Crack cocaine in the Dublin region - Health Research Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hough M, Mc Sweeney T and Turnbull P (2000) Drugs and crime: what are the links?A review prepared for DrugScope’s submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee.London: DrugScope.Hough M and Natarajan M (2000) Introduction: illegal drug markets, research andpolicy. In Natarajan M and Hough M (eds) Illegal drug markets: from research toprevention policy. Monsey New York: Criminal Justice Press. 1–19.INCB (International Narcotics Control Board) (2004) Report 2003. New York: UnitedNations Publications.Jeal N and Salsbury C (2007) Health needs and service use of parlour-based prostitutescompared with street-based prostitutes: a cross-sectional survey. British Journal ofObstetrics and Gynaecology, 114(7): 875–81.Johnson BD, Dunlap E and Tourigny S (2000) Crack distribution and abuse in New York.In Natarajan M and Hough M (eds) Illegal drug markets: from research to preventionpolicy. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press. 19–57.Keogh E (1997) Illicit drug use and related criminal activity in the Dublin MetropolitanArea. Dublin: An Garda Síochána.Kleiman MAR (1993) Enforcement swamping: a positive feedback mechanism in ratesof illicit activity. Math Comp Model, 17: 65–75.Lankenau S, Clatts M, Goldsant L and Welle D (2004) Crack cocaine injection practicesand HIV risk: findings from New York and Bridgeport. Journal of Drug Issues, 34(2):319–32.Lawless M and Corr C (2005) Drug use among the homeless in Ireland. Dublin:Stationery Office.Lenke L and Olsson B (1998) Heroin seizures as an indicator of variation in marketsituations: drugs availability and heroin use in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Levin JD, Culkin J and Perrotto RS (2001) Introduction to chemical dependencycounselling. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson.Long J, and Keenan E (2007) The evidence base for treatment of problem cocaine use.Drugnet Ireland 21: 16Crack cocaine in the Dublin region: an evidence base for a crack cocaine strategy121
Loughran H and McCann ME (2006) A community drugs study: developing communityindicators for problem drug use. Dublin: National Advisory Committee on Drugs.Lupton R, Wilson A, May T, Warburton H and Turnbull PJ (2002) A rock and a hardplace: drug markets in deprived neighbourhoods. London: Home Office.May T, Edmunds M and Hough M (1999) Street business: the links between sex and drugmarkets. London: Home Office PRCU.May T and Hough M (2001) Illegal dealings: the impact of low-level police enforcementon drug markets. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9(2): 137–62.May T and Hough M (2004) Drug markets and distribution systems. Addiction Research& Theory, 12(6):549–63.Mazerolle L, Soole DW and Rombouts S (2006) Street-level drug law enforcement: ameta-analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2: 409–35.Morgan JP and Zimmer L (1997) The social pharmacology of smokeable cocaine: not allit’s cracked up to be. In Reinarman and Levine (eds) Crack in America: demon drugs andsocial justice. Berkeley: University of California Press. 131–70.NACD (National Advisory Committee on Drugs) (2007a) Drug trend monitoring systempilot report. Dublin: National Advisory Committee on Drugs.NACD (National Advisory Committee on Drugs) (2007b) An overview of cocaine use inIreland: II. Dublin: National Advisory Committee on Drugs.NACD and DAIRU (National Advisory Committee on Drugs and Drug and AlcoholInformation and Research Unit) (2008) Drug use in Ireland and Northern Ireland: resultsby regional task force area from the 2006/2007 drug prevalence survey. Bulletin 2 Dublin:National Advisory Committee on Drugs.NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse) (2004) Cocaine abuse and addiction. ResearchReport Series [Electronic Version]. NIH Publication No. 99-4342, Printed May 1999,Revised November 2004. Retrieved from http://www.nida.nih.gov/ResearchReports/Cocaine/Cocaine.htmlNorth-inner city Drugs Task Force (2005) Changing track: a study informing a juvenilearrest referral pilot in the North-inner city. Dublin: North-inner city Drugs Task Force.122 Crack cocaine in the Dublin region: an evidence base for a crack cocaine strategy
