however, has been made on the extent of tissue tearing <strong>and</strong> trauma, or its impact on the whales.5. The ‘traditional’ sharp hook is secured into any part of the body. <strong>Whale</strong>s have been documentedwith hooks struck into the eye (EIA, 1987).6. Each unsuccessful strike extends the time from first wounding of the animal, to final loss ofsensibility, <strong>and</strong> eventual death. Although the Faroese authorities claim that it takes only a fewseconds to cut through the skin, blubber <strong>and</strong> flesh to sever the blood supply to the brain (Olsen1999), several factors may increase the cutting time, delaying time to loss of sensibility <strong>and</strong> death:• The whale may be struggling as a result of fear or the pain from the hook wound/s.• The slaughterer may be st<strong>and</strong>ing on rocks or in shallow water.• The slaughterer may not be experienced at cutting whales.7. The impact on those individuals who escape back to sea, having been trapped in the bay while thekilling of their companions or family members takes place has not been explored. It is unknown ifthese animals survive <strong>and</strong> join another herd.These aspects of the killing methods are thought to result in severe welfare problems for the animalsconcerned. Regulation should be introduced that would ensure that where whale hunting does occur,it is carried out in a manner that does not result in unnecessary individual suffering <strong>and</strong> prolongedtimes to death.The Japanese Dall’s porpoise <strong>and</strong> Baird’s beaked whale huntsAbout 20,000 whales, dolphins <strong>and</strong> porpoises are killed in Japan’s coastal waters each year. There islittle regulation of the methods used to kill them or the equipment used <strong>and</strong> no official training isapparently given to hunters (EIA 1999). As a consequence of intensive hunting, several cetaceanpopulations are at risk of extinction in Japan’s coastal waters <strong>and</strong> the animals may be subjected tosevere cruelty. The Japanese government records the numbers of cetaceans reported taken, althoughconcern has been expressed that the numbers of Dall’s porpoises may be under-reported. There is nodata collected on the duration of hunts, individual times to death, numbers struck <strong>and</strong> lost, or thenumbers of females taken that are accompanied by calves.THE SMALL CETACEAN DIMENSION59The Japanese government has published virtually no information describing the methods used to killcetaceans in its coastal waters. Investigations <strong>and</strong> research by non-governmental organisations(NGOs) <strong>and</strong> the media, however, has provided some information on the killing methods.The Dall’s porpoise huntDall’s porpoises have been hunted in Japanese coastal waters for centuries, with the h<strong>and</strong> harpoonbeing first used in the early 20th century. With the advent of faster boats in the 1970s, the catchaveraged 8,000 per year, causing IWC scientists to warn that it was too high (EIA, 1999). Catchnumbers continued to rise <strong>and</strong>, in 1988, as Japan reduced its commercial whaling operations as aresult of the commercial whaling moratorium, the Dall’s porpoise hunt was increased with theintroduction of new specialised boats, <strong>and</strong> the hunting season extending throughout almost theentire year. In 1987, 25,600 animals were reported killed. In 1988, this figure increased to 40,367porpoises – about 30 per cent of the estimated population in Japanese waters. The catch figures for1987 <strong>and</strong> 1988 are both thought to be underestimates. A year later in 1989, the catch was estimated
to be around 30,000 animals, <strong>and</strong> Japanese scientists warned that the hunting levels wereunsustainable (EIA 1999).As a result of pressure from the IWC <strong>and</strong> the international community, the annual hunt has nowbeen reduced to about 17,000 animals. There is, however, continued concern about the sustainabilityof this hunt <strong>and</strong> inadequacies in the reporting of the numbers killed.Killing methodsUsing specialised boats equipped with a bow platform, hunters travel offshore, anticipating that theDall’s porpoises will ‘bow ride’ the boats 1 . The hunter leans from the platform <strong>and</strong> throws harpoonsattached to long detachable shafts at the bow-riding porpoises. The harpoons are also attached tobuoys by lines to secure the harpooned porpoises while the hunt continues for other porpoises. Whenthe boat returns to collect the harpooned porpoises, they are dragged to the side of the boat <strong>and</strong>brought aboard the vessel. Some hunters apply a charge of electricity to the animals through theharpoon as it strikes them, or once they are aboard, if they have not been killed by the impact of theharpoon. Porpoises which have not been killed by either the harpoon or the electricity will have theirnecks cut with a knife, probably from the underside of the head, so that they bleed to death.60A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN WHALING ACTIVITIESWith numbers of Dall’s porpoises severely depleted in the Sea of Japan, hunters are targetingporpoises accompanied by calves. As the calves tire more quickly <strong>and</strong> the females will not ab<strong>and</strong>onthem, they are, therefore, easier to catch. Although the hunters do not take them, ab<strong>and</strong>oned calveswill inevitably die (Perry 1999).Baird’s beaked whale huntBaird’s beaked whales reach a length of 12.8 metres (42 ft). The Japanese government sets itself aquota for 62 