Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10.112 Assessing whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital requirements generated for an individual<br />
insurer by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula are sufficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> address its individual<br />
risk profile (including <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualitative requirements) is unlikely <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be an<br />
exact science and not comparable <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> deep analysis of an internal<br />
model.<br />
10.113 For example, it may be difficult <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> state (with any accuracy) that any<br />
particular insurer's capital requirement is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with an overall<br />
c<strong>on</strong>fidence level of, say, 95%. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> individual risk profile of<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer can be assessed, as part of a qualitative test, against <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
design criteria underlying <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula.<br />
10.114 The outcome of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory review of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer's risk profile and<br />
management practices and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimate of capital adequacy could<br />
result in a three step approach. In a first step, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory<br />
authority should ensure that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> real risks faced by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance<br />
undertaking are not underestimated. The real risks could be<br />
underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following causes:<br />
• Risks incurred by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking are not captured or<br />
captured insufficiently by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pillar I calculati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• The insurance undertaking presents deficiencies and failures in<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> systems or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r risks, including in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> internal c<strong>on</strong>trol and/or<br />
risk management systems, or in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> governance and market<br />
c<strong>on</strong>duct qualitative requirements.<br />
Therefore <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> outcome must be that CEIOPS develops a standard SCR<br />
formula that is sufficiently sophisticated <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> deliver a reas<strong>on</strong>ably<br />
accurate (judged against <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> desired safety c<strong>on</strong>fidence level) capital<br />
requirement for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vast majority of insurers in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scope of<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong>. In this way, it could be ensured that a Pillar II adjustment<br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pillar I SCR estimate would <strong>on</strong>ly rarely be needed; for example,<br />
this may be <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case for insurance companies that are niche players,<br />
and for which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> product and liability maturity assumpti<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
standard SCR formula may not be sufficiently sensitive.<br />
10.115 If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risks are underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first cause, in a sec<strong>on</strong>d step,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority should require a higher level of solvency<br />
capital requirement <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be calculated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking, by<br />
using an internal model or adjustments <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard formula which<br />
are <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be approved by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority.<br />
10.116 If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risks are underestimated due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d cause <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
supervisory authority should, in a sec<strong>on</strong>d step, report its summary of<br />
deficiencies and failures, and demand that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> undertaking remedies<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> within an agreed timeframe. If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> undertaking is not able<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> adapt its ec<strong>on</strong>omic situati<strong>on</strong> and processes <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> fit its real risk profile<br />
within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> agreed timeframe, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisory authority should, in a<br />
third step, specify a level of capital that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer should hold in order<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> meet regula<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry c<strong>on</strong>cerns until <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertaking has<br />
complied with supervisory demands. This may be a different level of<br />
capital (or a different quality of capital) from that calculated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
103