277 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyTEMPORAL CODING OF SIMILAR TASTANTS IN THENUCLEUS OF THE SOLITARY TRACT OF THE RATRoussin A.T. 1 , Di Lorenzo P.M. 1 , Victor J.D. 2 1 Psychology, StateUniversity of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY; 2 Neurologyand Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, NewYork, NYRecent work has shown that spike timing in the first 2 s of responsein the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) contributes to coding of tastequality. Cells with especially variable response magnitudes acrossrepeated stimulus presentations typically showed the greatest evidenceof temporal coding. Responses to repeated trials of tastants that were ofsimilar quality (salty, sour, sweet or bitter) but were of differentchemical composition were recorded in the NTS of anesthetized rats.Stimuli were NaCl (0.1 M), LiCl (0.1 M), HCl (0.01 M), citric acid(0.01 M), sucrose (0.5 M), fructose (0.3 M), quinineHCl (0.01 M) andurea (1.0 M). Temporal coding was assessed using an informationtheoreticapproach (Victor & Purpura, 1996). Response magnitudesevoked by similar-tasting stimuli varied substantially, and oftenindependently from each other, across trials. Spike timing contributed tothe information present in taste responses when the relative magnitudesof response to different tastants varied across trials whether the tasteresponses were evoked by similar or dissimilar tastants. Conversely,when the response to one stimulus of a pair was always greater than theother, rate coding was more likely to account for the informationconveyed by the responses. These data suggest that spike timing maycontribute to discrimination between tastants in cases where firing ratealone is not sufficient, regardless of whether those tastants evoke thesame quality. Supported by NIDCD RO1-DC005219 and NIMH R01-MH68012 to D. Gardner.278 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyFUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LOBSTEROLFACTORY PROJECTION NEURONSAggio J.F. 1 , Ache B.W. 1 1 The Whitney Laboratory for MarineBioscience, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FLSome larger crustaceans have a unique neuropil associated with theolfactory lobe (OL) called the accessory lobe (AL). The AL receivesolfactory input from a distinct subset of local interneurons arborizing inthe sub-cap region of OL glomeruli, although the role of the AL inprocessing olfactory information is unknown. Using a perfused nosebrainpreparation, we characterized the responses of OL and ALprojection neurons (PNs) to olfactory (antennular) input. In contrast tothe largely silent OL PNs, AL PNs exhibit spontaneous bursts of actionpotentials (APs) with a period of 12.3 ± 1.3 s (n = 6). Ablation ofantennular chemoreceptors abolishes the spontaneous bursting.Odorants evoke APs in both OL and AL PNs in an odorant- andconcentration-dependent manner. OL PNs respond with a complex,often multiphasic train of APs. AL PNs respond with a single phasictonictrain of APs, the duration and latency of which is phase-dependenton the ongoing bursting activity of the cells. AL PNs also respond tovisual stimuli with a shorter latency than to odorants (327 ± 48 ms [n =37] vs 777 ± 171 ms, [n = 12]). The ON response to light shortens thesubsequent response to odorant, which in turn abolishes the OFFresponse to light. Our findings raise the interesting possibility that ALPNs are multimodal neurons that process input from a recentlydiscovered subset of inherently oscillatory olfactory receptor neuronsthat may terminate in the sub-cap region of OL glomeruli.279 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyA COMPARISON OF ENSEMBLE REPRESENTATIONS FORNATURAL PLANT-ODOR BLENDS AND BLENDCOMPONENTS IN THE ANTENNAL LOBE OF THE MOTHMANDUCA SEXTARiffell J.A. 1 , Christensen T.C. 1 , Hildebrand J.G. 1 1 Division ofNeurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZAlthough most organisms in nature operate at low odor intensities,many chemosensory studies use olfactory stimuli at non-physiologicalconcentrations. Moreover, clear understanding of how the brainprocesses complex mixtures as opposed to single odorants has provenelusive owing to the lack of adequate analytical methods. Using themoth, Manduca sexta, we first approached an improved understandingof the behavioral importance of complex blends through wind-tunnelexperiments to odors from hostplant flowers. Selective removal of keyblend components suppressed upwind flight responses in comparison tothe entire blend. To compare how the antennal lobe (AL) of M. sextaencodes behaviorally relevant floral mixtures and single constituents, amulti-channel neural-ensemble recording array was coupled with aGCMS. Integration of these two technologies allows examination of ALresponse to natural complex mixtures and provides a means offractionating those same blends into their single