357 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneTHE G ENCODING GENE FAMILY OF THE MALARIAVECTOR MOSQUITO ANOPHELES GAMBIAE: EXPRESSIONANALYSIS AND IMMUNOLOCALIZATION OF AGGQ ANDAGGO IN FEMALE ANTENNAERuetzler M.R. 1 , Zwiebel L. 1 1 Biological Sciences, VanderbiltUniversity, Nashville, TNTo initiate a comprehensive investigation of chemosensory signaltransduction downstream of odorant receptors, we identify andcharacterize the complete set of genes that encode G-protein a subunitsin the genome of the malaria vector mosquito An. gambiae. Data isprovided on the tissue-specific expression patterns of 10 correspondingaga-transcripts in adult mosquitoes and pre-imago developmentalstages. Specific immunoreactivity in chemosensory hairs of femaleantennae provides evidence in support of the participation of a subset ofAgGaq isoforms in olfactory signal transduction in this mosquito. Incontrast, AgGao is localized along the flagellar axon bundle but isabsent from chemosensory sensilla, which suggests this G-protein asubunit does not participate in olfactory signal transduction359 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneEXPRESSION OF GPR4, A PROTON SENSING GPCR, INHUMAN FUNGIFORM PAPILLAEHuque T. 1 , Lischka F.W. 1 , Breslin P.A. 1 , Feldman R.S. 2 , Spielman A.I. 3 ,Brand J.G. 1 1 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA;2 Dental Medicine, V.A. Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; 3 New YorkUniversity, New York, NYThe molecular mechanisms underlying sourness remaincontroversial. Most proposed mechanisms postulate the involvement ofvarious ion channels. Recently, a proton sensing molecule named GPR4has been characterized which is a GPCR rather than an ion channel.Here we summarize our studies on the expression of GPR4 in humantaste tissue. Human fungiform papillae (HFP) were obtained from twosubjects who identified 15 mM citric acid as sour in both whole mouthand tongue tip tests. RTPCR of the pooled papillae confirmed theexpression of GPR4. Subsequently, the entire coding sequence of GPR4(1086 bp) was amplified from the pooled papillae. An open readingframe of 362 amino acids was identified, only two of which differedfrom the GenBank sequence. RTPCR of individual cells isolated fromHFP showed that GPR4 was expressed in a subset of taste cells. Twosour-abnormal subjects were studied, one of whom (ID # 62) identifiedthe sourness of 15 mM citric acid in a whole mouth test but not at thetongue tip. RTPCR of HFP from Subject 62 failed to detect the codingsequence of GPR4 after 50 cycles. The other sour-abnormal subject (ID# W) was unable to identify the sourness of citric acid, either at thetongue tip or in a whole mouth test, at concentrations up to 18 mM.RTPCR of HFP from Subject W failed to detect the coding sequence ofGPR4 after 50 cycles. Taken together, these initial data raise thepossibility of a role for GPR4 in human sour perception. Supported inpart by NSF Grant # 9816478 (TH); and NIH Grant P50DC0670 (PAB).358 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneGENETIC ANALYSIS OF TONGUE SIZE AND TONGUEWEIGHT IN RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAINS OF MICEJan T.A. 1 , Reiner D.J. 1 , Peirce J.L. 1 , Li C.X. 1 , Boughter J.D. 1 , Lu L. 1 ,Williams R.W. 1 , Waters R.S. 1 1 Anatomy and Neurobiology, Universityof Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TNLittle is known about the genetic factors underlying variability oftongue morphology. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is animportant methodology for mapping genes underlying differences inmorphology. QTL detection methods use a forward genetics approach,where a well-characterized phenotype is quantified in an effort toidentify a set of genes that are responsible for the variability of thephenotype. In the present study, the morphology of the mouse tonguewas examined in 18 recombinant inbred BXD strains. We measuredfour tongue dimensions that included apex to vallate (ApV), apex tomedian eminence (ApM), tongue width and tongue weight. Acorrelation analysis revealed that none of these measurements morethan modestly correlated with body weight, suggesting that the geneticfactors are largely independent of body size. Tongue weight correlatedwith tongue lengths of ApV and ApM at r 2 = 0.7 and r 2 = 0.8,respectively, and only modestly correlated with tongue width (r 2 = 0.5).Interestingly, the detected QTLs observed from residual regressionanalysis for ApV and ApM were different from those of tongue weight.We detected a QTL on chromosome 7 (LOD > 3.8) for both ApV andApM, while tongue weight showed two suggestive QTLs onchromosomes 9 (LOD = 4.0) and 16 (LOD = 3.8). Pair-scan analysisrevealed that the two suggestive QTLs affecting tongue weight werepurely additive in effect. These results are a first characterization ofgenetic variability in tongue morphology among BXD strains of mice.