12.07.2015 Views

coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...

coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...

coulomb excitation data analysis codes; gosia 2007 - Physics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 INTRODUCTION1.1 Gosia suite of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>codes</strong>Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>, which is <strong>excitation</strong> of nuclear states caused solely by the electromagnetic field actingbetween the colliding nuclei, is a powerful probe of collective nuclear structure [ALD56, ALD66, ALD75].The main advantage of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> lies in the fact that, unlike nuclear reactions, the interaction canbe described by the well-established theory of the electromagnetic interaction allowing nuclear structure tobe studied in a model-independent way. Excitation via the short-ranged nuclear interaction is negligible forbombarding energies well below the Coulomb barrier, whereas the long-ranged electromagnetic interactionstill gives rise to a considerable Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>. Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> is the preeminent probe of collectivedegrees of freedom in nuclear structure in that it selectively populates collective states with cross sectionsthat are a direct measure of the electromagnetic matrix elements.The recognition of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> as a method of studying collective motion in nuclei dates backto the early 1950’s [ALD56]. Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> with light-ion beams has been exploited extensively tomeasure the reduced <strong>excitation</strong> probabilities <strong>and</strong> quadrupole moments of the lowest excited states. Experimentsperformed using light-ion beams can be interpreted relatively easily because first- <strong>and</strong> second orderperturbation theory are applicable since only one <strong>and</strong> two step <strong>excitation</strong> processes need to be taken intoaccount (see e.g. the extensive discussion of the perturbation approach in [ALD75] ). The situation changesdramatically for multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> that results when heavy-ion beams are employed. MultipleCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> populates many excited states (up to spin, 40~ in strongly deformed nuclei) providingsensitivity to a large body of electromagnetic matrix elements but unfortunately perturbation methods areno longer viable. Review papers by Cline [CLI86] <strong>and</strong> de Boer[BOE84] contain a short summaries of theearly multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> work, complete with a extensive lists of references.A semiclassical theory of multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> was developed in 1956[ALD56]. The first semiclassicalmultiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> computer program COULEX was developed by Winther <strong>and</strong> de Boerin 1965[WIN65]. The code COULEX provided the first opportunity to calculate quantitatively multipleCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> amplitudes using an assumed set of the reduced electromagnetic matrix elements. Thiscode greatly exp<strong>and</strong>ed the exploitation of the powerful Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> technique to determine electromagneticmatrix elements in nuclear structure. However, the ultimate goal of a model-independent extractionof the electromagnetic structure parameters (reduced matrix elements) from the heavy-ion experiments wasnot viable until development, in 1980, of the code GOSIA described in this manual. The main difficultyfor making a model-independent <strong>analysis</strong> lies in the large number of reduced matrix elements influencingheavy-ion <strong>excitation</strong>. More than a hundred matrix elements can contribute significantly to Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong>when using heavy beams to excite strongly deformed nuclei. There are two major tasks to makinga model-independent <strong>analysis</strong> of multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong>. The first task is to overdetermine theproblem by collecting enough experimental <strong>data</strong>, this requires measurements for a wide dynamic range ofCoulomb <strong>excitation</strong> strength. The second task is to extract the many unknown matrix elements from thisoverdetermined <strong>data</strong> set.The need to collect Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong> for a wide dynamic range of Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> interactionstrength, has led to development of experimental methods to record de<strong>excitation</strong> γ-rays in coincidence withscattered ions over a wide range of particle scattering angle. The efficiency of <strong>data</strong> collection has been verymuch enhanced by the development of 4π arrays of Compton-suppressed Ge detectors, such as Gammasphere,<strong>and</strong> large solid-angle, position-sensitive, parallel-plate avalanche detectors that provide mass <strong>and</strong> scatteringangle resolution for detection of both scattered ions in kinematic coincidence. The particle detector allowsevent-by-event kinematic reconstruction to correct the considerable Doppler shifts of observed γ-ray energies,dramatically improving the quality of the γ-ray spectra. Ref. [SIM97] gives technical details of the Rochesterdesigned charged particle detection CHICO, that has been used extensively with Gammasphere for Coulomb<strong>excitation</strong> studies since 1995.Initially multiple Coulomb <strong>excitation</strong> <strong>data</strong> were analysed by comparing the <strong>data</strong> with the predictionsobtained using the code COULEX coupled to a program like CEGRY[CLI74] to evaluate the γ-de<strong>excitation</strong>.The sets of matrix elements required as input <strong>data</strong> to COULEX were taken from model predictions <strong>and</strong>the conclusions were drawn based on the quality of the agreement obtained. However, the results of such amodel-dependent analyses were not conclusive, primarily due to the unknown sensitivity of the experimental6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!