exempt from, these laws and regulations, thereis a risk that a governmental agency or courtcould disagree with our assessment or thatthese laws and regulations could change, whichmay require us to cease our operations incertain jurisdictions or result in other costs orfines.There are also federal, state and provincial lawsof general application, such as the FTC Act, andstate or provincial unfair and deceptive tradepractices laws that could potentially be invokedto challenge aspects of our recruiting of salesrepresentatives and compensation practices. Inparticular, our recruiting efforts includepromotional materials for recruits that describethe potential opportunity available to them ifthey join our sales force. These materials, aswell as our other recruiting efforts and those ofour sales representatives, are subject toscrutiny by the FTC and state and provincialenforcement authorities with respect tomisleading statements, including misleadingearnings claims made to convince potential newrecruits to join our sales force. If claims madeby us or by our sales representatives aredeemed to be misleading, it could result inviolations of the FTC Act or comparable stateand provincial statutes prohibiting unfair ordeceptive trade practices or result inreputational harm.Being subject to, or out of compliance with, theaforementioned laws and regulations couldrequire us to change our distribution structure,which could materially adversely affect ourbusiness, financial condition and results ofoperations.There may be adverse tax andemployment law consequences if theindependent contractor status of oursales representatives is successfullychallenged.Our sales representatives are independentcontractors who operate their own businesses.In the past, we have been successful indefending our company in various contextsbefore courts and administrative agenciesagainst claims that our sales representativesshould be treated like employees. Although webelieve that we have properly classified ourrepresentatives as independent contractors,there is nevertheless a risk that the IRS oranother authority will take a different view.Furthermore, the tests governing thedetermination of whether an individual isconsidered to be an independent contractor oran employee are typically fact sensitive andvary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Laws andregulations that govern the status andmisclassification of independent salesrepresentatives are subject to change orinterpretation by various authorities.In September <strong>2010</strong>, legislation was introducedin Congress known as the Fair Playing Field Actof <strong>2010</strong>, which, if enacted, would require theDepartment of the Treasury to prospectivelyeliminate Section 530 of the Revenue Act of1978 (“Section 530”). Section 530 currentlyprevents the IRS from reclassifyingindependent contractors as employees if thecompany has consistently treated the workersas independent contractors and has areasonable basis (such as an IRS ruling orjudicial precedent) for its independentcontractor classification. The proposedlegislation would also require businesses thatuse independent contractors on a regular andongoing basis to provide workers with a writtennotice informing them of their federal taxobligations, of the employment laws that do notapply to them, and of their right to seek adetermination of their employment status fromthe IRS. The White House budget proposalincludes provisions similar to those in the FairPlaying Field Act and allocates $25 million tothe Department of Labor (“DOL”) for additionalenforcement relating to the misclassification ofworkers as independent contractors. Neitherthe White House Budget proposal nor theproposed Fair Playing Field Act expresslychanges the standard for distinguishingbetween employees and independentcontractors.If a federal, state or provincial authority orcourt enacts legislation or adopts regulationsthat change the manner in which employeesand independent contractors are classified ormakes any adverse determination with respectto some or all of our independent contractors,we could incur significant costs in complying38 Freedom Lives Here
with such laws and regulations, including, inrespect of tax withholding, social securitypayments and recordkeeping, or we may berequired to modify our business model, any ofwhich could have a material adverse effect onour business, financial condition and results ofoperations. In addition, there is the risk that wemay be subject to significant monetaryliabilities arising from fines or judgments as aresult of any such actual or allegednon-compliance with federal, state, orprovincial tax or employment laws or withrespect to any applicable employee benefitplan.Our or our sales representatives’violation of or non-compliance withlaws and regulations and the relatedclaims and proceedings could expose usto material liabilities.Extensive federal, state, provincial