205 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalDETERMINATION OF ORAL TRIGEMINAL SENSITIVITY INHUMANSJust T. 1 , Steiner S. 1 , Pau H. 1 1 Otorhinolaryngology, University ofRostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, GermanyThe aim of this study was to establish a clinical test for determinationof oral trigeminal sensitivity. Capsaicin impregnated filter paper strips(5 concentrations: 0.0001–1%) were used for threshold tests of thedorsal anterior tongue. The strips were placed on the tongue for 10 s andthe subjects were asked for onset of any sensation, quality (9 trigeminaland 4 taste descriptors), and duration of sensation. Intensity ratings wereassessed after 10s stimulation. Thresholds were estimated in two ways:(1) the lowest concentration where subjects consistently indicated thatthey perceived a “burning,” “stinging,” or “hot” stimulus (THRESH1),and (2) the lowest concentration the pain intensity of which was rated 2and higher on a 10-item scale (THRESH2). The test was applied to 63nondesensitized healthy subjects (mean age 40 years; 34f, 29m). Thesedata were correlated to measures of gustatory sensitivity obtained with“taste strips” (filter papers impregnated with tastants). With regard towhole-mouth testing THRESH1 and THRESH2 exhibited a significantcorrelation (r63 =0.41, p < 0.001). Coefficients of correlations betweentest and retest were r25 = 0.67 (p < 0.001) for THRESH1 and r25 = 0.73(p 0.25). In conclusion, capsaicin threshold testappears to be a useful diagnostic tool for assessment of the intraoraltrigeminal sensitivity.206 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalCONCENTRATION-DETECTION FUNCTIONS FOR EYEIRRITATION FROM HOMOLOGOUS N-ALCOHOLSAPPROACHING A CUT-OFF POINTCometto-Muniz J.E. 1 , Cain W.S. 1 , Abraham M.H. 2 1 <strong>Chemosensory</strong>Perception Laboratory, Surgery (Otolaryngology), University ofCalifornia, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; 2 Chemistry, University CollegeLondon, London, United KingdomThe study aims to measure and to model concentration-detectionfunctions for eye irritation. Based on previous studies, we selectedhomologous n-alcohols with carbon chain length reaching values whereocular detection begins to fail (cut-off effect). Failure of a vapor to eliciteye irritation could rest on a chemical-structural or a concentrationlimitation. The stimuli comprised 1-nonanol, 1-decanol, and 1-undecanol delivered to the eye for 6 sec at 2.5 L/min by a computercontrolledvapor delivery device. Delivered vapor concentrations (ppmby volume) were measured by gas chromatography. Twenty-twosubjects (16 females) were tested using a 3-alternative forced-choiceprocedure against humidified air blanks. As expected, detectionprobability (P), i.e., detectability, increased with vapor concentration.Close to vapor saturation, nonanol approached perfect detection,whereas decanol and undecanol barely reached halfway (P = 0.5)between chance (P = 0.0) and perfect (P = 1.0) detection. In fact,undecanol reached a ceiling in detectability (P = 0.5) even below vaporsaturation, and further increases in concentration failed to increasedetectability. The outcome provides additional support to the notion thatthe cut-off in eye irritation at the level of 1-undecanol rests on achemical-structural limitation rather than on a concentration limitation.Supported by grant R01 DC 005003 from the NIDCD, NIH and byPhilip Morris.207 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalTRPV1 RECEPTORS AND NASAL TRIGEMINALCHEMESTHESISSilver W.L. 1 , Clapp T.R. 2 , Stone L.M. 2 , Kinnamon S.C. 2 1 Biology,Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC; 2 Biomedical Sciences,Colorado State University, Fort Collins, COThe trigeminal nerve responds to a variety of irritants in theenvironment and serves a protective role. Trigeminal nerve fibersexpress several receptors including TrpV1 (vanilloid receptor 1), ASICs(acid sensing ion channels), and P2X (purinergic receptors). TrpV1 isactivated by capsaicin (CA) and acids, although its role in thetransduction of other irritants has not been determined. The irritants:amyl acetate, AA; cyclohexanone, CY; acetic acid, AC; toluene, TO;benzaldehyde, BE; (–)-nicotine, NI; (R)-(+)-limonene, LI; (R)-(–)-carvone, RCR; (S)-(+)-carvone, SCR, and CA) all stimulate thetrigeminal nerve when delivered in solution to the nasal cavity of rats,but their mechanism of action is unclear. We have used standardcalcium imaging techniques to examine responses of TrpV1 receptors tothese chemical irritants. For these experiments, TrpV1 and GFPconstructs were co-transfected into HEK293t cells. Three irritants (AC,SCR and RCR) stimulated non-transfected controls and were not testedfurther. Two irritants (CA and CY) stimulated only transfected cells,and the response could be eliminated with capsazepine, a TrpV1blocker. The five remaining irritants (NI, BE, AA, LI, and TO) werenonstimulatory in both non-transfected and transfected cells, suggestingthey utilize a different receptor mechanism. These results suggest thatTrpV1 serves as a receptor for both CY and CA in trigeminal nerveendings. Supported by RO1DC006070-03.208 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalFOOD FLAVORS AND THE SWEETENER