341 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneCHANGES IN OLFACTORY RECEPTOR EXPRESSION INAGING MICELee A.C. 1 , Tian H. 1 , Ma M. 1 1 Neuroscience, University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAOlfactory perception deteriorates in mammals with age, which isaccompanied by structural and molecular changes along the olfactorypathway including the olfactory epithelium, the olfactory bulb, and theolfactory cortex. Previous studies have shown that the mainpathological change in the nose during aging is the reduction of theolfactory epithelial surface (area and thickness), and a net loss of matureolfactory sensory neurons. Odorant receptors (ORs) expressed in theepithelium are critical for smell, but it is not known how theirexpression levels change with age. In this study, we investigatedchanges in olfactory receptor expression by performing in situhybridization for representative ORs selected from all four zones. Thedensity of olfactory sensory neurons expressing particular ORs wascompared at ages of 1, 12, and 18 months. The expression of somereceptors decreased, while others increased. For example, the density ofMOR267-16 neurons decreased from 4,120 ± 781 cells/mm 3 at 1 monthto 2,784 ± 601 cells/mm 3 at 18 months. In contrast, the density ofMOR235-1 neurons increased from 8,836 ± 1501 cells/mm 3 at 1 monthto 12,954 ± 273 cells/mm 3 at 18 months. The results indicate that agerelatedolfactory deterioration is more complex than the simple loss ofolfactory receptors. This work is supported by NIDCD/NIH, WhitehallFoundation and UPenn IOA (Pilot Grant).342 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneSIGNATURES OF AGING: PROFILES OF GENEREGULATION IN THE MURINE OLFACTORY EPITHELIUMGetchell T.V. 1 , Hersh M.A. 2 , Vaishnav R.A. 1 , Saunders C.P. 2 , Liu H. 2 ,Stromberg A.J. 2 , Getchell M.L. 3 1 Physiology, University of Kentucky,Lexington, KY; 2 Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY;3 Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KYWe are investigating age-related changes in gene regulation in themurine olfactory system at 3 representative ontogenic stages: the 1.5month (mo) young adult, the 6.0 mo adult, and the 20 mo old adult.Following total RNA isolation from the olfactory epithelium (OE) of 3age-matched male mice at each stage, cDNAs from each mouse werehybridized on 9 Affymetrix 430 2.0 whole mouse genome GeneChips.After data scrubbing and ANOVA, 3,840 known genes had significantdifferences (p < 0.01) in their mean hybridization signals between atleast 2 stages. We used 2 methods of informatics analysis to identifysignatures of gene regulation associated with aging. First, theExpression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) program identifiedseveral Gene Ontology categories associated with cellular proliferationas being over-represented (EASE scores of < 0.05) and down-regulated.Second, post-hoc statistical comparisons identified 136 significantlyregulated genes (p < 0.01) that exhibited 1 of 3 characteristic temporalprofiles. There were 15 genes that were up-regulated with increasingage, 30 genes that were down-regulated with increasing age, and 91genes that had mixed patterns. The results of our study have identifiedspecific molecular and pattern profiles of gene regulation that establishsignatures of aging in the murine olfactory epithelium. Support: NIH-AG16824 (TVG), NIH-T32-CD00065 (CS), NIH-IP20-RR-16481(AJS)343 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneAN INTEGRATED OLFACTORY RECEPTOR MICROARRAYGENE EXPRESSION DATABASELiu N. 1 , Yang J. 1 , Crasto C.J. 1 , Firestein S. 2 , Ma M. 3 1 Center forMedical Informatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT; 2 Biology,Columbia University, New York, NY; 3 Neuroscience, University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAAims: The olfactory receptor gene expression pattern is an importantcomponent of signal encoding mechanisms in the mammalian olfactorysystem. We have developed the Olfactory Receptor MicroarrayDatabase (ORMD; http://neurolab.med.yale.edu/ormd/) to house ORgene expression data and have integrated the database with theSenseLab system, in particular, ORDB (http://senselab.med.yale.edu/senselab/ORDB/). Methods: ORMD is a Web-based database, built inJava and Oracle. This is a secure database, which requires anauthenticated login to access private data. Data contributors may definethe public availability of individual datasets. Results: ORMD allowsusers to manage projects/experiments and to deposit related geneexpression data. For each experiment, raw data files can be downloadedand analyzed gene expression data can be viewed or exported. For eachprobe set, a hyperlink is provided to directly access the related olfactoryreceptor in ORDB. On the other hand, hyperlinks are provided inORDB for individual receptors, allowing Web visitors to access therelated microarray data in ORMD. Conclusions: 1. ORMD willfacilitate microarray study of olfactory receptor gene expression; 2.Together with ORDB in SenseLab, ORMD integrates gene expressiondata with genomics data for the olfactory receptors, providing resourcesfor database users as well as the public. Acknowledgments: Supportedby the NIH Human Brain Project and National Library of Medicine.344 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneCHROMATIN STRUCTURE AT ODORANT RECEPTOR LOCIKambere M. 1 , Getman M. 1 , Lane