77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteEXPRESSION OF GENES INVOLVED IN SYNTHESIS ANDSECRETION OF BIOGENIC AMINE NEUROTRANSMITTERSIN MOUSE TASTE BUDSDvoriantchikov G. 1 , Chaudhari N. 1 1 Physiology & Biophysics,University of Miami, Miami, FLCells within mammalian taste buds are known to express a number ofneurotransmitters. These may play roles in communication betweencells of a taste bud and/or for signaling to afferent nerve fibers. One ofthe biogenic amines, serotonin, is found in a subset of taste cells inmany species, and is released following taste stimulation (Huang et al.,2005). We explored the expression of genes involved in the synthesis ofbiogenic amine neurotransmitters in mouse taste buds. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) is common to the pathways forserotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine. We find thisenzyme is expressed at high concentration in taste buds, and is lackingfrom surrounding non-taste epithelium. Further, mRNA for tryptophanhydroxylase isoforms (Tph1 and 2) and the serotonin transporter all keyfor serotonin synthesis or packaging are also detected, albeit at lowerlevels. Enzymes involves in catecholamine synthesis, packaging orrelease, including Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH), Vesicular MonoamineTransporter (VMaT2), Dopamine transporter, and α-sinuclein also areexpressed. Single-cell RT-PCR and immunocytochemical analysessuggest that some of these enzymes are found in a common subset ofcells in mouse taste buds. To date, we have been unable to detect eitherdopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) or phenylethanola-mine-Nmethyltransferase(PNMT), enzymes necessary for the synthesis ofnorepinephrine and epinephrine. (Supported by DC006308 to NC).79 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteECTO-ATPASE IN TASTE BUDS OF FISHESKirino M. 1 , Kiyohara S. 1 , Hansen A. 2 , Finger T.E. 2 1 Chemistry andBioScience, Fac. Science, Kagoshima Univ., Kagoshima, Kagoshima,Japan; 2 Cell and Developmental Biology, University of ColoradoHealth Sciences Center, Aurora, COATP is claimed to be a crucial neurotransmitter in mammalian tastebuds (Finger et al., Science 2005) and taste buds in mammals displayrobust ectoATPase activity, suggesting that this enzyme plays a role ininactivation of the neurotransmitter. We utilized histochemicaltechniques to assess whether ectoATPase activity is present in tastebuds of fishes. Taste bud-bearing tissue was obtained from 3 species offish: 2 catfish: Plotosus lineatus (barbels), Ictalurus punctatus (barbels),and goldfish, Carassius auratus (lips and palatal organ). Tissue wasfixed 1 hr in mixed aldehydes in Tris-maleate buffer, then washed andcryoprotected overnight. Free-floating sections were then placed inreaction solution (2 mM Pb(NO 3 ) 2 containing inhibitors of non-specificphosphatases (levamisole, ouabain, α,β-methylene ADP) along witheither ATP or ADP as substrates. Following a reaction period of 30min., the tissue was washed and exposed to 1% Ammonium sulfide for1 min. Reaction product outlined elongate cells of taste buds in alltissues treated with ATP but not ADP. This high specificity for ATP issimilar to the ectoATPase in rodent taste buds. Reaction product alsowas evident in the nerve bundles coursing through the submucosa andreaching the base of the taste bud. This neural ATPase, however, waspresent in tissue reacted with either ADP and ATP indicating thepresence of a different ATPase than is present in taste buds. Furtherstudies will determine the cell type or types that exhibit this ectoATPasereactivity. Supported by NIH Grant R01 DC007495 (T.E.F.)80 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral Taste78 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteCELL-TO-CELL COMMUNICATION IN TASTE BUDS: THEROLE OF ATP AND 5HTHuang Y. 1 , Maruyama Y. 1 , Pereira E. 1 , Roper S.D. 1 1 Physiology &Biophysics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FLWe previously have shown that sweet, sour, and bitter stimuli, andK + -induced depolarization all evoke 5HT release from mouse vallatetaste buds in vitro (Huang et al 2005, J Neurosci 25:843). Furthermore,applying ATP also stimulates 5HT release. Procedures that interferewith ATP stimulation, including applying suramin (a purinoceptorantagonist) or apyrase (an ATPase), block taste-evoked 5HT release.These data suggest that ATP acts as an intermediary in the release of5HT from taste buds. Here we present direct evidence for ATP releasefrom taste cells. Using CHO cells expressing highly sensitive P 2Xreceptors as biosensors, we are able to detect ATP release from isolatedtaste buds. ATP release was evoked by saccharin (2 mM), SC45647(100 µM), cycloheximide (10 µM), or denatonium (1 mM). We nextisolated single vallate taste cells, loaded them with Fura-2 for Ca 2+imaging, and identified 2 separate cell