components.Approximately 25% of the units responded specifically to singleodorants. Moreover, odor-evoked activity was often spatially restrictedto distinct regions of the AL. Spatiotemporal ensemble dynamics wereclearly modulated differentially by the blend as compared to the singleodorants alone. Together, these results provide new evidence that inmoths, upwind orientation to blends is mediated by the preciseintegration of multiple glomerular pathways, and that blend inputtransforms the network representations in a manner that is not predictedfrom responses to single odor compounds. Supported by NIH grantsDC-02751 and 2 K12 GM000708-06.280 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologySPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ORGANIZATION OF ODORREPRESENTATION BY UNIGLOMERULAR PROJECTIONNEURONS IN THE MOTH ANTENNAL LOBENamiki S. 1 , Kanzaki R. 2 1 Graduate School of Life and EnvironmentalSciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; 2 Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology,University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JapanThe antennal lobe (AL) is the first relay station for olfactoryinformation in the insect brain and the anatomical equivalent of theolfactory bulb (OB) of mammals. Both systems have commonstructures called glomeruli in which neurons make synapses. Olfactoryreceptor neurons expressing the same receptor project to the sameglomeruli in the AL. Projection neurons (PNs), the AL output neurons,transmit the processed information into higher order olfactory centers.To investigate spatial and temporal patterning of glomerular activity, wereconstructed olfactory representation by pooled set of single PNrecordings. Most of PNs innervated single glomeruli (n = 126). PNsshowed various slow temporal patterns to odor. PNs innervating thesame glomerulus had similar response profiles so that we couldreconstruct odor-evoked spatial pattern of PNs firing in the AL. Thisreconstructed spatial map is highly distributed and dynamic. Differentodor elicited different spatial pattern at each time point. The Euclidiandistances between odor representations reached maximum at 200 msafter the response onset. There were no clear correlation betweenphysical distance of glomeruli and response similarity of odor-evokedslow temporal patterns. This result is consistent with prior calciumimaging and modeling study. We conclude that olfactory information isencoded by distributed spatial and temporal pattern of PNs firing andthere are no clear relationship between the physical distance andresponse pattern in the moth AL.70
281 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyENSEMBLE CODING OF ODOR-BLEND RATIOS IN THEINSECT ANTENNAL LOBEMartin J.P. 1 , Christensen T.A. 1 , Hildebrand J.G. 1 1 ARL Division ofNeurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZForaging insects use complex floral odor blends, consisting ofcommon odorants in specific ratios, to identify host plants. Little isknown about how the ratio of the components of a host-flower blend isrepresented in the antennal lobe, the primary processing center forolfactory information in insects. We investigated whether the responseof an ensemble of neurons in the antennal lobe of the moth Manducasexta was tuned to the natural ratio of components in the floral odor of ahost plant, sacred datura. Using a synthetic mixture of 14 majorcomponents of this blend, we presented mixtures with varyingconcentrations of single components, from 0.01 to 100 times the naturalconcentration. The components were also presented alone over the sameconcentration range. The firing rate of single units and recruitment ofadditional units both increased with the concentration of themonomolecular odorants alone, consistent with previous results.However, the response to the mixtures did not follow this predictedpattern. Instead, individual units exhibited an optimal response to themixture with the natural ratio of components, and deviatedsymmetrically from this optimum when the concentration of a singlecomponent was raised or lowered. The shape of the deviation wasfurthermore dependent on which component was altered. These resultssuggest that the representation of a blend in the antennal lobe is not asimple, linear combination of the component representations and thatthe glomerular circuit may be tuned to natural, behaviorally relevantratios of the component concentrations. Supported by NIH grant R01-DC-02751 to JGH.282 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyCOMPARATIVE FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF MALE-SPECIFIC GLOMERULI IN TWO HELIOTHINE MOTHSPECIES, HELICOVERPA ZEA AND HELIOTHIS SUBFLEXALee S. 1 , Carlsson M.A. 2 , Hansson B.S. 2 , Vickers N. 3 , Baker T.C. 11 Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA;2 Crop Science, SLU, Alnarp, Sweden; 3 Biology, University of Utah, SaltLake City, UTTwo sympatric heliothine