R.P. 1 1 Molecular Biology andBiochemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CTThe mammalian olfactory system is able to detect and distinguishamong tens of thousands of odorants in the environment. This ability isdependent on an organizing principle in which each sensory neuron inthe nose expresses only one olfactory receptor (OR) allele from among>1000 OR genes in the genome. We are interested in understanding theregulatory mechanisms that govern this mutually exclusive expression.Previous genomic and genetic studies suggest that OR genes reside inrepressed regions of the genome, and we are exploring the hypothesisthat mutually exclusive transcription of only one OR allele is facilitatedby limiting transcriptional access by chromatin modifications. We haveused chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays to generatepreliminary results on the histone modifications at an OR locus that wehave previously shown becomes active in a differentiated olfactorysensory cell line. For all six modifications tested, histones around thetested OR locus in undifferentiated cells show acetylation andmethylation patterns consistent with inactive euchromatin. This resultsuggests that the ground state for OR loci in premature sensory neuronsis “closed”. We are now assaying histone acetylation and methylationpatterns at multiple OR loci to test whether all OR genes are similarly“closed” in undifferentiated cells, and investigating how chromatinpatterns change during the differentiation process. We anticipate havingpreliminary results for these studies by the date of this meeting.86
345 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromonePOTENTIATION AND INHIBITION AMONG ODORANTSACTING ON HUMAN VN1-TYPE RECEPTORSShirokova E. 1 , Krautwurst D. 1 1 German Institute of Human NutritionPotsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, GermanyThe human nose is exposed to odours that are shaped in many casesrather by mixtures of odorants than by a single odorant. For example,the key aroma compounds from food or human skin emanations arequite diverse, but also include homologous series of aliphatic odorants,that vary over size and functional groups. When tested with individuallyapplied odorants, olfactory receptors (ORs) display specific odorantrecognition profiles. At the receptor level, related odorants canantagonize each other´s effect. The complex actions of odorant mixtureson OR, however, are poorly understood. In 96well Ca 2+ imaging FLIPRexperiments, we identified specific C7-C11 aliphatics as best agonistsfor all five human VN1-type receptors (VN1Rs), when expressed inHeLa/Olf cells. In binary mixtures with agonists, related odorants withthe same functional group, but with a carbon chain length C11acted as antagonists. Related odorants with a different functional groupbut similar length had no effect by themselves, but potentiated the effectof the agonist. For example, VN1R1 responded specifically toaldehydes with decanal as best agonist. Hexanal and undecanalconcentration-dependently inhibited the decanal responses, whiledecanol had no effect by itself, but potentiated the decanal responseabout 2-fold. Similar effects were observed with the other VN1Rs.Antagonism and potentiating effects may thus account for thedominating or masking of odorants in complex mixtures. Ourobservations with binary mixtures anticipate an even higher level ofcomplexity of odorant coding at the level of ORs in nose.346 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneIDENTIFICATION OF A MOUSE V2R RECEPTOREXPRESSED IN VOMERONASAL SENSORY NEURONSSTIMULATED BY A MALE-SPECIFIC PEPTIDE ESP1Haga S. 1 , Kimoto H. 1 , Yanagawa T. 1 , Sato K. 1 , Touhara K. 1 1 TheUniversity of Tokyo, Chiba, JapanThe vomeronasal organ (VNO) is thought to be responsible formediating pheromone information in mice. We recently identified asex-specific peptide, named ESP1, in tears of male mice. The secretedESP1 appears to be transferred to the female VNO wherein it elicits anelectrical response in vomeronasal sensory neurons (VSNs), andtherefore, ESP1 is a candidate sex-pheromone in mice. The ESP1 genewas a member of a novel multigene family (ESP family) that composedof ~30 homologous genes in mouse genome. Some of orthologousgenes were found in rat genome, albeit the number was smaller thanthat in mice, whereas no apparent ESP gene was found in humangenome, suggesting that the ESP family has rapidly evolved during theevolutional process. ESP1 induced c-Fos expression in V2R-expressingVSNs that were stained with a V2Rp probe potentially hybridizing witheight homologous V2Rs. To identify which V2R in the V2Rpsubfamily is expressed in c-Fos-induced VSNs, we designed a set ofprobes from different regions of V2Rp and performed high-stringencyin situ hybridization. One probe that hybridized with only a V2Rp5gene product recognized 100% of c-Fos-positive VSNs. These resultssuggest that a ligand spectrum of a pheromone receptor is narrowlytuned and specific, not like in main olfactory system wherein eachodorant is recognized by a different set of olfactory receptors. [supported by PROBRAIN, Japan ]347 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneAN EARLIER ORIGIN FOR THE VOMERONASAL SYSTEM:TRP2 IN SEA LAMPREY (PETROMYZON MARINUS)Grus W.E. 1 , Zhang J.G. 1 1 Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Universityof Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIThe