61 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteEXPRESSION OF A VOLTAGE-GATED POTASSIUMCHANNEL KCNQ1 IN TASTE BUD CELLSWang H. 1 , Zhou M. 1 , Rong Q. 2 , Inoue M. 3 , Bachmanov A.A. 1 ,Margolskee R.F. 4 , Pfeifer K.E. 2 , Huang L. 1 1 Monell Chemical SensesCenter, Philadelphia, PA; 2 NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD; 3 TokyoUniversity of Pharmacy and Life Science, Tokyo, Japan; 4 Neuroscience,Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NYBitter, sweet and umami tastes are mediated by G protein coupledreceptor T1Rs and T2Rs while sour and salty stimuli are received bychannel receptors. Activation of T1R and T2R receptors results in anelevation of cytosolic Ca 2+ in taste receptor cells. The increase in Ca 2+stimulates a non-selective monovalent cation channel TRPM5,triggering influx of cations and consequently depolarizing receptor cellmembrane potential. Interestingly, activation or inhibition of channelreceptors by salty and sour stimuli also leads to membrane potentialdepolarization. To understand how these gustatory signals ofdepolarization are converted into the release of transmitters such asATP from taste bud cells onto afferent gustatory nerves, we reason thatvoltage-gated ion channels may respond to the depolarization andregulate the output of ATP. We set out to isolate voltage-gated ionchannels using various molecular methods. Here we report theoccurrence of a voltage-gated K + channel KCNQ1 (Kv7.1) in tastepapillae. Immunohistochemistry showed that KCNQ1 is expressed in alarge number of taste bud cells in mouse circumvallate and foliatepapillae including TRPM5-expressing cells. However, in fungiformpapillae, KCNQ1 expression is in a near-total overlap with T1R3.Previous studies have shown that in fungiform, T1R3 is largelycoexpressed with T1R1, forming T1R1/T1R3 receptors for umamisubstances, suggesting that KCNQ1 may play a role in umami taste.Preliminary two-bottle tests in fact showed that KCNQ1-null youngmice exhibited reduced preferences for some umami compounds. Theresults from this study may help understand the taste perception ofpatients with long QT or Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndromes.62 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteCALIBRATION OF A LINGUAL ELECTRIC STIMULATOR,LATERALITY OF RESPONSE AND METALLIC TASTEMcClure S.T. 1 , Lawless H.T. 1 1 Food Science, Cornell University,Ithaca, NYMetallic tastes can arise from electrical stimulation of the tongue.Two studies compared responses to fabricated electrical stimulators (a1.5 V, anode side exposed) and to a clinical electrogustometer (RIONTR6). The first study compared responses to the battery to theelectrogustometer and found equal intensities to be at 1.61 V and 16.94db, respectively. Verbal responses showed a frequency of metallic(36%), bitter (5.3%), sour (13.6%) and other (45%) reports. A list ofover 20 responses was shown as a guide, but was not limiting. A secondstudy examined responses on three areas of the tongue on each side, tofollow up on some differences in laterality observed in the first study.Results showed no clear laterality that persists through multiple testingsessions. Responses were in no way cued (no choice suggested) in thesecond study. Frequency of reports of different qualities showedmetallic (33.1%), bitter (7.5%), sour (8.3%) and other (51%) reports.The lack of a large difference in verbal reports suggests that a list ofresponses with sufficient choices, even though some are novel, does notstrongly cue towards those novel responses. This allows for use of sucha list when procedure dictates. The lack of strong laterality overmultiple sessions supports findings by others suggesting that there is nota persistent laterality in the tongue. These results still leave open thepossibility of a less persistent laterality, changing over a time intervalshorter than the weeks tested in this study. Supported by NIH RO1-DC-06223 to HTL.63 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteAQUAPORIN EXPRESSION IN MICEWatson K.J. 1 , Gilbertson T.A. 1 1 Biology, Utah State University, Logan,UTRecent studies have begun to characterize responses to hypoosmoticstimuli in the peripheral gustatory system in mouse. Aquaporin channels(AQP) have been implicated in the initial rapid movement of waterduring this response. Cellular and behavioral responses to changes inosmolarity have been examined in 2 inbred mouse strains (C57/6ByJand 129X/SvJ) that differentially express AQP5, an apically locatedwater channel. To examine the role of AQP5 more directly, we havecharacterized behavioral responses to taste stimuli in AQP5 null mice.However, we have not observed the magnitude of differences in theseresponses we would predict based on differences in AQP5 expression inB6 