SACCHARINACTIVATE THE TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIALVANILLOID SUBTYPE 1 (TRPV1) CHANNEL.Riera C. 1 , Damak S. 1 , Le Coutre J. 1 1 Nestle Research Center, Verschez-les-Blancs,Lausanne, Switzerland<strong>Chemosensory</strong> perception of food relies on olfaction, taste andtrigeminal sensation and several volatile organic compounds naturallypresent in food stimulate these senses. Many artificial sweetenersactivate two taste modalities (sweet and bitter at higher concentrations),but it is not known whether these molecules can also inducechemesthesis. The sensation of irritation is initiated by pungentmolecules activating Trp channels expressed in sensory nerve endingsof the trigeminal nerve. Capsaicin, the pungent molecule in hot chillipeppers, and other irritant molecules are known to activate the heatgated vanilloid receptor TRPV1. We investigated whether severalaromas and artificial sweeteners activate TRPV1, using Fura-2-basedCalcium imaging of a HEK293 cell line heterologously expressingTRPV1. Aromas at 1mM (Thujone, Geraniol, Linalool, Coumarine,Citral, p-Anisalehyde, Menthone) elevate intracellular [Ca 2+ ] i and thisresponse is decreased in the presence of the TRPV1 inhibitorcapsazepine. At one millimolar concentration Limonene, β-Pinene,Safrole, (+) and (-) Carvones, Cyclohexanol, and Thymol do notactivate the TRPV1 channel. Saccharin, a common artificial sweetener,strongly activates TRPV1 at 1 mM and at 10 mM. This response ispartially inhibited by capsazepine. Aspartame at 1 mM does not activatethe channel. All agonists listed here are lacking the vanilloid groupcharacteristic of Capsaicin but their hydrophobicity suggests they mightbind TRPV1 by diffusion through the cell membrane as does capsaicin.Taken together the data show that several food flavors and saccharincan stimulate the trigeminal system by activating the vanilloid receptor.52
209 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalTRPM5-EXPRESSING SOLITARY CHEMORECEPTOR CELLSIN THE MOUSE NASAL CAVITY RESPOND TO ODORS ATHIGH CONCENTRATIONSOgura T. 1 , Lin W. 1 , Margolskee R.F. 2 , Finger T.E. 1 , Restrepo D. 11 Rocky Mountain Taste & Smell Ctr, Univ of Colorado at Denver &Hlth Sci Ctr, Aurora, CO; 2 Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School ofMedicine, New York, NYThe trigeminal system in the respiratory epithelium of the nasalcavity detects airborne irritants. Previously, we reported that thetransient receptor potential channel TRPM5 is expressed in a largepopulation of solitary chemoreceptor cells (SCCs) in the mouse nasalcavity (Lin et al., Neurosci. meeting abstract. 2005); a subset of whichalso express α-gustducin (Finger et al., PNAS 2003), indicating thatdiverse populations of SCCs could be trigeminal sensors. In this study,we further characterized SCCs using immunohistochemistry and Ca 2+ -imaging. Many TRPM5-expressing cells also reacted with antibodiesagainst elements of the phospolipase C (PLC) pathway including PLCβ2 and G γ13. We also found that synaptobrevin-2, a key component insynaptic vesicle release, was present in these cells. In Ca 2+ -imagingstudies, we observed that some isolated GFP-marked TRPM5-expressing SCCs responded to high concentrations of various odorants,and the PLC inhibitor U73122 suppressed the odor-evoked Ca 2+responses, suggesting the TRM5-expressing SCCs respond to theseodors via the PLC transduction pathway. These results show thatdiverse populations of SCCs are present in the respiratory epithelium ofthe mouse nasal cavity, and that these cells are able to detect odorants athigh concentrations that act presumably as trigeminal irritants.Supported by NIH grants DC05140 (TO), DC006828 (WL), DC00566,DC04657, DC006070 (TF & DR), DC03155 (RFM).210 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalOLEOCANTHAL, AN ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANTI-OXIDANT COMPOUND OF OLIVE OILS, ELICITS ACTIVITYIN ISOLATED TRIGEMINAL NEURONSPeyrot Des Gachons C. 1 , Bryant B. 1 , Breslin P. 1 , Beauchamp G. 11 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PAPremium extra virgin olive oils are characterized by a distinctivepungency that is unusual because it is sensed primarily in the pharynxor throat and much less in the mouth. The compound responsible forthis irritation is (-)-deacetoxy-dialdehydic ligstroside aglycone, whichwe termed oleocanthal (oleo = oil; canth = sting; al = aldehyde).Thisrestricted throat irritation is remarkably similar to that elicited by thenon-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen. Cyclooxygenase andlipoxygenase assays conducted with synthetic (-)-oleocanthaldemonstrated that it is a natural NSAID. This compound may thus playa significant role in the well-known health benefits associated with adiet high in extra virgin olive oil. In order to investigate the physiologyunderlying the unusual pharyngeal sensation of oleocanthal, wemeasured intracellular calcium in rat trigeminal and nodose ganglionneurons. We found that oleocanthal induces increases in intracellularcalcium in a calcium- and sodium-dependent manner in selected cells.Because the compound activates neither all of the capsaicin- nor all ofthe cool-sensitive neurons, it is unlikely that either TRPV1 or TRPM8mediate the