Z EmaxY i (I → I f )= dE 1 Z θp,maxE min( dEdx ) Y (I → I f )dθ p (4.22)θ p,minNote that both the Rutherford cross section <strong>and</strong> the solid angle factor, sinθ p , are already included in thedefinition of the “point“ yields, as well as integration over the detected particle φ angle.The electronic stopping powers, dE/dx, in units of MeV/(mg/cm 2 ),aredefined by a user-specifiedtable assuming common energy meshpoints for all experiments. The actual values of the stopping powersare obtained using Lagrange interpolation. The double integral is then evaluated numerically using thediscrete Simpson method. GOSIA performs the integration in two separate steps - first, the full Coulomb<strong>excitation</strong> coupled-channel calculation is done at each of the user-specified (θ p,E) meshpoints to evaluate the“point“ γ-yields, next, the actual numerical integration is performed according to the user-defined stepsizesin both dimensions. The “point“ yields at the (θ p ,E) points as required by the fixed stepsizes are evaluatedfrom the meshpoint values using the logarithmic scale Lagrangian interpolation. The θ p −E mesh is limitedto a maximum of 11x20 points, while up to 50 steps in angle <strong>and</strong> 100 steps in energy can be defined forthe integration. Subdivision of the calculated mesh improves the accuracy of integration, since Lagrangianinterpolation provides the information of the order dependent on the number of meshpoints, while theSimpson method is a fixed second-order algorithm. In addition, in cases for which the φ p (θ p ) dependence iscomplicated, such as for the large area particle detectors where kinematic <strong>and</strong> mechanical constraints maycreate such shapes, the user may optionally choose to input this dependence at the subdivision meshpoints.The interpolation is then performed between the values divided by φ p ranges to assure continuity, then theuser-given dependence is used to estimate the yields at the subdivision meshpoints. The calculation of yieldsat the meshpoints requires the full coupled-channel Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> calculation which is time-consuming.Consequently, one should balance the number of meshpoints needed with the required accuracy.The integrated yields are calculated in units of mb/sterad times the target thickness (mg/cm 2 ), whichfor thick targets, should be assumed to be the projectile range in the target.The integration module of GOSIA is almost exclusively used in conjunction with the correction module,invoked by the OP,CORR comm<strong>and</strong> (V.4), used to transform the actual experimentally-observed yields tothe ones to which the subsequent fit of the matrix elements will be made. This operation is done to avoid thetime-consuming integration while fitting the matrix elements <strong>and</strong> is treated as an external level of iteration.An effect of the finite scattering angle <strong>and</strong> bombarding energy ranges as compared to the “point“ values ofthe yields is not explicitly dependent on the matrix elements, thus the fit can be done to the “point“ values<strong>and</strong> then the integration/correction procedure can be repeated <strong>and</strong> the fit refined until the convergence isachieved. Usually no more than two integration/correction steps are necessary to obtain the final solution,even in case of the experiments performed without the particle-γ coincidences, covering the full particle solidangle. The correction module of GOSIA uses both the integrated yields <strong>and</strong> the “point“ yields calculatedat the mean scattering angle <strong>and</strong> bombarding energy, as defined in the EXPT (V.8) input, to transform theactual experimental yields according to:Yexp(I c → I f )=Y exp (I → I f ) Y point(I → I f )(4.23)Y