101 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalOLFACTORY EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS TONEAR-THRESHOLD STIMULI IN HEALTHY ADULTSRamage E. 1 , Essoe J.K. 1 , Parks A.M. 1 , Hunt K. 1 , Lloyd K. 1 , GeislerM.W. 1 1 Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco,CAIncreased amplitudes and shortened latencies of olfactory eventrelatedpotentials (OERP's) in response to supra-threshold stimuli havebeen correlated to behavioral odor threshold scores, however, thephysiological processing of near-threshold olfactory stimuli and therelationship to behavioral measures have not been examined. This studyused a modified single-stimulus paradigm measuring OERP's at midlineand ten global sites in response to odor stimuli presented in blockrandomization at slightly below-threshold (SBT), near-threshold (NT),and supra-threshold (ST) concentrations. Reaction time, odor intensityratings, behavioral odor thresholds and magnitude matchings of theodor stimuli to a series of weights, were collected in 16 male and 23female college students. Results indicate that: (1) the amplitudes forearly sensory olfactory information processing of the N1 and P2 ERPcomponents are similar for SBT and NT stimuli and greater for ST,while the timing, or latency, of the P2 and N2 ERP components aremore similar for SBT and NT stimuli with longer P2 and shorter N2latencies for ST, (2) the amplitudes for later cognitive olfactoryinformation processing of the P3 ERP component significantlyincreased as odor stimuli concentration increased and 3) amplitudeswere greatest in the frontal electrode sites for both N1 and N2components and greatest in the parietal electrode sites for both the P2and P3 components. Results suggest that the greatest difference betweenthe OERP's of NT and SBT stimuli are found during cognitiveinformation processing.102 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalCENTRAL OLFACTORY ACTIVITY TO DIFFERENT ODORINTENSITY IN OLDER PEOPLEWang J. 1 , Zimmerman E. 1 , Grunfeld R. 1 , Vesck J. 1 , Eslinger P.J. 2 , SmithM.B. 1 , Connor J.R. 3 , Yang Q.X. 1 1 Radiology, Pennsylvania StateUniversity, Hershey, PA; 2 Neurology, Pennsylvania State University,Hershey, PA; 3 Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey,PADuring aging, human ability to evaluate odor intensity declines. Thepurpose of this study was using fMRI to examine the aging effect oncentral olfactory activity in response to different odor intensity. Theodor lavender (intensities 0.10%, 0.32%, and 1%) was presented to thenose with an olfactometer. The odor intensities used were determinedpsychophysically by another group of normal volunteers. The subjectswere asked to rate odor intensities using a scale of 0 to 10. Twelvesubjects (66.0 ± 10.9 years, 8 m, UPSIT score 33.3 ± 2.8) receivedfMRI at 3T. Ten of them provided complete pre-scan and after-scanevaluations of the odor intensities. While the subjective rating did notprovide significant difference between odor intensities (p > 0.11), fMRIshowed significant activation difference induced by different odorintensities (except between intensities 0.10% and 0.32%). Compared totwo weaker intensities, 1% lavender introduced significantly strongeractivation in the bilateral primary olfactory cortex, hippocampus, andentorhinal cortex (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the decline ofthe ability to evaluate different odor intensities during aging is notcaused by the functional decay of the brain structures mentioned above.This study is supported in part by Leader Family Foundation and NIHR01 EB00454.103 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalREDUCTION OF MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTSIN OLFACTORY FMRI WITH GESEPI-SENSE-EPI METHODZimmerman E. 1 , Wang J. 1 , Grunfeld R. 1 , Sun X. 1 , Vesck J. 1 , EslingerP.J. 2 , Smith M.B. 1 , Connor J.R. 3 , Yang Q.X. 1 1 Radiology, PennsylvaniaState University, Hershey, PA; 2 Neurology, Pennsylvania StateUniversity, Hershey, PA; 3 Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University,Hershey, PAThe severe magnetic susceptibility artifacts (signal loss andgeometric distortion) in the images of inferior brain areas pose adifficult challenge in conducting olfactory fMRI in these brain regions.To remove the artifacts for consistent olfactory fMRI mapping, wedeveloped the Gradient-Echo Slice Excitation Profile Imaging(GESEPI) technique. Combining the GESEPI with the state of artSENSE technology yields an effective method (GESEPI-SENSE-EPI)for olfactory fMRI with magnetic susceptibility artifact reduction. Theeffectiveness of GESEPI-SENSE-EPI in detection of olfactory fMRI inthe brain areas with