and locallaws regulate our products and ourrelationships with our clients, imposing certainrequirements that our sales representativesmust follow. The laws and regulationsapplicable to our business include thosepromulgated by FINRA, the SEC, the MSRB, theFTC and state insurance, lending and securitiesregulatory agencies in the United States. InCanada, the following Canadian regulatoryauthorities have responsibility for us: OSFI,FINTRAC, FCAC, MFDA, and provincial andterritorial insurance regulators and provincialand territorial securities regulators. At anygiven time, we may have pending state, federalor provincial examinations or inquiries of ourinvestment and savings products, insurance orloan businesses. In addition to imposingrequirements that representatives must followin their dealings with clients, these laws andrules generally require us to maintain a systemof supervision to attempt to ensure that oursales representatives comply with theserequirements. We have developed policies andprocedures to comply with these laws.However, despite these compliance andsupervisory efforts, the breadth of ouroperations and the broad regulatoryrequirements could result in oversight failuresand instances of non-compliance or misconducton the part of our sales representatives.From time to time, we are subject to privatelitigation as a result of alleged misconduct by oursales representatives. Examples include claimsthat a sales representative’s failure to discloseunderwriting-related information regarding theinsured on an insurance application resulted inthe denial of a life insurance policy claim, andwith respect to investment and savings productssales, errors or omissions that a representativemade in connection with an account.Non-compliance or misconduct by our salesrepresentatives could result in adverse findingsin either examinations or litigation and couldsubject us to sanctions, significant monetaryliabilities, restrictions on or the loss of theoperation of our business, claims against us orreputational harm, any of which could have amaterial adverse effect on our business, financialcondition and results of operations.Any failure to protect theconfidentiality of client informationcould adversely affect our reputationand have a material adverse effect onour business, financial condition andresults of operations.Pursuant to federal laws, various federalregulatory and law enforcement agencies haveestablished rules protecting the privacy andsecurity of personal information. In addition,most states and some provinces have enactedlaws, which vary significantly from jurisdictionto jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy andsecurity of personal information. Many of oursales representatives and employees haveaccess to and routinely process personalinformation of clients through a variety ofmedia, including the Internet and softwareapplications. We rely on various internalprocesses and controls to protect theconfidentiality of client information that isaccessible to, or in the possession of, ourcompany, our employees and our salesrepresentatives. We have a significant numberof sales representatives and employees, and itis possible that a sales representative oremployee could, intentionally orunintentionally, disclose or misappropriateconfidential client information. If we fail tomaintain adequate internal controls, including<strong>Primerica</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 39
- Page 1 and 2:
Freedom Lives Here 2010 Annual Repo
- Page 3 and 4:
A Main Street Company for Main Stre
- Page 5 and 6:
North America’s vastmiddle-income
- Page 7 and 8: More than 50 percent of U.S. househ
- Page 9 and 10: We are PrimericaPrimerica is a Main
- Page 11 and 12: Primerica helps familiescreate a fi
- Page 13 and 14: René Turner wasalways told growing
- Page 15 and 16: We teach people how money works.We
- Page 19 and 20: UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANG
- Page 21 and 22: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FOR
- Page 23 and 24: PART IITEM 1.BUSINESSOverviewPrimer
- Page 25 and 26: them reduce and ultimately pay off
- Page 27 and 28: With the support of our home office
- Page 29 and 30: ecognized with the sales representa
- Page 31 and 32: force. We also profile successful s
- Page 33 and 34: • bonuses and other compensation,
- Page 35 and 36: originators (and in some states as
- Page 37 and 38: We organize and manage our business
- Page 39 and 40: premiums that are less per person p
- Page 41 and 42: insurance policies that we underwri
- Page 43 and 44: assistance, has developed a series
- Page 45 and 46: SEC, FINRA and with respect to 529
- Page 47 and 48: they sell insurance policies. Our C
- Page 49 and 50: preceding 12 months, exceed this st
- Page 51 and 52: interest rate risk and business ris
- Page 53 and 54: operational support to its subsidia
- Page 55 and 56: Privacy of Consumer Information. U.