int (I → I f )where the superscript “c“ st<strong>and</strong>s for the “corrected“ value. To offset the numerical factor resulting from theenergy-loss integration the lowermost yield observed in a γ-detector labeled as #1 for the first experimentdefined in the EXPT input is renormalized in such a way that the corrected <strong>and</strong> actually observed yieldare equal. This can be done because the knowledge of the absolute cross-section is not required by GOSIA,therefore, no matter how the relative cross-sections for the various experiments are defined, there is always atleast one arbitrary normalization factor for the whole set of experiments. This normalization factor is fittedby GOSIA together with the matrix elements, as discussed in the following section (4.5). The renormalizationprocedure results in the “corrected“ yields being as close as possible to the original values if the same targethas been used for the whole set of the experiments analyzed, thus the energy-loss factor in the integrationprocedure is similar for the whole set of the experiments. However, one should be aware of the fact, that thecorrection factors may differ significantly for different experiments, thus the corrected yields, normalized toauser-specified transition, always given in the GOSIA output, should be used to confirm that the result isreasonable rather than absolute values.42
4.5 MinimizationThe minimization, i.e. fitting the matrix elements to the experimental <strong>data</strong> by finding a minimum of theleast-squares statistic is the most time-consuming stage of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>. A simultaneous fitof a large number of unknown parameters (matrix elements) having in general very different influences onthe <strong>data</strong>, is a complex task, which, to whatever extent algorithmized, still can be slowed down or speeded updependent on the way it is performed. GOSIA allows much freedom for the user to define a preferred strategyof the minimization. A proper use of the steering parameters of the minimization procedure can significantlyimprove the efficiency of fitting dependent on the case analyzed - in short, it still takes a physicist to get theresults!. The following overview of the fitting methods used by GOSIA is intended to provide some ideasabout how to use them in the most efficient way.4.5.1 Definition of the Least-square StatisticA set of the matrix elements best reproducing the experimental <strong>data</strong> is found by requesting the minimumof the least-squares statistic, S( ¯M). The matrix elements will be treated as a vector ordered according tothe user-defined sequence. The statistic S is in fact a usual χ 2 -type function, except for the normalizationto the number of <strong>data</strong> points rather than the number of degrees of freedom which cannot be defined due toaverydifferent sensitivity of the <strong>excitation</strong>/de<strong>excitation</strong> process to various matrix elements, as discussed inmore detail in Section 4.6. The statistic S, called CHISQ in the output from GOSIA, is explicitly given by:ÃS(M) = 1 S y + S 1 + X !w i S i (4.24)Niwhere N is the total number of <strong>data</strong> points ( including experimental yields, branching ratios, lifetimes,mixing ratios <strong>and</strong> known E2 matrix elements ) <strong>and</strong> S y , S 1 <strong>and</strong> S i are the components resulting from varioussubsets of the <strong>data</strong>, as defined below. Symbol w i st<strong>and</strong>s for the weight ascribed to a given subset of <strong>data</strong>.The contribution S y to the total S function from the measured γ-yields following the Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>,is defined as:S y = X I e I dw IeI dX1σ 2 k(I e,I d ) k(C IeI dY ck − Y ek ) 2 (4.25)where