5 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>7 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>REPRESENTATION OF NATURAL STIMULI IN THE RODENTMAIN OLFACTORY BULBLin D. 1 , Katz L.C. 1 1 Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NCTo understand the organization of natural stimuli in the bulb, werecorded electrophysiological responses of mitral cells and imagedintrinsic signals from glomeruli upon stimulation with volatiles fromnatural stimuli. All natural stimuli including urine are sparselyrepresented, activating less than 10% of mitral cells or glomeruli. Tofurther examine the origins of mitral cell and glomerular responses tonatural stimuli, we fractionated volatiles in natural stimuli using gaschromatography and delivered them sequentially to the animals whilemonitoring neural activities continuously. Among hundreds of volatilespresent in a natural stimulus, mitral cells and glomeruli are frequentlyactivated by a single component whereas individual components onlyevoked activation in a small distinct set of glomeruli. The representationof a complete natural stimulus is largely the simple union ofrepresentations of its individual components. During experiments usingurine volatiles, one cohort of mitral cells were found activatedexclusively by male mouse urine. These cells were determinedresponsive to a previously unknown male specific sulfur containingcompound (methylthio)methanethiol. When added to castrated malemouse urine, synthetic (methylthio)methanethiol significantly enhancedurine attractiveness to female mice. The conclusion from theseexperiments are as followings: (1) natural stimuli and their individualcomponents are sparsely represented in the MOB; (2) mitral cells andglomeruli encode natural odorant stimuli by acting as feature detectors;(3) individual components are processed in the bulb largelyindependently.6 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>OLFACTORY RECEPTORS IN THE SEPTAL ORGANGrosmaitre X. 1 , Tian H. 1 , Lee A. 1 , Ma M. 1 1 Neuroscience, University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAThe septal organ is a distinct chemosensory organ in the mammaliannose. We have identified the odorant receptors expressed in this region.The majority of the septal neurons express only a few odorant receptorsin varying patterns, with the most prevalent receptor (MOR256-3)present in nearly 50% of the neurons and the eight most prevalentreceptors in nearly 95% of the neurons. A single neuron probablyexpresses only one receptor. Using patch clamp recordings, we haveinvestigated how the mouse septal organ neurons in the intactepithelium respond to odorants delivered by pressure ejection (puffing).The majority of the septal organ neurons exhibit both odorant andmechanical responses mediated by adenylyl cyclase. These neurons arerelatively broadly-tuned by responding to multiple distinct odorantswith thresholds at the nanomolar range. In addition, they respond toRinger puffs (mechanical responses) and the response increases linearlywith the pressure of the puff. The septal organ, situated in the air path,may have dual functions in the nose: a sensitive, broadly-tuned odordetector and a mechanical sensor. When the air flows faster in the nose(such as during sniffing), the observed mechanical sensitivity mayincrease the chance for single neurons to fire upon weak stimulation.Furthermore, the mechanical sensitivity may provide a driving force(besides the episodic exposure of odorants during respiration) for theperiodic activities of the olfactory bulb neurons synchronized withbreathing cycles.Supported by NIDCD/NIH, Whitehall Foundation and UPenn IOA(Pilot Grant).8 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OFMAMMALIAN ODORANT RECEPTORSLuetje C.W. 1 1 Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University ofMiami, Miami, FLMammalian odorant receptors (ORs) are grouped into two broadclasses and numerous subfamilies, which may reflect functionalorganization. We are using Xenopus oocytes to investigate the ligandspecificities of members of OR subfamilies. We find that a wide varietyof Class I and Class II mouse ORs (MORs) can be functionallyexpressed. Co-expression of MORs with Gαolf and the cystic fibrosistransmembrane regulator allows measurement of odorant responsesusing electrophysiological methods. All receptor constructs include theN-terminal 20 amino acid residues of human rhodopsin, and for mostMORs tested this is sufficient for functional expression. Co-expressionof accessory proteins (RTP1, RTP2 and REEP1) allows functionalexpression of additional MORs. Using this assay, we examined theligand specificities of the MOR42 subfamily. MOR42-1 responded todicarboxylic acids (C9-C12). MOR42-2 responded to monocarboxylicacids (C7-C10). MOR42-3 responded to dicarboxylic acids (C8-C10)and monocarboxylic acids (C10-C12). Thus, the receptive range of eachreceptor is unique. However, overlap between the individual receptiveranges suggests that the members of this subfamily are contributing toone contiguous subfamily receptive range, supporting the idea that ORsubfamilies constitute functional units. We are screening a series ofmutant MORs to identify residues that confer differences in ligandspecificity between MOR42-1 and MOR42-3. This analysis, coupledwith computational receptor modeling, provides insight into thestructural basis for odorant recognition by ORs. Support: NIHMH66038, DA08102.RIC-8B, A PUTATIVE GEF FOR G ALPHA OLF, AMPLIFIESSIGNAL TRANSDUCTION THROUGH ODORANTRECEPTORSVon Dannecker L.C. 1 , Mercadante A.F. 1 , Malnic B. 1 1 Department ofBiochemistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilThe canonical pathway for odorant signal transduction in olfactoryneurons consists of four major olfactory specific components: odorantreceptors, G alpha olf, adenylyl cyclase III and a cyclic nucleotide-gatedchannel. During the last years, a large number of regulatorymechanisms that lead to odorant signal termination have beendescribed, but so far, there was no evidence for regulatory events thatwould result in signal amplification. We identified a protein, Ric-8B,which interacts with G alpha olf. Our results demonstrate that Ric-8B,which is a putative guanylyl nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), shows astriking restricted pattern of gene expression, which co-localizes withthat of G alpha olf: both genes are specifically expressed in maturesensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium and in a few regions in thebrain. In addition, we show that Ric-8B significantly enhances odorantreceptor signaling through G alpha olf in HEK293T cells. Our resultsindicate that Ric-8B can be used to improve high-throughput functionalexpression of odorant receptors in heterologous cells.Supported by grants from FAPESP.2
9 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>“DEORPHANIZING” MAMMALIAN ODORANT RECEPTORSMatsunami H. 1 1 MGM, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCHow does mammalian olfactory system use hundreds or moreodorant receptors (ORs) to detect and discriminate a vast number ofvolatile odorants? To tackle this question, it is essential to understandhow structurally diverse chemicals activate different ORs. However, ithas been difficult to express mammalian ORs on the cell surface ofheterologous cells and assay their ligand-binding specificities, becauseOR proteins are typically retained in the endoplasmic reticulum and nottransported to the cell surface. We have identified RTP1 and RTP2 thatpromote functional cell-surface expression of ORs in heterologous cells.Structure-function analysis of RTP1 revealed important domainsfunctioning in trafficking of ORs. We have constructed a heterologousexpression system to identify new ORs that respond to various odorants.We have tested ~300 human and ~200 mouse ORs against a panel of~100 diverse odorant chemicals to determine the odorant-ORinteractions. This screening have resulted in identification of ~100human and mouse ORs that respond to a wide variety of odorantchemicals. Some ORs seem to respond small number of structurallysimilar chemicals while others seem to respond to many chemicals,suggesting variable tuning specificities of ORs. Supported by an NIHgrant DC0578211 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>OLFACTORY DEFICITS IN MICE DEFICIENT FOR THETRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL CHANNEL M5Restrepo D. 1 , Margolskee R.F. 2 , Lin W. 1 1 Cell and DevelopmentalBiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO;2 Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NYMice defective for the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGA2) have asevere olfactory deficit, but respond to putative pheromones implyingthe presence of other transduction pathways in addition to the canonicalcAMP pathway (Lin et al., 24:3703, 2004). We studied theresponsiveness of individual glomeruli in CNGA2 knockout mice bydetecting odor-induced Fos expression in periglomerular cells. While asubset of the glomeruli activated by putative pheromones were necklaceglomeruli where the second messenger cGMP is thought to mediatetransduction, the majority of active glomeruli in CNGA2 knockout micewere regular glomeruli targeted by olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs)that would normally have expressed CNGA2, and do not expresselements of the cGMP pathway. Interestingly, electroolfactogram(EOG) responses elicited by putative pheromones in CNGA2 knockoutmice are inhibited by