SECTION THREEWhaling in the twenteth cemnturySection ThreeWhaling in thetwenty-first centurySECTION ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY12 A comparison between slaughterhouse st<strong>and</strong>ards91<strong>and</strong> methods used during whaling 509213 Ethics <strong>and</strong> whaling under special permit 5010414 Legal precedents for whale protection 50111WHALE WATCH.org
12 A comparison betweenslaughterhouse st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong>methods used during whalingPhilip Lymbery, Director of Communications, World <strong>Society</strong> for the Protection of Animals(WSPA), London, UK.Philippa Brakes, Marine Consultant, c/o WDCS (<strong>Whale</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Dolphin</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>),Chippenham, UK.Kitty Block, Special Counsel to the UN & Treaties Dept., the Humane <strong>Society</strong> of the UnitedStates (the HSUS), Washington DC, US.92A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN WHALING ACTIVITIESWhen animals are slaughtered for food it is considered important in many societies that, for ethicalreasons, the process used does not cause unnecessary suffering (Wotton, 2001). A killing method thatis truly painless <strong>and</strong> causes minimal distress to the animal can be classified as humane slaughter. Thefollowing chapter examines the regulation of slaughter <strong>and</strong> methodologies used in the slaughter oflivestock <strong>and</strong> compares these with methods used during the slaughter of whales. An assessment ismade of the welfare impact of the different methodologies employed.The guiding principle for the humane slaughter of livestock is the achievement of an immediate stateof unconsciousness in the animal, followed by rapid progression to death, <strong>and</strong> this ‘best practice’principle is enforced by legislation in many countries. In a study by Gregory <strong>and</strong> Lowe (1999), it wasfound that in the majority of countries reviewed, there was a requirement for the humane treatmentof animals prior to, <strong>and</strong> during slaughter, with emphasis on induction of insensibility with a stunningprocedure in order to avoid suffering during the slaughter process.Modern whaling activities fall outside current livestock legislation. Nonetheless, a legal argument canbe made that there is an emerging customary international legal requirement for the humaneslaughter <strong>and</strong> treatment of commercially slaughtered animals for human consumption. The meatfrom whaling operations, whether it is commercial, aboriginal subsistence or ‘special permit’, isultimately intended for human consumption. Even when cetaceans are killed during ‘research’activities, the meat is made available for human consumption. It is, therefore, legitimate to considerthe welfare implications of whale killing methods alongside slaughter practices for other ‘foodanimals’.National <strong>and</strong> international regulation of welfare at slaughterThe international community is showing a growing care <strong>and</strong> concern for the general welfare ofanimals. An enforced humane killing st<strong>and</strong>ard for animals whose meat is sold commercially isbecoming commonplace. Many states around the world have some type of humane slaughter laws orpractices. International organizations, European Union regulation <strong>and</strong> multi-lateral trade agreementsare codifying <strong>and</strong> improving upon these practices. More specifically, there is an emerging
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordWhales are highly evolved a
- Page 7:
1 Executive SummaryThis review exam
- Page 11 and 12:
2 A background to whalingPhilippa B
- Page 13 and 14:
y the weapon’s enormous recoil, w
- Page 15 and 16:
Japan currently whales in the Antar
- Page 17 and 18:
Otto, K. 1997. Animal Pain Behaviou
- Page 19 and 20:
Protecting the welfare of animals i
- Page 21 and 22:
Toothed whales (Odontoceti)Toothed
- Page 23 and 24:
Social behaviourMother-calf pairsOn
- Page 25 and 26:
to store and pass on information to
- Page 27 and 28:
Communication in great whalesThe mo
- Page 29:
Self-awarenessOne of the most compe
- Page 32 and 33:
J.G.M. Thewissen), pp. 158-162. Aca
- Page 34 and 35:
Whitehead, H., Waters, S. and Lyrho
- Page 36 and 37:
humanitarian purposes the time take
- Page 38 and 39:
Welfare and the modern IWCFrom 1980
- Page 40 and 41:
1996 UK proposes guidelines for col
- Page 42 and 43:
Section TwoWhale killing6 Commercia
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 1 Commercial, special permit
- Page 46 and 47: It can be argued that the figures f
- Page 48 and 49: Since struck and lost whales can in
- Page 50 and 51: equipment to Russian subsistence wh
- Page 52 and 53: This is the time from the throwing
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3 Aboriginal Subsistence Whal
- Page 56 and 57: International Aid For Korean Animal
- Page 58 and 59: 29 In Resolution 1999-1, the IWC no
- Page 60 and 61: For example, Greenland and the Faro
- Page 62 and 63: the past they made an important con
- Page 64 and 65: however, has been made on the exten
- Page 66 and 67: hunt indicate that the whales are s
- Page 68 and 69: 8 Weather, sea condition and shipmo
- Page 70 and 71: chance of fog decreases from 15 to
- Page 72 and 73: experienced in December, or y could
- Page 74: 9 The potential stress effects ofwh
- Page 77 and 78: Both chase and pursuit cause stress
- Page 79 and 80: and manifest in a series of lethal
- Page 81 and 82: Ridgeway, S. H. (1966). Dall porpoi
- Page 83 and 84: 10 Euthanasia of cetaceansPhilippa
- Page 85 and 86: for the task. The correct target ar
- Page 87 and 88: whales the size of minke whales (Ø
- Page 89 and 90: 11 Review of criteria for determini
- Page 91 and 92: It is apparent from Figure 1, that,
- Page 93 and 94: interpreted criteria, comparisons o
- Page 95: 90A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATI
- Page 99 and 100: include levels of premature mortali
- Page 101 and 102: the emphasis during some whaling op
- Page 103 and 104: affect an immediate and thereby law
- Page 105 and 106: Table 1 Animal welfare and the Sche
- Page 107 and 108: CIWF Trust, 2002. Farm Assurance Sc
- Page 109 and 110: 13 Ethics and whaling under special
- Page 111 and 112: Table 1. Consideration of the 3Rs i
- Page 113 and 114: skin samples, without the need for
- Page 115 and 116: IWC (2001) Report of the Scientific
- Page 117 and 118: Whales and the lawCetaceans (and wh
- Page 119 and 120: scientific and technical committees
- Page 121 and 122: ASCOBANS came into force in 1994. F
- Page 123 and 124: The Treaty of the Panama Canal, ena
- Page 125 and 126: 2 As a result, their need for prote
- Page 127 and 128: law says, but also the extent to wh
- Page 129 and 130: 15 Whaling and welfarePhilippa Brak
- Page 131 and 132: commercial whaling. Times to death
- Page 133 and 134: eath). Using the current criteria t
- Page 135 and 136: possibility of establishing a simil
- Page 137 and 138: international customary law and exi
- Page 139 and 140: 16 Summary of conclusionsModern day
- Page 141 and 142: Glossary136A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE
- Page 143 and 144: 138A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix IIColour plates©Mark Voti
- Page 147 and 148:
142A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 13. Processing minke whales