the summations extend over all experiments (I e ), γ-detectors (I d ) <strong>and</strong> experiment- as well as detectordependentobserved γ-yields, indexed by k. The weights ascribed to the various subsets of <strong>data</strong> (w IeI d)canbe chosen independently for each experiment <strong>and</strong> γ-detector, facilitating the h<strong>and</strong>ling of <strong>data</strong> during theminimization (particularly, some subsets can be excluded by using a zero weight without modifying theinput <strong>data</strong>). The superscript “c“ denotes calculated yields, while the superscript “e“ st<strong>and</strong>s for experimental<strong>data</strong>, with σ k being the experimental errors. The coefficients C Ie I dare the normalization factors, connectingcalculated <strong>and</strong> experimental yields (see 4.5.2).The next term S 1 of equation 4.24 is an “observation limit“ term, intended to prevent the minimizationprocedure from finding physically unreasonable solutions producing γ-ray transitions which should be, buthave not been, observed. An experiment <strong>and</strong> detector dependent observation upper limit, u(I e,I d ) is introduced,which is the ratio of the lowest observable intensity to that of the user-specified normalizationtransition (see V.29). S 1 is defined as:S 1 = X jµ Yc 2j (I e ,I d )1Yn c − u(I e ,I) ·(I e ,I d) u 2 (I e ,I d )(4.26)the summation extending over the calculated γ transitions not defined as experimentally observed <strong>and</strong>covering the whole set of the experiments <strong>and</strong> γ-detectors defined, provided that the upper limit has beenexceeded for a given transition. The terms added to S 1 are not counted as <strong>data</strong> points, thus the normalizationfactor N is not increased to avoid the situation in which the fit could be improved by creating unreasonabletransition intensities at the expense of the normalization factor.The remaining terms of 4.24 account for the spectroscopic <strong>data</strong> available, namely branching ratios, meanlifetimes, E2/M1 mixing ratios <strong>and</strong> known E2 matrix elements. Each S i term can be written as:43
- Page 1: COULOMB EXCITATION DATA ANALYSIS CO
- Page 4 and 5: 10 MINIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEAL
- Page 6 and 7: 1 INTRODUCTION1.1 Gosia suite of Co
- Page 8 and 9: 104 Ru, 110 Pd, 165 Ho, 166 Er, 186
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 1: Coordinate system used to
- Page 15 and 16: Cλ E =1.116547 · (13.889122) λ (
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 2: The orbital integrals R 2
- Page 19 and 20: 2.2 Gamma Decay Following Electroma
- Page 21 and 22: where :d 2 σ= σ R (θ p ) X R kχ
- Page 23 and 24: Formula 2.49 is valid only for t mu
- Page 25 and 26: Ã XK(α) =exp−iτ i (E γ )x i (
- Page 27 and 28: important to have an accurate knowl
- Page 29 and 30: 3 APPROXIMATE EVALUATION OF EXCITAT
- Page 31 and 32: with the reduced matrix element M c
- Page 33 and 34: q (20)s (0 + → 2 + ) · M 1 ζ (2
- Page 35 and 36: esults of minimization and error ru
- Page 37 and 38: adjustment of the stepsize accordin
- Page 39 and 40: approximation reliability improves
- Page 41: Zd 2 σ(I → I f )Y (I → I f )=s
- Page 45 and 46: X(CC k Yk c − Yk e ) 2 /σ 2 k =m
- Page 47 and 48: However, estimation of the stepsize
- Page 49 and 50: It can be shown that as long as the
- Page 51 and 52: een exceeded; third, the user-given
- Page 53 and 54: where f k stands for the functional
- Page 55 and 56: x i + δx i Rx iexp ¡ − 1 2 χ2
- Page 57 and 58: method used for the minimization, i
- Page 59 and 60: OP,ERRO (ERRORS) (5.6):Activates th
- Page 61 and 62: -----OP,SIXJ (SIX-j SYMBOL) (5.25):
- Page 63 and 64: 5.3 CONT (CONTROL)This suboption of
- Page 65 and 66: I,I1 Ranges of matrix elements to b