and 129 mice. We are exploring the possibility that there iscompensatory expression of one or more of the other AQP channels inAQP5 null mice. As a precursor to testing this hypothesis, we havebegun identifying which additional AQP channels are present in mousetaste buds. Using RT-PCR, we have found expression of other AQPchannels including AQP2 and 3, but not AQP6 in B6 and 129 mousetaste receptor cells (TRCs). Therefore, it is plausible that expression ofthese or other AQP channels may be altered in AQP5 null mice and thatthese AQP channels may also play a role in the water transductionpathway. Studies are in progress to determine whether AQP1, 4, 7, 8and 9 are expressed in mouse and we plan to use real time qPCR andimmunocytochemistry to quantify and localize expression of AQPchannels in mouse TRCs. Supported by NIH DC007239 (KJW);DC02507 (TAG).64 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteDIETARY FAT INDUCED OBESITY ALTERS K + CHANNELEXPRESSION AND REDUCES FATTY ACIDRESPONSIVENESS IN RATSBaquero A.F. 1 , Hansen D.R. 1 , Coombs C. 1 , Gilbertson T.A. 1 1 Biology &The Center for Integrated BioSystems, Utah State University, Logan,UTRecently, using heterologous expression and patch clamp recordingto determine the fatty acid sensitivity of delayed rectifying K + (DRK)channel subtypes and quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) to measureDRK expression levels, we have shown that obesity-resistant rats (S5B)express a much higher ratio of fatty acid-sensitive (fa-s) to fatty acidinsensitive(fa-i) DRK channels (5.2:1) than those from obesity-pronerats (O-M; 1.7:1). We hypothesize that the fa-s:fa-i ratio may beimportant in peripheral fat chemosensitivity and ultimately contribute todietary fat intake. To test this idea directly, we induced obesity in anormally obesity-resistant S5B rats by placing them on a diet containing70% fat for two months. S5B rats exhibit pronounced hyperphagia anddeveloped obesity similar to that seen in obesity-prone rats on this diet.After 63 days on the high-fat diet, we analyzed expression of DRKchannels and found that the fa-s:fa-i DRK ratio dropped from 5.2:1 to0.65:1. We next recorded from taste receptor cells (TRCs) from theserats using patch clamp recording to determine if these changes inexpression correlated with reduced responsiveness to fatty acids. Onnormal diets, fatty acids (10 µM) inhibit about 90-95% of the total DRKcurrent in TRCs from S5B rats, however, after developing obesity TRCswere inhibited only ~30%. Thus the fa-s:fa-i DRK ratio is sensitive todietary fat intake and a reduced sensitivity to fatty acids in TRCs iscorrelated with higher dietary fat intake and may contribute to fatinducedobesity. Supported by DK59611 (TAG).16
65 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteCHORDA TYMPANI NERVE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICALRESPONSES TO LINGUAL CO-APPLICATION OF MSG ANDLINOLEIC ACID IN MALE AND FEMALE RATSStratford J.M. 1 , Curtis K.S. 1 , Contreras R.J. 1 1 Department ofPsychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University,Tallahassee, FLWe reported that female rats have a lower taste threshold for linoleicacid (LA), a free fatty acid that is the main component of dietary fat,than do male rats. Furthermore, bilateral transection of the gustatorychorda tympani nerve (CTX) significantly impaired the ability of bothmale and female rats to detect LA. Surprisingly, lingual application ofLA alone did not produce whole nerve electrophysiological responsesfrom the CT. Electrophysiological studies of isolated taste receptorshave shown that LA inhibits delayed rectifying potassium channels,presumably broadening action potentials, and may thereby augmentresponses to other taste stimuli. Therefore, the goal of this study was todetermine whether LA facilitates CT responses to other taste stimuli. Asan initial approach, we used monosodium glutamate (MSG), acompound that activates multiple gustatory receptors, includingreceptors for sweet and sodium. We recorded whole nerveelectrophysiological activity from the CT in response to lingualapplication of MSG (40, 100 and 300 mM) and to combined applicationof 88 µM LA and MSG in male and female rats. Preliminary dataindicate that CT responses to co-application of LA and MSG weregreater than those to MSG alone, especially in male rats. Thus, itappears that LA enhancement of CT responses to MSG is greater inmale rats than in female rats, suggesting that fat may enhance tastestimuli to a greater degree in male rats than female rats. Supported byNIH grants DC04785 and DC00044.66 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteNEAR THRESHOLD CONCENTRATIONS OF LINOLEIC OROLEIC ACID SPECIFICALLY INHIBIT BITTERNESS OFQUININE IN HUMANS BUT DO NOT MODULATEPERCEPTION OF OTHER