severe artifacts was tested on nine human subjectswith GESEPI-SENSE-EPI and conventional EPI. The activationsdetected by the GESEPI-SENSE-EPI method in the base of the brainare in the areas of anterior olfactory nucleus and olfactory tubercles,which are impossible to see with conventional EPI. The success indetection of olfactory activation in these brain areas demonstrates thatthe GESEPI-SENSE-EPI is highly effective in artifact reduction andfMRI data acquisition. Supported by NIH RO1 EB00454.104 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalOLFACTORY TESTS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ESSENTIALTREMOR.Shah M. 1 , Findley L. 1 , Muhammed N. 1 , Hawkes C.H. 1 1 Smell & TasteResearch Unit, Essex Neuroscience Centre, London, United KingdomMost patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson´s disease (PD) haveimpaired smell function but it is unclear whether this is true for subjectswith essential tremor (ET). If ET patients do not exhibit meaningfulsmell loss, then olfactory testing may help to distinguish PD from ET.We assessed olfactory function of 59 ET and 64 PD patients using theUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and theolfactory event-related potential (OERP). UPSIT scores were comparedto those from 245 healthy controls, and OERPs were compared to thosefrom 74 controls. Unlike the PD test scores, those of ET patients wereindistinguishable from controls when the effects of age, age of onset,gender, and smoking were taken into account. ET patients with a familyhistory of tremor scored significantly better than controls on the UPSIT,and their rate of decline with age was slower. The effect was notobserved on the OERP. This suggests that smell testing may help todistinguish between ET and tremor-predominant PD, and that patientswith a positive family history of tremor may represent a subgroupwhose olfactory function is enhanced by some unknown mechanism.26
105 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalCHEMOSENSORY MEASUREMENT IN ESSENTIAL TREMORNoyce A. 1 , Shah M. 1 , Deeb J. 1 , Findley L.J. 1 , Hawkes C.H. 1 1 Smell &Taste Research Unit, Essex Neuroscience Centre, London, UnitedKingdomObjective: Tremulous Parkinson´s disease (PD) may be confusedwith Essential Tremor (ET). Smell and taste are abnormal in early stagePD but probably not at any stage in ET. We wished to determinewhether chemosensory testing is normal in ET and if so this might helpdistinguish it from PD. Methods: Three procedures were used: (1)University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification test (UPSIT); (2) SmellThreshold Test (Sensonics Inc.) using phenylethylalcohol in (i) 45healthy controls, mean age 49y (17-93 y), and (ii) 50 ET patients meanage 62y (17-82y); (3) taste threshold measurement with Rion TR-06electrogustometer applied to (a) tip of tongue (chorda tympani; CT) or(b) base of tongue over the most lateral vallate papilla (VP; IX). Allparticipants scored at least 27/30 on the Mini-Mental Status Test.Results: There were no significant differences in any control vs. ETcomparisons as follows (t-test, p > 0.05): (1) Mean UPSIT scoresbetween controls and ET (32.8/40 vs. 32.3/40. (2) mean control smellthresholds: -6.7 vol/vol compared to -6.3 vol/vol for ET. (3) Mean tastethreshold: controls CT: 11.2 dB; VP: 13.5 dB. ET CT: 13.5 dB and VP14.6 dB. Conclusions: Smell sense and taste threshold are normal in ETcompared to healthy controls. This information may be of value indistinguishing ET from tremulous PD patients.106 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalNASAL MUCOSA IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON´SDISEASEWitt M. 1 , Gudziol V. 1 , Haehner A. 1 , Reichmann H. 2 , Hummel T. 11 Otorhinolaryngology, University of Technology, Dresden, Med. Sch.,Dresden, Germany; 2 Neurology, University of Technology, Dresden,Med. Sch., Dresden, GermanyIdiopathic Parkinson´s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorderinvolving several neuronal systems. The pathognomonic formation ofneuronal inclusion bodies (Lewis bodies) usually starts in the medullaoblongata and the anterior olfactory nucleus, before motor symptomsbecome evident. Thus, an impaired olfactory function, when tested, mayconstitute one of the earliest symptoms of PD. However, it is stillunknown to what degree eventual changes of the olfactory epitheliummay contribute to dysmosmia in these patients. The aim of this pilotstudy was to investigate the morphology of the olfactory epithelium insubjects diagnosed with PD since several years. Methods: Biopsies ofseven individuals diagnosed with PD (mean age: 76 years) as well asfour anosmic controls (mean age: 53 