02.12.2012 Views

Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa

Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa

Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.112 Assessing whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital requirements generated for an individual<br />

insurer by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula are sufficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> address its individual<br />

risk profile (including <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualitative requirements) is unlikely <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be an<br />

exact science and not comparable <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> deep analysis of an internal<br />

model.<br />

10.113 For example, it may be difficult <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> state (with any accuracy) that any<br />

particular insurer's capital requirement is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with an overall<br />

c<strong>on</strong>fidence level of, say, 95%. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> individual risk profile of<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer can be assessed, as part of a qualitative test, against <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

design criteria underlying <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula.<br />

10.114 The outcome of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory review of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer's risk profile and<br />

management practices and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimate of capital adequacy could<br />

result in a three step approach. In a first step, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory<br />

authority should ensure that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> real risks faced by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance<br />

undertaking are not underestimated. The real risks could be<br />

underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following causes:<br />

• Risks incurred by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking are not captured or<br />

captured insufficiently by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pillar I calculati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

• The insurance undertaking presents deficiencies and failures in<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> systems or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r risks, including in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> internal c<strong>on</strong>trol and/or<br />

risk management systems, or in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> governance and market<br />

c<strong>on</strong>duct qualitative requirements.<br />

Therefore <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> outcome must be that CEIOPS develops a standard SCR<br />

formula that is sufficiently sophisticated <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> deliver a reas<strong>on</strong>ably<br />

accurate (judged against <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> desired safety c<strong>on</strong>fidence level) capital<br />

requirement for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vast majority of insurers in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scope of<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong>. In this way, it could be ensured that a Pillar II adjustment<br />

of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pillar I SCR estimate would <strong>on</strong>ly rarely be needed; for example,<br />

this may be <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case for insurance companies that are niche players,<br />

and for which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> product and liability maturity assumpti<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

standard SCR formula may not be sufficiently sensitive.<br />

10.115 If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risks are underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first cause, in a sec<strong>on</strong>d step,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority should require a higher level of solvency<br />

capital requirement <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be calculated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking, by<br />

using an internal model or adjustments <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula which<br />

are <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be approved by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority.<br />

10.116 If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risks are underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d cause <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

supervisory authority should, in a sec<strong>on</strong>d step, report its summary of<br />

deficiencies and failures, and demand that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> undertaking remedies<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> within an agreed timeframe. If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> undertaking is not able<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> adapt its ec<strong>on</strong>omic situati<strong>on</strong> and processes <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> fit its real risk profile<br />

within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> agreed timeframe, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority should, in a<br />

third step, specify a level of capital that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer should hold in order<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> meet regula<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry c<strong>on</strong>cerns until <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking has<br />

complied with supervisory demands. This may be a different level of<br />

capital (or a different quality of capital) from that calculated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!