TASTANTSGodinot N. 1 , Phan V. 1 , Chassagne S. 1 , Martin N. 1 1 Nestle, Lausanne,SwitzerlandStudies conducted in rodents suggest that free fatty acids can affecttaste receptor cells either through modulation of K + channels or viaputative fat receptors/transporters such as CD36. Only few studies havebeen reported so far in humans. We first assessed the potential tastesensation elicited in subject by solutions of linoleic acid (LA) and oleicacid (OA) at 10 µM, 50 µM and 50 mM. We then tested a putativemodulation by these fatty acids of the taste of other compounds varyingin their detection and transduction by taste cells (NaCl, sucrose, citricacid, MSG, caffeine, phenyl alanine, quinine). Solutions were all madein 0.5%ethanol demineralised water. Perceivable differences betweensamples with and without fatty acid were assessed by triangle and pairtests conducted with 24 panellists wearing nose-clip to minimize odourcues. We found that 50 µM LA alone could be differentiated from thesolvent, but not 50 µM OA. However, both fatty acid at 50 µMmodulated the taste of selected tastants similarly: a significant decreaseof the bitterness of quinine whose bitterness is thought to be mediatedby direct activation of G proteins and/or inhibition of some K + channels,but no modulation of GPCR mediated tastes (sucrose, MSG, phenylalanine), no modulation of intracellular PDE mediated taste (caffeine),and no modulation of neither Na + nor H + channels mediated taste(NaCl, citric acid). These results raise the hypothesis of a competitionbetween fatty acids and some bitter compounds leading to a decrease ofbitterness in food product.67 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteEXPRESSION OF ARACHIDONIC ACID SIGNALING-RELATED MOLECULES IN RAT CIRCUMVALLATE TASTEBUDSOike H. 1 , Misaka T. 1 , Matsumoto I. 1 , Abe K. 1 1 The University of Tokyo,Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo, JapanArachidonic acid and its metabolites are known as modulators forvarious ion channels. Reportedly, some taste responses in chordatympani nerves change when a gerbil tongue is pretreated with aninhibitor of phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ), an arachidonic acid-releasingenzyme, or arachidonic acid itself (Schiffman et al., 1995). However,no information is available on the potential role of arachidonic acid inthe taste signal transduction. There are multiple pathways to generate ormetabolize of arachidonic acid. Responsible enzymes for the generationinclude PLA 2 , diacylglycerol lipase (DAG lipase), and monoglyceridelipase (MGL). On the other hand, generated arachidonic acid ismetabolized to prostaglandins by cyclooxygenases (COX) and toleukotrienes by lipoxygenases (LOX). We investigated these enzymesin rat circumvallate taste buds by in situ hybridization and found that, ina subset of taste bud cells, MGL was expressed in addition to PLA 2 -IIAwe reported previously (Oike et al., 2006). Also, COX-2 was found tobe expressed in a subset of taste bud cells. These results suggest thatarachidonic acid is enzymatically released from glycerides andmetabolized actively in taste buds. Double-labeling in situ hybridizationand immunohistochemical analysis revealed that all these enzymes,MGL, PLA 2 -IIA, and COX-2, were actually expressed in taste receptorcells. Arachidonic acid should thus play some crucial role in tastesignaling.68 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and Peripheral TasteTRANSGENIC MICE EXPRESSING GFP IN PLC2 TASTECELLS DEMONSTRATE FUNCTIONAL CLASSES OF CELLSKim J. 1 , Maruyama Y. 1 , Roberts C.D. 1 , Berg S. 1 , Roper S.D. 1 , ChaudhariN. 1 1 Physiology & Biophysics, Miller School of Medicine, University ofMiami, Miami, FLTissue-specific promoters represent a powerful tool to monitorspecific cell-types within various tissues. In this experiment, weadopted the promoter of the phospholipase C type β2 (PLCβ2) gene thatis expressed in a subset of cells within mammalian taste buds. PLCβ2 isinvolved in the signal transduction of sweet, bitter, and umami stimuli.We have developed transgenic mice expressing GFP under the controlof either 2.9 kb or 8.0 kb of the PLCβ2 promoter. Across four tastefields, the expression of GFP was easily detected in living tissue withepifluorescence microscopy. Using immunostaining in several lines oftransgenic mice, we confirmed that cells expressing GFP also expressendogenous PLCβ2. In addition, the temporal regulation of the GFPtransgene seems to be coordinate with the endogenous PLCβ2 gene.When loaded with a calcium indicator dye, GFP-positive taste cellsproduced typical Ca 2+ responses to the bitter compound cycloheximide.In these same cells, KCl-depolarization did not result in Ca 2+ responses,confirming the absence of voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels in taste receptorcells. Conversely, only GFP-negative cells generated Ca 2+ responses todepolarization. These findings confirm the presence of at least twoindependent functional classes of cells within taste buds (cf. DeFazio etal, AChemS 2004). These PLCβ2 promoter-GFP transgenic mice couldbe useful for further studies involving taste transduction, sensory signalprocessing, and taste bud development. (Supported by DC006021,DC006308) [NC], and DC000374 [SDR])17
