Of specific importance to cetacean conservation is Article 65 of UNCLOS, which limits theexploitation of marine mammals <strong>and</strong> safeguards the “right of coastal states or the competence of aninternational organisation to prohibit, limit or regulate the exploitation of marine mammals more strictlythan provided for under the rules applicable to fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone”(Vicuna 1999).Article 120 makes a clear distinction between marine mammals <strong>and</strong> other living marine resources<strong>and</strong> extends the provisions of Article 65 to the high seas. 15 Both articles clearly distinguish themanagement of marine mammals, <strong>and</strong> more specifically cetaceans, as absolutely distinct fromfisheries, <strong>and</strong> exempts them from Article 64 which calls for “optimum utilisation” (Birnie 1985).Marine mammals in coastal Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) remain the responsibility of coastalstates under Article 65, according to the conservation <strong>and</strong> utilisation obligations of Articles 61 <strong>and</strong>62, except where conservation measures are less than those stipulated in Article 65. Marinemammals are also considered to be highly migratory species <strong>and</strong> are, therefore, governed by thecooperation aspects of Article 64 (Brown 1994). Some commentators have argued that Article 65reflects a trend in the protection of cetaceans beyond economic value, to include considerations of amoral <strong>and</strong> ethical nature (Maffei 1992).As can be seen in the presentations of Articles 61-65, “freedom of exploitation is no longer theprevailing principle in international law in this context” 16 Both Articles 61 <strong>and</strong> 62 provide a stricterst<strong>and</strong>ard of conservation for marine mammals than is applied to other species, <strong>and</strong> Articles 65 <strong>and</strong>120 set a higher st<strong>and</strong>ard again for marine mammals <strong>and</strong>, in particular, cetaceans (Prideaux 2003).The International Whaling Commission (IWC) 17The International Whaling Commission (IWC), established by the 1946 International Conventionfor the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), (see chapters 2 <strong>and</strong> 5) is the recognised internationalorganization with primacy over the management <strong>and</strong> conservation of whales <strong>and</strong> currently has 51members. The ICRW was established after World War II in an effort to both regulate the whalingindustry <strong>and</strong> to conserve whale populations for future generations.LEGAL PRECEDENTS FOR WHALE PROTECTION113Article V of the ICRW enables the IWC to adopt protective regulations “such as are necessary to carryout the objectives <strong>and</strong> purposes of this Convention <strong>and</strong> to provide for the conservation, development, <strong>and</strong>optimum utilization of the whale resources”. These include the setting of quotas; prohibitions onkilling certain species; the designation of protected seasons <strong>and</strong> areas; limitations on the sizes ofwhale that may be killed <strong>and</strong> the methods <strong>and</strong> equipment that may be used.Since the IWC implemented a commercial whaling moratorium in 1986, it has placed greateremphasis on the conservation of whales rather than on regulating their exploitation. For example, ithas designated established ‘sanctuaries’ in the Southern <strong>and</strong> Indian Oceans. Today, a majority of theIWC members are more concerned with protecting <strong>and</strong> conserving whales (<strong>and</strong> small cetaceans)than promoting <strong>and</strong> defending an industry that previously decimated whale stocks <strong>and</strong> provedimpossible to regulate.Although not all members recognise the IWC’s legal competence to address welfare issues in itsregulation of whaling, the Commission has a long, <strong>and</strong> well-established, practice of advancing‘humane killing’ 18 (see chapter 5). Any controversy about the IWC’s welfare m<strong>and</strong>ate was effectivelyresolved in 1980/1 when it banned the use of non-exploding harpoons, except in aboriginal hunts,on welfare grounds. Every year since then, welfare issues have been discussed by the Commission, its
scientific <strong>and</strong> technical committees, <strong>and</strong> its specialist Working Group <strong>and</strong> Workshop on <strong>Whale</strong>Killing Methods <strong>and</strong> Associated Welfare Issues.Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna <strong>and</strong> Flora (CITES) 19Complementary to the IWC, which regulates whaling, CITES regulates trade in cetaceans. CITEScame into force in 1975 <strong>and</strong> currently has 163 Parties. Its aim is to ensure that international trade inspecimens of wild animals <strong>and</strong> plants does not threaten their survival. CITES has three appendicesin which species are listed according to their level of endangerment <strong>and</strong> the threat of trade to them.CITES lists all ‘great whale’ 20 species <strong>and</strong> some freshwater <strong>and</strong> marine cetaceans in Appendix I,which affords the highest level of protection by prohibiting their international trade for commercialpurposes. All other cetaceans are listed in Appendix II <strong>and</strong> may be traded internationally if the tradewould not cause detriment to the survival of the species. Although much of CITES (including itsresolutions) speaks in terms of conservation <strong>and</strong> sustainable trade, the preamble to the treatyrecognises “that wild fauna <strong>and</strong> flora in their many beautiful <strong>and</strong> varied forms are an irreplaceable partof the natural systems of the earth which must be protected for this <strong>and</strong> the generations to come”. Languagein both the text of the Convention <strong>and</strong> several resolutions directly pertains to the welfare <strong>and</strong>humane treatment of live animals covered by the agreement. 