REPORT ON THE ANA OF 2014

Recommendations

Info

Figure 4.25: Percentage of grade 3 learners in achievement levels in Mathematics by provinceAbout 13% of the learners function at the not achieved level in Grade 3 Mathematics. About 30% of learners function athigh achievement levels.Performance of learners in the not achieved level is presented in Figure 4.26 for Grade 3 Mathematics.Figure 4.26: Grade 3 Mathematics Performance below 40% in 2013 and 2014In 2014 fewer learners performed at a lower category.The distribution of learner achievement across achievement levels is shown in Table 4.45 and Figure 4.27 for Grade 3Home Language.74 | REPORT ON THE ANNUAL NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS OF 2014
Table 4.45: Percentage of Grade 3 learners in achievement levels in Home Language by provincePROVINCE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7LP 22.1 10.4 10.8 15.1 13.8 13.2 14.6NC 20.0 9.7 11.1 14.7 14.7 13.3 16.4EC 19.7 9.9 11.0 14.9 15.1 14.4 15.0NW 19.4 10.0 10.7 15.7 14.7 14.1 15.4MP 17.4 9.1 10.2 16.4 15.9 15.3 15.9WC 14.8 7.7 9.5 14.3 15.9 16.1 21.8GP 12.6 7.6 8.9 14.0 15.0 16.5 25.4KZN 12.1 7.4 9.1 14.9 16.4 17.8 22.4FS 11.0 7.4 9.5 17.2 17.5 17.5 19.8National 15.9 8.6 9.9 15.0 15.4 15.7 19.5Figure 4.27: Percentage of Grade 3 learners in achievement levels in Home Language by provinceAbout 16% of the learners function at the not achieved level in Grade 3 Home Language. About 35% of the learnersfunction at high achievement levels.GRADES 1 – 6 & 9 | 75
Page 3:
REPORT ON THE ANNUAL NATIONALASSESS
Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 11 and 12:
In 2014, the overall results for AN
Page 13 and 14:
target has not been achieved in Mat
Page 15 and 16:
1. INTRODUCTION
Page 17 and 18:
1.2 ANA IN CONTEXT OF BROADER LEARN
Page 19 and 20:
2. CURRICULUMINTERVENTIONS
Page 21 and 22:
To further strengthen this project,
Page 23 and 24:
The NEEDU Grade 5 report (2013) rec
Page 25 and 26: 2.3 Provincial InterventionsThe DBE
Page 27 and 28: 3. DESIGN ANDMETHODOLOGY
Page 29 and 30: 3.2 METHODOLOGYIn this section a de
Page 31 and 32: Table 3.5: Participation of special
Page 33 and 34: (c)Test ReviewThe tests were first
Page 35 and 36: (b)Marking and Moderation of TestsT
Page 37 and 38: In four provinces i.e, Free State,
Page 39: 3.3 LIMITATIONS OF ANAThe tests adm
Page 42 and 43: 4. ANA RESULTS 20144.1 Introduction
Page 44 and 45: Table 4.3: National average percent
Page 46 and 47: Figure 4.4: Learners with acceptabl
Page 48 and 49: 4.3 Provincial Performance4.3.1 Ave
Page 50 and 51: GRADE 2The average percentage mark
Page 54 and 55: 4.3.1.2 Intermediate phaseGRADE 4Th
Page 56 and 57: The average percentage mark of Grad
Page 66 and 67: 4.3.2 Percentage learners at adequa
Page 68 and 69: GRADE 3The achievement of Grade 3 l
Page 70 and 71: Table 4.34: Achievement in Grade 4
Page 72 and 73: GRADE 6The achievement of Grade 6 l
Page 74 and 75: The achievement of Grade 9 learners
Page 78 and 79: Performance of learners in the not
Page 80 and 81: The distribution of learner achieve
Page 82 and 83: Figure 4.33: Percentage of Grade 6
Page 84 and 85: Performance of learners in the poor
Page 86 and 87: The distribution of learner achieve
Page 88 and 89: Figure 4.42: Average % mark in Grad
Page 90 and 91: Figure 4.46: Average % mark in Grad
Page 92 and 93: Table 4.54: Average % mark in FAL b
Page 94 and 95: 4.8 Performance by DistrictIn the f
Page 96 and 97: PROV DISTRICT _Gr3 MATHEMATICS HOME
Page 98 and 99: PROV DISTRICT Gr6 MATHEMATICS HOME
Page 100 and 101: Table 4.60: Average percentage mark
Page 102 and 103: PROV DISTRICT MATHEMATICS HOME LANG
Page 104 and 105: 4.11 SummaryIn lower grades more le
Page 106 and 107: 5. CONCLUSION AND WAY FORWARDOver t
Page 108 and 109: Note106 | REPORT ON THE ANNUAL NATI
Page 110: Note108 | REPORT ON THE ANNUAL NATI
show all

REPORT ON THE ANA OF 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?