coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...
coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...
coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 INTRODUCTION1.1 Gosia suite of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>codes</strong>Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>, which is <strong>excitation</strong> of nuclear states caused solely by the electromagnetic field actingbetween the colliding nuclei, is a powerful probe of collective nuclear structure [ALD56, ALD66, ALD75].The main advantage of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> lies in the fact that, unlike nuclear reactions, the interaction canbe described by the well-established theory of the electromagnetic interaction allowing nuclear structure tobe studied in a model-independent way. Excitation via the short-ranged nuclear interaction is negligible forbombarding energies well below the Coulomb barrier, whereas the long-ranged electromagnetic interactionstill gives rise to a considerable Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>. Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> is the preeminent probe of collectivedegrees of freedom in nuclear structure in that it selectively populates collective states with cross sectionsthat are a direct measure of the electromagnetic matrix elements.The recognition of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> as a method of studying collective motion in nuclei dates backto the early 1950’s [ALD56]. Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> with light-ion beams has been exploited extensively tomeasure the reduced <strong>excitation</strong> probabilities <strong>and</strong> quadrupole moments of the lowest excited states. Experimentsperformed using light-ion beams can be interpreted relatively easily because first- <strong>and</strong> second orderperturbation theory are applicable since only one <strong>and</strong> two step <strong>excitation</strong> processes need to be taken intoaccount (see e.g. the extensive discussion of the perturbation approach in [ALD75] ). The situation changesdramatically for multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> that results when heavy-ion beams are employed. MultipleCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> populates many excited states (up to spin, 40~ in strongly deformed nuclei) providingsensitivity to a large body of electromagnetic matrix elements but unfortunately perturbation methods areno longer viable. Review papers by Cline [CLI86] <strong>and</strong> de Boer[BOE84] contain a short summaries of theearly multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> work, complete with a extensive lists of references.A semiclassical theory of multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> was developed in 1956[ALD56]. The first semiclassicalmultiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> computer program COULEX was developed by Winther <strong>and</strong> de Boerin 1965[WIN65]. The code COULEX provided the first opportunity to calculate quantitatively multipleCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> amplitudes using an assumed set of the reduced electromagnetic matrix elements. Thiscode greatly exp<strong>and</strong>ed the exploitation of the powerful Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> technique to determine electromagneticmatrix elements in nuclear structure. However, the ultimate goal of a model-independent extractionof the electromagnetic structure parameters (reduced matrix elements) from the heavy-ion experiments wasnot viable until development, in 1980, of the code GOSIA described in this manual. The main difficultyfor making a model-independent <strong>analysis</strong> lies in the large number of reduced matrix elements influencingheavy-ion <strong>excitation</strong>. More than a hundred matrix elements can contribute significantly to Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>when using heavy beams to excite strongly deformed nuclei. There are two major tasks to makinga model-independent <strong>analysis</strong> of multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong>. The first task is to overdetermine theproblem by collecting enough experimental <strong>data</strong>, this requires measurements for a wide dynamic range ofCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> strength. The second task is to extract the many unknown matrix elements from thisoverdetermined <strong>data</strong> set.The need to collect Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong> for a wide dynamic range of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> interactionstrength, has led to development of experimental methods to record de<strong>excitation</strong> γ-rays in coincidence withscattered ions over a wide range of particle scattering angle. The efficiency of <strong>data</strong> collection has been verymuch enhanced by the development of 4π arrays of Compton-suppressed Ge detectors, such as Gammasphere,<strong>and</strong> large solid-angle, position-sensitive, parallel-plate avalanche detectors that provide mass <strong>and</strong> scatteringangle resolution for detection of both scattered ions in kinematic coincidence. The particle detector allowsevent-by-event kinematic reconstruction to correct the considerable Doppler shifts of observed γ-ray energies,dramatically improving the quality of the γ-ray spectra. Ref. [SIM97] gives technical details of the Rochesterdesigned charged particle detection CHICO, that has been used extensively with Gammasphere for Coulomb<strong>excitation</strong> studies since 1995.Initially multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong> were analysed by comparing the <strong>data</strong> with the predictionsobtained using the code COULEX coupled to a program like CEGRY[CLI74] to evaluate the γ-de<strong>excitation</strong>.The sets of matrix elements required as input <strong>data</strong> to COULEX were taken from model predictions <strong>and</strong>the conclusions were drawn based on the quality of the agreement obtained. However, the results of such amodel-dependent analyses were not conclusive, primarily due to the unknown sensitivity of the experimental6