trigeminal or nodose response to oleocanthal. Future studieswill further define the pharmacology of oleoacanthal receptors.Supported in part by NIH grants DC02995 and P50DC0670 (PASB).211 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalTOPOGRAPHICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE TRIGEMINALSENSITIVITY OF THE HUMAN NASAL MUCOSAScheibe M. 1 , Zahnert T. 1 , Hummel T. 1 1 Otorhinolaryngology,University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Saxony, GermanyBackground: Previous work suggests differences in the distribution ofhuman intranasal trigeminal receptors. The aim of this study was toinvestigate these topographical differences using anelectrophysiologcial measure of trigeminal induced activation, theNegative Mucosa Potential (NMP). Material and Methods: A total of29 young, healthy volunteers participated (16 men, 13 women; age 19-42 years). CO2 (60% v/v; stimulus duration 500 ms; interstimulusinterval 30 s) was used for trigeminal stimulation. For stimuluspresentation we used a computer controlled olfactometer (OM6b,Burghart Instruments, Wedel). Recording of the NMP was performedwith a tubular electrodes (AgAgCl, outside diameter 0.8 mm, 1%Ringer-agar). Recording sites were the anterior septum, the lowerturbinate, and the rima olfactoria. Results: Maximum amplitudes of theNMP were found at the anterior septum, lowest amplitudes wererecorded at the rima olfactoria. Conclusions: The present data suggestthat there are topographical differences in the arrangement of trigeminalneurons with the highest sensitivity in the anterior part of the nasalcavity. This finding is compatible with the idea that the trigeminalsystem acts as a sentinel of the human airways.212 Poster Multimodal, <strong>Chemosensory</strong> Measurement,Psychophysical, Clinical Olfactory, and TrigeminalPET-BASED INVESTIGATION OF CEREBRAL ACTIVATIONFOLLOWING INTRANASAL TRIGEMINAL STIMULATIONHummel T. 1 , Beuthien-Baumann B. 2 , Heinke M. 1 , Oehme L. 2 , Van DenHoff J. 3 , Gerber J.C. 4 1 Otorhinolaryngology, Univ of Dresden MedicalSchool, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 2 Nuclear Medicine, Univ ofDresden Medical School, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 3 Institute forBioanorganic and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry /PET Center,Research Center Rossendorf, Dresden, Saxony, Germany;4 Neuroradiology, Univ of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Saxony,GermanyThe present study aimed to investigate cerebral activation followingintranasal trigeminal chemosensory stimulation using O15-H2O-PET.A total of 15 healthy male volunteers participated (age range 30-58years). Using a PET scanner (ECAT EXACT HR+; Siemens, Erlangen,Germany) subjects underwent 4 sessions of 5 min each with an intervalof at least 15 min. During 2 of the sessions subjects received left-sidedCO2-stimuli (duration 1 s, interstimulus interval 3 s) embedded in aconstant stream of air (36°C, 80% rH). Stimulation started 20 s beforeintravenous injection of 1.7 GBq O15-H2O for the entire duration ofthe sampling period of 2 min. During the other two sessions subjectsreceived odorless air only. SPM99 was used for analysis of the data. In12 subjects measurements were analysed for all 4 sessions, in 3 subjectsonly one stimulation session and one resting session could be analysed.There was a pronounced activation of the trigeminal projection area atthe base of the postcentral gyrus which was more intense for the righthemisphere, contralateral to the side of stimulation. In addition,activation was also found in the orbitofrontal and the pririform cortex,respectively, which are typically found to be active followingpresentation of odors. In conclusion, the present data suggest thatintranasal trigeminal stimulation not only activates somatosensoryprojection areas, but that it also leads to activation in cerebral areasassociated with the processing of olfactory information. This may beinterpreted in terms of the intimate relation between intranasaltrigeminal and olfactory sensations.53
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 16 and 17: 61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67: 261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69: 269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71: 277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73: 285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75: 293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77: 301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79: 309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81: 317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83: 325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85: 333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87: 341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89: 349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91: 357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93: 365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95: 373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97: 381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99: 389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101: 397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26