whale to ‘excitement, pain or suffering’ to the point where, in some cases, this may induce exertionalmyopathy, a potentially fatal syndrome (Maas, 2003).The entire ethos of slaughtering cetaceans during whaling operations differs fundamentally from theresponsible attitude now taken by many states towards the slaughtering of food animals. In the UK,for example, legislation requires that animals awaiting slaughter should be inspected <strong>and</strong> “any animalfound to have experienced pain or suffering during transport or following arrival at the slaughterhouse orknacker’s yard, or which is too young to take solid feed, must be slaughtered immediately” (MAFF, 1995).In contrast, during whaling operations, animals are chosen for slaughter on the basis of proximity tothe vessel, ease of access, or on economic grounds (usually relating to size). No consideration is givento choosing an individual for slaughter on the basis of welfare, indeed the practical difficulties ofwhaling often inhibit this, although at least in some cases a whale that has been injured <strong>and</strong> thenbroken free from the harpoon or line may be pursued <strong>and</strong> killed. It may be argued that the killing ofsuckling humpback calves in order to entice a lactating female closer to a whaling vessel, a historicalpractice in the St Vincent hunt, demonstrated a disregard for the welfare of both the female <strong>and</strong> thecalf taken.In relation to the general treatment of animals during slaughter, UK legislation further prescribes that“no person shall strike or apply pressure to any particularly sensitive part of the body of an animal, nortwist or break the tail, or grasp the eye(s) of any animal” (MAFF 1995). Such safeguards against injuryto more sensitive parts of the body do not exist for whaling operations, <strong>and</strong> although whalers mayaim for the head or thorax (depending on the type of whaling conducted) harpoons <strong>and</strong> bullets canenter any region of the body, causing a variety of different wounds. Moreover, in the Faroese drivehunts a blunt ended gaff is placed in the blowhole in order to secure the cetacean. The blowhole is aregion with a rich nerve supply <strong>and</strong> is likely to be very sensitive to pressure <strong>and</strong> to trauma.A COMPARISON BETWEEN SLAUGHTERHOUSES AND METHODS USED DURING WHALING95Use of competent well-trained, caring personnelThe achievement of high st<strong>and</strong>ards of animal welfare requires an awareness of the physical <strong>and</strong>psychological needs of the animals involved. It also requires responsible <strong>and</strong> responsive management;informed, skilled <strong>and</strong> conscientious stockmanship; considerate h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> transport; <strong>and</strong> humaneslaughter (FAWC, 2003).A key component of achieving these aims is that slaughter personnel are competent <strong>and</strong> properlytrained. EU law requires that such employees possess the necessary skill, ability <strong>and</strong> professionalknowledge to do their job humanely <strong>and</strong> efficiently (EU, 1993). UK Slaughtermen, for example,must hold a registered licence that can be revoked on failure to comply with its conditions, or failureto observe other laws concerning animal welfare (MAFF, 1995). Additionally, in every UKslaughterhouse, a competent person is given authority to take action to safeguard welfare.During whaling operations, some degree of training for gunners is required. However, the trainingprocess itself is inherently flawed since training takes place using dead targets. This training processdoes not mimic the many variables that affect the accurate shooting of a live whale at sea(Stachowitsch & Brakes, 2003). This potential for error was illustrated in a report by Ishikawa (2002)regarding the 2001/2002 JARPA season – “TTD <strong>and</strong> instantaneous death rate of whales taken by thenew gunners were, on average, worse than that for whales taken by experienced gunners”. Simulating themany variables that effect the accurate placement of a ‘clean’ shot is highly complex. Furthermore,
the emphasis during some whaling operations (particularly Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW))is often on securing the animal rather than on killing it with speed. This means that in ASWinsensibility or a lethal shot can usually only be achieved after the animal is secured, <strong>and</strong> hence, oftenafter a protracted period of time.Appropriate equipment which is fit for the purposeThe humane slaughter of livestock animals is traditionally a two-stage process. First the animal isstunned to bring about unconsciousness, <strong>and</strong> this is immediately followed by severing of the majorblood vessels in the neck (carotid arteries <strong>and</strong> jugular veins) to bleed out the animal (exsanguination)<strong>and</strong> induce death by circulatory collapse. Stunning <strong>and</strong> killing can be achieved in a one-stage processby using a ‘stun-kill’ technique that induces both immediate loss of consciousness <strong>and</strong> cardiac arrest.This technique is only achievable with the use of complex <strong>and</strong> well regulated electrical stun-killequipment in slaughterhouses.The normal slaughter of livestock animals takes place within a controlled <strong>and</strong> often purposelydesignedenvironment. At the time of slaughter, animals are moved from the holding pen to thestunning point. Cattle are usually moved singly to a stunning box where the animal is restrained toenable an accurate stun. For sheep <strong>and</strong> pigs, a relatively small-group stunning pen is often used.Animals are not physically restrained within its confines <strong>and</strong> move around until they are in a positionto be stunned.96A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN WHALING ACTIVITIESStunning can be achieved by:• Mechanical means – the transfer of energy delivered by a cartridge or compressed air poweredcaptive bolt or percussive head, via the skull, to the brain <strong>and</strong> spinal cord.• Electrical means – the application of electrical energy to the brain via electrified stunning tongs(mammals) or a water bath (birds).• Gas stun/kill methods – the use of Carbon dioxide, Argon or Nitrogen mixtures to induceinsensibility <strong>and</strong> death in birds <strong>and</strong> pigs.Modern commercial whaling activities involve the capture <strong>and</strong> killing of whales with a grenadetipped harpoon fired from a cannon. The harpoon is targeted to strike the animal in the thorax,however, in practice it may strike a range of locations on the animal’s body, including, on occasion,the tail. If this primary method has been unsuccessful in killing the whale, then either a secondharpoon may be fired, or a rifle used as the secondary killing method. Finally, once the whale isassessed by the whalers to be dead (chapter 11) it is winched aboard the whaling vessel. There is nomethod for non-invasively securing cetaceans before a killing method is applied during whalingoperations. In addition, even when a cetacean has been secured using a harpoon (either a coldharpoon or an exploding harpoon that has failed to render the animal instantaneously dead), thisdoes not guarantee the efficiency of the slaughter, since the cetacean is not ‘restrained’ in the sensethat the whale may still be moving <strong>and</strong> the medium in which it rests (the sea) may also be moving.The gunner will also be aiming at this moving object from a moving platform compounding themargin for error in any given shot (van Liere 2003). Sea conditions <strong>and</strong> visibility (chapter 8) <strong>and</strong>marksmanship, can therefore have a significant impact on the efficiency of any killing method usedduring whaling.