populations—cells stimulated bytastants (taste receptor cells) and cells stimulated by depolarization(synaptic cells; DeFazio et al, AChemS 2005). Isolated taste receptorcells released ATP and isolated synaptic cells released 5HT in biosensorstudies. There was zero overlap in these two populations. Our dataemphasize the existence of two functional classes of taste cells (cf.DeFazio et al, ibid., and Kim et al, this meeting) and indicate thatmouse vallate taste receptor cells communicate with nearbyserotonergic synaptic taste cells via ATP. Specifically, ATP secretedfrom receptor cells triggers 5HT release. (Supported by DC007630[SDR])NUMERICAL DENSITY OF TASTE CELLS IN RAT ANDMOUSE CIRCUMVALLATE TASTE BUDSMa H. 1 , Yang R. 1 , Kinnamon J.C. 1 1 Biological Sciences, University ofDenver, Denver, COWe have previously shown that significant differences exist betweenmouse and rat taste buds with regard to the expression of markers fortaste signaling and synaptic proteins (Ma et al., AChemS 2005). In thepresent study we wished to determine if there are differences in thenumerical density of taste cells and taste bud volume between rat andmouse taste buds. For this study we sliced serial transverse sections (1µm thickness) from mouse and rat circumvallate papillae to count thenumbers of taste cells in the taste buds and to calculate taste budvolume. Forty-one taste buds from 3 mice and 42 taste buds from 3 ratswere analyzed. Our results indicate that mouse taste buds contain anaverage of 85.8 taste cells vs 68.4 taste cells in rat taste buds. Thenumbers of taste cells/bud ranged from 32-152 in the mouse and 34-126in the rat. Although the average mouse taste bud contains more tastecells than a rat taste bud, the average volume of a mouse taste bud(42,000 µm 3 ) is smaller than a rat taste bud (64,200 µm 3 ). Thenumerical density of taste cells in mouse circumvallate taste buds (2.1cells/1000 µm 3 ) is significantly higher than that in the rat (1.2cells/1000 µm 3 ). The results of the present study, taken together withour previous work, demonstrate that mouse and rat taste buds are bothquantitatively and qualitatively different. This work is funded by NIHgrant DC00285.20
81 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteSYNAPTOTAGMIN-1-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY INCIRCUMVALLATE TASTE BUDS OF THE RATThomas S. 1 , Yang R. 1 , Ma H. 1 , Kinnamon J.C. 1 1 Biological Sciences,University of Denver, Denver, COSynaptotagmin (syt) is a vesicle associated glycoprotein ofneurosecretory granules and synaptic vesicles. Synaptotagmin has twoC2 domains that interact with Ca 2+ and is thought to be the primarysensor for synaptic vesicle fusion and neurotransmitter exocytosis. Weused immunocytochemistry with syt-1 and other known functionalmarkers in taste cells to learn if synaptotagmin is associated with tastecells thought to possess synapses. Preliminary results reveal that syt-1 ispresent in a small subset of taste cells and nerve processes in ratcircumvallate taste buds. Approximately 13% of taste cells display syt-1-like immunoreactivity (LIR). The immunoreactive taste cells areslender in shape and extend the entire height of the taste bud from basallamina to taste pore. Syt-1-LIR colocalizes with synaptobrevin-2-,protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5)-, and serotonin-LIR in a subset oftaste cells, however, syt-1-LIR taste cells do not contain α-gustducin orPLCβ2 which are believed to be present in type II taste cells. Inaddition, we used DAB immunoelectron microscopy and found that syt-1-LIR taste cells possess synapses onto nerve processes in ratcircumvallate taste buds. These data suggest that syt-1 is present in typeIII taste cells and is associated with synapses onto nerve processes.Supported in part by NIH grant DC00285.82 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteCHARACTERISTICS OF GUSTATORY RESPONSES FROMTHE SOFT PALATE IN C57BL MICEHarada S. 1 , Ooki M. 1 , Nakayama A. 1 , Miura H. 1 1 Oral Physiology,Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JapanGustatory responses from the soft palate in C57BL mice were studiedby electrophysiological and behavioral experiments. Integrated tasteresponses from the greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSP), innervatingthe soft palate, to NaCl, HCl, sucrose (Suc), quinine HCl (QHCl), andother taste substances at various concentrations were recorded.Threshold for QHCl was 0.00001 M and QHCl produced robust phasicand tonic responses at 0.01 M. Threshold for HCl was 0.0003 M androbust phasic and tonic responses were observed at 0.01 M. Thresholdfor Suc response was rather high at 0.03 M and the response magnitudeincreased abruptly with increasing concentration until 1 M. Artificialsweeteners tested (0.1 M aceslfame-K, 0.1 M sucralose, 0.02 Msaccharin) also produced large responses similar to 1 M Suc.Stimulatory