or indirectly impacting animals are likely, therefore, to include measures protecting their welfare.Additionally, it is possible that existing conservation treaties that address cetaceans, such as the IWC<strong>and</strong> CITES, will be modified over time by this emerging customary law <strong>and</strong> amended to adoptgreater protection measures.ReferencesBirnie, P. 1985. International Regulation of Whaling: From <strong>Conservation</strong> of Whaling to <strong>Conservation</strong> of<strong>Whale</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the Regulation of <strong>Whale</strong> Watching. Vol I & II. Oceana Publications, London.Brown, E. 1994. The International Law of the Sea, Vol 1, Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot.CMS 1985. Working Group on Marine Mammals: Special points to be considered for Agreements for cetaceans,seals, turtles <strong>and</strong> sirenians. Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Parties Vol. II.CMS 1987. Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Parties 2, 23.CMS 2002a. Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the Parties; CMS, Future Action on the Antarctic minke,Bryde’s <strong>and</strong> Pygmy Right <strong>Whale</strong>s Under the Convention on Migratory Species. Res 7.15.CMS 2002b. Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the Parties, 222.IUCN 1996. UNCLOS, Part XII, Section I; Kimball, L., Annex: International Legal Instruments <strong>and</strong> Program. Inpress.Janis, M.W. 1999. An Introduction to International Law. Aspen 3d Edition.Kontou, N. 1994. The Termination <strong>and</strong> Revision of Treaties in Light of New Customary International Law. OxfordUniversity Press.LEGAL PRECEDENTS FOR WHALE PROTECTION119Maffei, M.C. 1992. The Protection of Endangered Species of Animals in the Mediterranean Sea. In: The Law ofthe Sea: New Worlds, New Discoveries, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Law of the Sea Institute.Edited by Miles E & Treves T. Law of the Sea Institute, Honolulu.Palmer, A.R. 1998. What do we mean by the Global Commons. Institute for Cambrian Studies, Boulder, Co..Geological <strong>Society</strong> of America, Part I.Prideaux, M. 2003. Small Cetaceans <strong>and</strong> World Politics, Developing Regimes for Species Survival. Centre forInternational Studies, University of south Australia.Ritvo, H. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English <strong>and</strong> Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Harvard UniversityPress.The Animal Welfare Institute, 1990. Animals <strong>and</strong> Their Legal Rights, 4th edition.US Congress 1971. U.S Congress Merchant Marine <strong>and</strong> Fisheries Committee Report 1971b: 11-12.Vicuna, F.O, 1999. The Changing International Law of High Seas Fisheries. Cambridge University Press.Villiger, M.E. 1985. Customary International Law <strong>and</strong> Treaties. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff.Wise, S.M. 2003. In: The State of the Animals II, Chapter 7: The Evolution of Animal Law since 1950. Editedby D. J. Salem <strong>and</strong> A. N. Rowan.Footnotes1 This call was endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly later that year.
2 As a result, their need for protection extends beyond national waters <strong>and</strong> requires cooperation between states,including on the high seas.3 For example Keiko, the orca who, in response to public pressure, was released from a life in captivity in 2001.4 Wildlife Interest Group, Journal of Internal Wildlife Law & Policy.5 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> adopted The Marine Mammals Protection Act in 1978 which prohibits any killing, harming,injuring or harassment of cetaceans.6 Legislation in Australia attributed a base level of rights to cetaceans in its <strong>Whale</strong> Protection Act 1980, followedby the Environment Protection <strong>and</strong> Biodiversity <strong>Conservation</strong> Act 1999. In Australia, permits to interact withcetaceans <strong>and</strong> other listed species are given only when there is assurance that the specified action willcontribute significantly towards the conservation of the species, the interference is incidental to the action, <strong>and</strong>will not adversely impact on the animals. Under Australian legislation it is a punishable offence to recklesslykill, injure or to take a cetacean.7 The Marine Mammal Protection Act was adopted by the US in 1972 to ameliorate the consequences of humanimpact on marine mammals. Its goal is to “protect <strong>and</strong> promote the growth of marine mammal populationscommensurate with sound policies of resource management <strong>and</strong> to maintain the health <strong>and</strong> stability of the marineecosystem.” 7 . Subject to certain exceptions, the MMPA prohibits the importation of marine mammals, <strong>and</strong> theirproducts, into the US, <strong>and</strong> forbids the taking of marine mammals in US waters <strong>and</strong> by US citizens on thehigh seas. ‘Take’ is defined as any act “to harass, hunt, capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture or killany marine mammal”.8 See, Australia, Environment Protection And Biodiversity <strong>Conservation</strong> Act 1999 – SECT 229A-232. See Also US,Marine Mammal Protection Act <strong>and</strong> Brazil’s Act No.7.643 Prohibiting the Catching of Cetaceans (1987).120A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN WHALING ACTIVITIES9 For instance, whale sanctuaries have been established in Mexico, the United States, <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>, while thegovernments of Fiji, the Cook Isl<strong>and</strong>s, Australia, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Niue,Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Samoa <strong>and</strong> Vanuatu have established a network of nationally declared, legislated<strong>and</strong> implemented whale sanctuaries in their EEZs for the effective conservation of whales in the South PacificOcean.10 Article V of the ICRW permits the IWC, by a three-fourth’s majority, to designated ‘closed areas’ in whichwhaling is not permitted. The IWC has declared ‘sanctuaries’ in the Southern Ocean <strong>and</strong> Indian Ocean. The‘Indian Ocean Sanctuary’ was adopted by the IWC at its 31st meeting in 1979, initially for a period of tenyears. It was renewed in 1989 for another ten years <strong>and</strong> indefinitely in 1992. It covers waters of the NorthernHemisphere from the coast of Africa – including the Red <strong>and</strong> Arabian seas <strong>and</strong> the Gulf of Oman – to100ºE; <strong>and</strong> the waters of the Southern Hemisphere from 20ºE to 130ºE.