- Page 1: COULOMB EXCITATION DATA ANALYSIS CO
- Page 4 and 5: 10 MINIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEAL
- Page 6 and 7: 1 INTRODUCTION1.1 Gosia suite of Co
- Page 8 and 9: 104 Ru, 110 Pd, 165 Ho, 166 Er, 186
- Page 14 and 15: y = a( 2 − 1) 1/2 sinh ω (2.14)z
- Page 16 and 17: leads to excitation of a growing nu
- Page 18 and 19: Table 2.1aElectric Collision Functi
- Page 20 and 21: Figure 3: The coordinate system use
- Page 22 and 23: G k (t) =e −Λ∗t G (fluct.)k(t)
- Page 24 and 25: of the a kχ tensor to the RN syste
- Page 26 and 27: are three to four orders of magnitu
- Page 28 and 29: example is the Coulomb excitation o
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 4: Actual and approximate Co
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 6: Model Coulomb excitation
- Page 34 and 35: 4 NUMERICAL METHODSThe code GOSIA i
- Page 36 and 37: where, as a worst case, the backsca
- Page 38 and 39: max(−I,M 0 − n) ≤ m ≤ min(I
- Page 40 and 41: time-consuming and it is not perfor
- Page 42 and 43: Z EmaxY i (I → I f )= dE 1 Z θp,
- Page 44 and 45: S i = X (d c n i −d e n i) 2 1 ·
- Page 46 and 47: transitions that are significantly
- Page 48 and 49: Figure 8: Simple steepest descent m
- Page 50 and 51: δfδ ln M = |M 0| δfδMwhich, usi
- Page 52 and 53: The sensitivity maps provide useful
- Page 54 and 55: µdP (¯x)= Cρ(¯x)exp − 1 dx 1
- Page 56 and 57: elements is done to find the correl
- Page 58 and 59: 5 INPUT INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE COMPUT
- Page 60 and 61:
OP,MAP (MAP) (5.14):Causes the q-pa
- Page 62 and 63:
5.2 INPUT FORMATSAs a rule the inpu
- Page 64 and 65:
...................................
- Page 66 and 67:
CODE DEFAULT OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF
- Page 68 and 69:
often a subset of the experiments i
- Page 70 and 71:
5.5 OP,COUL (COULEX )This option is
- Page 72 and 73:
IFC : IFC =0specifies that the corr
- Page 74 and 75:
5.8 EXPT (Mandatory suboption of OP
- Page 76 and 77:
5.9 OP,FILE (FILES)This option allo
- Page 78 and 79:
5.11 OP,GOSI (GOSIA)This alternate
- Page 80 and 81:
Figure 9: A rectangular particle de
- Page 82 and 83:
1-16.0,16.02-15.0,-2.0,2.0,15.02-14
- Page 84 and 85:
5.12.5 TOTAL COINCIDENT γ-RAY YIEL
- Page 86 and 87:
5.14 OP,MAP (MAP)This execution opt
- Page 88 and 89:
Note that the definition of reduced
- Page 90 and 91:
5.16 ME (OP,GOSI)Mandatory suboptio
- Page 92 and 93:
This describes the coupling of both
- Page 94 and 95:
5.17 OP,MINI (MINIMIZE)This command
- Page 96 and 97:
do not include σ R (θ p ) · sin(
- Page 98 and 99:
5.19 OP,RAND (RANDOM ME)This option
- Page 100 and 101:
OP,RAW1 experiment #1 labeled as ra
- Page 102 and 103:
5.24 OP,REST (RESTART)This option c
- Page 104 and 105:
5.26 OP,STAR (START)Execution comma
- Page 106 and 107:
· in- and interband couplings for
- Page 108 and 109:
5.28 OP,TITL (TITLE)This option req
- Page 110 and 111:
5.30 OP,YIEL (YIELDS)This option is
- Page 112 and 113:
LAMBDA, INDEX 1 , INDEX 2 , ME, DME
- Page 114 and 115:
Different experiments may have a kn
- Page 116 and 117:
··· LAMBA is the multipole, Eλ
- Page 118 and 119:
Below is an example of an experimen
- Page 120 and 121:
½ ¾2 2 0=(−1) 1 1I s I t I Is+I
- Page 122 and 123:
Figure 11: Distribution plot of the
- Page 124 and 125:
Q 2 1=2I +1¯v L • ¯v Ls√35Q 3
- Page 126 and 127:
are available using positive and ne
- Page 128 and 129:
7 FILE ASSIGNMENTSThe following cha
- Page 130 and 131:
TAPE18 An input file for the progra
- Page 132 and 133:
7.4.2 CREATION OF THE GE DETECTORS
- Page 134 and 135:
.CONT..END,OP,YIEL..OP,MAPOP,EXITIn
- Page 136 and 137:
the ME input. The internal correcti
- Page 138 and 139:
OP,ERRO1,MS,MEND,2,0,RMAXand attach
- Page 140 and 141:
8.1 INPUT INSTRUCTIONSImportant —
- Page 142 and 143:
4, 4,.2, −1, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0 E2 ex
- Page 144 and 145:
3, 5, 190, 194, 17.8, 28 Number of
- Page 146 and 147:
2,0,0,0,01,2,.8,.01,21,4,.1,-1,12,2
- Page 148 and 149:
10 MINIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEAL
- Page 150 and 151:
Hartley [Sz87] have shown that a Ca
- Page 152 and 153:
Since the SA approach relies on sam
- Page 154 and 155:
11 LEARNING GOSIAGOSIA is capable o
- Page 156 and 157:
11.3 Tutorial 1: Gosia basic flow s
- Page 158 and 159:
etween meshpoints. When starting a
- Page 160 and 161:
11.3.2 Fitting Matrix Elements to G
- Page 162 and 163:
Figure 16: Flow diagram for Gosia f
- Page 164 and 165:
5. Re-calculate Correction Factors
- Page 166 and 167:
4,05,111,012,014,016,00,0END,OP,GDE
- Page 168 and 169:
Figure 17: Initial guesses (squares
- Page 170 and 171:
11.5 Annotated GOSIA input g1demo.i
- Page 172 and 173:
11,012,014,016,00,0END,OP,YIELN1=18
- Page 174 and 175:
.10.626331.10.417631.10.291841.10.2
- Page 176 and 177:
5,4,634,650,46.000,50.000634,638,64
- Page 178 and 179:
10,10010,10010,10010,10010,10010,10
- Page 180 and 181:
13 7 8 6.56100 5.00000 9.0000014 8
- Page 182 and 183:
RECOMMENDED RELATIVE GE(LI) EFFICIE
- Page 184 and 185:
CALCULATED LIFETIMESLEVEL LIFETIME(
- Page 186 and 187:
EXPERIMENT 1 DETECTOR 2ENERGY RANGE
- Page 188 and 189:
• When the level scheme (LEVE) or
- Page 190 and 191:
12 GAMMA DETECTION EFFICIENCY CODE:
- Page 192 and 193:
A(E) =exp"−#mXμ i (E)d iA(E) sta
- Page 194 and 195:
where the efficiency error is estim
- Page 196 and 197:
The 2007 code has been updated to r
- Page 198 and 199:
198
- Page 200 and 201:
References[ABR53] A. Abragam, R.V.
- Page 202:
[WU91]C-Y. Wu, D. Cline, E.G. Vogt,