12.07.2015 Views

NMICS 2010 Report - Central Bureau of Statistics

NMICS 2010 Report - Central Bureau of Statistics

NMICS 2010 Report - Central Bureau of Statistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>NMICS</strong> <strong>2010</strong>, Mid- and Far Western RegionsTable CP.8: Attitudes toward domestic violencePercentage <strong>of</strong> women aged 15–49 years who believe a husband is justified in beating his wife/partner in various circumstances, MFWR,Nepal, <strong>2010</strong>RegionIf she goesout withouttelling himPercentage who believe a husband is justified in beating:If sheneglects thechildrenIf she argueswith himIf she refusessex with himIf she burnsthe foodFor any <strong>of</strong>these reasons[1]No. <strong>of</strong>womenaged 15–49yearsMid-Western 25.2 39.8 17.9 2.5 4.0 47.3 4,036Far Western 26.7 41.5 21.3 2.4 8.3 47.8 3,336SubregionAreaAgeMid-Western Mountains 30.9 45.0 24.7 5.1 6.0 49.5 408Mid-Western Hills 23.5 40.2 14.1 0.9 0.9 47.9 1,998Mid-Western Terai 25.9 38.1 20.7 3.8 7.3 46.0 1,630Far Western Mountains 35.8 42.9 34.5 2.4 6.9 47.6 508Far Western Hills 45.7 55.1 30.9 3.7 15.0 63.5 961Far Western Terai 14.4 34.1 12.8 1.6 5.2 39.8 1,867Urban 22.2 42.2 18.5 4.3 5.4 48.9 848Rural 26.3 40.4 19.6 2.2 6.0 47.4 6,52415–19 years 17.1 30.6 13.5 1.5 4.0 35.3 1,51120–24 years 23.9 39.0 15.9 1.6 4.9 46.0 1,38725–29 years 28.0 40.4 19.7 3.2 6.5 50.0 1,23530–34 years 28.7 46.4 21.6 2.5 7.9 52.3 99435–39 years 26.7 41.1 21.7 3.3 5.8 48.5 86140–44 years 32.5 51.5 25.2 1.9 7.2 57.1 80245–49 years 33.5 44.8 27.7 4.5 7.4 54.7 582Marital/union statusCurrently married/in union 28.8 43.4 21.6 2.8 6.6 51.1 5,706Formerly married/in union 27.1 44.9 21.1 1.1 5.6 50.7 197Never married/in union 14.2 29.2 10.8 1.0 3.5 33.1 1,469EducationNone 32.1 46.5 25.3 3.2 7.9 54.4 4,042Primary 27.7 42.1 18.9 2.1 4.4 50.3 1,036Secondary + 13.9 29.4 9.1 1.3 3.2 34.0 2,291Wealth index quintilePoorest 39.1 49.7 30.7 3.2 10.1 56.3 1,230Second 29.7 44.3 21.4 2.4 5.8 51.1 1,412Middle 25.1 40.7 18.9 2.6 6.6 48.6 1,519Fourth 20.6 35.9 14.1 2.2 3.7 43.0 1,594Richest 18.3 34.9 14.8 1.9 4.6 41.1 1,618Total 25.9 40.6 19.4 2.4 5.9 47.5 7,372[1] MICS Indicator 8.14It is <strong>of</strong>ten believed in Nepal that mothers-in-law have a high level <strong>of</strong> social control over theirdaughters-in-law that tends to be associated with the prevalence <strong>of</strong> violence against women.Therefore, a number <strong>of</strong> questions were asked <strong>of</strong> women aged 15–49 years to assess whether theybelieved that a mother-in-law is justified in verbally abusing or threatening her daughter-in-law in avariety <strong>of</strong> scenarios. As with the assumptions around domestic violence perpetrated by husbands,the assumption again is that women that agreed with the statements indicating that mothers-in-laware justified in verbally abusing or threatening their daughters-in-law in the situations described, inreality tend to be abused by their own mothers-in-law. Many <strong>of</strong> the scenarios were the same as161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!