any failure to implement newly requiredadditional controls, or if our salesrepresentatives or employees fail to complywith our policies and procedures,misappropriation or intentional or unintentionalinappropriate disclosure or misuse of clientinformation could occur. Such internal controlinadequacies or non-compliance couldmaterially damage our reputation or lead tocivil or criminal penalties, which, in turn, couldhave a material adverse effect on our business,financial condition and results of operations.Risks Related to Our InsuranceBusiness and ReinsuranceWe may face significant losses if ouractual experience differs from ourexpectations regarding mortality orpersistency.We set prices for life insurance policies basedupon expected claim payment patterns derivedfrom assumptions we make about the mortalityrates, or likelihood of death, of ourpolicyholders in any given year. The long-termprofitability of these products depends uponhow our actual mortality rates compare to ourpricing assumptions. For example, if mortalityrates are higher than those assumed in ourpricing assumptions, we could be required tomake more death benefit payments under ourlife insurance policies or to make suchpayments sooner than we had projected, whichmay decrease the profitability of our term lifeinsurance products and result in an increase inthe cost of our subsequent reinsurancetransactions.The prices and expected future profitability ofour life insurance products are also based, inpart, upon assumptions related to persistency,which is the probability that a policy will remainin force from one period to the next. Actualpersistency that is lower than our persistencyassumptions could have an adverse effect onprofitability, especially in the early years of apolicy, primarily because we would be requiredto accelerate the amortization of expenses wedeferred in connection with the acquisition ofthe policy. Actual persistency that is higherthan our persistency assumptions could havean adverse effect on profitability in the lateryears of a block of policies because theanticipated claims experience is higher in theselater years. If actual persistency is significantlydifferent from that assumed in our pricingassumptions, our reserves for future policybenefits may prove to be inadequate. We areprecluded from adjusting premiums on ourin-force business during the initial term of thepolicies, and our ability to adjust premiums onin-force business after the initial policy term islimited by our insurance policy forms to themaximum premium rates in the policy.Our assumptions and estimates regardingpersistency and mortality require us to makenumerous judgments and, therefore, areinherently uncertain. We cannot determine withprecision the actual persistency or ultimateamounts that we will pay for actual claimpayments on a block of policies, the timing ofthose payments, or whether the assetssupporting these contingent future paymentobligations will increase to the levels weestimate before payment of claims. If weconclude that our reserves, together withfuture premiums, are insufficient to coveractual or expected claims payments and thescheduled amortization of our DAC assets, wewould be required to first accelerate ouramortization of the DAC assets and thenincrease our reserves and incur incomestatement charges for the period in which wemake the determination, which could materiallyadversely affect our business, financialcondition and results of operations.The occurrence of a catastrophic eventcould materially adversely affect ourbusiness, financial condition and resultsof operations.Our insurance operations are exposed to therisk of catastrophic events, which could cause alarge number of premature deaths of ourinsureds. Catastrophic events include wars andother military actions, terrorist attacks, naturalor man-made disasters and pandemics or otherwidespread health crises. Catastrophic eventsare not contemplated in our actuarial mortalitymodels. A catastrophic event could also causesignificant volatility in global financial markets40 Freedom Lives Here
and disrupt the economy. Although we haveceded a significant majority of our mortalityrisk to reinsurers since the mid-1990s, acatastrophic event could cause a materialadverse effect on our business, financialcondition and results of operations. Claimsresulting from a catastrophic event could causesubstantial volatility in our financial results forany quarter or year and could also materiallyharm the financial condition of our reinsurers,which would increase the probability of defaulton reinsurance recoveries. Our ability to writenew business could also be adversely affected.In addition, most of the jurisdictions in whichour insurance subsidiaries are admitted totransact business require life insurers doingbusiness within the jurisdiction to participate inguaranty associations, which raise funds to paycontractual benefits owed pursuant toinsurance