Page 1 and 2:
HRB Research Series6Crack cocaine i
Page 3 and 4:
This publication should be cited as
Page 5 and 6:
HRB Research Series publicationsto
Page 8 and 9:
ContentsList of tables and figures
Page 10 and 11:
7 Social consequences of crack use
Page 12 and 13:
List of tables and figuresTablesTab
Page 14 and 15:
AbbreviationsADRUGNDUHRBISCCSGLDTFN
Page 16 and 17:
Glossary of termsBenzos: The street
Page 18 and 19:
Executive summaryBackground and stu
Page 20 and 21:
phone and buyers are directed to sp
Page 22 and 23:
Part 1IntroductionCrack cocaine in
Page 24 and 25:
In the light of these concerns, it
Page 26 and 27:
extensive reporting in the US about
Page 28 and 29:
Ten interviews were conducted with
Page 30 and 31:
also offers potential to trace supp
Page 32 and 33:
Part 2Crack cocaine in the Dublin r
Page 34 and 35:
2.2 Criminal justice data - cocaine
Page 36 and 37:
Prevalence of crack use among homel
Page 38 and 39:
Local survey dataA survey in 2006 o
Page 40 and 41:
Respondent 1: I’d say it’s stil
Page 42 and 43:
3 Dublin crack cocaine market3.0 Ov
Page 44 and 45:
sold on the street for as little as
Page 46 and 47:
Like, I was down on M… Street in
Page 48 and 49:
3.4 Marketing crackFour interviewee
Page 50 and 51:
While crack was generally bought al
Page 52 and 53:
• Although a number of dealers, o
Page 54 and 55:
4.2 Crack use and genderAccording t
Page 56 and 57:
From about 16 to 21 I would say - t
Page 58 and 59:
Table 4.4Number of new cases who li
Page 60 and 61:
5.2 Crack and other drugsMany of th
Page 62 and 63:
Whether treated cases reported crac
Page 64 and 65:
cases of intravenous cocaine use, t
Page 66 and 67:
Table 5.5Number (%) of new cases wh
Page 68 and 69:
Part 3Consequences of crack useCrac
Page 70 and 71:
etween heroin, cocaine and crime. T
Page 72 and 73: So, they would talk about the kind
Page 74 and 75: Crack and prostitutionNine services
Page 76 and 77: On the other hand, reports from two
Page 78 and 79: often with a prevalence of opiate d
Page 80 and 81: The data provided by the NDTRS in S
Page 82 and 83: But you know it would be about kind
Page 84 and 85: So, debt is another significant iss
Page 86 and 87: 7.6 Key findings• A significant p
Page 88 and 89: There are considerable long-term ps
Page 90: 8.3 Psychological consequences of c
Page 93 and 94: 9 Treating crack use9.0 OverviewIn
Page 95 and 96: Some services were in a position to
Page 97 and 98: Both opiate-dependent and non-opiat
Page 99 and 100: • more outreach work to identify
Page 101 and 102: 10 Policing crack markets10.0 Overv
Page 103 and 104: local communities. There is growing
Page 105 and 106: He’d know me, I’d know him, you
Page 107 and 108: Table 10.1 Number of new cases who
Page 109 and 110: 108 Crack cocaine in the Dublin reg
Page 111 and 112: 11 Discussion and research implicat
Page 113 and 114: 11.2 Responding to crack markets an
Page 115 and 116: 11.3 Reducing the harm that crack c
Page 117 and 118: Shoplifting, burglary and robbery w
Page 119 and 120: Bourgois P (2003b) Crack and the po
Page 121: Furey M and Browne C (2004) Opiate
Page 125 and 126: San Diego Police Department (1998)
Page 127 and 128: Appendix A:An evidence base for tre
Page 129 and 130: note that providing information on
Page 131 and 132: MedicationsA number of studies have
Page 133 and 134: interpersonal psychotherapy. Americ
Page 135 and 136: Jurisdiction Intervention/Descripti
Page 137 and 138: Jurisdiction Intervention/Descripti
Page 139 and 140: Appendix C:Recent HRB series public
Page 141 and 142: 140 Crack cocaine in the Dublin reg
show all

Crack cocaine in the Dublin region - Health Research Board

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?