- Page 67 and 68: CODE DEFAULT OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF
- Page 69 and 70: 5.4 OP,CORR (CORRECT )This executio
- Page 71 and 72: 5.6 OP,ERRO (ERRORS)ThemoduleofGOSI
- Page 73 and 74: 5.7 OP,EXIT (EXIT)This option cause
- Page 75 and 76: M AControls the number of magnetic
- Page 77 and 78: 5.10 OP,GDET (GE DETECTORS)This opt
- Page 79 and 80: 5.12 OP,INTG (INTEGRATE)This comman
- Page 81 and 82: ¡ dE¢dx1 ..¡ dEdx¢Stopping powe
- Page 83 and 84: NI1, NI2 Number of subdivisions of
- Page 85 and 86: 5.13 LEVE (LEVELS)Mandatory subopti
- Page 87 and 88: 5.15 ME (OP,COUL)Mandatory suboptio
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 10: Model system having 4 st
- Page 91 and 92: ME =< INDEX2||E(M)λ||INDEX1 > The
- Page 93 and 94:
When entering matrix elements in th
- Page 95 and 96:
There are no restrictions concernin
- Page 97 and 98:
5.18 OP,POIN (POINT CALCULATION)Thi
- Page 99 and 100:
5.20 OP,RAW (RAW UNCORRECTED γ YIE
- Page 101 and 102:
5.21 OP,RE,A (RELEASE,A)This option
- Page 103 and 104:
5.25 OP,SIXJ (SIXJ SYMBOL)This stan
- Page 105 and 106:
5.27 OP,THEO (COLLECTIVE MODEL ME)C
- Page 107 and 108:
2,5,1,-2,23,5,1,-2,23,6,1,-2,2Matri
- Page 109 and 110:
5.29 OP,TROU (TROUBLE)This troubles
- Page 111 and 112:
to that of the previous experiment,
- Page 113 and 114:
To reduce the unnecessary input, on
- Page 115 and 116:
OP,STAR or OP,POIN under OP,GOSI. N
- Page 117 and 118:
5.31 INPUT OF EXPERIMENTAL γ-RAY Y
- Page 119 and 120:
6 QUADRUPOLE ROTATION INVARIANTS -
- Page 121 and 122:
*½P 5 (J) = s(E2 × E2) J ׯh¾
- Page 123 and 124:
The expectation value of cos3δ can
- Page 125 and 126:
where ē is an arbitratry vector. D
- Page 127 and 128:
achieved using “mixed“ calculat
- Page 129 and 130:
TAPE9 Contains the parameters neede
- Page 131 and 132:
TAPE18 Input file, containing the i
- Page 133 and 134:
7.4.4 CALCULATION OF THE INTEGRATED
- Page 135 and 136:
OP,EXITInput: TAPE4,TAPE7,TAPE9Outp
- Page 137 and 138:
OP,ERRO0,MS,MEND,1,0,RMAXand the fi
- Page 139 and 140:
8 SIMULTANEOUS COULOMB EXCITATION:
- Page 141 and 142:
4, 3, 1kr88.corKr corrected yields
- Page 143 and 144:
0 Correction for in-flight decay ch
- Page 145 and 146:
OP, ERRO Estimation of errors of fi
- Page 147 and 148:
9 COULOMB EXCITATION OF ISOMERIC ST
- Page 149 and 150:
configurations with a probability e
- Page 151 and 152:
The average range covered by each m
- Page 153 and 154:
SFX,NTOTI1(1),I2(1),RSIGN(1)I1(2),I
- Page 155 and 156:
11.2 LearningtoWriteGosiaInputsThe
- Page 157 and 158:
(1.6 MeV)1.1 MeV0.75 MeV0.4 MeV0.08
- Page 159 and 160:
Define the germaniumdetector geomet
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 15: Flow diagram for Gosia m
- Page 163 and 164:
gosia < 2-make-correction-factors.i
- Page 165 and 166:
Issue the commandgosia < 9-diag-err
- Page 167 and 168:
At this point, it is suggested to c
- Page 169 and 170:
calculation.) In this case, a copy
- Page 171 and 172:
4,-4, -3.705, 3,44,5, 4.626, 3.,7.5
- Page 173 and 174:
90145901459014590145901459014590145
- Page 175 and 176:
.10.028921.10.026031.10.023431.10.0
- Page 177 and 178:
5,5,634,650,82.000,84.000634,638,64
- Page 179 and 180:
***********************************
- Page 181 and 182:
*** CHISQ= 0.134003E+01 ***MATRIX E
- Page 183 and 184:
CALCULATED AND EXPERIMENTAL YIELDS
- Page 185 and 186:
11.7 Annotated excerpt from a Coulo
- Page 187 and 188:
11.8 Accuracy and speed of calculat
- Page 189 and 190:
18,10.056,0.068,0.082,0.1,0.12,0.15
- Page 191 and 192:
line 152 Eu 182 Tanumber (keV) (keV
- Page 193 and 194:
1.6 Normalization between data sets
- Page 195 and 196:
13 GOSIA 2007 RELEASE NOTESThese no
- Page 197 and 198:
Matrix elements 500(April 1990, T.
- Page 199 and 200:
14 GOSIA Manual UpdatesDATE UPDATE2
- Page 201 and 202:
[KIB08]T.Kibédi,T.W.Burrows,M.B.Tr