policies issued by impaired, insolventor failed issuers. It is possible that acatastrophic event could require extraordinaryassessments on our insurance companies,which may have a material adverse effect onour business, financial condition and results ofoperations.Our insurance business is highlyregulated, and statutory and regulatorychanges may materially adverselyaffect our business, financial conditionand results of operations.Life insurance statutes and regulations aregenerally designed to protect the interests ofthe public and policyholders. Those interestsmay conflict with your interests as astockholder. Currently, in the United States, thepower to regulate insurance resides almostexclusively with the states. Much of this stateregulation follows model statutes or regulationsdeveloped or amended by the NAIC, which iscomposed of the insurance commissioners ofeach U.S. jurisdiction. The NAIC re-examinesand amends existing model laws andregulations (including holding companyregulations) in addition to determining whethernew ones are needed.The laws of the various U.S. jurisdictions grantinsurance departments broad powers toregulate almost all aspects of our insurancebusiness. The U.S. Congress continues toexamine the current condition of U.S. statebasedinsurance regulation to determinewhether to impose federal regulation and toallow optional federal insurance companyincorporation. The Dodd-Frank Act created anOffice of Federal Insurance Reform that will,among other things, study methods tomodernize and improve insurance regulation,including uniformity and the feasibility of federalregulation. We cannot predict with certaintywhether, or in what form, reforms will beenacted and, if so, whether the enacted reformswill materially affect our business. Changes infederal statutes, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the McCarran-Ferguson Act,financial services regulation and federaltaxation, in addition to changes to state statutesand regulations, may be more restrictive thancurrent requirements or may result in highercosts, and could materially adversely affect theinsurance industry and our business, financialcondition and results of operations.Provincial and federal insurance laws regulatemany aspects of our Canadian insurancebusiness. Changes to provincial or federalstatutes and regulations may be more restrictivethan current requirements or may result inhigher costs, which could materially adverselyaffect the insurance industry and our business,financial condition and results of operations. Wehave also entered into an undertakingagreement with OSFI in connection with ourinitial public offering and the Transactionspursuant to which we have agreed to provideOSFI certain information, including advancenotice, where practicable, of certain corporateactions. If we fail to comply with our undertakingto OSFI or if OSFI determines that our corporateactions do not comply with applicable Canadianlaw, <strong>Primerica</strong> Life Canada could face sanctionsor fines, and <strong>Primerica</strong> Life Canada could besubject to increased capital requirements orother requirements deemed appropriate byOSFI.We received approval from the Minister ofFinance (Canada) under the InsuranceCompanies Act (Canada) in connection with ourindirect acquisition of <strong>Primerica</strong> Life Canada.The Minister expects that a person controlling a<strong>Primerica</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 41
- Page 1 and 2:
Freedom Lives Here 2010 Annual Repo
- Page 3 and 4:
A Main Street Company for Main Stre
- Page 5 and 6:
North America’s vastmiddle-income
- Page 7 and 8:
More than 50 percent of U.S. househ
- Page 9 and 10: We are PrimericaPrimerica is a Main
- Page 11 and 12: Primerica helps familiescreate a fi
- Page 13 and 14: René Turner wasalways told growing
- Page 15 and 16: We teach people how money works.We
- Page 19 and 20: UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANG
- Page 21 and 22: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FOR
- Page 23 and 24: PART IITEM 1.BUSINESSOverviewPrimer
- Page 25 and 26: them reduce and ultimately pay off
- Page 27 and 28: With the support of our home office
- Page 29 and 30: ecognized with the sales representa
- Page 31 and 32: force. We also profile successful s
- Page 33 and 34: • bonuses and other compensation,
- Page 35 and 36: originators (and in some states as
- Page 37 and 38: We organize and manage our business
- Page 39 and 40: premiums that are less per person p
- Page 41 and 42: insurance policies that we underwri
- Page 43 and 44: assistance, has developed a series
- Page 45 and 46: SEC, FINRA and with respect to 529
- Page 47 and 48: they sell insurance policies. Our C
- Page 49 and 50: preceding 12 months, exceed this st
- Page 51 and 52: interest rate risk and business ris
- Page 53 and 54: operational support to its subsidia
- Page 55 and 56: Privacy of Consumer Information. U.
