Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eligibility criteria, or principles, and/or a list of eligible asset classes. 77<br />
In a combined approach, <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be eligible, an asset must be both listed as<br />
eligible and meet <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> principles. One possible way <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> achieve this is <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
determine principles at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> directive level, whereas a list of potentially<br />
eligible asset classes could be specified in implementing measures.<br />
9.126 The list of eligible asset classes should be mainly positive (i.e. any<br />
asset that is listed is potentially eligible; everything else is not). The<br />
list should be easy <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> apply and update. The principles used <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
c<strong>on</strong>struct <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> list should be clear and c<strong>on</strong>cise.<br />
Principles for eligible assets<br />
9.127 Future IAIS standards <strong>on</strong> assets covering technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s should<br />
be c<strong>on</strong>sidered as a starting point for determining asset eligibility.<br />
9.128 The following principles for asset eligibility are presented as a starting<br />
point for fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r elaborati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• an asset portfolio is acceptable <strong>on</strong>ly if and <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
assets can be realised before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> liabilities need <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be met. That<br />
is, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> assets covering <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital<br />
requirement should be able <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> generate an expected net cash<br />
flow (asset income less liability outgo) that is always positive;<br />
• in order for an asset <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be admissible its value needs <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be<br />
ascertainable; and<br />
• intangibles should be excluded.<br />
9.129 CEIOPS will need <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sider <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> practicability of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se principles and<br />
whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r additi<strong>on</strong>al requirements would be necessary. It is envisaged<br />
that currently eligible asset classes should be compatible with any<br />
principles that are developed. But a new approach <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> asset eligibility<br />
should enable greater flexibility for supervisors <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> recognise innovative<br />
asset types.<br />
List of eligible asset classes<br />
9.130 CEIOPS advises using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> current list of eligible asset classes as a<br />
starting point.<br />
9.131 One prec<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> of extending <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> list with a new asset class is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
possibility of a risk charge in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SCR standard formula <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> address <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
risks of that class.<br />
9.132 CEIOPS suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> updating procedure for revising <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> list is<br />
kept as simple as possible, in order <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> secure a list that reflects current<br />
financial markets and does not unnecessarily restrain innovati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
9.133 Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r analysis is needed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> decide what c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s should be placed<br />
<strong>on</strong> derivatives <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be included as eligible assets.<br />
73