- Page 1 and 2:
CEIOPS-DOC-07/05 Answers</s
- Page 3 and 4:
Style convention The following has
- Page 5 and 6:
• Safety measures (CfA 9); • So
- Page 7 and 8:
sole purpose is to
- Page 9 and 10:
Call for Advice No. 7 Technical pro
- Page 11 and 12:
one year). Therefore, capital requi
- Page 13 and 14:
perhaps through an explicit additio
- Page 15 and 16:
Discounting 7.22 The present value
- Page 17 and 18:
exposed to risk fr
- Page 19 and 20:
insurance liabilities set by refere
- Page 21 and 22:
Profit sharing In practice, for uni
- Page 23 and 24:
future cash flows will have <strong
- Page 25 and 26:
Explanatory text S
- Page 27 and 28:
always have resources to</s
- Page 29 and 30:
developed. They would help
- Page 31 and 32:
8.28 A fourth option could be envis
- Page 33 and 34:
In principle, "the
- Page 35 and 36:
8.48 Three alternatives can be cons
- Page 37 and 38:
essential part of the</stro
- Page 39 and 40:
statistical estimate (with a level
- Page 41 and 42:
8.77 It may be argued that
- Page 43 and 44:
to use more sophis
- Page 45 and 46:
consequence on the
- Page 47 and 48:
8.105 In some cases, the</s
- Page 49 and 50:
This shall be reviewed, at least an
- Page 51 and 52:
ut the exposure <s
- Page 53 and 54:
Explanatory text M
- Page 55 and 56:
9.15 Solvency II could also employ
- Page 57 and 58:
9.28 The life formula yields itself
- Page 59 and 60:
underestimate them
- Page 61 and 62:
'Prudent person plus' approach 9.52
- Page 63 and 64:
Uniform or different rules for tech
- Page 65 and 66:
through a prescribed list. Lists ar
- Page 67 and 68:
addition a range of stresses so tha
- Page 69 and 70:
(including the Rei
- Page 71 and 72:
for review of the
- Page 73 and 74:
eligibility criteria, or principles
- Page 75 and 76:
should not lead to
- Page 77 and 78:
• the degree of
- Page 79 and 80:
9.156 The senior management shall r
- Page 81 and 82:
- going-concern aspects of business
- Page 83 and 84:
features. 81 TailVaR is an example
- Page 85 and 86:
10.17 The SCR should also reflect <
- Page 87 and 88:
10.26 The risk of asset liability m
- Page 89 and 90:
Naturally, the pra
- Page 91 and 92:
too few categories
- Page 93 and 94:
- Choice of volume measures 10.57 W
- Page 95 and 96:
Underwriting risk in non-life insur
- Page 97 and 98:
volatility of thei
- Page 99 and 100:
those insurers this possible increa
- Page 101 and 102:
10.103 A factor-ba
- Page 103 and 104:
10.112 Assessing whethe</st
- Page 105 and 106:
10.121 The SCR should deliver a lev
- Page 107 and 108:
whenever its effects on the
- Page 109 and 110:
scenario techniques to</str
- Page 111 and 112:
Operational risk just ratings infor
- Page 113 and 114:
Call for Advice No. 11 Solvency cap
- Page 115 and 116:
Costs and Benefits 11.6 It should b
- Page 117 and 118:
• Qualitative requirements for <s
- Page 119 and 120:
11.19 Risk management criteria set
- Page 121 and 122:
individual undertaking is exposed a
- Page 123 and 124:
• sensitivity analyses that have
- Page 125 and 126:
• visualizations of flows of prod
- Page 127 and 128:
Partial models and the</str
- Page 129 and 130:
11.58 There should be few descripti
- Page 131 and 132:
of the SCR estimat
- Page 133 and 134:
equirements to imp
- Page 135 and 136:
Call for Advice No. 12 Reinsurance
- Page 137 and 138:
Reflection in technical provisions
- Page 139 and 140:
• provide an estimate of an under
- Page 141 and 142: particular reinsurer(s)’ aggregat
- Page 143 and 144: they auto<
- Page 145 and 146: einsurer to <stron
- Page 147 and 148: should be a reduction in risk regar
- Page 149 and 150: Call for Advice No. 13 Quantitative
- Page 151 and 152: • the process of
- Page 153 and 154: • handling questions from insuran
- Page 155 and 156: member countries and in the
- Page 157 and 158: components of the
- Page 159 and 160: Background 14.1 Current insurance D
- Page 161 and 162: 14.12 In order to
- Page 163 and 164: groups in its answer to</st
- Page 165 and 166: affected; • Impose restrictions o
- Page 167 and 168: 14.43 Regarding the</strong
- Page 169 and 170: off all contracts; • to</
- Page 171 and 172: Call for Advice No. 15 Solvency con
- Page 173 and 174: Minimum capital requirement (MCR) D
- Page 175 and 176: adjusted SCR. From a purely technic
- Page 177 and 178: to be implemented.
- Page 179 and 180: capital
- Page 181 and 182: absolute floor (expressed in euros
- Page 183 and 184: Bolkestein agreed to</stron
- Page 185 and 186: 16.14 Generally speaking, complianc
- Page 187 and 188: appoint an additional person <stron
- Page 189 and 190: 16.28 It should also be noted that
- Page 191: Time of application 16.41 The asses
- Page 195 and 196: Background 17.1 This document aims
- Page 197 and 198: Review Panel would be a permanent g
- Page 199 and 200: • the developmen
- Page 201 and 202: asis for considering improvements <
- Page 203 and 204: (I) Regulatory arb
- Page 205 and 206: (II) Capital requirements at group
- Page 207 and 208: into a SCR at grou
- Page 209 and 210: 18.31 Additionally, it must be deci
- Page 211 and 212: Capital requirements 18.39 The Fram
- Page 213 and 214: (III) Supervisory Review Process of
- Page 215 and 216: 18.60 In view of the</stron
- Page 217 and 218: new structure would need to
- Page 219 and 220: future Framework Directive. CEIOPS
- Page 221 and 222: 18.94 Model validation in t
- Page 223 and 224: the assumptions us
- Page 225 and 226: Annexes Annex A (Call for Advice No
- Page 227 and 228: pursuing a strategy which t
- Page 229 and 230: Specific principles for non-life in
- Page 231 and 232: Conformity, suitability and suffici
- Page 233 and 234: • existence of significant insuff
- Page 235 and 236: A.64 In the tests
- Page 237 and 238: the rules on <stro
- Page 239 and 240: TVaR1-α for Tail Value-at-risk. In
- Page 241 and 242: Degree of personalisation B.24 Tran
- Page 243 and 244:
B.34 There are two approaches <stro
- Page 245 and 246:
Segmentation B.44 In general terms,
- Page 247 and 248:
technical technical technical techn
- Page 249 and 250:
B.61 The second alternative was cho
- Page 251 and 252:
Dutch supervisory authority for <st
- Page 253 and 254:
Market risk Equity risk this altern
- Page 255 and 256:
B.95 In a scenario-based approach,
- Page 257 and 258:
B.106 As an alternative one could t
- Page 259 and 260:
where: KTSA = the
- Page 261 and 262:
Results from the a
- Page 263 and 264:
Solvency ratio prior to</st
- Page 265 and 266:
Number of instances Risk group Deta
- Page 267 and 268:
Conclusion In general, the<
- Page 269 and 270:
where: TP gross = technical provisi
- Page 271 and 272:
premium risk, the
- Page 273 and 274:
“While proportional reinsurance t
- Page 275 and 276:
contribute with any additional info
- Page 277 and 278:
E.29 Another way <
- Page 279:
programmes on the