of these rare whales to be taken in its coastal waters each year. The Scientific Committee<strong>and</strong> Working Group on <strong>Whale</strong> Killing Methods of the IWC have not formally considered the huntbut since the moratorium was passed in 1982, 1032 Baird’s beaked whales have been killed in Japan’scoastal waters (EIA 1999).These whales have been hunted for several decades with heavy exploitation by Soviet <strong>and</strong> Japanesehunters until 1970. In 1952 alone, 332 whales were taken. In the 1970s the catch averaged 44whales per year <strong>and</strong> on the imposition of the moratorium in 1986, Japan set itself a quota of 40Baird’s beaked whales per year. In 1989, the quota was increased to 62 whales, with the claim thatthis was an emergency increase to be reduced if a coastal quota of 50 minke whales was granted toJapan. This was refused <strong>and</strong> Japan reduced the Baird’s beaked whale quota to 54 animals. In 1999the quota was arbitrarily increased to 62 whales.Killing methodsBaird’s beaked whales are hunted off the Pacific coast of Japan <strong>and</strong> in the Sea of Japan off the coast ofHakodate, Hokkaido, using 48-ton ‘small type’ whaling boats. In the Sea of Japan, the boats travel tothe feeding grounds (EIA 2003) where the whales are harpooned with a 50mm harpoon (Braund1989). There are indications that non-exploding or cold harpoons may be being used to kill some ofthe whales (EIA 2003). The cold harpoon was banned in 1980 by the IWC on welfare grounds(ICRW schedule). There is no information available on the implement used if the impact of the firstharpoon does not kill the whales immediately. Reports from people associated with the Sea of Japan
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordWhales are highly evolved a
- Page 7:
1 Executive SummaryThis review exam
- Page 11 and 12:
2 A background to whalingPhilippa B
- Page 13 and 14: y the weapon’s enormous recoil, w
- Page 15 and 16: Japan currently whales in the Antar
- Page 17 and 18: Otto, K. 1997. Animal Pain Behaviou
- Page 19 and 20: Protecting the welfare of animals i
- Page 21 and 22: Toothed whales (Odontoceti)Toothed
- Page 23 and 24: Social behaviourMother-calf pairsOn
- Page 25 and 26: to store and pass on information to
- Page 27 and 28: Communication in great whalesThe mo
- Page 29: Self-awarenessOne of the most compe
- Page 32 and 33: J.G.M. Thewissen), pp. 158-162. Aca
- Page 34 and 35: Whitehead, H., Waters, S. and Lyrho
- Page 36 and 37: humanitarian purposes the time take
- Page 38 and 39: Welfare and the modern IWCFrom 1980
- Page 40 and 41: 1996 UK proposes guidelines for col
- Page 42 and 43: Section TwoWhale killing6 Commercia
- Page 44 and 45: Table 1 Commercial, special permit
- Page 46 and 47: It can be argued that the figures f
- Page 48 and 49: Since struck and lost whales can in
- Page 50 and 51: equipment to Russian subsistence wh
- Page 52 and 53: This is the time from the throwing
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3 Aboriginal Subsistence Whal
- Page 56 and 57: International Aid For Korean Animal
- Page 58 and 59: 29 In Resolution 1999-1, the IWC no
- Page 60 and 61: For example, Greenland and the Faro
- Page 62 and 63: the past they made an important con
- Page 66 and 67: hunt indicate that the whales are s
- Page 68 and 69: 8 Weather, sea condition and shipmo
- Page 70 and 71: chance of fog decreases from 15 to
- Page 72 and 73: experienced in December, or y could
- Page 74: 9 The potential stress effects ofwh
- Page 77 and 78: Both chase and pursuit cause stress
- Page 79 and 80: and manifest in a series of lethal
- Page 81 and 82: Ridgeway, S. H. (1966). Dall porpoi
- Page 83 and 84: 10 Euthanasia of cetaceansPhilippa
- Page 85 and 86: for the task. The correct target ar
- Page 87 and 88: whales the size of minke whales (Ø
- Page 89 and 90: 11 Review of criteria for determini
- Page 91 and 92: It is apparent from Figure 1, that,
- Page 93 and 94: interpreted criteria, comparisons o
- Page 95 and 96: 90A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICATI
- Page 97 and 98: 12 A comparison betweenslaughterhou
- Page 99 and 100: include levels of premature mortali
- Page 101 and 102: the emphasis during some whaling op
- Page 103 and 104: affect an immediate and thereby law
- Page 105 and 106: Table 1 Animal welfare and the Sche
- Page 107 and 108: CIWF Trust, 2002. Farm Assurance Sc
- Page 109 and 110: 13 Ethics and whaling under special
- Page 111 and 112: Table 1. Consideration of the 3Rs i
- Page 113 and 114: skin samples, without the need for
- Page 115 and 116:
IWC (2001) Report of the Scientific
- Page 117 and 118:
Whales and the lawCetaceans (and wh
- Page 119 and 120:
scientific and technical committees
- Page 121 and 122:
ASCOBANS came into force in 1994. F
- Page 123 and 124:
The Treaty of the Panama Canal, ena
- Page 125 and 126:
2 As a result, their need for prote
- Page 127 and 128:
law says, but also the extent to wh
- Page 129 and 130:
15 Whaling and welfarePhilippa Brak
- Page 131 and 132:
commercial whaling. Times to death
- Page 133 and 134:
eath). Using the current criteria t
- Page 135 and 136:
possibility of establishing a simil
- Page 137 and 138:
international customary law and exi
- Page 139 and 140:
16 Summary of conclusionsModern day
- Page 141 and 142:
Glossary136A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE
- Page 143 and 144:
138A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix IIColour plates©Mark Voti
- Page 147 and 148:
142A REVIEW OF THE WELFARE IMPLICAT
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 13. Processing minke whales