years) were taken from differentsites of the nasal mucosa. For immunohistochemistry, antibodies againstolfactory marker protein (OMP), neurotubulin, protein gene product 9.5(PGP 9.5) were applied to paraffin embedded tissue sections. Further,mRNA for OMP was isolated from olfactory and respiratory mucosausing RT-PCR. Results and conclusions: Preliminaryimmunohistochemical findings showed irregular areas of olfactoryepithelium positive for PGP 9.5 and neurotubulin, but mostly negativefor OMP. However, mRNA for OMP was found in mucosa of theolfactory cleft as well as in the respiratory mucosa. There were noapparent differences to the olfactory epithelium of patients withidiopathic anosmia. With due caution in this small number ofindividuals tested, we conclude from these data that PD-relatedolfactory impairment is not immediately associated with specificchanges in the olfactory epithelium.107 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalIDIOPATHIC PARKINSON'S DISEASE IS A PRIMARYOLFACTORY DISORDERHawkes C.H. 1 1 Essex Neuroscience Centre, Romford, United KingdomIn 1999 I proposed that idiopathic parkinson´s disease (IPD) was aprimary olfactory disorder and that the pathogen gained access to thebrain through the nose. Since then there have been further supportivedevelopments: (1) confirmation of alpha-synuclein deposits in theolfactory bulb in nearly all cases (2) observations by Braak et al (2003)that the earliest changes are in the olfactory bulb and dorsal medullarynuclei of IX and X. (3) virtual absence of mitral cells - the first relay inthe olfactory path (4) demonstration of hyposmia in at least 80%patients measured by identification score or olfactory event relatedpotentials (5) correlation in some studies of smell tests and disability (6)association of impaired dopamine transporter uptake or abnormal s.nigra transcranial Doppler in about one third cases with idiopathicanosmia (7) prospective community-based studies from the Honolulu-Asian Aging study show predictive value of olfactory testing for IPD onthe basis of clinical and pathological examination. It is proposed that inIPD, olfactory impairment is the earliest change along with damage incranial nuclei IX and X; that these alterations predate the motorcomponent by several years and that the likely agent is a neurotropicvirus which accesses the olfactory nerves and medulla through thenasopharynx.108 Poster <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Coding and ClinicalCLARIFYING THE NATURE OF THE OLFACTORYIMPAIRMENT FOUND IN PARKINSON´S DISEASEBailie J.M. 1 , Rybalsky K.A. 1 , Hastings L. 2 , Revilla F.J. 3 , GestelandR.C. 4 , Frank R.A. 5 1 Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,OH; 2 Osmic Enterprises, Inc., Cincinnati, OH; 3 Neurology, Universityof Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 4 Cell Biology, Neurobiology & Anatomy,University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 5 Psychology/Office of VicePresident for Research and Advance, University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati, OHOver the last 30 years investigators have shown that patients withParkinson´s disease (PD) perform poorly on odor identification tests.However, the relative contributions of sensory and cognitiveimpairment to this decline in performance are not well understood. Thisstudy investigated the possible role of a decrease in olfactory signalstrength on odor identification in PD patients. Patients were assessedusing a nine-odor olfactory identification test (OIT) and the SniffMagnitude Test (SMT). The SMT is a reliable measure of olfactoryfunction that examines sniffing behavior to quantify olfactory abilities.The tests were modified to incorporate odorants that could beadministered in increasing concentrations under the hypothesis thatpatient performance on both measures would improve as odors areintensified. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that patients with PDcorrectly identified more high concentration (M = 5.36, SD = 2.28) thanlow concentration odorants (M = 4.09, SD=2.20) on the OIT, F(1,21) =13.77, p < 0.001. Similarly, higher odor intensities produced more sniffsuppression when taking the SMT, F(1,21) = 13.69, p < 0.001. Theresults suggest that a portion of the olfactory identification deficit inpatients with PD is the result of decreased olfactory signal strength. Thefindings are discussed in terms of the theoretical understanding ofolfactory functioning in PD and stimulus selection in olfactory tests.This Project was supported by NIH grant DC004139, R. Gesteland, PI27
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77:
301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26