Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
Answers to the European Commission on the ... - Eiopa - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10.17 The SCR should also reflect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital required at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time<br />
horiz<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> properly address <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> run-off of an undertaking's liabilities.<br />
This does not mean that available capital should be sufficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> cover<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> full run-off period of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> liabilities. But <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> liabilities should be<br />
transferable <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> a third party at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time horiz<strong>on</strong>, or<br />
policyholders should have reas<strong>on</strong>able assurance that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir claims would<br />
be covered.<br />
10.18 The risk margin in technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s provides a reas<strong>on</strong>able proxy for<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se aims. The SCR should <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore deliver <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> amount of capital<br />
necessary <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> ensure, with a 99.5% c<strong>on</strong>fidence level, that assets will<br />
exceed technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s (and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r liabilities) as estimated over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
period <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> specified time horiz<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Going c<strong>on</strong>cern vs. run-off / winding up assumpti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
10.19 The purpose of regula<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry capital requirements for solvency purposes is<br />
twofold. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e hand, it aims at ensuring that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurer is<br />
sufficiently capitalised during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> defined time horiz<strong>on</strong> as a going<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cern. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, regula<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry capital should also provide for a<br />
successful run-off of an insurance undertaking in a ruin situati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Therefore, regula<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry capital has aspects of both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> going-c<strong>on</strong>cern and<br />
run-off situati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
10.20 Over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e-year time horiz<strong>on</strong>, new business may change <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk<br />
profile of an insurance undertaking. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> undertaking should be<br />
regarded as a going c<strong>on</strong>cern until an insolvency event, capital<br />
requirements should generally reflect new business. Additi<strong>on</strong>al legal<br />
c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s should be studied, especially for those Member States<br />
where law requires precise and clear definiti<strong>on</strong>s for imposing higher<br />
individual solvency requirements <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> address projecti<strong>on</strong>s of future<br />
business.<br />
10.21 In a ruin situati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue of costs specifically linked with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> run-off<br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insurers’ business arises. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> some extent, it could be<br />
argued that some costs associated with run-off are already reflected in<br />
technical provisi<strong>on</strong>s. O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r run-off costs might be addressed when<br />
determining <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> level of c<strong>on</strong>fidence in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SCR calculati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
10.22 CEIOPS notes that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> valuati<strong>on</strong> principles for assets and liabilities<br />
underlying <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> calculati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SCR should be compatible with IFRS <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greatest possible extent.<br />
85