(Supported by NIH grant to RSW)360 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneA NEWLY IDENTIFIED NEOHESPERIDINEDIHYDROCHALCONE BINDING SITE IN THE HUMANSWEET TASTE RECEPTOR OVERLAPS WITH ALLOSTERICMODULATOR BINDING SITES FOR CLASS 3 GPCRS.Winnig M. 1 , Bufe B. 1 , Kratochwil N. 2 , Slack J.P. 3 , Meyerhof W. 11 Molecular Genetics, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany; 2 Pharmaceuticals Division Chemistry,F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; 3 Givaudan FlavorsCorp., Cincinnati, OHThe sweet inhibitor lactisole and the sweetener cyclamate share anoverlapping binding site in the seven-transmembrane section of theTAS1R3 subunit of the human sweet receptor (Jiang et al., 2005).Using heterologous expression and functional analysis of rat/humanreceptor chimeras we recently showed that the seven-transmembranesection of hTAS1R3 is crucial for the activation by the sweetenerneohesperidine dihydrochalcone (NHDC, Winnig et al 2005).Interestingly, lactisole competitively inhibits NHDC and cyclamateactivation. We therefore assumed that NHDC may share some residueswith the lactisole and cyclamate binding site. To test this hypothesis wetested 13 point mutants involved in lactisole and cyclamate bindingtowards NHDC. Indeed, 7 of them increased the EC50 of NHDC > 10fold. Modelling of the NHDC pharmacophore revealed 12 additionalpossible interaction sites. Mutational analysis showed that 10 of themclearly affected NHDC activation. Moreover, sequence alignments ofthe TAS1R3 seven-transmembrane section with other members oft theclass 3 GPCRs revealed that 40% of the amino acids involved in NHDCactivation overlap with known binding positions of allostericmodulators in other class 3 GPCRs. This allows us to predict additionalresidues in the TAS1R3 seven-transmembrane section that may beinvolved in the binding of other sweeteners.90
361 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneTASTE RECEPTORS FOR GLUTAMATE IN HUMANFUNGIFORM PAPILLAEMariam R. 1 , Boucher Y. 2 , Wiencis A. 3 , Bézirard V. 4 , Pernollet J. 4 ,Trotier D. 5 , Faurion A. 5 , Montmayeur J. 6 1 University of Paris7, Jouy enJosas, France; 2 Université Paris 7, Paris, France; 3 CSG-CNRS/INRA/UB, Dijon, France; 4 INRA, Jouy en Josas, France;5 CNRS/INRA, Jouy en Josas, France; 6 Centre National de la RechercheScientifique, Dijon, FranceMolecular and behavioural experiments in rodents suggest thatseveral candidate receptors might be involved in glutamate tastedetection. Truncated isoforms of metabotropic glutamate receptors,namely Taste-mGluR4 and Taste-mGluR1, have been found in tastebuds together with a heterodimer receptor (TAS1R1 and TAS1R3).Interindividual variability in the sensitivity to MSG [Lugaz et al.,Chem. Senses 2002] in humans led us to study candidate receptorexpression in human fungiform papillae, both by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.Our data indicate that mGluR4, TAS1R1 and TAS1R3are present in human fungiform taste buds. Potential variations of thesequences in the genes coding for TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 wereexamined in 215 subjects. Sequencing of the 6 exons encompassing thecoding region of TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 respectively uncovered threesingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TAS1R1 and five SNPsdistributed throughout the coding sequence in TAS1R3. Two of 3 SNPsin TAS1R1 and 4 of 5 SNPs in TAS1R3 lead to an amino acidsubstitution. The prevalence of each SNP was evaluated and will bepresented. Additionally, Mendelian transmission of each SNP leading toan amino acid substitution was studied in 25 families. These resultsrepresent a first step towards understanding the genetic factorsunderlying interindividual variability of sensitivity for MSG in humans.362 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromonePOSITIONAL CLONING APPROACH TO IDENTIFICATIONOF THE SUCROSE OCTAACETATE AVERSION (SOA) LOCUSBosak N.P. 1 , Theodorides M.L. 1 , Beauchamp G.K. 1 , Bachmanov A.A. 11 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PASucrose octaacetate (SOA) tastes bitter to humans and has anaversive taste to some mice and other animals. While some mice avoidSOA, others do not, which depends on allelic variation of a single locus,Soa. A