effectiveness for NaCl was smaller than that in the chordatympani (CT). Although inhibitory effects of amiloride on responses toNa salts was weak in the rat GSP, 50 µM amiloride strongly inhibitedtonic responses to NaCl and Na-acetate in mice GSP similarly to that inthe CT. To determine the relative importance of the three major nerves[the GSP, the glossopharyngeal (GL), and the CT] for mediating tasteinformation, effects on licking behavior by bilateral transection of eachnerve or combination of the nerves in mice were studied. As for theQHCl, the effect of GSP + GL transection was large by ~75%. Theseresults suggest functional differences of soft palate taste buds amongrodents.83 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteMIXING SWEET AND SOUR STIMULI: EFFECTS ON THEHAMSTER CHORDA TYMPANILin H. 1 , Formaker B.K. 1 , Hettinger T.P. 1 , Frank M.E. 1 1 Oral Health &Diagnostic Sciences, UConn Health Center, Farmington, CTChorda tympani (CT) and central hamster taste responses to sucroseare inhibited by quinine•HCl when presented together in a mixture; inaddition, central sucrose responses are also inhibited by mixtures withcitric acid (HCit) [Formaker & Frank, 1996; Vogt & Smith, 1993a, b].Thus, we hypothesized that mixtures of sucrose with acids wouldreduce sucrose CT responses. We recorded CT responses in a total of 11golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) to the following stimuli: 3mMHCl, 10mM HCit, 10mM acetic acid (HAc), 100mM sucrose and thebinary combinations of sucrose with each acid. Responses to 500 mMNH 4 Cl were used to normalize response measurements. Responses tosucrose mixtures with HCit equaled responses to HCit alone and weresmaller (p < 0.001) than responses predicted by an additive responsemodel, implying sucrose response suppression by HCit. In contrast,responses to sucrose mixtures with HAc or HCl were larger thanresponses to either mixture component alone (p < 0.001) and equaledresponses predicted by an additive response model, implying responseindependence. Solution pH did not account for these effects. We alsorecorded CT responses to a concentration series of HCit (1, 3, 10mM)alone and mixed with 100 mM sucrose in 4 animals. As with HAc andHCl, responses to mixtures with 1mM HCit were larger than responsesto either mixture component presented alone (p < 0.001); however, themixture response was still smaller (p < 0.05) than that predicted by anindependent response model. Thus, HCit may modulate the sucrosereceptor complex making it less effective. Alternatively, cross-talk mayoccur between the sweet and sour stimulus modalities in the hamstergustatory periphery. [Supported by NIH grant DC 040499]84 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteAMILORIDE INHIBITION OF THE NA-EVOKED LINGUALSURFACE POTENTIALS (LSP) VARIES IN HUMANSFeldman G. 1 , Heck G. 2 1 Internal Medicine, Virginia CommonwealthUniversity, Richmond, VA; 2 Physiology, Virginia CommonwealthUniversity, Richmond, VAAs we previously reported Na affects the LSP in humans, and insome people the Na-evoked LSP is partly inhibited by amiloride, ablocker of the epithelial Na channel. In this study we examined whetherthe amiloride effect is constant in given individuals or whether it variesfrom one day to the next. Using a voltage sensing gustometer adheringto the anterior surface of the tongue, the amiloride effect was measuredas 150 mM NaCl superfused the lingual surface. The amiloride effectwas quantified as the induced rate of change of the LSP (mV / sec);larger positive numbers signify greater effects. In 10 subjects, 100 µMamiloride inhibited the Na-evoked LSP an average of 0.0280 (±0.049SD). When the same subject was tested repeatedly on different days theamiloride effect varied considerably. For example, in one subjectamiloride´s effects were determined on 13 days; the average effect was0.155, the minimum was 0.020 and the maximum was 0.357. In anothersubject amiloride´s effects were determined on 5 days; the average was-0.003, the minimum was -0.025, and the maximum was 0.041. Thesedata demonstrate that the amiloride effect on the Na-evoked LSP variesamong subjects and that in individual subjects the amiloride effectvaries from one day to the next. Daily variation of the amiloride effectcould suggest that the Na-evoked LSP is responding to physiologicalregulatory events, such as hormones. If this speculation is correct, thenit is possible that in humans the perception of salt taste may also vary inresponse to physiological events. This work is funded by a MeritReview Grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs.21
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71:
277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73:
285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75:
293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77:
301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26