The Winton M. Blount Postal History Symposia - Smithsonian ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

9 4 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o h i s t o ry a n d t e c h n o l o g yFigure 1. An approved large die proof (J32P1) of the first two- cent bureau postage duestamp, dated August 11, 1894. This proof is signed by Kerr Craige, the Third AssistantPostmaster General. From the collection of Harry K. Charles, Jr.to believe that the distribution of the newly printed BEPstamps might not have been as efficient as it was at thebanknote company, especially in the beginning years.The following sections trace the early postage duestamp production at the BEP, determine the remaininginventories of ABNCo dues, project the demand for postagedue stamps in the 1894–1895 period, and examine thepostmasters’ response to shortages—the use of provisionaland bisected postage due stamps.BEP Produces Postage Due StampsThe BEP began creating a new design for postage duestamps soon after its contract began on July 1, 1894. Adie proof for the new two- cent postagedue stamp (ScottNo. J32) 3 is shown in Figure 1. The two- cent value wasengraved first because the two- cent banknote dues werein short supply as will be shown below. The BEP assignedthe two- cent die, the number 50. The die was used to lay
n u m b e r 5 5 • 9 5down Plate No. 34. A plate proof (on card) of Scott No.J32P4 is shown in Figure 2 illustrating the marginal markingsand the plate number. It should be mentioned thatwhile the card proof in Figure 2 appears claret in color,it fluoresces under long wavelength ultraviolet light, thusFigure 2. A plate proof on card (J32P4) of the two- cent small numeralpostage due illustrating the original plate number (no. 34) andthe marginal marking. From the collection of Harry K. Charles, Jr.placing it amongst the vermilion shades (e.g. Scott No.J30), that also fluoresce under UV light. 4 A plate proofin deep claret was approved on July 14, 1894. The BEPsent the two- cent to press immediately, and it was issuedon July 20, 1894. Note the die proof shown in Figure 1was approved on August 11, 1894, by Third AssistantPostmaster General Kerr Craige. The approval date wasalmost a month after the plate proof was approved andthree weeks after the stamps were issued.The one- cent die was the next postagedue design prepared.It was assigned die number 56, and it was used tolay down Plate No. 57. A plate proof from Plate No. 57was pulled and approved on August 11, 1894. The colorof this plate proof sheet was deep carmine.The ten- cent bureau due was issued on September 24,1894. The plate for the ten- cent due was prepared fromdie number 55. A large die proof for the ten- cent valuewas approved on August 30, 1894, by Wesley R. Davis,the United States postage stamp agent. Kerr Craige alsoapproved another copy of the ten- cent die proof on August30th. Although the dies and plates for the three- cent, fivecent,thirty- cent, and fifty- cent values were prepared atabout the same time, they were not issued until April 27,1895, when supplies of these other values in postmasters’hands ran low. Die numbers and large die approval datesfor the first bureau dues are given in Table 1. Many issuesplagued the early production of the new bureau postagedues including the three- cent cracked die which necessitatedthe creation of a new die prior to plate production 5(See Table 1). Bureaucratic delays and other administrativeTable 1. Die Numbers and Approval, Hardening, and Issue Dates for the First Postage Dues Produced by the BEPDie Die Die Plate PlateScott No. Value No. Approval Hardening No. Certification Issue DateJ31 1¢ 56 8/11/1894 a 8/10/1894 b 57 8/11/1894 8/14/1894J32 2¢ 50 8/11/1894 a 7/13/1894 b 34 7/14/1894 7/20/1894J32 3¢ 54c8/18/1894 d3¢ 64 8/23/1894 a 8/28/1894 70f4/27/1895J34 5¢ 57 8/30/1894 a,e 8/29/1894 b 71f4/27/1895J35 10¢ 55 8/30/1894 a,e 8/29/1894 b 72f9/24/1894J36 30¢ 53 8/23/1894 a 8/30/1894 73f4/27/1895J37 50¢ 61 9/1/1894 a,e 9/4/1894 74 10/4/1894 4/27/1895aApproved by 3rd Assistant Postmaster General, Kerr CraigebApparently hardened before official approval.cDie Approval Information Unavailable.dDie Cracked upon hardening. It was put in a clamp and used to make a transfer roll. The transfer roll had the raised crack line removed and then was used to lay down anew die—die 64. The complete story of the die crack is given by McIntire.eApproved by Wesley R. Davis (U.S.P.S.A.).fThe exact dates are unavailable to this author, but they are likely to be within a few days of die hardening.
Page 1 and 2:
Smithsonian InstitutionScholarly Pr
Page 3 and 4:
smithsonian contributions to histor
Page 5:
ContentsLETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR OF
Page 9:
AcknowledgmentsThe symposium would
Page 12 and 13:
2 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o n t
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
1 0 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o n
Page 22 and 23:
Page 25 and 26:
“Little Colored Bits of Paper”C
Page 27 and 28:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 7as something
Page 29 and 30:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 9protest came
Page 31 and 32:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 2 1nals I revie
Page 33 and 34:
WWI Philatelic Censuses of East Afr
Page 35 and 36:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 2 5Table 1. GEA
Page 37 and 38:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 2 7Figure 5. MA
Page 39 and 40:
Explorations in the Official Regist
Page 41 and 42:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 3 1receipts. De
Page 43 and 44:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 3 3TABLE 2. Pop
Page 45 and 46:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 3 5different ge
Page 47:
Introduction to the Second Symposiu
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55: 4 4 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o n
Page 59 and 60: “Food Will Win the War”: Motor
Page 61 and 62: n u m b e r 5 5 • 5 1business tha
Page 63 and 64: n u m b e r 5 5 • 5 3support for
Page 65 and 66: n u m b e r 5 5 • 5 53. “Postal
Page 67: n u m b e r 5 5 • 5 7“Farmers W
Page 81 and 82: Picking Up the Pieces: The Aftermat
Page 83 and 84: n u m b e r 5 5 • 7 3and U.S. adm
Page 85 and 86: n u m b e r 5 5 • 7 5September, 1
Page 87 and 88: n u m b e r 5 5 • 7 7Figure 9. Th
Page 89: n u m b e r 5 5 • 7 9“B.C.O.F.
Page 101: Introduction to the Fourth Symposiu
Page 110 and 111: 1 0 0 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 131 and 132: “Why Is a Raven Like a Writing De
Page 133 and 134: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 2 3and prepai
Page 135 and 136: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 2 5Figure 3.
Page 139 and 140: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 2 9A Final No
Page 141 and 142: America’s First Carrier Service:T
Page 145 and 146: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 3 5The glazed
Page 147 and 148: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 3 7Intercity
Page 149 and 150: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 3 9The End of
Page 151 and 152: The U.S. 1847 Issue:Stamps That Cha
Page 153 and 154: n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 4 3the positi
Page 155 and 156:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 4 5stamps as
Page 157 and 158:
From the Pulpit to the Post: Anti-
Page 159 and 160:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 4 9The allege
Page 161 and 162:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 5 1Individual
Page 163:
n u m b e r 5 5 • 1 5 337. Archiv
Page 166 and 167:
1 5 6 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 168 and 169:
1 5 8 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 170 and 171:
1 6 0 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 172 and 173:
1 6 2 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 174 and 175:
1 6 4 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
Page 176 and 177:
1 6 6 • s m i t h s o n i a n c o
show all

The Winton M. Blount Postal History Symposia - Smithsonian ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?