- Page 57 and 58: media. This negative commentary can
- Page 59: with such laws and regulations, inc
- Page 63 and 64: Our financial strength and credit r
- Page 65 and 66: There are certain risks and uncerta
- Page 67 and 68: 26). The update revises the definit
- Page 69 and 70: conduct standards prescribed by FIN
- Page 71 and 72: licensing requirements have caused,
- Page 73 and 74: Terrorist Financing Act and its acc
- Page 75 and 76: educing dividends or other amounts
- Page 77 and 78: housed at our Duluth and Roswell, G
- Page 79 and 80: • for dates as of or periods endi
- Page 81 and 82: to and subject to the limitations o
- Page 83 and 84: Field Audit Department from 1993 to
- Page 85 and 86: Securities Authorized for Issuanceu
- Page 87 and 88: ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.The
- Page 89 and 90: pursuant to which we issued to a wh
- Page 91 and 92: ecruiting boost we experienced in t
- Page 93 and 94: • Mortality. We use historical ex
- Page 95 and 96: • sales of a higher proportion of
- Page 97 and 98: on quality rating, average life and
- Page 99 and 100: Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs(D
- Page 101 and 102: life insurance processing responsib
- Page 103 and 104: einsurance agreements impacted the
- Page 105 and 106: Notes to the Pro Forma Statement of
- Page 107 and 108: Term Life Insurance Segment ProForm
- Page 109 and 110: Investments and Savings ProductsSeg
- Page 111 and 112:
We believe that the pro forma resul
- Page 113 and 114:
ecognized in 2008. Excluding the ef
- Page 115 and 116:
amortize the higher DAC balance res
- Page 117 and 118:
Corporate and Other DistributedProd
- Page 119 and 120:
The composition of our invested ass
- Page 121 and 122:
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITALRESOURCESDivid
- Page 123 and 124:
surplus notes, hybrid securities or
- Page 125 and 126:
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE ANDQUALITATIV
- Page 127 and 128:
AssetsPRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIAR
- Page 129 and 130:
PRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCon
- Page 131 and 132:
PRIMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCon
- Page 133 and 134:
which we are able to reinvest at ou
- Page 135 and 136:
with reinsured policies. Ceded poli
- Page 137 and 138:
indemnify and hold the Company harm
- Page 139 and 140:
New Accounting PrinciplesScope Exce
- Page 141 and 142:
immediately contributed back to us
- Page 143 and 144:
The Investment and Savings Products
- Page 145 and 146:
(4) InvestmentsOn March 31, 2010, w
- Page 147 and 148:
The following tables summarize, for
- Page 149 and 150:
The net effect on stockholders’ e
- Page 151 and 152:
The amortized cost and fair value o
- Page 153 and 154:
The roll-forward of credit-related
- Page 155 and 156:
having similar tenors (e.g., sector
- Page 157 and 158:
(5) Financial InstrumentsThe carryi
- Page 159 and 160:
Due from reinsurers includes ceded
- Page 161 and 162:
(8) Intangible Assets and GoodwillT
- Page 163 and 164:
(11) Note PayableIn April 2010, we
- Page 165 and 166:
Income tax expense (benefit) attrib
- Page 167 and 168:
above, plus an additional 7,098 com
- Page 169 and 170:
Non-Employee Share-BasedTransaction
- Page 171 and 172:
We had arrangements with Citi in re
- Page 173 and 174:
Contingent LiabilitiesThe Company i
- Page 175 and 176:
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN ANDDISAGREEMENTS
- Page 177 and 178:
Members of Our Board of DirectorsTh
- Page 179 and 180:
finance, and risk and asset managem
- Page 181 and 182:
PART IVITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANC
- Page 183 and 184:
10.4 Long-Term Services Agreement d
- Page 185 and 186:
10.29 Employment Agreement, dated a
- Page 187 and 188:
Schedule ISummary of Investments
- Page 189 and 190:
Schedule IICondensed Financial Info
- Page 191 and 192:
Schedule IICondensed Financial Info
- Page 193 and 194:
101% of the outstanding principal a
- Page 195 and 196:
GrossamountSchedule IVReinsurancePR
- Page 197 and 198:
Annual MeetingThe annual meeting of