Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore not feasible <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> ask <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertakings <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>duct QIS<br />
calculati<strong>on</strong>s during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths of a year.<br />
13.24 According <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> current versi<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Solvency II Roadmap (Annex <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
MARKT/2502/05-rev. 1) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>European</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> will c<strong>on</strong>duct an<br />
impact assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be presented July 2007 . CEIOPS will c<strong>on</strong>tribute<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> this impact assessment by providing greater clarity <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> implicit<br />
prudence embedded in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> current level of technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with assessing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact of its advice <strong>on</strong> technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
and capital requirements under Solvency II. To this extent, it will<br />
organize a limited QIS1 exercise during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fourth quarter of 2005 that<br />
will be primarily focussed <strong>on</strong> testing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various c<strong>on</strong>fidence levels with<br />
respect <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> determinati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposed risk margin surrounding<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> best estimate of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurers’ liabilities. From <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PFS <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> valuati<strong>on</strong><br />
of insurance liabilities appeared <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be <strong>on</strong>e of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> central elements when<br />
striving for greater harm<strong>on</strong>isati<strong>on</strong> of prudence levels requested under<br />
Solvency II. In this c<strong>on</strong>text, QIS 1 will test <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 75 th and 90 th percentile,<br />
as well as inviting firms <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> bring <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 60 th percentile and/or alternative<br />
approaches (such as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost of capital approach) <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> CEIOPS' attenti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Simultaneously, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pillar I Working Group will work <strong>on</strong> fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
refinements of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MCR and SCR formulas, which would allow <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
CEIOPS FSC <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>duct its first full-blown QIS (QIS2) exercise e.g. <strong>on</strong><br />
technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s, MCR and SCR during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d quarter of 2006.<br />
CEIOPS envisages that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re will still be different opti<strong>on</strong>s for technical<br />
provisi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be tested under QIS2.<br />
Planning for progressively more sophisticated and comprehensive<br />
approaches <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> field testing.<br />
13.25 Throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire Solvency II project (e.g. up <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> and bey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
presentati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Directive in July 2007) a series of QIS is foreseen.<br />
The QIS process will thus have several iterati<strong>on</strong>s with progressively<br />
more sophisticated and comprehensive approaches. Input for more<br />
sophisticated assumpti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> be included in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> subsequent QIS will<br />
come as progress is achieved by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Solvency II Working Groups. Aside<br />
from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> minimum and solvency capital requirements <strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>European</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurance undertakings, CEIOPS may c<strong>on</strong>tribute <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> EU<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>'s Impact Assessment by addressing broader ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sequences of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall Solvency II project as well as cost-benefit<br />
analyses of all waves under work.<br />
CEIOPS' Advice<br />
13.26 QIS will test <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact of proposed principles with respect <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
financial resources of individual insurance undertakings. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> QIS is<br />
very challenging from a technical, resource and timing point of view, it<br />
will require careful planning and effective executi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
13.27 The QIS process is expected <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> have several iterati<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
progressively more sophisticated and comprehensive approaches as<br />
quantitative requirements are developed in more detail (e.g., fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
156