunesystem-related categories had significant EASE scores. For genes upregulatedin the OB, 10/21 categories with significant EASE scoreswere related to immune activity; for down-regulated genes, 2/17categories with significant EASE scores were immune-related. Upregulatedimmune system genes in both OE and OB werepredominantly related to autoimmunity and MHC antigen presentation.Down-regulated genes in the OB were associated with chemokines andT cell regulation. These results identify immune system activity as acharacteristic signature of aging in the murine OE and OB. Grantsupport: NIH R01 AG-16824 (TVG); NIH 1P20-RR-16481-01 (AJS).82
329 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromonePROBING FUNCTIONALITY OF THE HUMAN VNOWyart C.J. 1 , Webster W. 2 , McClary A. 3 , Sobel N. 3 1 Psychology,University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; 2 Kaiser Medical,Berkeley, CA; 3 Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley,berkeley, CAMammalian pheromones influence behavior and/or hormonal state inconspecifics, often through the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Humanputative pheromones have been identified, but whether human adultshave a functional VNO remains controversial. Here we test whether theputative human VNO mediates the effects of smelling the putativepheromone 4,16-androstadien-3-one (AND). Smelling AND influencesautonomic nervous system activity, endocrine state, and mood inwomen. We set out to quantify these effects, and then ask whether wecould negate them by physically and chemically blocking the putativeVNO (VNOblock). 30 women are scheduled for three 2.5-hour-longsessions separated by 28 days. In a double-blind study, VNOblock wasapplied selectively before exposure to either AND or CONTROL.Session order was counter balanced, and AND/CONTROL werematched for intensity/pleasantness. This design allowed us to assess thedifferential impact of VNOblock on the physiological, endocrine, andpsychological response to AND and CONTROL. To date, 31 womenhave completed the first day of study, 12 have completed 2 days. Alimited pilot analysis of 7 subjects who were counterbalanced for daysONE and TWO suggests a greater physiological response to AND thanCONTROL (F(1,69) = 10.3, p < 0.002), but no interaction withVNOblock (F(1,69) = .8, p = 0.36). Although this points againstfunctionality of the human VNO, the power of this comparison isminimal (n = 7). By Achems meeting time, all participants will havecompleted all days, and we expect to be able to determine whetherblocking the putative human VNO influences the response to putativehuman pheromones.330 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneFUNCTIONAL NEURONAL PROCESSING OF BODY ODORSDIFFERS FROM THAT OF COMMON ODORSLundstrom J.N. 1 , Boyle J.A. 1 , Zatorre R.J. 1 , Jones-Gotman M. 11 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec,CanadaOur ability to identify related individuals based solely on their bodyodor is remarkably high also in the absence of conscious awareness ofour performance. By means of positron emission tomography (PET), wesought to elucidate the neuronal substrate behind body odor perceptionto answer the question of whether central processing of body odorsdiffers from that of common, non-body odors. To date, six participants,of a total of twelve, were scanned while smelling either body odors, amixture of perceptually similar common odors, or clean air. Initialanalyses indicate that smelling the mixture of common odors activatedregions commonly associated with olfactory processing such as thepiriform cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex. In contrast, body odorsuniquely activated areas seldom seen in olfactory processing such assuperior frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, and occipital corticalareas. Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that body odorsare processed differently from common odors, with a largerinvolvement of multimodal processing mechanisms.331 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneDIFFERENT CEREBRAL ACTIVATION PRODUCED BY APUTATIVE SOCIAL CHEMOSIGNAL AND PERCEPTUALLYSIMILAR ODORANTSGerber J.C. 1 , Bensafi M. 2 , Husner A. 3 , Frasnelli J. 4 , Reden J. 4 , HummelT. 4 1 University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; 2 Neuroscience,University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; 3 ENT Department,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 4 ENT, University of Dresden,Dresden, GermanyAim of this study was to compare cerebral activation produced by aputative social chemosignal and perceptually similar odorants, namelyandrostadienone, androstenone, and butanol. A computer-controlledolfactometer was used for stimulus presentation (OM6b, BurghartInstruments, Germany); 12 healthy female volunteers (mean age 24years; 20 to 30 years) participated. The three odors were rated asequally intense, and received similar hedonic ratings (n.s.). Subjectswere right-handed, normosmic and had no nasal pathology. They wereexamined in a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Germany). Stimuliwere presented in blocks (30 s odorless air, 30 s odorant; 1 s stimulusduration, 3 s ISI, randomized). Preliminary investigations showeddifferences in cortical representation, pointing to a higher involvementof limbic structures (cingulate cortex, amygdala) and orbitofronal cortexfor androstadienone. The data suggest that a putative social chemosignalproduces different patterns of activation compared to “normal” odors .332 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneCULTURE, OLFACTION AND COGNITION:MULTIDIMENSIONALITY OF 'CULTURALLY SCENTEDKNOWLEDGE'Damhuis C. 1 1 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PAOlfactory experiences and odor meanings are multidimensional: Theyare individual and simultaneously impacted by collectiverepresentations (cultural norm). The dimension of the individualperceiver is influenced by evolutionary and environmental factors,stimulus property, and odorant/receptor interactions as well as by avariety of upstream processes, e.g. psychophysical, psychogenetic andcognitive mechanisms. These top-down and bottom-up dimensionsinteract simultaneously when it comes to experiencing and `makingscents of´ odor. One of the major debates concerning the currentscientific discourse revolves around the origin of odor hedonics. Whilesome odor meanings may be derived from our evolutionary legacy, themajority is learned in the pre-natal stage as well as afterwards,suggesting THAT our socio-cultural milieu is impacting in the process.The simultaneity of the processes of odor learning and the acquisition ofcultural knowledge is suggested by (1) the location in the CNS whereboth odor meaning and rational information is processed, namely theleft frontal cortex, (2) the diversity of odor schemata employed andgenerated across space and time as to what odor is deemed sociallyacceptable or unacceptable, and (3) observations about how individualsmanipulate olfactory experiences, that is, how humans negotiate theboundaries between nature and culture and between the individual andthe collective. An investigation of the interactions between thesedimensions furthers our understanding as to what odor indeed `means´.By introducing the cultural dimension to our current cognitive paradigmthis presentation proposes a synthesized model of what is involvedwhen generating `culturally scented knowledge´.83
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26