the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U73122implying an involvement of this pathway in olfactory transduction.Further, we find that the transient receptor potential channel M5, aneffector participating in the PLC pathway in taste cells is co-expressedwith CNGA2 in a subset of OSNs projecting to glomeruli that respondto putative pheromones and urine. While the olfactory deficits inTRPM5 knockout mice are relatively mild, we find that mice defectivefor both TRPM5 and CNGA2 have a dramatic phenotype includingseverely diminished size of the olfactory bulb and missing glomeruli indiscrete areas of the bulb. These data imply that, in a subset of OSNs,the PLC/TRPM5 and cAMP pathways are co-expressed and play a rolein olfactory transduction. Supported by NIH grants DC00566,DC04657, DC006070 (DR) and DC006828 (WL), DC03155 (RFM).10 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>OLFACTION TARGETEDMombaerts P. 1 1 The Rockefeller University, New York, NYThe sense of smell is mediated by a repertoire of ~1000 odorantreceptor genes in mice. Each olfactory sensory neuron is thought toexpress just one of these genes. Its axon synapes with second-orderneurons within a glomerulus in the olfactory bulb. The axons of allneurons that express the same receptor gene converge to the sameglomeruli. The odorant receptor is a critical determinant of whichglomerulus is innervated. An olfactory sensory neuron thus faces twotasks during differentiation: to choose one odorant receptor gene forexpression, and to project its axon to a specific glomerulus.12 <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>Chemosensory</strong> <strong>Receptors</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong>MONITORING ODORANT DETECTION BY OLFACTORYRECEPTORS EXPRESSED IN YEAST AS A REPORTERSYSTEMMinic J. 1 , Grosclaude J. 2 , Persuy M. 1 , Aioun J. 1 , Connerton I. 3 , SalesseR. 1 , Pajot-Augy E. 1 1 Neurobiologie de l'Olfaction et de la PriseAlimentaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France; 2 Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, InstitutNational de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France;3 Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomBreaking down the molecular mechanisms of odorant perception andcoding, and screening receptor-odorant couples primarily require thefunctional expression of olfactory receptors in a cellular system. Wehave developed techniques to optimize membrane expression ofolfactory receptors in engineered S. cerevisiae yeast. <strong>Receptors</strong>functional activity is evaluated both in living cells, where receptorstimulation by its odorant ligand is monitored through thebioluminescence of a luciferase reporter, and in nanosomes membranefragments, where activation of the receptor upon odorant stimulationcan be assessed by monitoring surface plasmon resonance response. Wedemonstrate that olfactory receptors maintain their activity in membranefragments. A same bell-shaped concentration-dependence response isobtained, in terms of threshold concentration and optimal concentration,which gives evidence that this receptor functional response in the livingcell indeed arises from its own behavior upon odorant stimulation, withno artefactual contribution from the cellular transduction pathway.Olfactory receptors efficiently discriminate between odorant ligandsand unrelated odorants. This system can fruitfully serve to evaluate thecomparative coupling efficiency of olfactory receptors to various G alphaprotein subunits, without the interference of cellular contribution.Moreover, nanosomes can be used as sensing elements of bioelectronicsensors, at the basis of potentially powerful electronic noses with a newconcept of mimicking in vivo odorant specific detection anddiscrimination. This work was supported by the PICASSO program(HF2004-0055) funded by EGIDE and the SPOT-NOSED project (IST-38899) of the European Community.3
- Page 1: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53:
205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55:
213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57:
221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59:
229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61:
237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63:
245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65:
253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67:
261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69:
269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71:
277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73:
285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75:
293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77:
301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26