NMICS 2010 Report - Central Bureau of Statistics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix A. Sample DesignThe major features of the sample design are described in this appendix. Sample design featuresinclude target sample size, sample allocation, sampling frame and listing, choice of domains,sampling stages, stratification, and the calculation of sample weights.The primary objective of the sample design for NMICS 2010 was to produce statistically reliableestimates of most indicators at each of the six subregions: Mid-Western Mountains, Mid-WesternHills, Mid-Western Terai, Far Western Mountains, Far Western Hills and Far Western Terai. It alsoprovides estimates in aggregate at urban and rural areas of the combined Mid- and Far WesternRegions of Nepal. In subregions where urban areas exist, (i.e., four of six subregions), urban and ruralareas were defined as the sampling strata.A two-stage, cluster sampling design was used for the selection of the survey sample.Sample Size and Sample AllocationThe target sample size for NMICS 2010 was calculated as 6,000 households. For the calculation ofthe sample size, the key indicator used was the comprehensive knowledge about the HIVtransmission among women aged 15–49 years. The following formula was used to estimate therequired sample size for this indicator:[4( r)(1 r)(f )(1.05)]n _2[(0.12r)( p)(n)]wheren is the required sample size, expressed as number of households4 is a factor to achieve the 95 percent level of confidencer is the predicted or anticipated value of the indicator, expressed in the form ofa proportion1.05 is the factor necessary to raise the sample size by five percent for theexpected non-responsef is the shortened symbol for deff (design effect)0.12r is the margin of error to be tolerated at the 95 percent level ofconfidence, defined as 12 percent of r (relative margin of error of r)p is the proportion of the total population upon which the indicator, r, is based_n is the average household size (number of persons per household).For the sample size calculation, r (comprehensive knowledge about HIV transmission) wasanticipated to be 24 percent of women aged 15–49 years. The value of deff (design effect) was takenas 1.5 based on the absence of any estimate from previous surveys, p (percentage of women aged15–49 years in the total population) was taken as 25 percent, and average household size was takenas 5.5 person per household. The values of p and average household size were used from thepopulation projections of Nepal for the specified subregions for 2010.196
NMICS 2010, Mid- and Far Western RegionsThe resulting number of households from this exercise was 1,000 households, which is the samplesize needed in each subregion—thus yielding about 6,000 in total. The average number ofhouseholds selected per cluster for NMICS 2010 was determined as 25 households, based on anumber of considerations, including the design effect, intra-class correlation coefficient, the budgetavailable, and the time that would be needed per team to complete one cluster. Dividing the totalnumber of households by the number of sample households per cluster, it was calculated that 40sample clusters would need to be selected in each subregion.Equal allocation of the total sample size to the six subregions was used. Therefore, 40 clusters wereallocated to each subregion, with the final sample size calculated at 6,000 households (40 clusters *6 subregions * 25 sample households per cluster). In each subregion, the clusters (primary samplingunits) were distributed to urban and rural domains, proportional to the size of urban and ruralhouseholds in that subregion. Table SD.1 shows the allocation of clusters to the sampling strata.Table SD.1: Allocation of sample clusters (primary sampling units) to sampling strataRegionEcologicalzoneDistrict Pop Census 2001 NMICS 2010UrbanhouseholdsRuralhouseholdsNumber of clustersSample householdsUrban Rural Total Urban Rural TotalFar-Western Mountain Bajhura 20,378 - 12 12 - 300 300Bajhang 28,588 - 16 16 - 400 400Darchula 21,029 - 12 12 - 300 300Domain 1 Total 69,995 - 40 40 - 1,000 1,000Mid-Western Mountain Dolpa 5,812 - 4 4 - 100 100Karnali Jumla 15,850 - 12 12 - 300 300Kalikot 18,487 - 13 13 - 325 325Mugu 8,261 - 6 6 - 150 150Humla 6,953 - 5 5 - 125 125Domain 2 Total 55,363 - 40 40 - 1,000 1,000Far-Western Hills Achham 44,005 - 10 10 - 250 250Doti 4,203 32,262 4 7 11 100 175 275Dadeldhura 3,538 18,442 3 4 7 75 100 175Baitadi 3,481 36,906 3 9 12 75 225 300Domain 3 Total 11,222 131,615 10 30 40 250 750 1,000Mid-Western Hills Pyuthan 40,183 - 5 5 - 125 125Rolpa 38,512 - 5 5 - 125 125Rukum 33,501 - 4 4 - 100 100Salyan 38,084 - 4 4 - 100 100Surkhet 7,139 46,908 6 5 11 150 125 275Dailekh 3,854 37,286 4 4 8 100 100 200Jajarkot 24,147 - 3 3 - 75 75Domain 4 Total 10,993 258,621 10 30 40 250 750 1,000Far-Western Terai Kailali 18,025 76,405 9 16 25 225 400 625Kanchanpur 13,738 46,420 6 9 15 150 225 375Domain 5 Total 31,763 122,825 15 25 40 375 625 1,000Mid-Western Terai Dang 16,001 66,494 7 10 17 175 250 425Banke 10,592 56,677 5 8 13 125 200 325Bardiya 7,939 51,630 3 7 10 75 175 250Domain 6 Total 34,532 174,801 15 25 40 375 625 1,000Total households/clusters 88,510 813,220 50 190 240 1,250 4,750 6,000197