‘The Southern Ocean Sanctuary’ was adopted by the IWC at its 46th Annual Meeting in 1994. Thissanctuary will be reviewed at succeeding ten-year intervals. The IWC has recently considered proposals toestablish two new sanctuaries in the South Atlantic <strong>and</strong> South Pacific.11 The definition of a protected area adopted by IUCN is “An area of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or sea especially dedicated to theprotection <strong>and</strong> maintenance of biological diversity, <strong>and</strong> of natural <strong>and</strong> associated cultural resources, <strong>and</strong> managedthrough legal or other effective means”. IUCN has further developed a system of categorisation for protectedareas. See: IUCN, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories (CNPPA with the assistance ofWCMC, IUCN, Gl<strong>and</strong>, Switzerl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Cambridge, 1994). Summary athttp://www.wcmc.org.uk/protected_areas/categories/eng/index.html12 In old English law, the commons or common was a tract of ground shared by residents of a village, butbelonging to no one. It was property held in common for the good of all its citizens. Likewise, whales belongto no one country, the idea of absolute sovereignty over migratory species is an idea whose time has passed. Itis the obligation of all countries <strong>and</strong> its citizens to share in the protection <strong>and</strong> conservation of whales throughinternational agreements <strong>and</strong> cooperation.13 In addition to agreements specifically addressing whales there are numerous laws that indirectly benefit these
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordWhales are highly evolved a
- Page 7:
1 Executive SummaryThis review exam
- Page 11 and 12:
2 A background to whalingPhilippa B
- Page 13 and 14:
y the weapon’s enormous recoil, w
- Page 15 and 16:
Japan currently whales in the Antar
- Page 17 and 18:
Otto, K. 1997. Animal Pain Behaviou
- Page 19 and 20:
Protecting the welfare of animals i
- Page 21 and 22:
Toothed whales (Odontoceti)Toothed
- Page 23 and 24:
Social behaviourMother-calf pairsOn
- Page 25 and 26:
to store and pass on information to
- Page 27 and 28:
Communication in great whalesThe mo
- Page 29:
Self-awarenessOne of the most compe
- Page 32 and 33:
J.G.M. Thewissen), pp. 158-162. Aca
- Page 34 and 35:
Whitehead, H., Waters, S. and Lyrho
- Page 36 and 37:
humanitarian purposes the time take
- Page 38 and 39:
Welfare and the modern IWCFrom 1980
- Page 40 and 41:
1996 UK proposes guidelines for col
- Page 42 and 43:
Section TwoWhale killing6 Commercia
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 1 Commercial, special permit
- Page 46 and 47:
It can be argued that the figures f
- Page 48 and 49:
Since struck and lost whales can in
- Page 50 and 51:
equipment to Russian subsistence wh
- Page 52 and 53:
This is the time from the throwing
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 3 Aboriginal Subsistence Whal
- Page 56 and 57:
International Aid For Korean Animal
- Page 58 and 59:
29 In Resolution 1999-1, the IWC no
- Page 60 and 61:
For example, Greenland and the Faro
- Page 62 and 63:
the past they made an important con
- Page 64 and 65:
however, has been made on the exten
- Page 66 and 67:
hunt indicate that the whales are s
- Page 68 and 69:
8 Weather, sea condition and shipmo
- Page 70 and 71:
chance of fog decreases from 15 to
- Page 72 and 73:
experienced in December, or y could
- Page 74: 9 The potential stress effects ofwh
- Page 77 and 78: Both chase and pursuit cause stress
- Page 79 and 80: and manifest in a series of lethal
- Page 81 and 82: Ridgeway, S. H. (1966). Dall porpoi
- Page 83 and 84: 10 Euthanasia of cetaceansPhilippa
- Page 85 and 86: for the task. The correct target ar
- Page 87 and 88: whales the size of minke whales (Ø
- Page 89 and 90: 11 Review of criteria for determini
- Page 91 and 92: It is apparent from Figure 1, that,
- Page 93 and 94: interpreted criteria, comparisons o
- Page 95 and 96: 90A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATI
- Page 97 and 98: 12 A comparison betweenslaughterhou
- Page 99 and 100: include levels of premature mortali
- Page 101 and 102: the emphasis during some whaling op
- Page 103 and 104: affect an immediate and thereby law
- Page 105 and 106: Table 1 Animal welfare and the Sche
- Page 107 and 108: CIWF Trust, 2002. Farm Assurance Sc
- Page 109 and 110: 13 Ethics and whaling under special
- Page 111 and 112: Table 1. Consideration of the 3Rs i
- Page 113 and 114: skin samples, without the need for
- Page 115 and 116: IWC (2001) Report of the Scientific
- Page 117 and 118: Whales and the lawCetaceans (and wh
- Page 119 and 120: scientific and technical committees
- Page 121 and 122: ASCOBANS came into force in 1994. F
- Page 123: The Treaty of the Panama Canal, ena
- Page 127 and 128: law says, but also the extent to wh
- Page 129 and 130: 15 Whaling and welfarePhilippa Brak
- Page 131 and 132: commercial whaling. Times to death
- Page 133 and 134: eath). Using the current criteria t
- Page 135 and 136: possibility of establishing a simil
- Page 137 and 138: international customary law and exi
- Page 139 and 140: 16 Summary of conclusionsModern day
- Page 141 and 142: Glossary136A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE
- Page 143 and 144: 138A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix IIColour plates©Mark Voti
- Page 147 and 148: 142A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 13. Processing minke whales