vomeronasal system (VNS) is one of two nasal chemosensorysystems found in tetrapods. Currently, the VNS is defined by twomorphological components, the vomeronasal organ and the accessoryolfactory bulb. These components are only found in tetrapods(amphibians, reptiles, and mammals). Alternatively, the VNS could bedefined by system-specific genetic components. Compared with apurely morphological view, this view gives a different picture of VNSevolution. In mammals, VNS-specific genetic components have beenwell characterized, and all three mammalian VNS-specific genes(V1Rs, V2Rs, and Trp2) have been identified in teleost fish with tissuespecificexpression, indicating that they are involved in chemosensorydetection. Additionally, studies revealed that these teleost genes are coexpressedand function together. Thus, the VNS-specific signaltransduction pathway predates the morphologically defined VNS. Here,we suggest an even earlier origin of the VNS by describing the partialsequence of Trp2, in a jawless vertebrate, the sea lamprey (Petromyzonmarinus). Expression studies could confirm that this VNS-specific genein lampreys indicates that the VNS was present in the common ancestorof jawless fish and jawed vertebrates at least 550-650 million years ago.WEG is supported by the Rackham Graduate School, the University ofMichigan Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and NIH TrainingGrant T32 HG00040.348 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Molecular Genetics andVNO/PheromoneTWO FAMILIES OF CANDIDATE TASTE RECEPTORS INFISHESIshimaru Y. 1 , Okada S. 1 , Naito H. 1 , Nagai T. 1 , Yasuoka A. 2 , MatsumotoI. 1 , Abe K. 1 1 Applied Biological Chemistry, The University of Tokyo,Tokyo, Japan; 2 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,Research Triangle Park, NCVertebrates receive tastants, such as sugars, amino acids, andnucleotides, via taste bud cells in epithelial tissues. In mammals, twofamilies of G protein-coupled receptors for tastants are expressed intaste bud cells—T1Rs for sweet tastants and umami tastants (L-aminoacids) and T2Rs for bitter tastants. Here, we report two families ofcandidate taste receptors in fish species, fish T1Rs and T2Rs, whichshow significant identity to mammalian T1Rs and T2Rs, respectively.Fish T1Rs consist of three types: fish T1R1 and T1R3 that show thehighest degrees of identity to mammalian T1R1 and T1R3, respectively,and fish T1R2 that shows almost equivalent identity to both mammalianT1R1 and T1R2. Unlike mammalian T1R2, fish T1R2 consists of twoor three members in each species. We also identified two fish T2Rs thatshow low degrees of identity to mammalian T2Rs. In situ hybridizationexperiments revealed that fish T1R and T2R genes were expressedspecifically in taste bud cells, but not in olfactory receptor cells. FishT1R1 and T1R2 genes were expressed in different subsets of taste budcells, and fish T1R3 gene was co-expressed with either fish T1R1 orT1R2 gene as in the case of mammals. There were also a significantnumber of cells expressing fish T1R2 genes only. Fish T2R genes wereexpressed in different cells from those expressing fish T1R genes.These results suggest that vertebrates commonly have two kinds of tastesignaling pathways that are defined by the types of taste receptorsexpressed in taste receptor cells. Ishimaru Y. et al. Mech. Dev. 122:1310-1321 (2005)87
- Page 1 and 2:
1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4:
9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6:
17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8:
25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11:
37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13:
45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15:
53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17:
61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19:
69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21:
77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23:
85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25:
93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27:
101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29:
109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31:
117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33:
125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35:
133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103: 405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105: 413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107: 421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109: 429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111: 437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113: 445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115: 453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117: 461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119: 469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121: 477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123: 485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125: 493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127: 501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129: Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131: Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133: Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135: Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26