Page 1 and 2:
NepalMonitoring the situationof chi
Page 3:
Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Su
Page 6 and 7:
NMICS 2010, Mid- and Far Western Re
Page 10:
ForewordIt is my great pleasure to
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Executive SummarySummary of finding
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
I. IntroductionBackgroundThis repor
Page 25 and 26:
II.Sample and Survey MethodologySam
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Mid-WesternFar WesternMid-WesternMo
Page 31 and 32:
Age groupNMICS 2010, Mid- and Far W
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
IV.NutritionNutritional statusChild
Page 39 and 40:
PercentNMICS 2010, Mid- and Far Wes
Page 41 and 42:
0-12-34-56-78-910-1112-1314-1516-17
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
PercentNMICS 2010, Mid- and Far Wes
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Table CH.6: Feeding practices durin
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Cont’d Table CH.7: Oral rehydrati
Page 69 and 70:
Government hospitalPrimary healthca
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Table CH.10: Solid fuel usePercenta
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Cont’d Table CH.12: Anti-malarial
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Table WS.1: Use of improved water s
Page 83 and 84:
Table WS.2: Household water treatme
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Cont’d Table RH.2: Unmet need for
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Table RH.7: Assistance during deliv
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
VIII.Child DevelopmentEarly childho
Page 123 and 124:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Cont’d Table ED.5: Secondary scho
Page 140 and 141:
Table ED.7: School attendancePercen
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147: Table CP.2: Child labourPercentage
Page 148 and 149: NMICS 2010, Mid- and Far Western Re
Page 154 and 155: Cont’d Table CP.5: Early marriage
Page 156 and 157: Table CP.6: Trends in early marriag
Page 158 and 159: Table CP.7: Spousal age differenceP
Page 170 and 171: Cont’d Table HA.2: Knowledge abou
Page 184 and 185: Table TA.1: Ever and current use of
Page 190 and 191: XIV. Subjective well-beingIt is wel
Page 192 and 193: Cont’d Table SW.1: Life satisfact
Page 204 and 205: Appendix C. Estimates of Sampling E
Page 206 and 207: Table SE.2: Sampling errors: Total
Page 208 and 209: Table SE.3: Sampling errors: Urban
Page 210 and 211: Table SE.4: Sampling errors: Rural
Page 212 and 213: Table SE.5: Sampling errors: Mid-We
Page 218 and 219: Table SE.8: Sampling errors: Far We
Page 220 and 221: Table SE.9: Sampling errors: Far We
Page 222 and 223: Table SE.10: Sampling errors: Far W
Page 224 and 225: Appendix D. Data Quality TablesTabl
Page 234 and 235: Appendix E. MICS4 Indicators: Numer
Page 240 and 241: Appendix F. QuestionnairesNEPAL MUL
Page 242 and 243: HL1.LinenumberHL2.Name, last nameHL
Page 244 and 245: EDUCATIONFor household members age
Page 246 and 247:
WATER AND SANITATIONWS1. WHAT IS TH
Page 248 and 249:
WS7D.IS THIS CONTAINER USED ONLY FO
Page 250 and 251:
HC5. Main material of the exterior
Page 252 and 253:
HC10. DO YOU OR SOMEONE LIVING IN T
Page 254 and 255:
CHILD LABOURTo be administered for
Page 256 and 257:
DE-WORMINGTo be administered only f
Page 258 and 259:
CD9. Write the name and line number
Page 260 and 261:
HH19. Record the time.Hour and minu
Page 262 and 263:
Interviewer’s ObservationsField E
Page 264 and 265:
WOMAN’S BACKGROUNDWBWB1. IN WHAT
Page 266 and 267:
DESIRE OF LAST BIRTHDBThe questionn
Page 268 and 269:
MN9. DID YOU RECEIVE ANY TETANUS IN
Page 270 and 271:
MN20. WHEN (name) WAS BORN, WAS HE/
Page 272 and 273:
CONTRACEPTIONCP1. LET'S US TALK ABO
Page 274 and 275:
UN9. Check CP2. Currently using a f
Page 276 and 277:
ATTITUDES TOWARD DOMESTIC VIOLENCED
Page 278 and 279:
HIV/AIDSHA1. NOW I WOULD LIKE TO TA
Page 280 and 281:
HA19. Check MN17: Birth delivered b
Page 282 and 283:
TA11. HAVE YOU CONSUMED ANY SMOKELE
Page 284 and 285:
LS5. HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH YOU
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
UF12. Record the time.Hour and minu
Page 290 and 291:
EC6. WITHIN THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, AB
Page 292 and 293:
BREASTFEEDINGBF1. HAS (name) EVER B
Page 294 and 295:
CARE OF ILLNESSCA1. IN THE LAST TWO
Page 296 and 297:
CA9. WAS THE FAST OR DIFFICULT BREA
Page 298 and 299:
ML8. WAS (name) GIVEN ANY MEDICINE
Page 300 and 301:
IM5. HAS (name) BEEN ADMINISTERED A
Page 302 and 303:
Child Grant (only for Humla, Jumla,
Page 304:
show all

NMICS 2010 Report - Central Bureau of Statistics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?