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordWhales are highly evolved a
- Page 7:
1 Executive SummaryThis review exam
- Page 11 and 12:
2 A background to whalingPhilippa B
- Page 13 and 14:
y the weapon’s enormous recoil, w
- Page 15 and 16:
Japan currently whales in the Antar
- Page 17 and 18:
Otto, K. 1997. Animal Pain Behaviou
- Page 19 and 20:
Protecting the welfare of animals i
- Page 21 and 22:
Toothed whales (Odontoceti)Toothed
- Page 23 and 24:
Social behaviourMother-calf pairsOn
- Page 25 and 26:
to store and pass on information to
- Page 27 and 28:
Communication in great whalesThe mo
- Page 29:
Self-awarenessOne of the most compe
- Page 32 and 33:
J.G.M. Thewissen), pp. 158-162. Aca
- Page 34 and 35:
Whitehead, H., Waters, S. and Lyrho
- Page 36 and 37:
humanitarian purposes the time take
- Page 38 and 39:
Welfare and the modern IWCFrom 1980
- Page 40 and 41:
1996 UK proposes guidelines for col
- Page 42 and 43:
Section TwoWhale killing6 Commercia
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 1 Commercial, special permit
- Page 46 and 47:
It can be argued that the figures f
- Page 48 and 49:
Since struck and lost whales can in
- Page 50 and 51: equipment to Russian subsistence wh
- Page 52 and 53: This is the time from the throwing
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3 Aboriginal Subsistence Whal
- Page 56 and 57: International Aid For Korean Animal
- Page 58 and 59: 29 In Resolution 1999-1, the IWC no
- Page 60 and 61: For example, Greenland and the Faro
- Page 62 and 63: the past they made an important con
- Page 64 and 65: however, has been made on the exten
- Page 66 and 67: hunt indicate that the whales are s
- Page 68 and 69: 8 Weather, sea condition and shipmo
- Page 70 and 71: chance of fog decreases from 15 to
- Page 72 and 73: experienced in December, or y could
- Page 74: 9 The potential stress effects ofwh
- Page 77 and 78: Both chase and pursuit cause stress
- Page 79 and 80: and manifest in a series of lethal
- Page 81 and 82: Ridgeway, S. H. (1966). Dall porpoi
- Page 83 and 84: 10 Euthanasia of cetaceansPhilippa
- Page 85 and 86: for the task. The correct target ar
- Page 87 and 88: whales the size of minke whales (Ø
- Page 89 and 90: 11 Review of criteria for determini
- Page 91 and 92: It is apparent from Figure 1, that,
- Page 93 and 94: interpreted criteria, comparisons o
- Page 95 and 96: 90A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATI
- Page 97 and 98: 12 A comparison betweenslaughterhou
- Page 99: include levels of premature mortali
- Page 103 and 104: affect an immediate and thereby law
- Page 105 and 106: Table 1 Animal welfare and the Sche
- Page 107 and 108: CIWF Trust, 2002. Farm Assurance Sc
- Page 109 and 110: 13 Ethics and whaling under special
- Page 111 and 112: Table 1. Consideration of the 3Rs i
- Page 113 and 114: skin samples, without the need for
- Page 115 and 116: IWC (2001) Report of the Scientific
- Page 117 and 118: Whales and the lawCetaceans (and wh
- Page 119 and 120: scientific and technical committees
- Page 121 and 122: ASCOBANS came into force in 1994. F
- Page 123 and 124: The Treaty of the Panama Canal, ena
- Page 125 and 126: 2 As a result, their need for prote
- Page 127 and 128: law says, but also the extent to wh
- Page 129 and 130: 15 Whaling and welfarePhilippa Brak
- Page 131 and 132: commercial whaling. Times to death
- Page 133 and 134: eath). Using the current criteria t
- Page 135 and 136: possibility of establishing a simil
- Page 137 and 138: international customary law and exi
- Page 139 and 140: 16 Summary of conclusionsModern day
- Page 141 and 142: Glossary136A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE
- Page 143 and 144: 138A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix IIColour plates©Mark Voti
- Page 147 and 148: 142A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 13. Processing minke whales