species, Helicoverpa zea and Heliothissubflexa, share a major pheromone component, (Z)-11-hexadecenal(Z11-16:Ald). However, males are not attracted to interspecific femalesdue to the activity of minor components in heterospecific pheromoneblends. Action potentials from pheromone-component-sensitiveolfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) converge on specific glomeruli forfurther olfactory discrimination. We examined the morphological andphysiological characteristics of male-specific glomeruli with regard toORN excitation by different pheromone components in male H. zea andH. subflexa in order to delineate the glomeruli in the antennal lobe towhich each type of ORN projects its axons. For this research we usedthe cut-tip single sensillum recording technique followed by cobaltstaining to visualize glomerular targets of physiologically identifiedORNs. ORNs specifically responding to each component projectedconsistently to specific glomeruli in the olfactory lobe. Calciumimagingof component-specific glomerular activities in both speciescorroborated the cobalt stainings. We also described for the first time adistinct glomerular complex (“Posterior Complex”) in both specieswhose specific glomeruli are the arborization destinations of secondaryORNs co-compartmentalized with specific pheromone-sensitive ORNs.Supported by NSF IBN-9910783283 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyOLFACTORY SHIFTS PARELLEL SUPERSPECIALISM FORTOXIC FRUIT IN A DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER SIBLING,D. SECHELLIADekker T. 1 , Ibba I. 2 , Siju K. 2 , Stensmyr M. 2 , Hansson B. 2 1 SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden; 2 SLU, Alnarp,SwedenOlfaction in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster is increasinglyunderstood, from ligand–receptor–neuron combinations, to their axonalprojection patterns into the antennal lobe. Drosophila thus offers anexcellent opportunity to study the evolutionary and ecological dynamicsof olfactory systems. We compared the structure and function of thegeneralist D. melanogaster with that of specialist D. sechellia, whichoviposits exclusively on morinda fruit. Our analyses show that, whereasthe fruit´s headspace was dominated by acids, antennae responded moststrongly to hexanoates. D. sechellia exhibited an extraordinary strongresponse to methyl hexanoate (MeHex). Behaviorally D. sechellia wasmuch more attracted to these morinda fruit volatiles than D.melanogaster. The high sensitivity to MeHex was paralleled by a 2.5-3xoverrepresentation of MeHex neurons on the antenna and a concordant2.9 x increase in volume of the corresponding glomerulus as comparedto D. melanogaster. In addition, the MeHex neuron exhibited anextreme sensitivity down to femtograms of its ligand. In contrast, noperipherally-mediated shift was found paralleling D. sechellia`sincreased attraction to acids. These findings are a demonstration ofevolution acting at several levels in the olfactory circuitry in mediatinga fruitfly´s unique preference for fruit toxic to its sibling species.284 Poster Central Olfaction and Chemical EcologyRELEVANCE OF AGE, SEX, AND ODOR ON THE FORAGINGCAPABILITIES OF MANDUCA SEXTAWilliams A.K. 1 , Raguso R. 1 1 Biological Sciences, University of SouthCarolina, Columbia, SCForaging behavior of nectarivorous hawkmoths typically involvesbrief bouts of floral visitation. During these times, it is possible for theanimal to take up relatively large quantities of nectar with respect tobody weight. We are interested in the variation between the volume thatthe animals are capable of imbibing when immobilized versus thatwhich they will freely take up during flight. Additionally, we areinterested in the role that odor plays in the quantity of nectar imbibed aswell as the relevance of sex and age. Naïve Manduca sexta of bothsexes and from one to five days post-eclosion in age, were immobilizedby clamping the wings and force-fed by manually extending theproboscis into a 25% sucrose solution. The mass of the solution inaddition to the masses of the moths was determined before and aftereach session so as to obtain the total volume ingested. Hand-feedingswere conducted with and without the presence of bergamot oil. Anothercohort of moths was released, individually, into a flight cage containingmock flowers. Each mock flower contained an eppendorf tube, intowhich one ml of 25% sucrose solution was pipetted. All moths andtubes containing the solution were weighed before each session.Subsequent to the flight, the moths and the tubes of the flowers visitedwere weighed. As in the hand-feedings, flights were carried out withand without the presence of bergamot oil. At one day followingeclosion, hand-fed males ingested greater volumes on average thanfemales. By the end of the second day quantities imbibed were moreuniform between the two sexes.71
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26