- Page 57: media. This negative commentary can
- Page 61 and 62: and disrupt the economy. Although w
- Page 63 and 64: Our financial strength and credit r
- Page 65 and 66: There are certain risks and uncerta
- Page 67 and 68: 26). The update revises the definit
- Page 69 and 70: conduct standards prescribed by FIN
- Page 71 and 72: licensing requirements have caused,
- Page 73 and 74: Terrorist Financing Act and its acc
- Page 75 and 76: educing dividends or other amounts
- Page 77 and 78: housed at our Duluth and Roswell, G
- Page 79 and 80: • for dates as of or periods endi
- Page 81 and 82: to and subject to the limitations o
- Page 83 and 84: Field Audit Department from 1993 to
- Page 85 and 86: Securities Authorized for Issuanceu
- Page 87 and 88: ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.The
- Page 89 and 90: pursuant to which we issued to a wh
- Page 91 and 92: ecruiting boost we experienced in t
- Page 93 and 94: • Mortality. We use historical ex
- Page 95 and 96: • sales of a higher proportion of
- Page 97 and 98: on quality rating, average life and
- Page 99 and 100: Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs(D
- Page 101 and 102: life insurance processing responsib
- Page 103 and 104: einsurance agreements impacted the
- Page 105 and 106: Notes to the Pro Forma Statement of
- Page 107 and 108: Term Life Insurance Segment ProForm
- Page 109 and 110:
Investments and Savings ProductsSeg
- Page 111 and 112:
We believe that the pro forma resul
- Page 113 and 114:
ecognized in 2008. Excluding the ef
- Page 115 and 116:
amortize the higher DAC balance res
- Page 117 and 118:
Corporate and Other DistributedProd
- Page 119 and 120:
The composition of our invested ass
- Page 121 and 122:
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITALRESOURCESDivid
- Page 123 and 124:
surplus notes, hybrid securities or
- Page 125 and 126:
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE ANDQUALITATIV
- Page 127 and 128:
AssetsPRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIAR
- Page 129 and 130:
PRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCon
- Page 131 and 132:
PRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCon
- Page 133 and 134:
which we are able to reinvest at ou
- Page 135 and 136:
with reinsured policies. Ceded poli
- Page 137 and 138:
indemnify and hold the Company harm
- Page 139 and 140:
New Accounting PrinciplesScope Exce
- Page 141 and 142:
immediately contributed back to us
- Page 143 and 144:
The Investment and Savings Products
- Page 145 and 146:
(4) InvestmentsOn March 31, 2010, w
- Page 147 and 148:
The following tables summarize, for
- Page 149 and 150:
The net effect on stockholders’ e
- Page 151 and 152:
The amortized cost and fair value o
- Page 153 and 154:
The roll-forward of credit-related
- Page 155 and 156:
having similar tenors (e.g., sector
- Page 157 and 158:
(5) Financial InstrumentsThe carryi
- Page 159 and 160:
Due from reinsurers includes ceded
- Page 161 and 162:
(8) Intangible Assets and GoodwillT
- Page 163 and 164:
(11) Note PayableIn April 2010, we
- Page 165 and 166:
Income tax expense (benefit) attrib
- Page 167 and 168:
above, plus an additional 7,098 com
- Page 169 and 170:
Non-Employee Share-BasedTransaction
- Page 171 and 172:
We had arrangements with Citi in re
- Page 173 and 174:
Contingent LiabilitiesThe Company i
- Page 175 and 176:
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN ANDDISAGREEMENTS
- Page 177 and 178:
Members of Our Board of DirectorsTh
- Page 179 and 180:
finance, and risk and asset managem
- Page 181 and 182:
PART IVITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANC
- Page 183 and 184:
10.4 Long-Term Services Agreement d
- Page 185 and 186:
10.29 Employment Agreement, dated a
- Page 187 and 188:
Schedule ISummary of Investments
- Page 189 and 190:
Schedule IICondensed Financial Info
- Page 191 and 192:
Schedule IICondensed Financial Info
- Page 193 and 194:
101% of the outstanding principal a
- Page 195 and 196:
GrossamountSchedule IVReinsurancePR
- Page 197 and 198:
Annual MeetingThe annual meeting of