12.07.2015 Views

Crack cocaine in the Dublin region - Health Research Board

Crack cocaine in the Dublin region - Health Research Board

Crack cocaine in the Dublin region - Health Research Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

List of tables and figuresTablesTable 1.1Table 2.1Table 2.2Table 4.1Table 4.2Table 4.3Table 4.4Table 5.1Table 5.2Table 5.3Table 5.4Table 5.5Number of <strong>in</strong>terviews with service providers <strong>in</strong> local drugs taskforce areas, 2007 26Number of cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and were treated for <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 36Number of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by task force area of residence, as reported to<strong>the</strong> NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 38Number of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by age commenced treatment, as reported to<strong>the</strong> NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 53Number (%) of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by age commenced use, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS,2004 to 2006 54Number of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by highest level of education completed, as reportedto <strong>the</strong> NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 56Number of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by accommodation status, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS,2004 to 2006 57Number of cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and were treated for problem crack<strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong> use, by treatment status, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 59Number of cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and were treated for crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a ma<strong>in</strong> problem drug, by treatment status, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS,2004 to 2006 59Number of cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and were treated for crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as an additional problem drug, by treatment status, as reported to <strong>the</strong>NDTRS, 2004 to 2006 60Route of adm<strong>in</strong>istration of crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong> reported by new cases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>month prior to treatment, 2004 to 2006 64Number (%) of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by frequency of use, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS,2004 to 2006 65Table 7.1 Employment status of new cases of crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong> use, 2004 to 2006 80Table 10.1Number of new cases who lived <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> and reported crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong>as a problem drug, by source of referral, as reported to <strong>the</strong> NDTRS,2004 to 2006 106<strong>Crack</strong> <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> <strong>region</strong>: an evidence base for a crack <strong>coca<strong>in</strong>e</strong> strategy11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!