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 3 and 4: 9 Symposium Chemosensory Receptors
- Page 5 and 6: 17 Givaudan LectureFISHING FOR NOVE
- Page 7 and 8: 25 Symposium Impact of Odorant Meta
- Page 10 and 11: 37 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 12 and 13: 45 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 14 and 15: 53 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 18 and 19: 69 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 20 and 21: 77 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 22 and 23: 85 Poster Peripheral Olfaction and
- Page 24 and 25: 93 Poster Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 26 and 27: 101 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 28 and 29: 109 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 30 and 31: 117 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 32 and 33: 125 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 34 and 35: 133 Poster Chemosensory Coding and
- Page 36 and 37: sniffing behavior. Furthermore, we
- Page 38 and 39: 149 Slide Chemosensory Coding and C
- Page 40 and 41: 157 Slide Taste ChemoreceptionHTAS2
- Page 42 and 43: 165 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 44 and 45: 173 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 46 and 47: 181 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 48 and 49: 189 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 50 and 51: 197 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 52 and 53: 205 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 54 and 55: 213 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 56 and 57: 221 Poster Multimodal, Chemosensory
- Page 58 and 59: 229 Slide Molecular Genetic Approac
- Page 60 and 61: 237 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 62 and 63: 245 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 64 and 65: 253 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 66 and 67:
261 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 68 and 69:
269 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 70 and 71:
277 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 72 and 73:
285 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 74 and 75:
293 Poster Central Olfaction and Ch
- Page 76 and 77:
301 Slide Central OlfactionOLFACTOR
- Page 78 and 79:
309 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 80 and 81:
317 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 82 and 83:
325 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 84 and 85:
333 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 86 and 87:
341 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 88 and 89:
349 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 90 and 91:
357 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 92 and 93:
365 Poster Chemosensory Molecular G
- Page 94 and 95:
373 Symposium Olfactory Bulb Comput
- Page 96 and 97:
381 Symposium Presidential: Why Hav
- Page 98 and 99:
389 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 100 and 101:
397 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 102 and 103:
405 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 104 and 105:
413 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 106 and 107:
421 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 108 and 109:
429 Poster Central Taste and Chemos
- Page 110 and 111:
437 Symposium Neural Dynamics and C
- Page 112 and 113:
445 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 114 and 115:
453 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 116 and 117:
461 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 118 and 119:
469 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 120 and 121:
477 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 122 and 123:
485 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 124 and 125:
493 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 126 and 127:
501 Poster Developmental, Neurogene
- Page 128 and 129:
Brody, Carlos, 438Brown, R. Lane, 3
- Page 130 and 131:
Gilbertson, Timothy Allan, 63, 64,
- Page 132 and 133:
Klouckova, Iveta, 150Klyuchnikova,
- Page 134 and 135:
Ni, Daofeng, 93Nichols, Zachary, 35
- Page 136 and 137:
Sorensen, Peter W., 23, 288, 289Sou
- Page 138:
Zeng, Musheng, 466Zeng, Shaoqun, 26