21 In particular, animals must betransported humanely <strong>and</strong> CITES has adopted st<strong>and</strong>ards set by the International Air TransportAuthority (IATA) for the transport by air of cetaceans. As a result, shipment by air of a live cetaceanthat does not comply with IATA’s Live Animal Regulations violates the treaty <strong>and</strong> renders the exportillegal.114A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN WHALING ACTIVITIESCITES has adopted several resolutions that relate to whales which were consolidated in 2000 inResolution 11.4 on <strong>Conservation</strong> of Cetaceans, Trade in Cetacean Specimens <strong>and</strong> the Relationshipwith the International Whaling Commission. This recognises the primacy of the IWC <strong>and</strong> seekscooperation between the two organisations. The IWC has reciprocated with a series of Resolutionswelcoming the continuing cooperation between CITES <strong>and</strong> the IWC on issues related to trade inwhale products, <strong>and</strong> urging all governments to continue to support IWC <strong>and</strong> CITES obligationswith respect to this issue 22 .The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) 23The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) (also known as the Bonn Convention) aims toconserve terrestrial, marine <strong>and</strong> avian migratory species throughout their range on a global scale.The treaty entered into force in 1983 <strong>and</strong> currently has 84 Parties. CMS lists species in appendicesaccording to their biological status <strong>and</strong> need for protection, <strong>and</strong> directs special attention toendangered species, <strong>and</strong> to populations or species whose habitat is threatened.Importantly, migration is defined by CMS as: “the entire population or any geographically separate partof the population of any species or lower taxon of wild animals, a significant proportion of whose memberscyclically <strong>and</strong> predictably cross one or more national jurisdictional boundaries” 24 . By 1985, CMS hadagreed that migration included international waters (outside of national sovereignty) <strong>and</strong> thatconservation <strong>and</strong> management plans should extend into international waters (CMS 1985).For Appendix I species, CMS urges states into whose waters cetaceans range to remove obstacles tomigration, prohibit takes, restore habitats, <strong>and</strong> control factors that threaten the species’ survival 25 .Uniquely, its Appendix II lists migratory species that require, or would benefit significantly from,
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordWhales are highly evolved a
- Page 7:
1 Executive SummaryThis review exam
- Page 11 and 12:
2 A background to whalingPhilippa B
- Page 13 and 14:
y the weapon’s enormous recoil, w
- Page 15 and 16:
Japan currently whales in the Antar
- Page 17 and 18:
Otto, K. 1997. Animal Pain Behaviou
- Page 19 and 20:
Protecting the welfare of animals i
- Page 21 and 22:
Toothed whales (Odontoceti)Toothed
- Page 23 and 24:
Social behaviourMother-calf pairsOn
- Page 25 and 26:
to store and pass on information to
- Page 27 and 28:
Communication in great whalesThe mo
- Page 29:
Self-awarenessOne of the most compe
- Page 32 and 33:
J.G.M. Thewissen), pp. 158-162. Aca
- Page 34 and 35:
Whitehead, H., Waters, S. and Lyrho
- Page 36 and 37:
humanitarian purposes the time take
- Page 38 and 39:
Welfare and the modern IWCFrom 1980
- Page 40 and 41:
1996 UK proposes guidelines for col
- Page 42 and 43:
Section TwoWhale killing6 Commercia
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 1 Commercial, special permit
- Page 46 and 47:
It can be argued that the figures f
- Page 48 and 49:
Since struck and lost whales can in
- Page 50 and 51:
equipment to Russian subsistence wh
- Page 52 and 53:
This is the time from the throwing
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 3 Aboriginal Subsistence Whal
- Page 56 and 57:
International Aid For Korean Animal
- Page 58 and 59:
29 In Resolution 1999-1, the IWC no
- Page 60 and 61:
For example, Greenland and the Faro
- Page 62 and 63:
the past they made an important con
- Page 64 and 65:
however, has been made on the exten
- Page 66 and 67:
hunt indicate that the whales are s
- Page 68 and 69: 8 Weather, sea condition and shipmo
- Page 70 and 71: chance of fog decreases from 15 to
- Page 72 and 73: experienced in December, or y could
- Page 74: 9 The potential stress effects ofwh
- Page 77 and 78: Both chase and pursuit cause stress
- Page 79 and 80: and manifest in a series of lethal
- Page 81 and 82: Ridgeway, S. H. (1966). Dall porpoi
- Page 83 and 84: 10 Euthanasia of cetaceansPhilippa
- Page 85 and 86: for the task. The correct target ar
- Page 87 and 88: whales the size of minke whales (Ø
- Page 89 and 90: 11 Review of criteria for determini
- Page 91 and 92: It is apparent from Figure 1, that,
- Page 93 and 94: interpreted criteria, comparisons o
- Page 95 and 96: 90A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATI
- Page 97 and 98: 12 A comparison betweenslaughterhou
- Page 99 and 100: include levels of premature mortali
- Page 101 and 102: the emphasis during some whaling op
- Page 103 and 104: affect an immediate and thereby law
- Page 105 and 106: Table 1 Animal welfare and the Sche
- Page 107 and 108: CIWF Trust, 2002. Farm Assurance Sc
- Page 109 and 110: 13 Ethics and whaling under special
- Page 111 and 112: Table 1. Consideration of the 3Rs i
- Page 113 and 114: skin samples, without the need for
- Page 115 and 116: IWC (2001) Report of the Scientific
- Page 117: Whales and the lawCetaceans (and wh
- Page 121 and 122: ASCOBANS came into force in 1994. F
- Page 123 and 124: The Treaty of the Panama Canal, ena
- Page 125 and 126: 2 As a result, their need for prote
- Page 127 and 128: law says, but also the extent to wh
- Page 129 and 130: 15 Whaling and welfarePhilippa Brak
- Page 131 and 132: commercial whaling. Times to death
- Page 133 and 134: eath). Using the current criteria t
- Page 135 and 136: possibility of establishing a simil
- Page 137 and 138: international customary law and exi
- Page 139 and 140: 16 Summary of conclusionsModern day
- Page 141 and 142: Glossary136A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE
- Page 143 and 144: 138A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix IIColour plates©Mark Voti
- Page 147 and 148: 142A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 13. Processing minke whales