dominant Soa a allele produces the taster phenotype (i.e., SOAavoidance); recessive alleles Soa b and Soa c produce the nontaster anddemitaster phenotypes, respectively. We use a positional cloningapproach to identify a gene corresponding to the Soa locus. Ourprevious studies have shown that the Soa locus resides withinapproximately 5-Mb region on chromosome 6. This region contains anumber of genes encoding G protein-coupled receptors from the T2Rsfamily that are proposed to be bitter receptors and therefore arecandidate genes for the Soa locus. Currently, we conduct a highresolutionmapping of the Soa locus. We created a dense set of markersthroughout the Soa region, produced a large (>1,000 mice) crossbetween strains with different Soa alleles, and are genotyping thesemice to find recombinations that shorten the critical Soa interval. Weexpect to reduce the genomic segment encompassing Soa to < 100 kband thus exclude many of the T2R genes from the list of candidates forSoa.363 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneMOLECULAR MODELING OF SWEET TASTE RECEPTORSCui M. 1 , Jiang P. 1 , Max M. 2 , Margolskee R.F. 3 , Osman R. 1 1 Physiology& Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 2 MountSinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 3 Neuroscience, Mount SinaiSchool of Medicine, New York, NYThe heterodimer of T1R2 and T1R3 is a broadly acting sweet tastereceptor responsive to natural sugars, artificial sweeteners, D-aminoacids, and sweet-tasting proteins. T1Rs are characterized by a largeextracellular Venus flytrap model (VFTM), which is linked by acysteine rich domain (CRD) to the 7-TM-domain (TMD). Althoughcrystal structures are not available for the sweet taste receptor, usefulhomology models can be developed based on appropriate templates.The VFTM, CRD and TMD of T1R2 and T1R3 have been modeledbased on the crystal structures of metabotropic glutamate receptor type1, tumor necrosis factor receptor, and bovine rhodopsin, respectively.We have used homology models of the sweet taste receptors, moleculardocking of sweet ligands to the receptors, and directed mutagenesis ofthe receptors to identify potential ligand binding sites of the sweet tastereceptor. Financical support from National Institute Health Grant1R03DC007721-01(M.C.), and 1R01DC006696-01A2 (M.M.).364 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromonePROBING THE ASPARTAME BINDING SITE OF HUMANT1R2Maillet E. 1 , Cui M. 2 , Jiang P. 1 , Ahmed F. 1 , Zhao B. 1 , Osman R. 2 ,Margolskee R.F. 1 , Max M. 1 1 Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School ofMedicine, New York, NY; 2 Physiology & Biophysics, Mount SinaiSchool of Medicine, New York, NYThe heterodimer of T1R2 + T1R3 is a broadly acting sweet tastereceptor responsive to natural sugars, small molecule artificialsweeteners and sweet tasting proteins. Certain compounds are sweet tohumans but not rodents; this species-specificity can be replicated invitro by expressing the human or mouse T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimers.We had previously used human/mouse mismatched and chimericreceptors and directed mutagenesis to map the sweet receptor´s sites ofinteraction with the sweet protein brazzein (interacts with the cysteinerich domain of T1R2), the sweetener cyclamate and the inverse agonistlactisole (both bind within the transmembrane domain of T1R3) (Jianget al. 2004, 2005ab). Li and colleagues (Li et al. 2002) had determinedthat the extracellular “Venus Fly Trap Domain” (VFTM) of humanT1R2 was required for a human-type response to the dipeptidesweetener aspartame. Based on models of T1R2 with aspartame dockedto the receptor (Cui et al. 2005) we have predicted residues of theVFTM likely to be critical for the interaction with aspartame and otherdipeptide sweeteners. We have used chimeric receptors and mutants toanalyze the interaction of aspartame, neotame and other dipeptidesweeteners with the canonical ligand binding site in the VFTM ofT1R2. From this functional analysis we have tested and refined ourmolecular models of the aspartame-T1R2 VFTM interaction. Ourvalidated model provides a biophysical explanation for why neotame isa much more potent sweetener than aspartame. Supported by NIDCDGrants DC007721 (MC), DC007984 (PJ), DC006696 (MM),DC003055 and DC03155 (RFM).91
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37:
sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39:
149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137: Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138: Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26